Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Application value of triglyceride-glucose index and triglyceride-glucose body mass index in evaluating the degree of hepatic steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 22, Article number: 186 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The elevation of TyG is considered an important factor in promoting the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but its impact on the degree of liver steatosis remains unclear. This study aims to explore the relationship between TyG and TyG-related indices, such as triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI), with the degree of liver fat accumulation.

Methods

From January 2021 to March 2022, 1171 participants underwent health check-ups, and all underwent FibroScan transient elastography. The analysis focused on identifying the factors that contribute to the onset of NAFLD and the degree of hepatic steatosis.

Results

The predictive value of TyG-BMI (OR = 1.039, 95% CI 1.031–1.046) in triggering NAFLD development was greater than that of TyG alone. The areas under the curve for TyG-BMI and TyG were calculated at 0.808 and 0.720, respectively. TyG-BMI (OR = 1.034, P < 0.001) was identified as a main independent factor affecting hepatic steatosis severity. With each incremental increase in TyG-BMI, the likelihood of experiencing an increase in the extent of hepatic steatosis was 1.034 times higher than that of the preceding unit.

Conclusions

The TyG-BMI showed higher accuracy in predicting NAFLD than did the TyG, and was more closely linked to the severity of hepatic steatosis. Therefore, it can be included as a parameter in health management centers and should be widely used to screen and evaluate patients with NAFLD.

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic condition that is becoming more prevalent globally, with approximately 25% of adults worldwide being affected [1, 2]. The initial manifestation of this disease entails the excessive accumulation of lipids within hepatocytes, potentially advancing to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In severe cases, NAFLD may progress to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma [3]. Consequently, early recognition of risk factors for NAFLD and detection of fatty liver severity are of utmost importance.

The progression of NAFLD is the outcome of a blend of genetic and ecological elements. The most potent genetic risk factors for fatty liver disease are missense variations in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2. Both of these variations are connected with the full range of NAFLD [4]. Studies have substantiated the correlation between the TM6SF2 E167K variation and the content of fat in the liver, as well as the severity of liver disease [5]. Moreover, there exists a close association between hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance (IR) [6]. The key feature of NAFLD manifests in the excessive accumulation of triglycerides (TG) inside the liver, which in turn induces IR. Furthermore, the presence of IR gives rise to an excess secretion of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) [7]. The metabolic pathways of TG in hepatocytes include de novo lipogenesis (DNL), oxidative breakdown, absorption, and transport. Any abnormalities in these pathways can lead to lipid deposition [8]. Excessive accumulation of highly toxic free fatty acids (FFAs) linked to IR leads to the mobilization of a large quantity of FFAs from adipose tissue and an increase in hepatic FFA synthesis for glucose synthesis, representing “the first step” in NAFLD [9]. Currently, classic indicators of IR, like the high insulin-normal glucose clamp test and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of IR, have limitations in their use owing to insulin instability and relatively high costs. Therefore, some primary hospitals and health management centers have not yet implemented them, making them difficult to use widely in clinical practice [10]. Additionally, they are not suitable for routine inspections and large-scale epidemiological investigations. Ascertaining individuals afflicted with NAFLD during its early stages is currently a focal point in research, hence necessitating the exploration of a straightforward and efficacious approach.

Recently, some scholars have found that a simple index, the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), formed by taking the logarithm of the multiplication of TG and glucose, can effectively reflect IR and even outperform HOMA as a predictor for NAFLD [11]. Elevated TyG levels correlate with an augmented likelihood of NAFLD advancement and a reduced probability of NAFLD amelioration [10]. Moreover, researchers have noted that the amalgamation of body mass index (BMI) with the TyG demonstrates a more accurate assessment of IR in comparison to solely utilizing the TyG [12]. Combining the TyG with anthropometric measurements of obesity can predict liver fat deposition more comprehensively than using the TyG alone [13].

Transient elastography (TE) of the liver is a non-invasive means for evaluating the severity of fat deposition by evaluating controlled attenuation parameters (CAP) [14]. CAP can detect > 5% liver fat deposition and accurately distinguish between mild and moderate-to-severe liver fat deposition [15]. While research has been conducted regarding the correlation between TyG and NAFLD, there is limited research on the capacity of TyG or TyG-related parameters to determine the extent of liver fat accumulation. This study utilized FibroScan transient elastography to evaluate hepatic steatosis levels and examine the potential utility of TyG and TyG-BMI in predicting its severity. Additionally, the study explored whether TyG-BMI outperforms TyG in forecasting hepatic steatosis severity. The results of this investigation offer fresh perspectives for the management of NAFLD.

