Open Access

Association between polymorphisms in phospholipase A2 genes and the plasma triglyceride response to an n-3 PUFA supplementation: a clinical trial

  • Bénédicte L Tremblay1,
  • Hubert Cormier1,
  • Iwona Rudkowska2,
  • Simone Lemieux1,
  • Patrick Couture1, 2 and
  • Marie-Claude Vohl1, 2Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201514:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0009-2

Received: 16 September 2014

Accepted: 5 February 2015

Published: 21 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Fish oil-derived long-chain omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), reduce plasma triglyceride (TG) levels. Genetic factors such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in genes involved in metabolic pathways of n-3 PUFA could be responsible for well-recognized heterogeneity in plasma TG response to n-3 PUFA supplementation. Previous studies have shown that genes in the glycerophospholipid metabolism such as phospholipase A2 (PLA2) group II, IV, and VI, demonstrate changes in their expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after n-3 PUFA supplementation.

Methods

A total of 208 subjects consumed 3 g/day of n-3 PUFA for 6 weeks. Plasma lipids were measured before and after the supplementation period. Five SNPs in PLA2G2A, six in PLA2G2C, eight in PLA2G2D, six in PLA2G2F, 22 in PLA2G4A, five in PLA2G6, and nine in PLA2G7 were genotyped. The MIXED Procedure for repeated measures adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and energy intake was used in order to test whether the genotype, supplementation or interaction (genotype by supplementation) were associated with plasma TG levels.

Results

The n-3 PUFA supplementation had an independent effect on plasma TG levels. Genotype effects on plasma TG levels were observed for rs2301475 in PLA2G2C, rs818571 in PLA2G2F, and rs1569480 in PLA2G4A. Genotype x supplementation interaction effects on plasma TG levels were observed for rs1805018 in PLA2G7 as well as for rs10752979, rs10737277, rs7540602, and rs3820185 in PLA2G4A.

Conclusion

These results suggest that, SNPs in PLA2 genes may influence plasma TG levels during a supplementation with n-3 PUFA. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01343342.

Keywords

Gene-diet interactions Plasma lipid levels Omega-3 fatty acids Phospholipase Nutrigenetics

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide [1]. Triglyceride (TG) is an independent risk factor of CVD [2]. Fish oil-derived long-chain omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) play a significant role in preventing CVD [3]. The potential underlying mechanisms of n-3 PUFAs for reducing CVD risk are related to their hypo-triglyceridemic, anti-inflammatory, anti-atherogenic, and anti-arrhytmic effects [4]. Health organizations around the world currently recommend consumption of EPA and DHA to reduce CVD risk [5]-[8]. More specifically, The American Heart Association recommends an intake of 2 to 4 g of EPA/DHA per day for patients who need to lower their TG levels [5].

Yet, there is a well-recognized heterogeneity in the plasma TG response to n-3 PUFA supplementation [9]. For example, in the Fish Oil Intervention and Genotype (FINGEN) Study, 31% of all volunteers showed no reduction in plasma TG after taking 1.8 g EPA and DHA per day for 8 weeks [10]. The inter-individual variability observed in the plasma lipid response to an n-3 PUFA supplementation may partly result from genetic variations in genes involved in metabolic pathways of n-3 PUFA [9],[11],[12]. Understanding the genetic determinants of inter-individual variability to n-3 PUFA supplementation would provide a more rational basis for advising individuals on intake levels likely to achieve optimal reduction in CVD risk [9].

Our team worked on differences in metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles between responders and non-responders to an n-3 PUFA supplementation and found that the lipid metabolism pathways appears to be one of the most different between those two groups [13]. Genes in the glycerophospholipid metabolism such as phospholipase A2 (PLA2) group II, IV, and VI had changes in their expression levels after n-3 PUFA supplementation [13].

The PLA2 represents an important superfamily of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of the ester bond at the sn-2 position of phospholipids to yield non-esterified fatty acids such as AA and lysophospholipids [14]. Usually, these products lead to the generation of a variety of downstream signaling molecules including prostaglandins, leukotrienes, lysophospholipids, platelet activating factor (PAF), and oxidized lipids [15]-[20]. AA release by PLA2 catalytic reaction is the initial and rate-limiting step for the biosynthesis of eicosanoids [21]. Currently these enzymes are classified into six major groups with many subgroups, depending on their functions and cellular locations: the secreted PLA2 (sPLA2), lipoprotein-associated PLA2 (Lp-PLA2), cytosolic PLA2 calcium-dependent (cPLA2), cytosolic PLA2 calcium-independent (iPLA2), lysosomal PLA2 (lPLA2) and adipose-specific PLA2 (adPLA) [21]. In addition, elevated plasma PLA2 activity, likely sPLA2G2A, is an independent risk factor for CVD [22],[23] and variations on the PLA2G4A gene are associated with a CVD phenotype mediated by dietary PUFAs [24].

The objective of the present study is to examine whether genetic variations in PLA2 genes influence plasma TG levels of healthy overweight adults following an n-3 PUFA supplementation.

Methods

Study population

A total of 254 subjects from the greater Quebec City metropolitan area were recruited to participate in the study between September 2009 and December 2011 via electronic messages sent to university students and employees as well as advertisements in local newspapers. The participants had to be between 18 and 50 years old, have a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 40 kg/m2, be non-smokers, and with no current lipid-lowering medications. They also needed to be free of any thyroid or metabolic disorders requiring treatment, e.g. diabetes, hypertension, severe dyslipidemia, and coronary heart disease (CHD). Subjects were not included if they had taken n-3 PUFA supplements for at least 6 months prior to the beginning of the study. A total of 210 subjects completed the intervention protocol and 208 had plasma TG levels data available for further analyses. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of Laval University Hospital Research Center and Laval University. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01343342.

