Skip to main content

Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) as an early biomarker in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a prospective observational study

Abstract

Background

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) is a common and life-threatening complication of sepsis, significantly contributing to elevated mortality. This study aimed to identify crucial indicators for the prompt and early assessment of SICM.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with sepsis or SICM within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients were assigned to the training set, validation set and external test set. The primary endpoint was 7-day ICU mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 28-day ICU mortality. Three machine learning algorithms were utilized to identify relevant indicators for diagnosing SICM, incorporating 64 indicators including serum biomarkers associated with cardiac, renal, and liver function, lipid metabolism, coagulation, and inflammation. Internal and external validations were performed on the screening results. Patients were then stratified based on the cut-off value of the most diagnostically effective biomarker identified, and their prognostic outcomes were observed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 270 patients were included in the training and validation set, and 52 patients were included in the external test set. Age, sex, and comorbidities did not significantly differ between the sepsis and SICM groups (P > 0.05). The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm identified six indicators with an accuracy of 84.5%, the random forest (RF) algorithm identified six indicators with an accuracy of 81.9%, and the logistic regression (LR) algorithm screened out seven indicators. Following rigorous selection, a diagnostic model for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy was established based on heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) (OR 1.308, 95% CI 1.170–1.462, P < 0.001) and retinol-binding protein (RBP) (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006–1.034, P < 0.05). H-FABP alone exhibited the highest diagnostic performance in both the internal (AUROC 0.689, P < 0.05) and external sets (AUROC 0.845, P < 0.05). Patients with SICM were further stratified based on an H-FABP diagnostic cut-off value of 8.335 ng/mL. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that elevated H-FABP levels at admission were associated with higher 7-day ICU mortality in patients with SICM (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study revealed that H-FABP concentrations measured within 24 h of patient admission could serve as a crucial biomarker for the early and rapid diagnosis and short-term prognostic evaluation of SICM.

Background

Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, poses a significant challenge in clinical management due to its atypical clinical presentation and the difficulty in achieving timely diagnosis [1]. With mortality rates ranging from 15 to 20%, sepsis has emerged as a leading cause of death among critically ill patients [1, 2]. Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction, also known as sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM), has been a focal point of research. Its prevalence varies from 10 to 70% and is primarily characterized by left ventricular dilatation, normal or decreased filling pressures, reduced ventricular contractility, both left and right ventricular dysfunction, and diminished responsiveness to volume [3, 4]. Importantly, studies have shown that the mortality rate among patients with sepsis and myocardial injury is three times higher than among those without cardiovascular involvement [5].

The physiological abnormalities and pathophysiological mechanisms of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction remain uncertain. Currently, left ventricular systolic function is routinely evaluated by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) determined by echocardiography. However, LVEF and other ultrasonic assessments, while noninvasive, are largely susceptible to loading conditions, potentially limiting their utility as an indicator of left ventricular performance [6]. Moreover, not all primary healthcare facilities are equipped with echocardiography machines and trained personnel, presenting obstacles to its widespread adoption. Consequently, there is an urgent need for early, rapid and cost-effective methods to evaluate the condition of SICM.

Serum biomarkers, due to their simple and rapid detection, are widely used in clinical practice to evaluate patient conditions. This study aimed to identify key indicators from multiple biomarkers to facilitate the early and rapid diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of SICM, thereby aiding in the treatment of patients.

Methods

Study population

Patients who were diagnosed with sepsis or SICM within 24 h of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2021 and May 2024 were enrolled in this prospective observational study (Fig. 1). The exclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged under 18 years, (2) ICU stay less than 24 h, and (3) withdrawal of treatment for any reason during hospitalization. Patients enrolled from Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital were assigned to the training and validation set, while patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were included in the external test set.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow chart

The definition of the SICM

The diagnostic criteria for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy were as follows: (1) Sepsis was diagnosed according to the definition of sepsis-3 [1]. (2) Patients had no history of other pre-existing heart conditions, including acute coronary syndrome, chronic cardiac dysfunction, severe heart valve disease, severe arrhythmia, hypertensive heart disease, congenital heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, infective endocarditis, myocarditis, or any other form of cardiomyopathy (such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, or stress cardiomyopathy). (3) Patients exhibited an LVEF < 50% [6].

Preparation of blood samples and data collection

Demographic information, clinical data, blood samples, and echocardiographic measurements were obtained within 24 h of enrollment. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the upper layer of serum was collected and stored at -80 °C. The biomarkers involved in the study were systematically measured by the laboratory at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University using blood samples from enrolled patients. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were manufactured by Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology and Joinstar Biomedical Technology in China. Clinical data of patients were collected and recorded from the electronic monitoring system. The primary endpoint was 7-day ICU mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 28-day ICU mortality.