Materials and methods

Data source

Participants were selected among individuals who underwent health check-ups at the Health Management Center of Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. The inclusion criterion was the participants’ data, including TE and metabolic-related indices, being true and complete. The following populations were not included: (1) age < 18 years; (2) history of excessive alcohol consumption, equivalent to > 20 g/day for males or 10 g/day for females; (3) any history of liver diseases (such as hepatitis B, C) and other specific diseases that may result in fatty liver; (4) NAFLD combined with malignant tumors; (5) pregnancy or lactation; (6) recent use of drugs that affect liver or kidney metabolism.

The classification of NAFLD based on the CAP value of FibroScan was determined as follows: CAP value of ≥ 238 dB/m defined hepatic steatosis, CAP values between 238 and < 259 dB/m defined mild hepatic steatosis, those between 259 and < 292 dB/m defined moderate hepatic steatosis, those ≥ 292 dB/m defined severe hepatic steatosis.

The study included 1,171 individuals who underwent health examinations (943 males and 228 females) after the screening process. The ethics committee of the aforementioned hospital (XYFY2023-KL245-02) granted approval for this study.

Methods

General information and biochemical indicators

General information about the enrolled patients was collected. Height and weight were measured using a Shen Yuan HGM-601 measuring instrument. A pulse-wave blood pressure monitoring device was employed to measure blood pressure. After fasting blood collection, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine (CREA), uric acid (UA), total cholesterol (TC), TG, high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), and FPG were determined using the Beckman AU5800 automatic biochemical analyzer. TyG = Ln[TG(mg/dL)* FPG (mg/dL)/2],TyG -BMI = TyG *BMI.

TE

FibroScan PRO (produced by Shenzhen Hui Bo Medical Device Co., Ltd.) was used to assess the extent of liver steatosis by measuring the CAP values. Prior to the examination, participants were required to fast for at least 2 h and lie in a supine position whereby their right upper limb was extended and positioned towards the posterior aspect of their cranium. The investigator subsequently positioned the probe in a vertical manner on the surface of the skin within the intercostal region. The examiner triggered the device to begin collecting images and measurements by pressing a button on the probe. The final outcome was the median value obtained from 10 successful measurements. Notably, it is required that the success rate of the operation is no less than 60%, and the interquartile range (IQR) divided by the median (M) of the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is ≤ 0.3. However, even if IQR/M is > 0.3, the result is considered relatively reliable when LSM is < 7.1 kPa [16].

Statistical analysis

The descriptive statistics for normally distributed continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Skewed continuous data were presented the statistics as M (1/4, 3/4). To compare normally distributed continuous data and non-normally distributed continuous data, independent t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were utilized, respectively. Binary logistic regression models were utilized for the purpose of identifying the factors associated with NAFLD, while ordinal logistic regression models were employed to ascertain the factors associated with the severity of liver steatosis. The predictive abilities of TyG and TyG-BMI for NAFLD were estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and the AUROC comparison was conducted using MedCalc. Correlation analysis between CAP and TyG, TyG-BMI, and their components was performed by GraphPad. The intergroup differences between CAP and the quartiles of TyG and TyG-BMI, as well as between TyG, TyG-BMI, and different degrees of fatty liver, were analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. The criterion for statistical significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study population

This study enrolled 1,171 participants, including 943 males and 228 females. Among them, 434 participants did not have NAFLD and 737 had NAFLD. Compared to the non-NAFLD group, patients with NAFLD, regardless of sex, demonstrated significantly elevated levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), BMI, AST, ALT, TG, TC, UA, Cr, LDL, FPG, TyG, and TyG-BMI; in contrast, the non-NAFLD group exhibited a significantly higher level of HDL compared to the NAFLD group (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of subjects
Full size table

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors influencing NAFLD

Collinearity diagnostics on the factors were performed in the study, and identified severe collinearity between BMI, TyG, and TyG-BMI (variance inflation factor [VIF] > 10). After removing BMI, the VIF values for the remaining factors were all less than 10 (Additional file Table S1). Because the VIF for both TyG and TyG-BMI was less than 10, even though there was similarity between the two and the latter includes the multiplication of BMI, both could still be used in analysis. The findings indicated that TyG-BMI (OR = 1.039, 95% CI 1.031–1.046) emerged as the sole independent risk factor for NAFLD (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors influencing NAFLD
Full size table