Study design and diets

First, subjects followed a two-week run-in period during which they received dietary instructions by a trained registered dietitian to achieve the recommendations from Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating. They were asked to apply these dietary recommendations and maintain their body weight stable throughout the protocol. The following instructions were given to ensure stable n-3 PUFA dietary intake: do not exceed two fish or seafood servings per week (maximum 150 g), prefer white flesh fish to fatty fish (examples were given), and avoid enriched n-3 PUFA food such as milk, juices, bread, and eggs. In addition, subjects were not allowed to take n-3 PUFA supplementation (such as flaxseed), vitamins, or natural health products during the protocol. They were also asked to limit their alcohol consumption to two drinks per week.

Second, after the two-week run-in period, subjects received a bottle containing needed n-3 PUFA capsules (Ocean Nutrition, Nova Scotia, Canada) for the following six weeks of supplementation. Subjects had to take five capsules per day (1 g of fish oil concentrate each) providing a total of 3 g of n-3 PUFA (including 1.9 g EPA and 1.1 g DHA) per day. Compliance was assessed from the return of bottles and by measuring the incorporation of EPA and DHA in plasma phospholipids (PL). The participants were asked to report any deviation during the protocol, write down their alcohol and fish consumption as well as the side effects of supplementation. Before each phase, subjects received detailed written and oral instructions on their diet.

A registered dietitian showed the participants how to complete a 3-day (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day) food journal before and after n-3 PUFA supplementation. Nutrition Data System for Research software version 2011 (Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to analyse dietary intakes.

Anthropometric measurements

Body weight, height, and waist girth were measured according to the procedures recommended by the Airlie Conference [25] and were taken before the run-in period as well as before and after n-3 PUFA supplementation. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).

Biochemical parameters

Blood samples were collected from an antecubital vein into vacutainer tubes containing EDTA after 12-hour overnight fast and 48-hour alcohol abstinence. Blood samples were drawn before the run-in period to identify and exclude participants with metabolic disorders. Afterwards, the selected participants had blood samples taken before and after the n-3 PUFA supplementation period. Plasma was separated by centrifugation (2,500 g for 10 min at 4°C), and samples were aliquoted and frozen for subsequent analyses. Plasma total cholesterol (TC) and TG concentrations were measured using enzymatic assays [26]. The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) fraction was obtained after precipitation of very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in the infranatant with heparin manganese chloride [27]. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated with the Friedewald formula [28]. Apolipoprotein B-100 concentrations were measured in plasma by the rocket immune-electrophoretic method of Laurell, as previously described [29]. Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured by nephelometry (Prospec equipment Behring) using a sensitive assay [30].

Fatty acid composition of plasma phospholipids

According to a modified Folch method, plasma lipids were extracted with chloroform:methanol (2:1, by volume) [31]. Total PL were separated by thin layer chromatography using a combination of acetic acid and isopropyl ether. Fatty acids of isolated PL were then methylated and capillary gas chromatography was then used to obtain fatty acids profiles. This technique has been previously validated [32].

SNP Selection and genotyping

SNPs in PLA2G2A, PLA2G2C, PLA2G2D, PLA2G2F, PLA2G4A, PLA2G6, and PLA2G7 were identified with the International HapMap Project SNP database, based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) B36 assembly Data Rel phase II + III, build 126 (Table 1). Tagger procedure in Haploview software V4.2 was used to determine tag SNPs (tSNPs) using a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 5% and pairwise tagging (R2 ≥ 0.80). The LD procedure in Haploview V4.2 was then used to examine linkage disequilibrium (LD) between 5 SNPs in PLA2G2A, 6 in PLA2G2C, 8 in PLA2G2D, 6 in PLA2G2F, 22 in PLA2G4A, 5 in PLA2G6, and 9 in PLA2G7 covering all common variations (MAF > 5%) in these genes. Most of the SNPs were in LD (R2 ≥ 0.80), and the mean R2 was 0.943 for PLA2G2A, 0.974 for PLA2G2C, 1.0 for PLA2G2D, 0.976 for PLA2G2F, 0.975 for PLA2G4A, 0.968 for PLA2G6, and 0.973 for PLA2G7. The SIGMA GenElute Gel Extraction Kit (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) has been used to extract genomics DNA. Selected SNPs (Table 1) were genotyped using validated primers and TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [33]. DNA was then mixed with TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific.), with a gene-specific primer and probe mixture (predeveloped TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays; Thermo Fisher Scientific.) in a final volume of 10 μL. Thereafter, genotypes were determined using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System and analyzed using ABI Prism SDS version 2.0.5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific.). Minor allele homozygotes with a genotype frequency <5% were grouped with heterozygotes for statistical analyses.
Table 1

Selected polymorphisms in phospholipase A 2 genes

Gene

dbSNP No.