Construction of the diagnostic model

A total of sixty-four indicators, including biomarkers related to cardiac, renal, and liver function, lipid metabolism, coagulation, and inflammation, were analyzed. Three machine learning classifiers—support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR)—were employed to identify the most relevant biomarkers for the diagnosis of SICM. Subsequently, a diagnostic model based on multivariate logistic regression analysis was established, and both internal and external validations were conducted to assess the diagnostic performance of the model.

Echocardiography measurements

Echocardiographic examinations were conducted according to a standardized protocol based on guidelines from the American and European Society of Echocardiography [7, 8]. All measurements were performed by experienced physicians proficient in echocardiography.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis and figure construction were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 27 and R 4.4.1. Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation, while non-normally distributed continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range. Group comparisons for normally distributed data were conducted using the independent sample t-test, whereas the Mann–Whitney U test was employed for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables are presented as counts (percentages) and were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine significance. Three machine learning classifiers—SVM, RF, and LR—were utilized to identify indicators strongly associated with the diagnosis of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. A diagnostic model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression and tested for significance with a likelihood ratio test (forward: LR). The performance and clinical utility of the nomogram were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). DeLong’s test was used to compare differences between ROC curves. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between biomarkers and clinical indicators. Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis was performed by the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

This study included 316 patients admitted to the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Forty-six patients were excluded according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 270 patients were ultimately enrolled (Fig. 1). The patients were stratified into two groups: the sepsis group (n = 214) and the SICM group (n = 56), according to established definitions. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the sepsis and SICM groups. Upon admission, cardiac biomarkers such as pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), troponin T (TNT), and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) were significantly elevated in the SICM group compared to the sepsis group (2054.0 pg/mL vs. 672.8 pg/mL, P < 0.05; 58.9 ng/L vs. 33.6 ng/L, P < 0.05; 6.3 ng/mL vs. 4.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001, respectively). Echocardiographic parameters, including stroke volume (SV) and LVEF, were significantly reduced in the SICM group compared to the sepsis group (41.7 mL vs. 54.4 mL, P < 0.05; 43.2% vs. 64.2%, P < 0.001, respectively; Table 1 and the complete data of the 64 indicators is shown in Table S1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study population

Screening indicators for the diagnosis of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

The SVM algorithm identified six indicators with an accuracy of 84.5% (Fig. 2A and Table S2). The RF algorithm identified six indicators with an accuracy of 81.9% (Fig. 2B and Table S2). The LR algorithm screened out seven indicators (Table 2). The intersection of the three algorithms was determined (Fig. 2C), and the resulting two indicators were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, H-FABP (OR 1.308, 95% CI 1.170–1.462, P < 0.001) and retinol-binding protein (RBP) (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.006–1.034, P < 0.05) were identified as the most relevant indicators for the diagnosis of SICM (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Performance of machine learning algorithms. A and B are the results of the SVM and RF methods, respectively. C The Venn diagram illustrates the intersection of the results from the three machine learning algorithms

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses

Construction and validation of the diagnostic model for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 6:4. A diagnostic nomogram model with two predictors was constructed (Fig. 3A). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of our diagnostic model, which was established by H-FABP and RBP was 0.722 (Fig. 3B). The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities of SICM (Fig. 3C). Decision curve analysis indicated a high net benefit and clinical decision effectiveness (Fig. 3D). The diagnostic performance of the model was further verified in the validation set (Fig. 3E-G).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Establishment and validation of a diagnostic model for SICM. A Nomogram of H-FABP and RBP for the prediction of SICM. Each indicator was assigned a corresponding score, and the "total points" were calculated by integrating the two indicators. B, C and D show the ROC curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis of the model in the training set. The performance of the internal validation of the model in the validation set is shown in (EG)

Comparison of biomarkers and external validation

The ROC curve analysis revealed that the combined diagnostic performance of H-FABP and RBP for SICM (AUROC 0.697, P < 0.001) was not significantly better than that of H-FABP (AUROC 0.689, P < 0.001) alone (Fig. 4A, DeLong test, P > 0.05). Given the excellent diagnostic performance of H-FABP, we further validated its diagnostic efficacy using an external test set of 52 patients from another center. Patients in the test set were selected based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the levels of H-FABP, as well as cardiac biomarkers pro-BNP and troponin I (TNI) were measured (Table 3). Notably, H-FABP exhibited the highest AUROC (AUROC 0.845, P < 0.05) among these conventional biomarkers, indicating its novel and significant diagnostic efficacy for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