The TyG index and TyG-BMI as predictive indicators for NAFLD

ROC curve analysis was performed with NAFLD as the state variable and baseline TyG, TyG-BMI, and BMI as test variables. The AUCs of the three indicators were 0.720, 0.808, and 0.794, indicating that all three indicators had a predictive effect on NAFLD, with TyG-BMI having the highest predictive accuracy (Fig. 1). The AUC comparisons using MedCalc observed that TyG-BMI had a slightly higher AUC than BMI (0.014 difference, Z-statistic 2.055, P = 0.040). The optimal cutoff for TyG was > 8.73, achieving 66.21% sensitivity and 69.59% specificity, while for TyG-BMI, a cutoff of > 213.09 yielded 83.31% sensitivity and 63.13% specificity. The positive predictive value for BMI (0.83) was higher compared to TyG-BMI (0.79), while the negative predictive value for BMI (0.57) was lower compared to TyG-BMI (0.69).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curve for NAFLD-related indicators in all subjects (A), males (B) and females (C)

Full size image

In terms of gender stratification, the analysis demonstrated that the TyG-BMI AUC value was 0.778 for males and 0.863 for females. Among the three indicators considered, TyG-BMI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy for NAFLD in both genders.

Correlation analysis between CAP and TyG, TyG-BMI, and their components

Correlation analysis showed a positive association between CAP and BMI, FPG, lnTG, TyG, and TyG-BMI, with the highest correlation coefficient being between the CAP and TyG-BMI (Fig. 2). Due to the non-normal distribution of TG, logarithmic transformation was performed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation analysis between CAP values and TyG, TyG-BMI, and their components

Full size image

Comparison of CAP between the TyG and TyG-BMI quartiles

The population undergoing health check-ups was divided according to the TyG and TyG-BMI quartiles. CAP values gradually increased with the increase of TyG quartiles (all P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A, Additional file Table S2), as well as with the increase of TyG-BMI quartiles (all P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B, Additional file Table S3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of CAP in the study population between the TyG (A) and TyG-BMI (B) quartiles. The error bars represent standard deviation (SD) Classification of TyG quartiles: Q1 (–8.36), Q2 (8.37–8.74), Q3 (8.75–9.20), Q4 (9.21–); TyG-BMI quartiles: Q1 (–200.55), Q2 (200.56–223.35), Q3 (223.36–246.62), Q4 (246.63–) **:P < 0.01; ***:P < 0.001; ****:P < 0.0001

Full size image

Comparison of TyG and TyG-BMI among different degrees of fatty liver

NAFLD patients were categorized into three groups based on the degree of fatty liver: mild (n = 184), moderate (n = 247), and severe (n = 306). The TyG index showed no statistically significant difference between the mild and moderate groups (P = 0.359) (Fig. 4A), but the TyG-BMI index showed statistically significant differences among all groups (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison between the TyG (A) index and TyG-BMI (B) among different degrees of fatty liver. The error bars represent Standard Deviation (SD) A: mild fatty liver group; B: moderate fatty liver group; C: severe fatty liver group **:P < 0.01; ****:P < 0.0001

Full size image

Ordered multiclass logistic regression analysis of factors affecting the degree of hepatic steatosis

An ordered logistic regression analysis was conducted on the relevant factors, and the likelihood ratio test result was P < 0.001; in contrast, the parallel line test result was P = 0.430, indicating the feasibility of the analysis. The results showed that SBP (P = 0.007), ALT (P = 0.025), UA (P < 0.001), and TyG-BMI (P < 0.001) were independent factors affecting the degree of hepatic steatosis (Table 3). The higher the four indicators mentioned above, the more severe the hepatic steatosis. When TyG-BMI increased by 1 unit, the likelihood of steatosis increasing by one level was 1.034 times the original value. This likelihood was 1.031 and 1.044 times the original value for men and women, respectively. The findings revealed a positive association between the elevation of TyG-BMI and the progression of hepatic steatosis, with a greater impact observed in women compared to men.

