Open Access

Physical activity, sedentary behavior time and lipid levels in the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg study

Lipids in Health and Disease201514:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0085-3

Received: 8 January 2015

Accepted: 23 July 2015

Published: 11 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Recently attention has been drawn to the health impacts of time spent engaging in sedentary behaviors. While many studies have investigated general physical activity (PA) in relation to blood lipid levels, the current study aimed to examine the intensity of activity, including sedentary behavior time, and time spent engaging in moderate and intense PA, with concentrations of HDL and LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides.

Methods

Participants comprised 1331 individuals, aged 18 to 70 years, from the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study, who underwent objective cardiovascular health assessments and completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Time spent engaging in sedentary behaviors (screen time on a workday and a day off, and total sitting time on a work day), and moderate and intense PA, were related to levels of HDL and LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Analyses were conducted in the whole sample, and then with stratification according to BMI (normal weight versus overweight/obese).

Results

Both lower screen time during days off and higher intense PA time were significantly associated with higher HDL-cholesterol after full adjustment for socio-demographic factors, dietary factors and smoking (both p < 0.05). In normal weight individuals, consistent positive relations between triglycerides, LDL, and total cholesterol with all sedentary behavior time variables were observed (all p < 0.05; adjusted for age, education, gender). There were no statistically significant associations between any intensity level of PA or sedentary behavior time variable and lipid levels in those overweight or obese.

Conclusions

Spending less time in sedentary behaviors, and engaging in medium levels of intense physical activity may be associated with a more favorable blood lipid profile, particularly with regard to levels of HDL and triglycerides.

Keywords

Sedentary behavior time Physical activity HDL-cholesterol LDL-cholesterol Triglycerides

Background

Physical activity (PA) has been inversely related to fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) [16]. Attention has more recently been drawn to the association between sedentary behaviors and negative health outcomes, including CVD [715]. Sedentary behavior refers to any waking behavior that involves an energy expenditure of less than 1.5 metabolic equivalent units (METs) [16, 17]. This can include activities undertaken in sitting or lying, such as watching television or using a computer. It has been previously demonstrated that greater times spent sitting, viewing television and using a computer may be unfavorably associated with ideal cardiovascular health [18]. However, there are some inconsistencies in the literature [19, 20] and several reviews have concluded that causal relationships between sedentary behavior time and health outcomes need to be further clarified [21, 22].

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) is an atherogenic, harmful lipoprotein, responsible for the atherosclerotic process and an increased risk for CVD [23, 24]. Elevated blood triglycerides have a dose-dependent association with cardiovascular-related and all-cause mortality [25]. In contrast, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) is related to lower prevalence of cardiovascular mortality [26] and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) [27, 28]. In contrast to the research focused on relations between lipid levels and PA, fewer studies to date have examined associations between sedentary behavior time and lipids.

The ATTICA study showed that physically active women had significantly lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and higher levels of HDL- cholesterol, compared to sedentary women [29]. Significance was only retained for HDL associations after adjustment for age, smoking, and body mass index (BMI). Clinical trials have shown that physical exercise may increase HDL-cholesterol in healthy elderly subjects [30] and further may facilitate increases in HDL-cholesterol from dieting in overwight individuals [31]; while others suggest that diet and exercise interventions in overweight and obese adults may have differential effects on LDL- versus HDL-cholesterol [32]. One recent study by Aadland et al. [33] examined associations between lipoprotein concentrations and PA versus sedentary behavior in healthy adults. Their results suggested differential effects of sedentary versus PA time, as they found positive associations between sedentary time and LDL, total cholesterol and triglycerides, and between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and HDL-cholesterol. However, this study had a small sample size of 73 subjects and did not control for other potential confounding factors. Other studies have shown conflicting results; sedentary behavior time has not been associated with any lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides [34, 35], associated with higher triglycerides, total and LDL-cholesterol and lower HDL-cholesterol [36], and with both higher HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides [7]. None of these studies that we are aware of have specifically differentiated whether any associations between sedentary behavior time and lipid levels vary according to day of the week (i.e., a workday versus a day off), or have stratified according to BMI.

Further, a recent meta-analysis has shown a positive association between sedentary behaviour time and odds of having metabolic syndrome by 73 % [37], of which raised triglycerides and reduced HDL-cholesterol are two risk factors [38]. This meta-analysis was based on 10 cross-sectional studies and indicated a significant influence of sedentary time on disease risk, independent of physical activity [37].