Sequence

Position

Allele frequency

PLA2G2A

rs876018

ATAC[A/T]TGAT

3-UTR

A (n = 352) 0.8421

T (n = 66) 0.1579

rs955587

GCGT[A/G]GACT

Intron

G (n = 352) 0.8381

A (n = 68) 0.1619

rs3753827

GTAA[G/T]GCCC

Intron

G (n = 233) 0.5574

T (n = 185) 0.4426

rs11573156

GGAG[C/G]AGCT

5-UTR

C (n = 326) 0.7762

G (n = 94) 0.2238

rs11573142

ATGG[C/T]ATTC

NearGene-5

T (n = 406) 0.9667

C (n = 14) 0.0333

PLA2G2C

rs6426616

AGCC[A/G]GCCC

Missense Q [Gln]- > R [Arg]

G (n = 249) 0.5929

A (n = 171) 0.4071

rs12139100

GGGG[C/T]GAAG

Stop-gain

C (n = 356) 0.8476

T (n = 64) 0.1524

rs10916716

ACCC[A/G]GGCC

Intron

A (n = 358) 0.8524

G (n = 62) 0.1476

rs2301475

GGAG[A/G]TATT

Intron

A (n = 294) 0.7000

G (n = 98) 0.3000

rs10916712

GAAG[G/C]TGTG

3-UTR

C (n = 322) 0.76677

G (n = 98) 0.2333

rs10916718

GCTC[A/G]AAGC

Intron

A (n = 237) 0.5643

G (n = 183) 0.4357

PLA2G2D

rs578459

TATC[A/T]TCCA

3-UTR

A (n = 234) 0.5571

T (n = 186) 0.4429

rs16823482

ATTT[T/C]TCAC

Intron

T (n = 399) 0.9500

C (n = 21) 0.0500

rs3736979

ACTG[G/A]GTGC

Intron

G (n = 309) 0.7357

A (n = 111) 0.2643

rs584367

GTGC[A/G]GCAT

Missense S [Ser] - > G [Gly]