Table 3 Ordered multiclass logistic regression analysis of factors affecting the degree of hepatic steatosis
Full size table

Discussion

The liver, as a significant metabolic organ, assumes critical functions in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. IR and dysmetabolism of glucose and lipids are interrelated factors significantly contributing to NAFLD progression [6]. The occurrence of NAFLD can be attributed to the hepatic imbalance of triglyceride homeostasis, namely an inability to offset increased DNL or fat acid intake with fatty acid oxidation or VLDL secretion [17, 18]. Chen et al. found that residual cholesterol (RC) predominantly represented cholesterol present in the remnants of VLDL. Their findings unveiled a non-linear correlation between RC and NAFLD [19].

TyG is considered a valuable marker for IR and superior to the steady-state model IR index. TyG-related parameters, such as the TyG-BMI, have also shown predictive abilities for NAFLD [20, 21]. Nevertheless, limited research exists utilizing the TyG or TyG-BMI to predict the degree of hepatic steatosis. CAP is a non-invasive technique used on Fibroscan to identify liver steatosis; specifically, this technique assesses the presence of hepatic fat accumulation by analyzing the extent of ultrasound attenuation caused by the lipid content in the liver [22]. FibroScan has a high concordance with liver biopsy in grading liver steatosis and has consequently been endorsed as the favored non-invasive diagnostic instrument for evaluating fatty liver by major liver disease society guidelines [23, 24]. This study utilized TE to investigate whether TyG and TyG-BMI are related to the degree of liver steatosis, providing new insights into the health management of NAFLD.

The current investigation showed that the TyG-BMI played a significant role in predicting NAFLD. This study found that the optimal cutoff point for TyG was 8.73, which aligns with the results of Guo et al. They concluded that a TyG value ≥ 8.70 can effectively screen for NAFLD in the Chinese population [25]. Recent genetic and biochemical research has provided evidence supporting the significant involvement of adipose tissue in the development of IR. One potential mechanism by which adipose tissue contributes to IR is by releasing lipids and various circulating factors that propagate insulin resistance in other organs [26]. This study demonstrated that TyG-BMI is more accurate in predicting NAFLD than TyG, with an AUC of 0.808. Li et al. [27] and Kim et al. [28] discovered that the TyG-BMI had a more prominent predictive capacity for NAFLD in individuals with obesity than in those without. The study conducted by Lim et al. provided further evidence that TyG-BMI outperforms TyG or other TyG-related parameters in predicting insulin resistance [29].

This study showed a positive link between TyG, TyG-BMI, and their components with CAP. This finding aligned with the results of Khamseh et al. [13]. Furthermore, this study found that TyG-BMI was more statistically significant in evaluating the degree of liver fat deposition than TyG. Moreover, TyG-BMI was identified as the primary independent factor influencing the severity of liver fat deposition, and can be used as an effective biomarker for evaluating the severity of NAFLD. The likelihood of an increase in fatty liver by one level for every unit increase in TyG-BMI was 1.034 times higher in men than in women. However, the likelihood of an increase in women was even higher, at 1.044 times. The impact of gender on the association between TyG-BMI and the level of hepatic steatosis is not yet comprehensible. Nevertheless, this relationship could potentially be ascribed to the influence of gender on IR [30].

Being overweight and obese are major drivers of metabolic diseases and NAFLD [31]. Lipids initially accumulate in hepatocytes, leading to simple steatosis [32]. Moreover, the adipose accumulation in the liver is linked to obesity [27]. Oral et al. [33] investigated the correlation between uric acid and NAFLD. To mitigate the influence of BMI disparities between the control group and the NAFLD group, individuals with a BMI exceeding 30 were excluded. However, this study did not exclude obese cases because TyG-BMI relies on multiplying TyG and BMI. Overall, TyG-BMI has more advantages than TyG in predicting the accuracy and severity of NAFLD.

Study strengths and limitations

This study presents several distinct strengths. First, the data for this study comes from a diverse group of individuals from different age groups and genders who underwent physical examinations, making it reasonably representative. Second, this study focuses on the impact of TyG and TyG-BMI on the degree of liver steatosis, providing new insights into health management for individuals with fatty liver. Lastly, in this investigation, analyses were carried out focusing on sex to ascertain the impact of TyG-BMI on the extent of hepatic steatosis.