The first aim of this study was to investigate sedentary time (television and computer time) both on a weekday and a day off, in relation to total-, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides. The second aim was to explore relations between moderate and intense PA time and lipid levels. It was hypothesised that there would be positive associations between sedentary behaviors and lipid levels, and inverse associations between PA and lipids. A hypothesis as to how any relationships may vary according to day of the week or according to body weight status was not advanced.

Methods

Participants

Data was obtained from the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX), a nationwide cross-sectional study conducted, to gather information on the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and lifestyle health-related factors such as PA and nutritional status, among the general adult population of Luxembourg. A representative random sample of 1432 individuals, stratified by sex, age (18–69 years) and district of residence, selected from the national health insurance registry was recruited between November 2007 and January 2009. This sample size was estimated to ensure statistical power, i.e. a statistical precision of at least 2 % for the estimation of the prevalence of the risk factors at the 95 % confidence level. Institutionalized subjects (n = 12), pregnant women (n = 21), subjects with serious mental and/or physical handicap (n = 5), prisoners (n = 1), people outside the determined age range (n = 2) and those deceased before recruitment (n = 5) were excluded. Description of the study design and recruitment have been published in detail previously [39, 40]. A total of 1432 participants completed the recruitment procedure. After eliminating those with missing data on lipids, sedentary behavior time, PA or covariates, data from 1331 participants were available for the present analysis.

Procedure and measures

Demographics and health information

Information on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, including age, gender, education, occupation, and income was obtained from a detailed self-administered questionnaire. Education level was classified into three levels, based on the highest diploma obtained: ‘primary’ (less than 12 years of education), ‘secondary’ (approximately 12 to 13 years of education) and ‘tertiary’ (more than 13 years). Participants were required to indicate their occupation, and based on the type of work performed, each participant was categorized into one of three groups with regard to their occupation: ‘sedentary’, ‘moderately active’, and ‘active’. For example, manual laborers were placed in the active category, while scientific professionals were placed in the sedentary category. Economic status was ascertained by asking participants to select the category best representing total monthly household income. Body weight was measured using a digital column scale (Seca® 701, Hamburg, Germany), recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg, with subject barefoot and wearing light clothing. Standing body height was recorded to the nearest 0.2 cm with a portable wall stadiometer (Seca, Germany). BMI was calculated as weight in kg divided by height in metres squared (kg/m2).

Lipid levels

Blood samples were collected after a minimum 8-hour fast from the antecubital vein to measure total cholesterol (mg/dL), HDL-cholesterol (HDL, mg/dL) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL, mg/dL), and triglycerides (mg/dL), by using Roche (Switzerland) reagents on a P module of a Modular analyzer (Roche, Switzerland) [41]. All biochemical analyses were carried out within two hours of blood sampling in the core laboratory of ‘Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg (CHL)’. The CHL laboratory applies strict internal and external standard quality control techniques.

Physical activity and sedentary behavior time

PA and sedentary behaviour time was assessed using the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [42], designed and validated to measure PA in large populations. The IPAQ is conceived in a way to distinguish the time spent in performing four types of physical behaviors (vigrous physical activity, moderate physical activity, walking and sitting).

Physical activity

Participants were required to report the number of days in the preceding week (including the weekend) that they engaged in both moderate and intense PA, and the amount of time spent in these activities on one of these days (in hours). Examples of moderate activities provided included carrying light loads, vacuuming or slow cycling, whilst intense activities included carrying heavy loads, digging or playing soccer.

Mean daily moderate and intense PA time (in hours per day) was calculated by multiplying self-reported time spent engaging in each with the reported number of days per week in which these activities were undertaken, and dividing by seven. These values were summed to obtain total mean PA time (moderate plus intense). Moderate, intense and total PA time were then categorized into three groups: <0.5 hours per day, 0.5-1 hour per day, and >1 hour per day.

Sedentary behavior time

Sedentary behaviour time was also obtained from the IPAQ. Participants were required to report screen time, i.e., how much time they spent watching television (including videos/DVD), and in front of a computer (including internet and video games), during a typical workday, and during a day off. Participants also reported overall sitting time, i.e., how much time they spent sitting during a normal weekday (distinguished form a weekend day), including time spent sitting at place of work, on transportation, reading, visiting friends’, sitting or laying down to watch television or use a computer. All responses were given in hours per day, with reference to the preceding seven days.