G (n = 262) 0.6238

A (n = 158) 0.3762

rs12045689

GGAG[T/C]AAGA

Intron

T (n = 381) 0.9071

C (n = 39) 0.0929

rs679667

CCCC[G/A]CTGC

Intron

G (n = 381) 0.9071

A (n = 39) 0.0929

rs17354769

AACT[A/G]GGGC

NearGene-5

A (n = 399) 0.9545

G (n = 19) 0.0455

rs10916711

CTAG[T/C]GATT

Intron

T (n = 266) 0.6425

C (n = 148) 0.3575

PLA2G2F

rs12065685

GGGC[C/T]TCTG

Non-coding exon

T (n = 369) 0.8786

C (n = 51) 0.1214

rs6657574

TGAC[C/T]TTGC

Non-coding exon

C (n = 345) 0.8214

T (n = 75) 0.1786

rs11582551

ATCT[C/T]CTGT

Intron

T (n = 303) 0.7214

C (n = 117) 0.2786

rs818571

CGCC[C/T]GGAC

3-UTR

C (n = 296) 0.7048

T (n = 124) 0.2952

rs631134

ATTC[G/A]GTGA

NearGene-5

G (n = 335) 0.7976

A (n = 85) 0.2024

rs11583904

TGAG[A/G]TGGA

Intron

A (n = 71) 0.169

G (n = 349) 0.831

PLA2G4A

rs979924

TACA[C/T]TGCA

NearGene-5

C (n = 33) 0.0786

T (n = 387) 0.9214

rs2076075

ATTC[G/A]TATAC

Intron

G (n = 381) 0.9071

A (n = 39) 0.0929

rs3736741

TTCC[A/G]GGCT

Intron

A (n = 320) 0.7619

G (n = 100) 0.2381

rs10911949

CTAA[C/T]GGCA

Intron

C (n = 222) 0.5286

T (n = 198) 0.4714

rs10752979

TCTC[A/G]TTGT

Intron

A (n = 68) 0.1619

G (n = 352) 0.8381

rs1160719

TTTC[A/G]TTAT

Intron

A (n = 79) 0.1881

G (n = 341) 0.8119

rs10737277

ATCA[C/G]ACAC

Intron

C (n = 231) 0.55

G (n = 189) 0.45

rs12720702

AATA[A/G]CAAG

Intron

A (n = 386) 0.919

G (n = 34) 0.081

rs7522213

ATTA[C/T]ATCC

Intron

C (n = 403) 0.9595

T (n = 17) 0.0405

rs7540602

CTCT[G/T]GACA

Intron

G (n = 379) 0.9024

T (n = 41) 0.0976

rs10157410

TTTT[C/G]ACTA

Intron

C (n = 57) 0.1357

G (n = 363) 0.8643

rs12720497

CCAG[C/T]GACC

Intron

C (n = 262) 0.6238

T (n = 158) 0.3762

rs4651331

CAAG[G/T]AGCA

Intron

G (n = 101) 0.2405

T (n = 319) 0.7595

rs1569480

TCAC[A/G]ATGG

Intron

A (n = 236) 0.5619

G (n = 184) 0.4381

rs10911935

ACTC[G/T]TGAT

Intron

G (n = 337) 0.8024

T (n = 83) 0.1976

rs12353944

AAAA[C/T]CTGA

Intron

C (n = 76) 0.181

T (n = 344) 0.819

rs11576330

CACA[C/T]CCAC

Intron

C (n = 38) 0.0905

T (n = 382) 0.9095

rs10489410

TTTC[G/T]TAGT

Intron

G (n = 16) 0.0381

T (n = 404) 0.9619

rs10911946

TTAG[C/T]TGAC

Intron

C (n = 299) 0.7119

T (n = 121) 0.2881

rs3820185

CATG[G/T]TGAG

Intron

G (n = 283) 0.3262

T (n = 137) 0.3262

rs12746200

CCAG[A/G]ATCA

Intron

A (n = 384) 0.9143

G (n = 36) 0.0857

rs11587539

TAGG[A/T]TTTG

Intron

A (n = 243) 0.5786

T (n = 177) 0.4214

PLA2G6

rs5750546

TAAA[G/A]GAAA

Intron

G (n = 259) 0.6167

A (n = 161) 0.3833

rs132989

GGGG[G/A]ACAG

Intron

G (n = 392) 0.9333

A (n = 28) 0.0677

rs133016

AGTG[G/A]ACCC

Intron

G (n = 215) 0.5119

A (n = 205) 0.4881

rs2235346

TGCC[C/A]GGGG

Intron

C (n = 200) 0.4762

A (n = 220) 0.5238

rs2284060

AATC[A/G]ACGC

Intron

A (n = 228) 0.5429

G (n = 192) 0.4571

PLA2G7

rs12195701

ATGT[G/A]GATC

Intron

G (n = 333) 0.7929

A (n = 87) 0.2071

rs12528807

CCAC[A/C]GATC

Intron

A (n = 379) 0.9024

C (n = 41) 0.0976

rs1421368

ATGA[C/T]CTTA

Intron

C (n = 34) 0.081

T (386) 0.919

rs1421378

TGAT[T/C]CGGA

NearGene-5

T (n = 244) 0.581

C (n = 176) 0.419

rs17288905

TCCA[T/C]AGCA

Intron

T (n = 378) 0.9214

C (n = 33) 0.0786

rs1805017

GATC[G/A]CCTT

Missense R [Arg] - > H [His]

G (n = 304) 0.7238

A (n = 116) 0.2762

rs1805018

GAAA[T/C]AGGG

Missense I [Ile] - > T [Thr]

T (n = 403) 0.9595

C (n = 17) 0.0405

rs6929105

TGAA[A/G]GATG

Intron

A (n = 98) 0.2333

G (n = 322) 0.7667

rs7756935

GGGG[G/T]TAGA

Intron

G (n = 85) 0.2024

T (n = 335) 0.7976

Allelic frequencies were obtained using the ALLELE Procedure (SAS Genetics v9.3).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with SAS Statistical Software V9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., USA), except for the ALLELE Procedure, which was done with SAS Genetics V9.3. The ALLELE Procedure was used to verify departure from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and calculate MAF. Values that were not normally distributed were log10 or negative reciprocal transformed before analysis. ANOVA was used to test for significant differences in metabolic characteristics between men and women at baseline with age, sex, and BMI included in the model. A paired t-test was used to test for significant differences between various nutrient intakes before and after n-3 PUFA supplementation. A linear regression using the stepwise bidirectional elimination approach was applied to assess which SNPs could explain part of the plasma TG level variance. The 61 SNPs were in HWE. First, the MIXED procedure for repeated measures was used to test for the effects of the genotype, supplementation and genotype × supplementation interaction on plasma TG in a model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and energy intake. Secondly, ANOVAs adjusted for age, sex, BMI, energy intake, and pre-supplementation plasma TG levels were used to test the differences in TG levels after supplementation between genotypic groups. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Allele frequencies of selected SNPs are shown in Table 1. All SNPs were in HWE. Therefore, associations with 61 SNPs were tested in statistical analyses. The percent coverage was 90% for PLA2G2A, 85% for PLA2G2C, 90% for PLA2G2D, 80% for PLA2G2F, 85% for PLA2G4A, 98% for PLA2G6, and 93% for PLA2G7. While most of the SNPs selected were intronic, one PLA2G2C SNP, one PLA2G2D SNP, and two PLA2G7 SNPs were located in exons and resulted in amino acid changes: rs6426616 (Gln → Arg), rs584367 (Ser → Gly), rs1805017 (Arg → His), and rs1805018 (Ile → Thr).

Baseline characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 2. As required by inclusion criteria, men and women were overweight (mean BMI > kg/m2) and had mean plasma TG levels slightly above the cut-off value of 1.13 mmol/l recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) for optimal plasma TG levels [34]. Significant gender differences were observed for weight, HDL-C, TG, and CRP levels. Daily energy and nutrient intakes measured by a 3-day food record are presented in Table 3. After n-3 supplementation, energy, carbohydrate, protein, and saturated fat intakes including n-3 supplements were significantly different from the pre-supplementation period (p = 0.006, p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, and p < 0.0001 respectively). PUFA intakes after the supplementation (including fish oil capsules and food) were significantly higher (p = 0.0002).
Table 2

Baseline characteristics of the study sample (n = 208)

Characteristics

All

Men

Women

p a

Study population, n

208

96

112

 

Age, years

30.8 ± 8.7

31.2 ± 8.1

30.5 ± 9.1

0.55

Weight, kgb,d

81.4 ± 13.9

87.2 ± 13.4

76.4 ± 12.3

<0.0001*

BMIb,d

27.8 ± 3.7

27.5 ± 3.6

28.2 ± 3.8

0.13

Waist circumference, cm

93.3 ± 10.8

94.8 ± 11.0

92.0 ± 10.4

0.06

TC, mmol/Le

4.82 ± 1.01

4.80 ± 1.00

4.83 ± 1.02

0.75

HDL-C, mmol/Le

1.46 ± 0.39

1.29 ± 0.31

1.61 ± 0.39

<0.0001*

LDL-C, mmol/Le

2.79 ± 0.87

2.91 ± 0.87

2.70 ± 0.86

0.08

TG, mmol/Lb,e

1.23 ± 0.64

1.32 ± 0.74

1.15 ± 0.53

0.04*

Apolipoprotein B, g/le

0.86 ± 0.25

0.89 ± 0.25

0.84 ± 0.25

0.12

CRP, mg/Lc,e

3.13 ± 7.10

1.66 ± 2.45

4.39 ± 9.24

0.02*

Values are means ± SD. *p < 0.05.

ap value from ANOVA for the differences between men and women at baseline;

bvalues are log10 transformed;

cvalues are negative reciprocal transformed;

dvalues adjusted for age;

evalues adjusted for age and BMI.