However, this study is constrained by certain limitations. First, the diagnosis of NAFLD relied on TE as opposed to liver biopsy. Thus, the reliability of diagnosing NAFLD may be compromised [34]. Second, based on this cross-sectional study, it is impossible to establish the causal link between TyG and liver fat accumulation in NAFLD. Furthermore, this study was a retrospective inquiry; hence, it could not provide negative test results for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus antibodies. Additionally, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR were not routinely measured, thus resulting in a lack of measurement data for IR. Finally, there was no information about abdominal obesity, such as waist circumference; therefore, it was impossible to compare the parameters of the TyG combined with obesity anthropometric indicators.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that TyG-BMI exhibits superior predictive accuracy for NAFLD compared to TyG alone. Additionally, a rise in TyG-BMI is correlated with an elevated degree of hepatic steatosis. Therefore, TyG-BMI proves to be a reliable indicator for identifying NAFLD within the population. NAFLD patients can reduce the risk of increasing the severity of fatty liver by lowering their TyG-BMI. Consequently, incorporating TyG-BMI into health management centers can be beneficial for monitoring and managing NAFLD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets are available from the corresponding author under reasonable requests.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

BMI:

Body mass index

CAP:

Controlled attenuation parameters

CREA:

Creatinine

DNL:

de novo lipogenesis

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

FFAs:

Free fatty acids

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein

HOMA:

Homeostasis model assessment

IR:

Insulin resistance

IQR:

Interquartile range

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

RC:

Residual cholesterol

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

TC:

Total cholesterol

TE:

Transient elastography

TG:

Triglycerides

TyG:

Triglyceride-glucose index

UA:

Uric acid

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

VLDL:

Very low-density lipoprotein

References

  1. Ahadi M, Molooghi K, Masoudifar N, Namdar AB, Vossoughinia H, Farzanehfar M. A review of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in non-obese and lean individuals. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36:1497–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lazarus J, Mark H, Anstee Q, Arab J, Batterham R, Castera L, Cortez-Pinto H, Crespo J, Cusi K, Dirac M, et al. Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:60–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-021-00523-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tutunchi H, Naeini F, Mobasseri M, Ostadrahimi A. Triglyceride glucose (TyG) index and the progression of liver fibrosis: A cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;44:483–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.04.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo F, Smagris E, Martin S, Vale G, McDonald J, Fletcher J, Burgess S, Hobbs H, Cohen J. Hepatic TM6SF2 Is Required for Lipidation of VLDL in a Pre-Golgi Compartment in Mice and Rats. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;13:879–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo F, Oldoni F, Das A. TM6SF2: A Novel Genetic Player in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Cardiovascular Disease. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6:448–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watt M, Miotto P, De Nardo W, Montgomery M. The Liver as an Endocrine Organ-Linking NAFLD and Insulin Resistance. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:1367–93. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2019-00034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang S, Du T, Zhang J, Lu H, Lin X, Xie J, Yang Y, Yu X: The triglyceride and glucose index (TyG) is an effective biomarker to identify nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids in Health and Disease 2017, 16.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0409-6