ROC curve analysis of indicators related to the diagnosis of SICM. A ROC curve analysis of patients in the training set and validation set. B ROC curve analysis of patients in the external test set

Table 3 Clinical characteristics of the study population in the external test set

Prognostic value of H-FABP in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

Since the high diagnostic efficacy of H-FABP in SICM has been established, further analysis was continued to explore whether H-FABP levels measured within 24 h of patient admission could serve as an early prognostic biomarker for SICM. Accordingly, patients were stratified based on an H-FABP diagnostic cut-off value of 8.335 ng/mL, and their clinical outcomes were observed and recorded (Table 4). The P-value for comparing 7-day ICU mortality between patients in the high H-FABP group and those in the low H-FABP group was 0.013. The continuity correction (Yates' Correction for Continuity) was adopted to mitigate the potential bias of the Pearson chi-square test in small sample sizes, resulting in a P-value of 0.050. No significant difference was observed in 28-day ICU mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kaplan‒Meier curves were constructed using 7-day and 28-day survival outcomes as endpoints (Fig. 5). The results showed that patients with lower H-FABP levels exhibited significantly better 7-day survival outcomes than those with higher H-FABP levels (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the 28-day survival outcomes.

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of SICM patients grouped by H-FABP levels
Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis of H-FABP in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. The endpoint of the KM survival analysis in (A) corresponds to the survival outcome of patients on the 7th day of ICU stay, while in (B) it corresponds to the survival outcome of patients on the 28th day

Discussion

In this prospective observational study involving patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, a diagnostic model containing H-FABP and RBP was established. Notably, H-FABP concentrations measured within 24 h of patient admission demonstrated significant diagnostic accuracy and short-term prognostic value for patients with SICM, offering crucial clinical insights into the early and rapid evaluation of SICM.

Sepsis is an inflammatory state, and inflammatory cell infiltration can be observed in all affected organs to some extent, which can lead to cardiotoxicity and cardiomyocyte injury, resulting in the release of H-FABP. In addition, in septic patients, the catabolism of glycogen and lipids can lead to a direct elevation in the concentration of free fatty acids, and simultaneously, lipid dysregulation and the liberation of free radicals may contribute significantly to the increase of H-FABP levels [9]. To further elucidate the clinical significance of H-FABP in sepsis, we conducted a correlation analysis between H-FABP and commonly used clinical indicators in 270 septic patients (see Fig. S1). The results demonstrated a significant correlation between H-FABP and both the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis, suggesting its unique role in indicating the inflammatory state of sepsis. Further studies are required to clarify its potential clinical applications in SICM.

H-FABP is an essential member of the FABP family that participates in cellular fatty acid metabolism by reversibly binding and transporting long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids from the cytoplasm to mitochondria. It is predominantly distributed in cardiomyocyte cytoplasm and plays a crucial role in the intracellular uptake and buffering of free fatty acids in cardiomyocytes [10]. Additionally, H-FABP contributes to cell growth and proliferation processes and can activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which are pivotal in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis [11, 12]. Compared to conventional biomarkers, such as myoglobin (MYO, 18 kDa) and TNT (37 kDa), H-FABP has a lower molecular weight (15 kDa), higher concentration, and superior stability in cardiomyocytes [13,14,15,16,17]. These characteristics enable H-FABP to traverse the cell membrane of ischemic cardiomyocytes and be released into the blood more rapidly than conventional myocardial biomarkers. In addition, studies have shown that H-FABP can identify early myocardial ischemia resulting from coronary artery spasm prior to the onset of apparent cardiomyocyte necrosis, whereas troponin levels are typically not elevated in the blood at this stage [15]. Moreover, H-FABP has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of mortality and major cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes, independent of other well-established clinical risk predictors and biomarkers [18, 19]. However, limited research has been conducted on its role in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.

Strengths and limitations of the study

To our knowledge, few studies employ machine learning algorithms to screen crucial indicators from clinical biomarkers for the diagnosis and evaluation of SICM. The combination of machine learning and statistical analysis enhances the rigor and accuracy of the screening results. Notably, H-FABP, an important intracellular fatty acid-binding protein that can be directly obtained from blood, is easy to detect, cost-effective, and has fewer operational requirements. Considering the high mortality of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation based on H-FABP levels measured within the first 24 h of patient admission could significantly enhance treatment and improve clinical outcomes, underscoring the significance of this study.

However, this study has several limitations. First, the clinical data and samples were limited to the first 24 h after enrollment, and changes in H-FABP and other indicators were not monitored during the ICU stay. Second, further expansion of the sample size is necessary to better mitigate bias and more effectively establish the effects and underlying mechanisms of this valuable biomarker in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.

Conclusions

In conclusion, as an easily accessible serum biomarker, elevated levels of H-FABP measured within the initial 24 h of ICU admission can early suggest the diagnosis of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy and indicate poor short-term prognosis, which provides crucial value for clinicians in evaluating the condition of SICM patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALP:

Alkaline posphatase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CI:

Confidence interval

CK-MB:

Creatine kinase-MB

Cr:

Creatinine

CRP:

C-reactive protein

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyltransferase

H-FABP:

Heart-type fatty acid binding protein

LR:

Logistic regression

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LY:

Lymphocyte

MAPSE:

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion

MYO:

Myoglobin

NEUT:

Neutrophilic granulocyte

OR:

Odds ratio

PCT:

Procalcitonin

pro-BNP:

Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

RBP:

Retinol-binding protein

RF:

Random forest

SICM:

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

SV:

Stroke volume

SVM:

Support vector machine

TAPSE:

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

TNT:

Troponin T

WBC:

White blood cell count

References

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walley KR. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24:292–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beesley SJ, Weber G, Sarge T, Nikravan S, Grissom CK, Lanspa MJ, et al. Septic cardiomyopathy. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarez S, Vico T, Vanasco V. Cardiac dysfunction, mitochondrial architecture, energy production, and inflammatory pathways: interrelated aspects in endotoxemia and sepsis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81:307–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollenberg SM, Singer M. Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:424–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.e14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713 quiz 786–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan GT, Lin J, Hao XH, Xue H, Zhang K, Wang LH. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein is a useful marker for organ dysfunction and leptin alleviates sepsis-induced organ injuries by restraining its tissue levels. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;616:244–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glatz JF, Luiken JJ, Van Nieuwenhoven FA, Van der Vusse GJ. Molecular mechanism of cellular uptake and intracellular translocation of fatty acids. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1997;57:3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chmurzyńska A. The multigene family of fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs): function, structure and polymorphism. J Appl Genet. 2006;47:39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan NS, Shaw NS, Vinckenbosch N, Liu P, Yasmin R, Desvergne B, et al. Selective cooperation between fatty acid binding proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in regulating transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5114–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Glatz JF, Van der Vusse GJ, Simoons ML, Kragten JA, Van Dieijen-Visser MP, Hermens WT. Fatty acid-binding protein and the early detection of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta. 1998;272:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seino Y, Ogata K, Takano T, Ishii J, Hishida H, Morita H, et al. Use of a whole blood rapid panel test for heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in patients with acute chest pain: comparison with rapid troponin T and myoglobin tests. Am J Med. 2003;115:185–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Viswanathan K, Kilcullen N, Morrell C, Thistlethwaite SJ, Sivananthan MU, Hassan TB, et al. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality and re-infarction in consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who are troponin-negative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2590–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCann CJ, Glover BM, Menown IB, Moore MJ, McEneny J, Owens CG, et al. Novel biomarkers in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with cardiac troponin T. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2843–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michielsen EC, Diris JH, Kleijnen VW, Wodzig WK, Van Dieijen-Visser MP. Interpretation of cardiac troponin T behaviour in size-exclusion chromatography. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:1422–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Donoghue M, De Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Murphy SA, Buros JL, Cannon CP, et al. Prognostic utility of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006;114:550–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilcullen N, Viswanathan K, Das R, Morrell C, Farrin A, Barth JH, et al. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality after acute coronary syndrome and identifies high-risk patients across the range of troponin values. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2061–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their sincere gratitude to all the patients and their families for their invaluable support and assistance in this work.

Funding

This study was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 82070475.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XC and YH designed the study, interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. YG, JW and JL conducted the experiments and collected the data. YM and QL assisted in preparing the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval and consent from the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2020-SR-055 and 2022-SR-678) and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (2024GZRYS-228). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for the use of their personal data for scientific research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1: Fig. S1. Correlation analysis between biomarkers and commonly used clinical indicators

12944_2024_2264_MOESM2_ESM.zip

Supplementary Material 2: Table S1.xls Clinical characteristics of the study population (complete version including 64 indicators). Table S2.xls Indicators identified by three machine learning algorithms

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, X., Guo, Y., Wang, J. et al. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) as an early biomarker in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a prospective observational study. Lipids Health Dis 23, 283 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02264-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02264-0

Keywords