Table 3

Nutrient intakes before and after n-3 PUFA supplementation (n = 208)

Dietary Intakes

Pre-supplementation

Post-supplementation

P-values*

 

(includingn-3 PUFA supplements)

Energy (kcal)

2273 ± 590

2186 ± 566

0.006

Carbohydrate (g/d)

286.7 ± 78.9

263.4 ± 77.7

<0.0001

Protein (g/d)

97.8 ± 30.2

92.6 ± 29.6

0.002

Total fat (g/d)

84.5 ± 29.2

86.6 ± 29.8

0.44

SFA (g/d)

29.0 ± 12.0

25.4 ± 10.4

<0.0001

MUFA (g/d)

30.8 ± 11.8

29.6 ± 12.4

0.11

PUFA (g/d)

15.2 ± 6.6

17.1 ± 6.9

0.0002

Values are means ± SD. p < 0.05. *p-values provided by a paired t-test.

MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFA = saturated fatty acids.

Subjects were asked to limit their fish intake to no more than two servings per week (one serving of fish = 75 g). Based on the compliance questionnaire, the mean intake of fish was of 0.89 serving per week during the n-3 PUFA supplementation period. Accordingly, subjects who had consumed the maximum quantity of fish permitted each week (150 g) would have had an extra 0.43 g of EPA and DHA per day. Following the supplementation, TG levels decreased in 71.2% and increased in 28.8% of the subjects (delta mean ± SD = −0.25 ± 0.15 and 0.20 ± 0.19 mmol/l, respectively), as previously reported [35].

We further tested the independent effect of the genotype, the supplementation or the interaction (genotype by supplementation) on plasma TG levels. First, the supplementation had an independent effect on plasma TG levels (p < 0.0001), as expected. Secondly, three SNPS, one of PLA2G2C (rs2301475), one of PLA2G2F (rs818571), and one of PLA2G4A (rs1569480) were associated with plasma TG levels. Thirdly, interaction effects between n-3 PUFA supplementation and genotype were observed for one SNP of PLA2G7 (rs1805018) and four of PLA2G4A (rs10752979, rs10737277, rs7540602, and rs3820185) (Table 4). All associations remained significant after further adjustments for changes in carbohydrate, protein and saturated fat intakes and for changes in PUFA levels in plasma phospholipids (data not shown).
Table 4

Significant effects of the genotype, the n-3 supplementation and the genotype x supplementation on TG levels (n = 208)

Genes

SNPs

Genotype

Supplementation

Interaction

p

p

p

PLA2G2C

rs2301475

0.0209

<.0001

0.8703

PLA2G2F

rs818571

0.0188

<.0001

0.3958

PLA2G7

rs1805018

0.2383

<.0001

0.0286

PLA2G4A

rs10752979f

0.9152

<.0001

0.0273

PLA2G4A

rs10737277

0.6696

<.0001

0.0241

PLA2G4A

rs7540602f

0.1663

<.0001

0.0344

PLA2G4A

rs1569480

0.0203

<.0001

0.7758

PLA2G4A

rs3820185

0.4778

<.0001

0.0231

*p values are derived from log10-transformed data.

All results were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and energy intake.

The MIXED procedure (SAS v9.3) was used to test the interaction effects.

Further analyses revealed that post-supplementation plasma TG levels were different only for rs2301475 (PLA2G2C) and rs1569480 (PLA2G4A) but not for rs818571 (PLA2G2F). Figures 1 and 2 show significant differences between post-supplementation plasma TG levels of genotype groups for rs2301475 and rs1569480 after adjustments for age, sex, BMI, and energy. However, the association was no longer significant for these two SNPs after adjustment for pre-supplementation plasma TG levels.
Figure 1

TG levels after an n-3 PUFA supplementation by genotype groups for rs2301475 ( PLA2G2C ).

Figure 2

TG levels after an n-3 PUFA supplementation by genotype groups for rs1569480 ( PLA2G4A ).

Finally, 60 SNPs were included in a linear regression model, post-supplementation plasma TG levels as the dependant variable, adjusted for pre-supplementation plasma TG levels, age, sex, BMI, and energy intake. Using the stepwise bidirectional selection method, SNPs in PLA2G2D, PLA2G7, and PLA2G4A were associated (p ≤ 0.05) with post-supplementation TG levels. Rs132989 from PLA2G6, rs1805018 from PLA2G7, rs679667 and rs12045689 from PLA2G2D and rs10752979 and rs1160719 from PLA2G4A explained, respectively 1.06, 1.14, 0.98, 0.63, 1.27, and 0.82% of the trait. In sum, SNPs on those genes explain 5.9% of the trait.

Discussion

In this study, we tested whether the plasma TG levels response of healthy overweight adults to n-3 PUFA supplementation is modulated by genes encoding PLA2. Our team observed that PLA2G2A, PLA2G2C, PLA2G2D, PLA2G2F, PLA2G4A, and PLA2G6 are modulated by n-3 PUFA supplementation, since they were differentially expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after supplementation [13]. PLA2 family was shown to be influenced by n-3 PUFA supplementation so we included PLA2G7 since its gene product is a secreted enzyme whose activity is associated with CHD biomarkers [36],[37].