  8. Loomba R, Friedman SL, Shulman GI. Mechanisms and disease consequences of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell. 2021;184:2537–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bessone F, Razori MV, Roma MG. Molecular pathways of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease development and progression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76:99–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2947-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu J, Guan L, Zhao M, Li Q, Song A, Gao L, Lin H, Zhao J. Association Between the Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Outcomes of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Large-Scale Health Management Cohort Study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021;14:2829–39. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S316864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SB, Kim MK, Kang S, Park K, Kim JH, Baik SJ, Nam JS, Ahn CW, Park JS. Triglyceride Glucose Index Is Superior to the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance for Predicting Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Korean Adults. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2019;34:179–86. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2019.34.2.179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang R, Dai L, Zhong Y, Xie G. Usefulness of the triglyceride glucose-body mass index in evaluating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: insights from a general population. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01506-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Khamseh ME, Malek M, Abbasi R, Taheri H, Lahouti M, Alaei-Shahmiri F. Triglyceride Glucose Index and Related Parameters (Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference) Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Liver Fibrosis in Individuals with Overweight/Obesity. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2021;19:167–73. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2020.0109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Sousa Magalhaes R, Xavier S, Magalhaes J, Rosa B, Marinho C, Cotter J. Transient elastography through controlled attenuated parameter assisting the stratification of cardiovascular disease risk in NAFLD patients. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;45:101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2020.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu L, Lu W, Li P, Shen F, Mi YQ, Fan JG. A comparison of hepatic steatosis index, controlled attenuation parameter and ultrasound as noninvasive diagnostic tools for steatosis in chronic hepatitis B. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:910–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong GL. Update of liver fibrosis and steatosis with transient elastography (Fibroscan). Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013;1:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou B, Liu C, Xu L, Yuan Y, Zhao J, Zhao W, Chen Y, Qiu J, Meng M, Zheng Y, et al. N(6) -Methyladenosine Reader Protein YT521-B Homology Domain-Containing 2 Suppresses Liver Steatosis by Regulation of mRNA Stability of Lipogenic Genes. Hepatology. 2021;73:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilg H, Adolph TE, Dudek M, Knolle P. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the interplay between metabolism, microbes and immunity. Nat Metab. 2021;3:1596–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00501-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Su Y, Su X, Luo F. Remnant cholesterol has a non-linear association with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023;201:110733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheng G, Lu S, Xie Q, Peng N, Kuang M, Zou Y. The usefulness of obesity and lipid-related indices to predict the presence of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01561-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Amzolini AM, Fortofoiu MC, Barau Abu-Alhija A, Vladu IM, Clenciu D, Mitrea A, Fortofoiu M, Matei D, Enachescu V, Predescu OI, Micu ES. Triglyceride and glucose index: a useful tool for non-alcoholic liver disease assessed by liver biopsy in patients with metabolic syndrome? Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021;62:475–80. https://doi.org/10.47162/RJME.62.2.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie F, Pei Y, Zhou Q, Cao D, Wang Y. Comparison of obesity-related indices for identifying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cross-sectional study in China. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01560-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. European Association for Study of L, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del H. EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:237–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim JK, Flamm SL, Singh S, Falck-Ytter YT. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American Gastroenterological A: American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Role of Elastography in the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1536–43. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo W, Lu J, Qin P, Li X, Zhu W, Wu J, Xu N, Zhang Q. The triglyceride-glucose index is associated with the severity of hepatic steatosis and the presence of liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study in Chinese adults. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19:218. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-020-01393-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. James DE, Stöckli J, Birnbaum MJ. The aetiology and molecular landscape of insulin resistance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:751–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-021-00390-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li N, Tan H, Xie A, Li C, Fu X, Xang W, Kirim A, Huang X. Value of the triglyceride glucose index combined with body mass index in identifying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00993-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim H, Cho Y, Kim E, Lee M, Jung C, Park J, Kim H, Lee W: Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference Is Superior to the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance in Identifying Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Healthy Subjects. J Clin Med 2021, 11.https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010041

  29. Lim J, Kim J, Koo SH, Kwon GC. Comparison of triglyceride glucose index, and related parameters to predict insulin resistance in Korean adults: An analysis of the 2007–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0212963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Zheng R, Li J, Feng S, Wang L, Huang Z: Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the non-obese Chinese population with normal blood lipid levels: a secondary analysis based on a prospective cohort study. Lipids in Health and Disease 2020, 19.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-020-01409-1

  31. Godoy-Matos AF, Silva Junior WS, Valerio CM. NAFLD as a continuum: from obesity to metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00570-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism. 2019;92:82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oral A, Sahin T, Turker F, Kocak E: Relationship Between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Non-Obese Patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019, 55.https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55090600

  34. Li Q, Dhyani M, Grajo J, Sirlin C, Samir A. Current status of imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Hepatol. 2018;10:530–42. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v10.i8.530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding was provided by Project supported by the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University(2021ZA29).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Management Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Mengyuan Wang, Mingxing Chang, Peipu Shen, Wei Wei, Huayao Li & Guifang Shen

Authors
  1. Mengyuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingxing Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peipu Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huayao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guifang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Wang.M. wrote the main manuscript text, Chang.M. and Shen.P. handled project administration, Wei.W. conducted data curation, Li.H. developed the methodology and Shen.G. provided supervision. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guifang Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (XYFY2023-KL245-02).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Collinearity diagnostics among various factors influencing the risk of NAFLD incidence.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Post-hoc test for comparing CAP among different quartiles of the TyG.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Post-hoc test for comparing CAP among different quartiles of the TyG-BMI.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M., Chang, M., Shen, P. et al. Application value of triglyceride-glucose index and triglyceride-glucose body mass index in evaluating the degree of hepatic steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis 22, 186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-023-01954-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-023-01954-5

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X