Total screen time for a workday and a day off were calculated by summing television time and computer time. The screen time variables were then divided into three categories: ≤1, >1-4, ≥4 hours per day. The overall sitting time variable was divided into five categories: 0–2, >2-4, >4-6, >6-10, and >10 hours per day.

In addition, individuals were categorized into one of four groups to reflect their mean weekly behavior with regard to activity level, referred to as physical activity status. Participants who reported moderate or intense PA on at least one day per week were classified into low, medium or high tertiles of PA, calculated from the total PA time variable (hours per day). The remainding participants who did not engage in moderate or intense PA during the preceding week were classified as ‘sedentary’. This evaluation method of overall PA has been used previously [29].

Other covariates

Detailed data regarding cigarette smoking were obtained from the questionnaire. Each participant was classified as current smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker. A validated, semi-quantified food frequency quesionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess the frequency of consumption of 134 food and beverage items over the previous three months [43, 44]. Participants were asked how frequently they consumed one standardized portion of each food, with six frequency response categories ranging from “never or rarely” to “2 or more times per day”. Energy and nutrient intake data were compiled to obtain total carbohydrate (g/day), total protein (g/day), total fat (g/day), total fiber (g/d), alcohol (g/day), and total energy intake (Kcal/day). Total carbohydrate, protein, total and saturated fat as proportions of total enery intake were subsequently calculated and expressed as % E.

Statistical analyses

For the descriptive analyses, Chi-squared tests and ANOVA were performed to compare the socio-demographic characteristics, blood lipid levels and dietary characteristics of participants according to the overall activity level classification, ranging from sedentary to a high level of PA.

General linear modelling with polynomial trend analyses was used to compare each lipid biomarker (as continuous variables) across increasing categories of screen time (workday and day off), total sitting time, and PA time (moderate and intense). Two covariate sets were employed:
  1. 1)

    Basic: age, education, gender.

     
  2. 2)

    Extended: basic model in addition to income, profession, carbohydrate % E, protein % E, saturated fat % E, alcohol (ml/day), and smoking.

     

Total PA (hours/day) was included in the extended model for analyses with the sedentary behavior time variables only.

The same statistical procedures, assessing relations between sedentary behavior time, PA time and blood lipids, were performed separately in the sample stratified by BMI status: normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 589), and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, n = 741).

All statistical anlyses were performed with PASW for Windows® version 21.0 software (formerly SPSS Statistics Inc. Chicago, Illinois). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical statement

All participants gave informed written consent to take part in the study. The study design and information collected were approved by the National Research Ethics Committee (Comité d'Ethique de Recherche, CNER) and the National Commission for Private Data Protection (Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données, CNPD).

Results

Sample characteristics

The sample consisted of 1331 individuals (646 males and 685 females), aged 18 to 69 years (mean 44.4 years). Mean overall sitting time was 6.2 (±3.2) hours. Reported screen time (television plus computer time) on a weekday was 4.2 (±3.4) hours, and 3.4 (±2.5) hours on a day off. Mean daily moderate PA time was 1.4 (±2.0) hours, and 0.4 (±0.9) hours for intense PA.

Overall, 11 % of participants were classified as sedentary, with a higher proportion of men (66.7 %) than women (33.3 %) being inactive (p < 0.001). Sedentary participants were older than those who were physically active (p < 0.05), but frequency of active smoking was similar between sedentary participants (25.3 %) and active participants (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics according to physical activity statusa, in ORISCAV-LUX participants (N = 1331)

 

Physical activity statusa

 

Characteristic

Sedentary n = 150

Low (>0-0.5 hours/day) n = 393

Medium (>0.5-2 hours/day) n = 394

High (>2 hours/day) n = 394

pb

 

%

%

%

%

 

Gender

    

<0.001

Males

66.7

47.6

43.9

47.2

 

Females

33.3

52.4

56.1

52.8

 

Education

    

<0.001

No diploma

35.4

20.6

22.8

31.2

 

Secondary

39.5

42.0

47.7

54.7

 

Tertiary

25.2

37.4

29.4

14.1

 

Occupation

    

<0.001

Sedentary

4.0

6.1

5.1

3.3

 

Moderately active

73.3

78.1

78.4

66.8

 

Active

21.3

15.3

16.2

29.2

 

Income

    

<0.001

Q1

26.4

20.7

14.1

21.7

 

Q2

44.8

41.6

53.2

58.3

 

Q3

23.2

29.3

27.9

17.7

 