In the present study, we tested the independent effects of the supplementation, genotypes of selected SNPs in PLA2 genes, and genotype x supplementation interaction on plasma TG levels. As expected, n-3 PUFA supplementation significantly lowered plasma TG levels, a finding that is concordant with results reported in literature [10],[38]. Moreover, three SNPs of PLA2 genes influenced TG levels independently of the supplementation. In addition, genotypes x supplementation interaction effects were observed for five SNPs as previously mentioned. These SNPs and interaction effects considerably contributed to explain inter-individual variability in plasma TG levels after n-3 PUFA supplementation. Despite the fact that some nutrient intakes were significantly different pre- and post-supplementation, further analyses taking into account changes in carbohydrate, protein and saturated fat intakes revealed that results remained the same (data not shown). SNPs of PLA2G2D, PLA2G7, and PLA2G4A explained 5.9% of the variance in post TG supplementation, in a linear regression model.

Our study showed that genetic factors, especially SNPs of PLA2G2C, PLA2G2F, PLA2G4A, and PLA2G7 influenced plasma TG levels response to n-3 supplementation and therefore potentially explained the variability observed which is consistent with findings from other investigators [9],[10],[38]. PLA2G2C and PLA2G2F that are part of the sPLA2 group have been less studied. PLA2G2C appears to be a non-functional pseudogene, unlike its rodent counterpart [39]. PLA2G2F has a twofold preference for AA over linoleic acid in vitro and that its expression generally increases in the aorta consecutively with advance of atherosclerosis [40],[41].

PLA2G7 encodes human Lp-PLA2, also known as platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), which has been much largely studied in the literature [21]. Lp-PLA2 may play an important role in the pathophysiology of inflammation because it participates in the oxidative modification of LDL [42]. High levels of Lp-PLA2 mass and activity were associated with the risk of CHD, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality [43]. It also may be an emerging biomarker for improved cardiovascular risk assessment in clinical practice and a potential therapeutic target for primary and secondary prevention of CVD [43]. The rs1805017 G and rs1051931 A alleles of PLA2G7 gene were found to be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) [44] yet, up to now, studies are inconclusive on the association between PLA2G7 variants and cardiovascular risk [43],[45]-[47]. SNP rs1805018 tended toward significantly decreased expression of the PLA2G7 gene [44] and decreased Lp-PLA2 activity [48].

One of our selected SNPs, rs1805018 (I198T), was part of the SNPs that had a genotype x supplementation interaction and was in strong-LD with SNPs found in the literature, namely rs201554087 (V279P), rs1051931 (A379V), and rs1805017 (R92H) [48]. Consequently, we may suppose that the genotype x supplementation effect we observed with rs1805018 is partly the reflection of these other functional SNPs. Further analyses performed with ESEfinder 3.0 showed that rs1805018 located in the coding region may impact mRNA splicing. However, analyses with SIFT and PolyPhen-2 did not confirm the potential functional effect of this SNP since the amino acid change was considered tolerated or benign.

Therefore, the majority of genotype x supplementation effects were observed with SNPs within PLA2G4A gene (rs10752979, rs10737277, rs7540602, and rs3820185). PLA2G4A encodes a cPLA2 that is now considered a central enzyme for mediating eicosanoid production and thus plays a major role in inflammatory diseases. Indeed, PLA2G4A hydrolysis of phospholipid substrates has high substrate specificity for AA at the sn-2 position [21]. The release of AA has been linked to the action of cPLA2 but release of DHA is less clear, although the action of iPLA2 has been suggested in literature [49],[50]. In addition, a functional variant (rs12746200) was associated with CVD phenotype mediated by dietary PUFAs [24]. Interestingly, our team demonstrated that participants who did not lower their TG levels (non-responders) had lower PLA2G4A expression after n-3 PUFA supplementation and that PLA2G4A was expressed in opposite direction between responders and non-responders after supplementation [13]. We could postulate that a lower PLA2G4A expression may decrease the release of EPA, DHA, and AA from cellular membrane and thus decrease activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha (PPAR-α) and PPAR-γ and their action to reduce TG levels [51]-[53]. Indeed, n-3 and AA activate PPAR-α to decrease TG and VLDL secretion and increase fatty acid oxidation in the liver. N-3 and AA also activate PPAR-γ in the adipose tissues to improve insulin sensitivity, increasing TG clearance, supressing lipolysis and hepatic TG production, thus helping to decrease TG levels [54]-[56].

Conclusions

Data from the present study suggest that SNPs within PLA2 genes may modulate plasma TG levels after n-3 PUFA supplementation in healthy overweight adults. These results need to be replicated in other independent studies, therefore we will be able to better understand the potential functional mechanism underlying these genetic associations. In conclusion, these results indicate that gene-diet interaction effects may modulate the response of plasma TG levels to n-3 PUFA intakes and thus contribute to the explanation of the inter-individual variability observed.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects for the publication of this report.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ann-Marie Paradis, Élisabeth Thifault, Véronique Garneau, Frédéric Guénard, Karelle Dugas-Bourdage, Catherine Ouellette, and Annie Bouchard-Mercier who contributed to the success of this study. We also thank Catherine Raymond for contributing to the laboratory work.

IR and PC are recipients of a scholarship from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS). MCV is Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Genomics Applied to Nutrition and Health. This work was supported by a grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) - (MOP-110975).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF), Laval University
(2)
CHU de Québec Research Center – Endocrinology and Nephrology

References

  1. World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. 2011, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. Cullen P: Evidence that triglycerides are an independent coronary heart disease risk factor. Am J Cardiol. 2000, 86: 943-9. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01127-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang C, Harris WS, Chung M, Lichtenstein AH, Balk EM, Kupelnick B: n-3 Fatty acids from fish or fish-oil supplements, but not alpha-linolenic acid, benefit cardiovascular disease outcomes in primary- and secondary-prevention studies: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 5-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris WS: n-3 fatty acids and serum lipoproteins: human studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997, 65: 1645S-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS, Appel LJ: Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23: e20-30. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000038493.65177.94View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kris-Etherton PM, Innis S, Ammerican DA: Dietitians of Canada, Position of the American dietetic association and dietitians of Canada: dietary fatty acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007, 107: 1599-611. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.11.040View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. McGuire S: U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011, 2: 293-294.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes. Edited by NHMRC. 2005. Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. Madden J, Williams CM, Calder PC, Lietz G, Miles EA, Cordell H: The impact of common gene variants on the response of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to increased fish oil fatty acids intakes. Annu Rev Nutr. 2011, 31: 203-34. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-010411-095239View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Caslake MJ, Miles EA, Kofler BM, Lietz G, Curtis P, Armah CK: Effect of sex and genotype on cardiovascular biomarker response to fish oils: the FINGEN Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 88: 618-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Masson LF, McNeill G, Avenell A: Genetic variation and the lipid response to dietary intervention: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 77: 1098-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Minihane AM: Fatty acid-genotype interactions and cardiovascular risk. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010, 82: 259-64. 10.1016/j.plefa.2010.02.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rudkowska I, Paradis AM, Thifault E, Julien P, Barbier O, Couture P: Differences in metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles between responders and non-responders to an n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) supplementation. Genes Nutr. 2013, 8: 411-23. 10.1007/s12263-012-0328-0PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hui DY: Phospholipase A(2) enzymes in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2012, 23: 235-40. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328351b439PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pratico D: Prostanoid and isoprostanoid pathways in atherogenesis. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 201: 8-16. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.04.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deigner HP, Hermetter A: Oxidized phospholipids: emerging lipid mediators in pathophysiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008, 19: 289-94. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282fe1d0eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wymann MP, Schneiter R: Lipid signalling in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 9: 162-76. 10.1038/nrm2335View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Das UN: Can endogenous lipid molecules serve as predictors and prognostic markers of coronary heart disease?. Lipids Health Dis. 2008, 7: 19- 10.1186/1476-511X-7-19PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimizu T: Lipid mediators in health and disease: enzymes and receptors as therapeutic targets for the regulation of immunity and inflammation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009, 49: 123-50. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.011008.145616View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cedars A, Jenkins CM, Mancuso DJ, Gross RW: Calcium-independent phospholipases in the heart: mediators of cellular signaling, bioenergetics, and ischemia-induced electrophysiologic dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009, 53: 277-89.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dennis EA, Cao J, Hsu YH, Magrioti V, Kokotos G: Phospholipase A2 enzymes: physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem Rev. 2011, 111: 6130-85. 10.1021/cr200085wPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kugiyama K, Ota Y, Takazoe K, Moriyama Y, Kawano H, Miyao Y: Circulating levels of secretory type II phospholipase A(2) predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999, 100: 1280-4. 10.1161/01.CIR.100.12.1280View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mallat Z, Steg PG, Benessiano J, Tanguy ML, Fox KA, Collet JP: Circulating secretory phospholipase A2 activity predicts recurrent events in patients with severe acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 46: 1249-57. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.056View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartiala J, Li D, Conti DV, Vikman S, Patel Y, Tang WH: Genetic contribution of the leukotriene pathway to coronary artery disease. Hum Genet. 2011, 129: 617-27. 10.1007/s00439-011-0963-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, Himes JH, Lohman TG, Martin AD: Standardization of Anthropomeric Measurements : The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference. 1988, Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IR, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. McNamara JR, Schaefer EJ: Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. Clin Chim Acta. 1987, 166: 1-8. 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90188-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Albers JJ, Warnick GR, Wiebe D, King P, Steiner P, Smith L: Multi-laboratory comparison of three heparin-Mn2+ precipitation procedures for estimating cholesterol in high-density lipoprotein. Clin Chem. 1978, 24: 853-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Laurell CB: Quantitative estimation of proteins by electrophoresis in agarose gel containing antibodies. Anal Biochem. 1966, 15: 45-52. 10.1016/0003-2697(66)90246-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pirro M, Bergeron J, Dagenais GR, Bernard PM, Cantin B, Despres JP: Age and duration of follow-up as modulators of the risk for ischemic heart disease associated with high plasma C-reactive protein levels in men. Arch Intern Med. 2001, 161: 2474-80. 10.1001/archinte.161.20.2474View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shaikh NA, Downar E: Time course of changes in porcine myocardial phospholipid levels during ischemia. A reassessment of the lysolipid hypothesis. Circ Res. 1981, 49: 316-25. 10.1161/01.RES.49.2.316View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kroger E, Verreault R, Carmichael PH, Lindsay J, Julien P, Dewailly E: Omega-3 fatty acids and risk of dementia: the Canadian study of health and aging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90: 184-92. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26987View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Livak KJ. Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay. Genet Anal. 1999;14:143–9.Google Scholar