Q4

5.6

8.4

4.9

2.3

 

Smoking, current

25.3

17.6

17.8

26.4

0.003

aSedentary time: reported undertaking no moderate or intense physical activity on any day of the preceding week; low, medium and high groups: tertiles according to total moderate plus intense physical activity (hours per day)

bChi-square for categorical variables

Compared to sedentary participants, physically active participants had lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (all p < 0.05, linear trend), and significantly higher HDL-cholesterol (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The three physically active groups also had lower mean BMI, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic BP, than the sedentary group (all p < 0.05).
Table 2

Health and dietary characteristics according to weekday sitting timea, in ORISCAV-LUX participants (N = 1331)

 

Physical activity statusa

  

Characterstic

Sedentary n = 150

Low (>0-0.5 hours/day) n = 393

Medium (>0.5-2 hours/day) n = 394

High (>2 hours/day) n = 394

Partial eta squared

p (linear)b

 

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

  

Age (years)

47.2

12.9

43.5

13.5

43.9

12.8

44.7

12.9

0.007

0.064

BMI (kg/m2)

28.2

6.1

26.3

5.0

26.0

4.7

26.6

4.7

0.017

0.001

Waist circmference (cm)

95.6

15.9

89.1

14.0

87.9

12.9

89.2

13.1

0.026

<0.001

Systolic BP (mm Hg)

134.4

18.8

128.5

17.8

128.4

16.7

130.6

18.3

0.011

0.028

Diastolic BP (mm Hg)

85.7

11.2

81.8

11.0

81.6

10.6

82.5

11.6

0.013

0.003

Lipid biomarkers

          

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

208.8

44.1

201.1

40.7

201.9

42.2

199.4

37.7

0.004

0.023

HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)

57.1

16.8

62.7

18.4

63.5

16.9

60.2

15.1

0.015

0.047

LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)

131.9

39.1

122.1

35.4

123.4

35.3

124.1

32.9

0.007

0.034

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

134.4

86.6

120.8

115.7

109.5

92.6

109.3

73.2

0.008

0.002

Dietary factors

          

Total energy intake (kCal)

2366

973

2311

865

2443

960

2530

948

0.009

0.024

Carbohydrate, (% E)

42.4

7.6

42.1

7.4

42.0

7.3

43.4

7.6

0.006

0.22

Protein (% E)

16.3

3.6

16.0

3.2

16.0

3.1

15.8

3.2

0.002

0.11

Total fat (% E)

37.2

7.2

38.9

6.9

39.1

6.8

37.9

7.4

0.008

0.29

Saturated fat (% E)

12.9

3.0

13.6

2.8

13.6

2.8

13.0

2.9

0.013

0.83

Alcohol (ml/day)

11.4

13.4

9.1

12.2

8.0

10.1

7.8

10.7

0.010

0.001

aSedentary time: reported undertaking no moderate or intense physical activity on any day of the preceding week; low, medium and high groups: tertiles according to total moderate plus intense physical activity (hours per day)

bANOVA for continuous variables

Sedentary behavior time and lipids

In the whole sample, there was a significant, inverse association observed between screen time during a day off and HDL-cholesterol (Table 3). Those who engaged in at least four hours of screen time per day (television viewing and using a computer) had significantly lower HDL-cholesterol levels (mean 60.4 ± 0.75 mg/dL/ [1.56 ± 0.02 mmol/L]) than those who spent one hour or less undertaking these behaviors (mean 63.6 ± 1.2 mg/dL [1.65 ± 0.03 mmol/L]) (p < 0.05). This association was significant after taking into account sociodemographic factors (age, education, gender, income, profession), dietary intake, total PA (moderate plus intense PA, hours/day) and smoking.
Table 3

Multivariate adjusted mean and SE of HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol, and triglycerides across increasing sedentary and physical activity time categories in ORISCAV-LUX (N = 1331)

Lipid outcomea

Model

Screen time (day off)

R 2

p linear

  

≤1 hour/day 13.9 %

>1-4 hours/day 48.7 %

≥4 hours/day 37.3 %

  
  

M

SE

M

SE

M

SE

  

HDL-cholesterol

Basic

63.8

1.1

61.7

0.59

60.4*

0.69

0.22

0.011

 

Extendedb

63.6

1.2

61.6

0.62

60.4*

0.75

0.24

0.030

LDL-cholesterol

Basic

121.3

2.5

123.6

1.31

126.2

1.5

0.12

0.09

 

Extendedb

122.3

2.8

124.3

1.4

127.3

1.7

0.14

0.13

Total cholesterol

Basic

199.5

2.9

200.6

1.5

203.8

1.8

0.10

0.21

 

Extendedb

201.0

3.3

201.7

1.7

204.7

2.0

0.11

0.34

Triglycerides

Basic

102.8

6.5

112.9

3.4

121.4*

3.9

0.06

0.016

 

Extendedb

104.8

7.3

114.5

3.7

120.6

4.5

0.09

0.07

  

PA time (intense)

  
  

<0.5 hours/day 73.5 %

0.5-1 hours/day 13.7 %

>1 hour/day 12.5 %

  
 

M

SE

M

SE

M

SE

  

HDL-cholesterol

Basic

60.9

0.48

64.0*

1.1

62.5

1.2

0.21

0.031a

 

Extendedc

60.8

0.52

64.5*

1.2

61.8

1.2

0.24

0.016a

LDL-cholesterol

Basic

124.5

1.1

124.6

2.4

122.0

2.6

0.11

0.37

 

Extendedc

125.4

1.2

125.7

2.7

122.4

2.8

0.12

0.32

Total cholesterol

Basic

202.4

1.2

202.5

2.9

197.3

3.0

0.09

0.12

 

Extendedc

203.4

1.4

204.1

3.2

197.6

3.3

0.10

0.10

Triglycerides

Basic

120.4

2.9

105.7*

6.8

97.6*

7.2

0.06

0.003

 

Extendedc

121.3

3.3

108.4

7.6

97.8*

7.9

0.08

0.006

*significantly different from ≤ 1 hour/day group (for screen time) or <0.5 hours/day group (for PA), p < 0.05

aoverall p value

Basic: age, education, gender

bExtended: Basic + income, profession, total PA (hours/day), carbohydrate as % of total enery intake, protein as % of total energy intake, saturated fat as % of total energy intake, alcohol, smoking

cExtended: Basic + income, profession, carbohydrate as % of total enery intake, protein as % of total energy intake, saturated fat as % of total energy intake, alcohol, smoking

There was a significant, positive association between triglyceride levels and screen time during a day off (p < 0.05 basic model, linear trend, Table 3). Those in the highest screen time category had significantly higher triglyceride levels (121.4 ± 3.9 mg/dL [1.37 ± 0.04 mmol/L]) than those in the lowest category (102.8 ± 6.5 mg/dL [1.16 ± 0.07]) (p < 0.05), after adjustment for age, sex and education level. Although the same linear increase in triglyceride levels was observed with the addition of further confounding variables (extended model), the association was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.07).

Moderate and intense physical activity time and lipid levels

Those who undertook a medium level of intense PA (0.5-1 hour/day) had significantly higher HDL-cholesterol levels (mean = 64.5 ± 1.2 mg/dL [1.67 ± 0.03 mmol/L]) than those who undertook less than this (mean = 60.8 ± 0.52 mg/dL [1.57 ± 0.01 mmol/L]) (p < 0.05, extended model, Table 3). Triglyceride levels decreased in a linear pattern with increasing duration of intense PA (p < 0.01, extended model). Both of these associations remained significant after adjustment for sociodemographics, dietary factors, and smoking. There were no significant associations found between total or LDL-cholesterol and intense PA time. Non of the lipid biomarkers were significantly associated with moderate PA time (data not shown).

Stratification according to weight status

BMI < 25 kg/m2

In normal weight participants (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 589), significant, linear associations were observed between increasing screen time (day off) and total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (all p < 0.05, basic model, Table 4). Those who reported the least screen time (≤1 hour/day) had significantly lower levels of all three lipids, compared to the highest screen time group (≥4 hours/day) (all p < 0.05, basic models). Associations remained for LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides with full adjustment, but significance was lost for total cholesterol.
Table 4

Multivariate adjusted mean and SE of HDL-, LDL-, and total cholesterol, and triglycerides across increasing sedentary and PA time categories in ORISCAV-LUX, in normal weight participants (BMI <25 kg/m2, n = 589)

Lipid outcomea

Modelb

Screen time (day off)

R 2

p linear

  

≤1 hour/day 13.9 %

>1-4 hours/day 48.7 %

≥4 hours/day 37.3 %

  
  

M

SE

M

SE

M

SE

  

HDL-cholesterol

Basic

70.0

1.7

67.8

0.9

66.3

1.1

0.19

0.07

 

Extended

70.2

1.8

68.1

0.9

66.7

1.3

0.23

0.12

LDL-cholesterol

Basic

109.1*

3.2

112.9

1.7

118.4

2.2

0.20

0.020

 

Extended

110.0*

3.5

114.0

1.9

119.3

2.5

0.23

0.036

Total cholesterol

Basic

188.6*

3.8

190.8*

2.0

198.1

2.5

0.22

0.039

 

Extended

190.2

4.0

192.3

2.1

198.6

2.9

0.26

0.10

Triglycerides

Basic

76.7*

4.8

81.0*

2.5

97.9

3.2

0.07

<0.001

 

Extended

77.3*

5.0

82.3*

2.7

96.7

3.5

0.11

0.002

*significantly different from ≥ 4 hours/day group, p < 0.05

Basic: age, education, gender

Extended: Basic + income, profession, total PA (mins/wk), carbohydrate as % of total enery intake, protein as % of total energy intake, saturated fat as % of total energy intake, alcohol, smoking

A similar pattern of results were observed for total cholesterol and triglycerides with the work day sedentary behavior time variables. Both total cholesterol and triglycerides increased with increasing screen time on a work day and overall sitting time (all p < 0.05, linear trends, basic models only, data not shown).

Neither moderate or intense PA time was related with any lipid in normal weight participants (data not shown).

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2

There were no observed associations between any of the sedentary behavior time variables and lipid biomarkers in overweight or obese participants. Neither moderate or intense PA time was related with any lipid in the overweight/obese groups.

Discussion

In this cross-sectional population-based study of European adults, screen time (viewing television and using a computer) on a day off was inversely associated with HDL-cholesterol, regardless of age, gender, education, profession type, income, PA, dietary factors, and smoking. Intense PA time was positively associated with HDL-cholesterol, and inversely associated with triglyceride levels (both with full adjustment). Relations between the other lipids and activity level were only observed in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) individuals. For these participants, consistent positive associations with screen time on both a work day and a day off, and total sitting time on a work day with the ‘bad cholesterols’, triglycerides and total cholesterol, were observed with adjustment for the basic set of covariates. This is consistent with a number of other studies [7, 33, 36]. Contrary to what may be expected, sedentary behavior time or PA time was not associated with any lipid level in overweight or obese participants. To our knowledge, this has not been demonstrated previously, and suggests that we need to differentiate prevention measures targeting obese subjects.

Time spent engaging in sedentary behaviors has gained considerable interest recently as a risk factor for the metabolic syndrome, CVD, and mortality [14, 15, 37]. Our findings are consistent with a number of studies showing associations between higher sedentary behavior time and poorer cardiometabolic health, as measured by a cluster of risk factors, in Australian [9], US [7], and European adults [18]. Healy and colleagues [9] found objectively-measured sedentary time in an Australian population was associated with a increased metabolic risk score, comprised of a cluster of factors (waist circumference, triglycerides, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose). The same relations between sedentary behavior time, HDL and triglycerides have also been shown in extensive NHANES data from the US [7].

Our previous research has shown that television viewing time regardless of day of the week, and computer time on a day off, were negatively associated with an overall index of cardiovascular health [18]. From a public health standpoint, this finding is important. A recent large prospective study has provided evidence that different sedentary behaviors may not have the same association with health outcomes [45], and television time, but not sitting at work or during transportation, was associated with overall and cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, reducing sedentary behavior during ‘free or leisure time’ may be a particularly important message to those who have sedentary or computer-based occupations during the working week.

Our findings in normal weight individuals were similar to those of Aadland et al. [33], who examined PA and sedentary behavior with lipoprotein subclass concentrations in a small sample of healthy adults, with the exclusion of obese participants (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). In our study amongst normal weight individuals, the strongest associations for sedentary time were with increases in triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and total cholesterol. Aadland et al. [33], also showed a strong relationship between moderate to vigorous PA with HDL, which we similarly observed in the whole sample analysis. However, no associations were observed between moderate or intense PA time and lipid levels in the present study when stratified by BMI, compared with the sedentary behavior time variables. Like Aadland et al. [33], our findings suggest that the patterns of associations between the lipoproteins with PA and sedentary behavior time may differ, and this was further highlighted when we stratified by BMI. HDL-cholesterol was the only lipoprotein to relate to both intense PA time (positively) and screen time (inversely). These relations were however no longer observed when the sample was stratified by weight status.

The present study sample could be considered active, with 70.4 % meeting the American Heart Association recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of moderate intensity PA [46]. We found fewer relations between the PA time variables and lipids, compared with the sedentary time variables. Those who reported engaging in at least 1 hour per day of intense PA had the lowest levels of triglycerides, while the highest HDL-cholesterol levels were observed in those who undertook between 0.5 and 1 hour of intense activity per day. No significant relations were observed with moderate PA time. This finding is however, consistent with others [9].

This study presents some novel findings and has several strong points. We utilized recent data from a nationwide, population-based sample, with extensive data on cardiovascular risk factors and other potential confounding variables. We have differentiated between type of sedentary behavior (screen time in addition to overall sitting time), intensity of PA (moderate versus intense), and between the occasion (workday versus day off). Furthermore, we have examined these relations in two groups according to body weight status.

The use of a self-reported measure of sedentary behavior and PA time as opposed to objective, accelerometer-derived measures must be acknowledged. We used the IPAQ, which may underestimate the strength of some relationships with disease risk factors [36] and is subject to reponse bias [47]. However, self-reported measures remain the most feasible and affordable instrument for the global surveillance of PA. As the IPAQ refers to the seven days preceding the interview, it also may be less accurate in reflecting long-term or seasonal behavior patterns. The cross-sectional design precludes any conclusion regarding causality between PA, sedentary behaviors and lipid concentrations. Although we controlled for a number of demographic and socioeconomic variables, diet, alcohol intake and smoking, confounding by other factors could explain the results. Gender was adjusted for; there was no evidence of effects-modification according to gender.

Future studies should explore associations between different sedentary behaviors and varying levels of PA intensity with cardiometabolic risk factors, particularly utilizing objective measures of sedentary time and energy expenditure [48]. The present results, as well as previous study findings [18] indicate that targeting a reduction in screen time on days off, such as time spent watching television and on a computer, may be just as important as interventions aimed at reducing sitting time during the working week.

Conclusions

\The findings from this cross-sectional study indicate that greater screen time may be associated with a poorer lipid profile (notably among normal weight subjects). Reducing sedentary behavior time and engaging in daily intense PA may be of benefit to levels of HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, and important for the prevention of cardiovascular health problems.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

GC was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Sidney Sax Research Fellowship (Australia) and AA was supported by a research grant from the National Fund of Research (Fond National de Recherche; project DIQUA-LUX, 5870404).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, University of South Australia
(2)
Luxembourg Institute of Health, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

References

  1. Shiroma EJ, Lee IM. Physical activity and cardiovascular health: lessons learned from epidemiological studies across age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Circulation. 2010;122:743–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mathieu RA, Powell-Wiley TM, Ayers CR, McGuire DK, Khera A, Das SR, et al. Physical activity participation, health perceptions, and cardiovascular disease mortality in a multiethnic population: The Dallas Heart Study. Am Heart J. 2012;163:1037–40.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Leitzmann MF, Park Y, Blair A, Ballard-Barbash R, Mouw T, Hollenbeck AR, et al. Physical activity recommendations and decreased risk of mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2453–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown WJ, Burton NW, Rowan PJ. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:404–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. United States Department Health Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: a Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Manson JE, Greenland P, LaCroix AZ, Stefanick ML, Mouton CP, Oberman A, et al. Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:716–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW, Winkler EA, Owen N. Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003–06. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:590–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Thorp AA, Healy GN, Owen N, Salmon J, Ball K, Shaw JE, et al. Deleterious Associations of Sitting Time and Television Viewing Time With Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers: Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study 2004–2005. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:327–34.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Owen N, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, et al. Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care. 2008;31:369–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakes RW, Day NE, Khaw KT, Luben R, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolk population-based study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:1089–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu FB, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rimm EB. Physical activity and television watching in relation to risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1542–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, et al. Physical activity and television viewing in relation to risk of undiagnosed abnormal glucose metabolism in adults. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2603–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Frydenlund G, Jorgensen T, Toft U, Pisinger C, Aadahl M. Sedentary leisure time behavior, snacking habits and cardiovascular biomarkers: the Inter99 Study. Eur J Prevent Cardiol. 2012;19:1111–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford ES, Caspersen CJ. Sedentary behaviour and cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1338–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2895–905.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnes J, Behrens TK, Benden ME, Biddle S, Bond D, Brassard P, et al. Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pate RR, O'Neill JR, Lobelo F. The evolving definition of “sedentary”. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008;36:173–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Crichton GE, Alkerwi A. Association of sedentary behavior time with ideal cardiovascular health: the ORISCAV-LUX study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99829.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinto Pereira SM, Ki M, Power C. Sedentary Behaviour and Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Mid-Life: The Role of Television-Viewing and Sitting at Work. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Tilling K, Lawlor DA. Sedentary time in relation to cardio-metabolic risk factors: differential associations for self-report vs accelerometry in working age adults. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1328–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:174–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, et al. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:379–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ip S, Lichtenstein AH, Chung M, Lau J, Balk EM. Systematic Review: Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions With Cardiovascular Outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:474−+.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sacks FM, Campos H. Clinical review 163 - Cardiovascular endocrinology 4 - Low-density lipoprotein size and cardiovascular disease: A reappraisal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4525–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Zeng F-F, Liu Z-M, Zhang C-X, Ling W-h, Chen Y-M. Effects of blood triglycerides on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 61 prospective studies. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:159.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Silbernagel G, Schoettker B, Appelbaum S, Scharnagl H, Kleber ME, Grammer TB, et al. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular mortality. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3563–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tehrani DM, Gardin JM, Yanez D, Hirsch CH, Lloyd-Jones DM, Stein PK, et al. Impact of inflammatory biomarkers on relation of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol with incident coronary heart disease: Cardiovascular Health Study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;231:246–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PWF, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels - the Framingham study. JAMA. 1986;256:2835–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Skoumas J, Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Chrysohoou C, Zeimbekis A, Papaioannou I, et al. Physical activity, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipids levels, in men and women from the ATTICA study. Lipids Health Dis. 2003;2:3–3.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sunami Y, Motoyama M, Kinoshita F, Mizooka Y, Sueta K, Matsunaga A, et al. Effects of low-intensity aerobic training on the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in healthy elderly subjects. Metab Clin Exp. 1999;48:984–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood PD, Stefanick ML, Williams PT, Haskell WL. The effects on plasma-lipoproteins of a prudent weight-reducing diet, with or without exercise, in overweight men and women. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:461–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Varady KA, Bhutani S, Klempel MC, Kroeger CM. Comparison of effects of diet versus exercise weight loss regimens on LDL and HDL particle size in obese adults. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:119.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Aadland E, Andersen JR, Anderssen SA, Kvalheim OM. Physical activity versus sedentary behavior: associations with lipoprotein particle subclass concentrations in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2013;8:e85223.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. McGuire KA, Ross R. Sedentary Behavior Is Not Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults with Abdominal Obesity. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20503.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ekelund U, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ. Physical activity and metabolic risk in individuals with a family history of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:337–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Celis-Morales CA, Perez-Bravo F, Ibanez L, Salas C, Bailey MES, Gill JMR. Objective vs. Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Time: Effects of Measurement Method on Relationships with Risk Biomarkers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36345.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Wilmot EG, et al. Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34916.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome - a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006;23:469–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Alkerwi A, Sauvageot N, Donneau AF, Lair ML, Couffignal S, Beissel J, et al. First nationwide survey on cardiovascular risk factors in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX). BMC Public Health. 2010;10:468.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Alkerwi A, Sauvageot N, Couffignal S, Albert A, Lair ML, Guillaume M. Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Alkerwi A, Donneau AF, Sauvageot N, Lair ML, Scheen A, Albert A, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Luxembourg according to the Joint Interim Statement definition estimated from the ORISCAV-LUX study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. [www.ipaq.ki.se]
  43. Sauvageot N, Alkerwi A, Adelin A, Guillaume M. Validation of the food frequency questionnaire used to assess the association between dietary habits and cardiovascular risk factors in the NESCAV study. J Nutrition and Food Science. 2013;3:208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sauvageot N, Alkerwi A, Albert A, Guillaume M. Use of food frequency questionnaire to assess relationships between dietary habits and cardiovascular risk factors in NESCAV study: validation with biomarkers. Nutr J. 2013;12:143.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim Y, Wilkens LR, Park SY, Goodman MT, Monroe KR, Kolonel LN. Association between various sedentary behaviours and all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1040–56.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:197–206. discussion 206.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EAH, Gardiner PA, Brown WJ, Matthews CE. Measurement of Adults’ Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:216–27.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Crichton and Alkerwi. 2015

Advertisement