  34. Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, Bittner V, Criqui MH, Ginsberg HN: Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011, 123: 2292-333. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182160726View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cormier H, Rudkowska I, Paradis AM, Thifault E, Garneau V, Lemieux S: Association between polymorphisms in the fatty acid desaturase gene cluster and the plasma triacylglycerol response to an n-3 PUFA supplementation. Nutrients. 2012, 4: 1026-41. 10.3390/nu4081026PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vittos O, Toana B, Vittos A, Moldoveanu E: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2): a review of its role and significance as a cardiovascular biomarker. Biomarkers. 2012, 17: 289-302. 10.3109/1354750X.2012.664170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sertic J, Skoric B, Lovric J, Bozina T, Reiner Z: Does Lp-PLA2 determination help predict atherosclerosis and cardiocerebrovascular disease?. Acta Med Croatica. 2010, 64: 237-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Thifault E, Cormier H, Bouchard-Mercier A, Rudkowska I, Paradis AM, Garneau V: Effects of age, sex, body mass index and APOE genotype on cardiovascular biomarker response to an n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2013, 6: 73-82. 10.1159/000350744View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tischfield JA, Xia YR, Shih DM, Klisak I, Chen J, Engle SJ: Low-molecular-weight, calcium-dependent phospholipase A2 genes are linked and map to homologous chromosome regions in mouse and human. Genomics. 1996, 32: 328-33. 10.1006/geno.1996.0126View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sato H, Kato R, Isogai Y, Saka G, Ohtsuki M, Taketomi Y: Analyses of group III secreted phospholipase A2 transgenic mice reveal potential participation of this enzyme in plasma lipoprotein modification, macrophage foam cell formation, and atherosclerosis. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 33483-97. 10.1074/jbc.M804628200PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kimura-Matsumoto M, Ishikawa Y, Komiyama K, Tsuruta T, Murakami M, Masuda S: Expression of secretory phospholipase A2s in human atherosclerosis development. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 196: 81-91. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.08.062View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu X, Zhu RX, Tian YL, Li Q, Li L, Deng SM: Association of PLA2G7 gene polymorphisms with ischemic stroke in northern Chinese Han population. Clin Biochem. 2014, 47: 404-8. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Grallert H, Dupuis J, Bis JC, Dehghan A, Barbalic M, Baumert J: Eight genetic loci associated with variation in lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass and activity and coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from five community-based studies. Eur Heart J. 2012, 33: 238-51. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr372PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sutton BS, Crosslin DR, Shah SH, Nelson SC, Bassil A, Hale AB: Comprehensive genetic analysis of the platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase (PLA2G7) gene and cardiovascular disease in case–control and family datasets. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 1318-28. 10.1093/hmg/ddn020PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jang Y, Kim OY, Koh SJ, Chae JS, Ko YG, Kim JY: The Val279Phe variant of the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 gene is associated with catalytic activities and cardiovascular disease in Korean men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 3521-7. 10.1210/jc.2006-0116View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ninio E, Tregouet D, Carrier JL, Stengel D, Bickel C, Perret C: Platelet-activating factor-acetylhydrolase and PAF-receptor gene haplotypes in relation to future cardiovascular event in patients with coronary artery disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2004, 13: 1341-51. 10.1093/hmg/ddh145View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Casas JP, Ninio E, Panayiotou A, Palmen J, Cooper JA, Ricketts SL: PLA2G7 genotype, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity, and coronary heart disease risk in 10 494 cases and 15 624 controls of European Ancestry. Circulation. 2010, 121: 2284-93. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.923383PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hou L, Chen S, Yu H, Lu X, Chen J, Wang L: Associations of PLA2G7 gene polymorphisms with plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity and coronary heart disease in a Chinese Han population: the Beijing atherosclerosis study. Hum Genet. 2009, 125: 11-20. 10.1007/s00439-008-0587-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rapoport SI: Translational studies on regulation of brain docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) metabolism in vivo. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2013, 88: 79-85. 10.1016/j.plefa.2012.05.003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Cheon Y, Kim HW, Igarashi M, Modi HR, Chang L, Ma K: Disturbed brain phospholipid and docosahexaenoic acid metabolism in calcium-independent phospholipase A(2)-VIA (iPLA(2)beta)-knockout mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1821, 2012: 1278-86.Google Scholar
  51. Denys A, Hichami A, Khan NA: n-3 PUFAs modulate T-cell activation via protein kinase C-alpha and -epsilon and the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46: 752-8. 10.1194/jlr.M400444-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Han C, Demetris AJ, Michalopoulos G, Shelhamer JH, Wu T: 85-kDa cPLA(2) plays a critical role in PPAR-mediated gene transcription in human hepatoma cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002, 282: G586-97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pawliczak R, Han C, Huang XL, Demetris AJ, Shelhamer JH, Wu T: 85-kDa cytosolic phospholipase A2 mediates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation in human lung epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 33153-63. 10.1074/jbc.M200246200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Calder PC: Mechanisms of action of (n-3) fatty acids. J Nutr. 2012, 142: 592S-9. 10.3945/jn.111.155259View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chaudhuri A, Rosenstock J, DiGenio A, Meneghini L, Hollander P, McGill JB: Comparing the effects of insulin glargine and thiazolidinediones on plasma lipids in type 2 diabetes: a patient-level pooled analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012, 28: 258-67. 10.1002/dmrr.1305PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kong AP, Yamasaki A, Ozaki R, Saito H, Asami T, Ohwada S: A randomized-controlled trial to investigate the effects of rivoglitazone, a novel PPAR gamma agonist on glucose-lipid control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13: 806-13. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01411.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tremblay et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement