Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the necrotic region participates in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a pathological and in vitro study

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 20, Article number: 167 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common but intractable disease that appears to involve lipid metabolic disorders. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that high blood levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) are closely associated with ONFH, there is limited evidence to explain the pathological role of LDL. Pathological and in vitro studies were performed to investigate the role of disordered metabolism of LDL and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) in the femoral head in the pathology of ONFH.

Methods

Nineteen femoral head specimens from patients with ONFH were obtained for immunohistochemistry analysis. Murine long-bone osteocyte Y4 cells were used to study the effects of LDL/ox-LDL on cell viability, apoptosis, and metabolism process of LDL/ox-LDL in osteocytes in normoxic and hypoxic environments.

Results

In the pathological specimens, marked accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL was observed in osteocytes/lacunae of necrotic regions compared with healthy regions. In vitro studies showed that ox-LDL, rather than LDL, reduced the viability and enhanced apoptosis of osteocytes. Pathological sections indicated that the accumulation of ox-LDL was significantly associated with impaired blood supply. Exposure to a hypoxic environment appeared to be a key factor leading to LDL/ox-LDL accumulation by enhancing internalisation and oxidation of LDL in osteocytes.

Conclusions

The accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the necrotic region may contribute to the pathology of ONFH. These findings could provide new insights into the prevention and treatment of ONFH.

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common but intractable orthopaedic disease that mainly affects younger people. Trauma, glucocorticoids (GCs), and alcohol are the causal agents in most cases of ONFH. Although global epidemiological studies have not been conducted, there are about 10000 to 20000 new cases of ONFH per year in the United States [1]. In China, it is estimated that 8.12 million patients have non-traumatic ONFH [2]. ONFH is a multifactorial disorder and the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear [3].

Circulating and local lipid metabolic disorders are crucial in ONFH, especially in cases associated with GC or alcohol abuse [3]. The conventional theory assumes that disordered lipid metabolism elicits its effects through two pathways, both of which ultimately lead to impaired blood supply [4]. The first pathway involves the promotion of differentiation and maturation of adipocytes from bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and pre-adipocytes, which may block the medullary blood supply. The second pathway involves altered levels of circulating lipids, which may form fat microemboli in the microvessels of the femoral head.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), known as bad cholesterol, is a vehicle for transporting cholesterol. High blood levels of LDL are associated with idiopathic ONFH [5] and osteonecrosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [6]. An epidemiological survey of 30,030 respondents revealed that high LDL levels are associated with increased risk of non-traumatic ONFH [2]. Furthermore, high LDL is an independent risk factor of postoperative ONFH in those with femoral neck fractures [7]. However, there is limited evidence to explain the pathological role of LDL in ONFH, and local LDL metabolism in the femoral head is poorly understood. LDL is a complex particle that is sensitive to oxidation and readily forms oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL). Because ox-LDL contains various oxidized proteins and lipids with potential oxidative toxicity, it can trigger apoptosis of many cell types and plays a key role in atherosclerosis [8]. Since ONFH shares a number of risk factors with atherosclerosis [2], understanding the role of ox-LDL in atherosclerosis may shed new light on ONFH.

In this work, pathological and in vitro studies were performed to investigate the role of disordered metabolism of LDL and ox-LDL in the femoral head in the pathological process of ONFH. Preliminary studies were also performed to explore the reasons for the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the femoral head.

Methods

Reagents and antibodies

LDL and ox-LDL were obtained from Solarbio (Beijing, China). Primary antibodies against cleaved-caspase3, Bax, β-actin, and secondary antibody for western blotting were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, USA), and those against LDL and ox-LDL were obtained from Bioss (Beijing, China) and Biorbyt (Cambridge, UK), respectively.

Femoral head specimens and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Nineteen femoral head specimens were obtained from consecutive patients with ONFH who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) or core decompression with bone grafting at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai between May 2019 and December 2019. The inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their clinical characteristics (Supplemental Table 1) are provided in the Supplemental Materials. The fresh femoral head specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 14 days, and decalcified with 10% EDTA. The whole specimen obtained from hip-preserving surgery or a rectangular specimen from the femoral head obtained by THA were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Each specimen contained necrotic and healthy regions. For IHC, the specimens were cut for 5-μm-thick sections, and incubated with primary antibodies against LDL (1:200) and ox-LDL (1:100) separately. Representative images were recorded by optical microscope (IX73, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and representative sections were digitally scanned using Pannoramic DESK (3D HISTECH, Budapest, Hungary).

The percentage of empty lacunae was analysed manually, and the necrotic and healthy regions were distinguished as described previously [9]. The percentage of LDL/ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae among all osteocytes/lacunae, and the percentage of empty lacunae among LDL/ox-LDL-positive lacunae were calculated manually. The intensity of osteocyte/lacuna staining was graded as from 0 (negative) to 3 (intense). According to a previous study [10], the immunoreactive score (IRS) for each microscopic field was obtained by multiplying the percentage of immunopositive osteocytes/lacunae (×100%) by staining intensity grading. The quantity and diameter of the medullary microvessels in the necrotic region were measured on the scanned sections. Ten random fields (400×) of both necrotic and healthy regions in each section were used for the analysis.

Cell culture

Murine long-bone osteocyte Y4 (MLO-Y4) osteocyte-like cell line is one of the most widely used osteocyte models in vitro [11]. The MLO-Y4 cell line and macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 were acquired from Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank. MLO-Y4s were cultured in α-MEM medium with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5% calf serum (CS), and RAW 264.7s were cultured in DMEM medium with 10% FBS, both at 37°C with 21% O2 and 5% CO2. The hypoxic environment was set by adjusting the gas concentrations to 5% CO2 and 1% O2 using N2. The culture media were changed every 1 or 2 days.

Cell viability assay

MLO-Y4s were planted at a density of 1×104 cells/mL (100μL/well) and cultured for 24h for attachment. They were treated with varying concentrations of LDL or ox-LDL (0, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100μg/mL) for 12, 24, or 48h. Cell viability was tested with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, AbMole, Shanghai, China). Microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) was used for optical density measurement at 450 nm.

Western blotting

After treating MLO-Y4s with LDL or ox-LDL (0, 5, 10, 25, or 50μg/mL) for 24 or 48h, the total protein was exacted with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Western blotting was conducted to quantify the protein levels of cleaved-caspase3, Bax, and β-actin. Briefly, the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes, and then blocked using 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1h. After incubation with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and the secondary antibody for 1h at room temperature, the membranes were detected by enhanced chemi-luminescence (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) and quantitatively analysed with ImageJ software (Bethesda, Rockville, USA).

Immunofluorescence assay

MLO-Y4s were planted in 24-well plates and cultured for 24h for attachment. Based on the dose-dependent effects of LDL and ox-LDL on cell viability, a dose of 25μg/mL was selected for subsequent LDL and ox-LDL metabolism experiments. The cells were incubated with LDL or ox-LDL for 0, 6, 12, or 24h, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and blocked with 1% BSA. The MLO-Y4s were incubated with antibodies against either LDL (1:200) or ox-LDL (1:200) at 4°C overnight, and then with an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated fluorescently labelled secondary antibody at room temperature for 1h. 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Beyotime) was used for nucleus staining and Olympus IX71 microscope was used for image recording. The percentage of LDL/ox-LDL-positive cells were determined in five random fields (200×).

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from MLO-Y4 or RAW 264.7 cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and reverse-transcribed using PrimeScrip RT Master Mix (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). Primers for GAPDH (B661304) were purchased from and other primers were designed by Sangon (Shanghai, China; Supplemental Table 2). qRT-PCR was conducted with a qRT-PCR system (Bio-Rad CFX96, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, USA). The mRNA expression was measured in triplicate and normalised to GAPDH.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) assay

MLO-Y4s were treated with LDL or ox-LDL at the concentration of 25μg/mL for 0, 6, 12, or 24h. The culture supernatant and cell cytoplasm obtained after lysis with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime) were collected. A commercial lipid peroxidation assay kit (S0131S, Beyotime) was used to measure the MDA levels in the culture supernatant and osteocytes.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v25.0 (IBM, Armonk, USA). Between-group comparisons were made using Student’s t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate. Comparisons of necrotic and healthy regions or different sections of individual specimens were made using paired t-test or Wilcoxon’s paired test. Correlation analyses were performed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. All values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 3 independent experiments and P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Although LDL and ox-LDL accumulated in the necrotic region, the empty bone lacunae were more likely to accumulate ox-LDL.

Figure 1A shows distinct fat accumulation in the necrotic region in gross specimens. Representative pathological sections of ONFH that contained necrotic, sclerotic, and healthy regions are shown in Figures 1B and C. In necrotic regions, the dead trabeculae were disorganised and broken, and there was extensive loss of living osteocytes in the bone lacunae. The necrotic and healthy regions were separated by sclerotic regions, where large numbers of dead and living trabeculae were joined. In healthy regions, the trabeculae showed a normal arrangement and the medullary tissue was intact.

Fig. 1
figure 1

LDL and ox-LDL accumulated in the necrotic region of ONFH. A A representative femoral head specimen from the patient underwent hip-preserving surgery. B IHC staining of LDL on a representative pathological section of ONFH. C IHC staining of ox-LDL on a representative pathological section of ONFH. D The percentage of LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae and IRS in necrotic and healthy regions. E The percentage of ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae and IRS in necrotic and healthy regions. Ten random fields (400×) of both necrotic and healthy regions in each specimen were observed and calculated for analysis. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of 19 specimens, and comparisons are made using paired t-test or Wilcoxon’s paired test

Full size image

Figures 1B and C show that LDL and ox-LDL accumulated in necrotic regions, in stark contrast to the healthy regions. The dead and living osteocytes in the necrotic region were generally positive for LDL and ox-LDL unlike those in the healthy region. The quantitative analysis of the IHC sections showed that the percentage of LDL/ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae and the IRS of the necrotic region were significantly greater than those of healthy regions (P < 0.001, Figures 1D and E).

Although LDL and ox-LDL accumulated in the bone lacunae in the necrotic regions, there were differences in the distribution of immunopositive lacunae. The representative images of the junctions between the living and dead trabeculae revealed that the empty bone lacunae were more likely to accumulate ox-LDL than LDL (Figure 2A). As shown in Figure 2B, the percentage of empty bone lacunae of ox-LDL-positive lacunae in the necrotic region was significantly greater than that of LDL-positive lacunae (P < 0.001). The percentage of empty lacunae was significantly correlated with the percentage of ox-LDL-positive lacunae (P < 0.01) and the IRS for ox-LDL (P < 0.005, Figure 2D), but not with LDL accumulation (P = 0.743 for LDL-positive lacunae and P = 0.622 for IRS, Figure 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Empty bone lacunae were more likely to be ox-LDL-positive rather than LDL-positive. A Representative IHC staining images of the junctional region of living and dead trabeculae. Ox-LDL was more likely to accumulate in empty lacunae (red arrows) when compared with LDL (black arrows). B The percentage of empty bone lacunae among LDL-positive and ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae in the necrotic region. C Correlation between the percentage of empty lacunae in the necrotic region with the percentage of LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae and IRS for LDL. D Correlation between the percentage of empty lacunae in the necrotic region with the percentage of ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae and IRS for ox-LDL. Ten random fields (400×) in each specimen were observed and calculated for analysis. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of 19 specimens. Between-group comparisons are made using Student’s t test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients are used for correlation analysis

Full size image

Decreased blood supply in the necrotic region was correlated with LDL/ox-LDL accumulation.

Correlation analysis was conducted to examine which factors were correlated with LDL/ox-LDL accumulation (Table 1). LDL and ox-LDL accumulation were not correlated with the patients’ age, body mass index, or risk factors. Furthermore, there was no correlation between LDL accumulation and ox-LDL accumulation. The Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage of ONFH was positively correlated with the percentage of ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae (P < 0.05) but not the percentage of LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae (P > 0.05). Although the density of medullary microvessels was not correlated with LDL accumulation (Figures 3A and B), the microvessel density was significantly and negatively correlated with the percentage of ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae (P < 0.01) and with the IRS for ox-LDL (P < 0.001, Figures 3C and D).

Table 1 Potential correlation factors associated with LDL/ox-LDL accumulation in the necrotic region
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation analysis between microvessel density and LDL/ox-LDL accumulation in the necrotic region. Correlation between the percentage of LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae (A) and IRS for LDL (B) with the quantity of microvessels per field in the necrotic region. Correlation between the percentage of ox-LDL-positive osteocytes/lacunae (C) and IRS for ox-LDL (D) with the quantity of microvessels per field in the necrotic region. Ten random fields (400×) in each specimen were observed and calculated for analysis. Spearman’s correlation coefficients are used for correlation analysis

Full size image

Ox-LDL had greater effects on decreasing cell viability and enhancing apoptosis than LDL in MLO-Y4s.

Figures 4A–C show that ox-LDL significantly decreased the viability of MLO-Y4s in dose- and time-dependent manners. By contrast, LDL hardly affected MLO-Y4 viability, with a small decrease in cell viability at the highest concentrations tested (50 and 100μg/mL). At concentrations below 50 μg/mL, LDL hardly induced apoptosis of MLO-Y4 (Figures 4D and E). Incubation with ox-LDL for 24 and 48h significantly up-regulated the levels of cleaved-caspase3 and Bax in MLO-Y4s in dose-dependent manners (Figures 4F and G). These results indicate that after incubation for 24 or 48h, ox-LDL tended to induce more severe apoptosis of MLO-Y4 cells than LDL.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of LDL and ox-LDL on cell viability and apoptosis in MLO-Y4 cells. A, B and C Effects on cell viability in MLO-Y4 cells after incubation with LDL or ox-LDL for 12, 24, or 48h. D and E Western blotting and quantitative analysis of cell apoptosis in MLO-Y4 cells incubated with LDL for 24 or 48 h. F and G Western blotting and quantitative analysis of cell apoptosis in MLO-Y4 cells incubated with ox-LDL for 24 or 48 h. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Comparisons are made using Student’s t test. *P <0.05; **P <0.01; ***P <0.005; ****P <0.001

Full size image

MLO-Y4 cells could internalise LDL and ox-LDL.

qRT-PCR revealed that MLO-Y4 cells expressed the LDL receptor (LDLR) and scavenger receptors (SRs), including collectin-12 and SR-B1, which are responsible for binding to and internalising ox-LDL (Figures 5A and B). RAW 264.7 cells, used as a positive control, also expressed other SRs including LOX-1, SR-A, CD36, and CD68, which participate in the cellular uptake of ox-LDL, but these receptors were not expressed or were expressed at low levels in MLO-Y4s (Figure 5B). Immunofluorescence and quantitative analyses indicated that MLO-Y4 cells internalised LDL and ox-LDL after incubation for 6–24h (Figures 5C–F). The fluorescence intensity of LDL taken up by MLO-Y4 cells gradually increased up to 12h, but remained almost constant from 12 to 24h. By comparison, the amount of ox-LDL taken up by MLO-Y4 cells, as well as the intracellular MDA content after incubation with ox-LDL (Figure 5G), continued to increase for 24h.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The cellular uptake of LDL and ox-LDL in MLO-Y4 cells in normoxic and hypoxic environments. A The relative expression of LDLR, collectin-12 and SR-B1 in MLO-Y4 cells in normoxic and hypoxic environments. B The relative expression of LDLR and main SRs in MLO-Y4 and RAW264.7 cells. C and D Immunofluorescence and quantitative statistics of LDL internalised by MLO-Y4 cells in normoxic and hypoxic environments. E and F Immunofluorescence and quantitative statistics of ox-LDL internalised by MLO-Y4 cells in normoxic and hypoxic environments. G The relative MDA content in MLO-Y4 cells after incubation with ox-LDL in normoxic and hypoxic environments. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments unless particularly stated, and the percentage of LDL/ox-LDL-positive cells were calculated from five random fields (200×). Comparisons are made using Student’s t test. ***P <0.005; ****P <0.001; scale bar = 100μm

Full size image

Hypoxia enhanced LDL uptake but did not significantly affect ox-LDL uptake by MLO-Y4 cells.

The immunofluorescence studies (Figures 5C and D) revealed that exposure to hypoxia significantly enhanced the cellular uptake of LDL in MLO-Y4 cells relative to the normoxic environment. However, hypoxia did not significantly affect ox-LDL uptake (Figures 5E and F). In the hypoxic environment, the amount of LDL internalised by MLO-Y4s peaked at 12h and remained constant, whereas the intracellular amount of ox-LDL continued to increase for 24h, similar to the results from MLO-Y4s cultured in the normoxic environment. The oxidative status of MLO-Y4s incubated with LDL or ox-LDL was evaluated by measuring the MDA content. Although the total intracellular MDA content continued to increase at 24h, hypoxia did not significantly affect intracellular MDA accumulation compared with normoxia (Figure 5G). Consistent with the immunofluorescence and MDA studies, qRT-PCR revealed that the expression of LDLR and collectin-12 were up-regulated, but the expression of SR-B1 was down-regulated by hypoxia (Figure 5A). Thus, hypoxia significantly enhanced the cellular uptake of LDL, but did not significantly affect ox-LDL internalisation.

MLO-Y4 cells could oxidize LDL particles in a process that was enhanced by hypoxia.

Figures 6A and B show that the accumulation of ox-LDL in MLO-Y4 cells incubated with LDL increased in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, the MDA levels in MLO-Y4s and culture supernatant increased following incubation with LDL (Figures 6C and D). Thus, MLO-Y4 cells could oxidize LDL particles to ox-LDL. The increase of MDA and ox-LDL was slower after incubation with LDL for more than 12h.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The LDL oxidative modification capability of MLO-Y4 was enhanced in hypoxic environment. A and B Immunofluorescence and quantitative statistics of ox-LDL oxidized from LDL by MLO-Y4 cells in normoxic and hypoxic environments. C The relative MDA content in MLO-Y4 cells after incubation with LDL in normoxic and hypoxic environments. D The relative MDA content in culture supernatant of MLO-Y4 cells after incubation with LDL in normoxic and hypoxic environments. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments unless particularly stated, and the percentage of ox-LDL-positive cells were calculated from five random fields (200×). Comparisons are made using Student’s t test. *P <0.05; ***P <0.005; ****P <0.001; scale bar = 100μm

Full size image

Regarding the effects of hypoxia on oxidation of LDL, the percentage of ox-LDL-positive cells in the hypoxic environment increased significantly after incubation with LDL for 6, 12, or 24h (Figures 6A and B). After incubation with LDL for 24 h, the MDA levels in MLO-Y4s and culture supernatant were significantly greater in the hypoxic environment than in the normoxic environment (Figures 6C and D). Furthermore, unlike in the normoxic environment, the accumulation of ox-LDL and MDA increased rapidly in MLO-Y4 cells incubated with LDL for 12 to 24h.

Discussion

Disordered lipid metabolism, including LDL metabolism, is a common pathological process in ONFH. However, there is limited knowledge about the local pathophysiological metabolism of LDL in the necrotic femoral head. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the necrotic femoral head.

The present study revealed that LDL and ox-LDL accumulated significantly in the necrotic region. Although cell death and lysis emptied the bone lacunae in dead trabeculae, the IHC studies indicated that most of the empty bone lacunae contained LDL and ox-LDL. However, the percentage of empty lacunae among ox-LDL-positive lacunae was significantly higher than that among LDL-positive lacunae. This suggests that the death of osteocytes is more likely to be associated with ox-LDL than with native LDL. Subsequent in vitro experiments revealed that ox-LDL decreased osteocyte viability and enhanced apoptosis in dose- and time-dependent manners, whereas LDL hardly affected the osteocytes. Because ox-LDL contains various toxic oxidized lipids, numerous studies have demonstrated that it triggers cellular oxidative stress [12], endoplasmic reticulum stress [13], biofilm dysfunction [14], lysosomal membrane damage [15, 16], mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis [17]. Recent studies have also suggested that ox-LDL may be a determinant of osteoporosis because it inhibits the differentiation of BMSCs to osteoblasts [18] and the osteoblast mineralization [19]. By comparison, ox-LDL promotes the formation of osteoclasts and enhances bone resorption [20], and disturbs the crosstalk between osteoblasts and osteoclast [21]. However, few studies have examined the pathophysiological effects of ox-LDL in osteocytes.

Although osteocyte apoptosis is a fundamental pathological mechanism of ONFH, the accumulation of ox-LDL may promote other mechanisms, including bone metabolism and microvessels disorders. In addition, ox-LDL may induce osteoblast apoptosis directly [15, 16]. Regarding microvessel disorders, there have been numerous studies showing that ox-LDL promotes inflammation, oxidative damage, and apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells [22,23,24]. Moreover, ox-LDL may impair the proliferation and network formation of endothelial progenitor cells, and induce their cell senescence and apoptosis [25, 26]. Ox-LDL also suppresses endothelial differentiation and induces apoptosis of bone marrow multipotent progenitor cells [27].

The internalisation of native LDL is mediated by LDLR, but this mainly involves several SRs, including LOX-1, SR-A, CD36, SR-BI, CD68, and collectin-12, after oxidation. Unlike LDL, the uptake of ox-LDL was not negatively regulated by intracellular cholesterol content, which readily causes intracellular ox-LDL accumulation [28]. Here, it was found that, after incubating osteocytes with LDL or ox-LDL at the same concentration, the intracellular content of LDL remained stable after 12h, but the accumulation of ox-LDL continued to increase for 24h. Because previous studies examining ox-LDL metabolism mainly used macrophages or vascular endothelial cells, it was assumed that LOX-1, SR-A, CD36, and SR-BI were the main SRs responsible for internalisation of ox-LDL [29, 30]. However, the present study revealed that collectin-12 and SR-B1 might be the primary SRs involved in ox-LDL uptake in osteocytes. It was also demonstrated that the osteocyte expressed high levels of LDLR and could internalise and oxidize native LDL. Similarly, it was reported that the LDLR expression in osteoblasts was high [31] and that they can also oxidize LDL [15]. Although osteoblasts may exacerbate the accumulation of ox-LDL, osteocytes are more likely to play a major role because they account for over 90% of bone cells. Although there have been several studies examining SR expression in osteoblasts and osteocytes, the results were controversial. For example, consistent with the present results, it was shown that SR-B1 was prominently expressed in MLO-Y4 cells and osteoblasts, whereas CD36 expression was low or undetectable [32]. By contrast, Brodeur et al. reported that SR-B1 and CD36 were expressed in osteoblast-like cell lines [33]. Similar to the present results, Kalajzic et al. detected low SR-A expression in osteoblasts, but a higher level of CD68, which increased during osteogenic differentiation [34]. The present study suggests that collectin-12, a newly-identified SR, may play a key role in ox-LDL metabolism in osteocytes.

Considering that the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL did not differ significantly among traumatic, GC-associated, and alcohol-associated ONFH, this may be a common pathological process in ONFH. Thus, the negative correlation between ox-LDL accumulation and medullary blood supply in the necrotic region seems reasonable. Impaired blood supply creates a hypoxic environment for osteocytes in the necrotic region, a fundamental pathological change in ONFH. The present study revealed that hypoxia significantly enhanced the internalisation and oxidation of LDL, but did not significantly affect ox-LDL uptake. Hypoxia can induce the accumulation of lipids in various cells; in particular, hypoxia enhances LDL internalisation in smooth muscle and cancer cells [35, 36]. Furthermore, macrophages oxidize native LDL to a greater extent in hypoxic environments than in normoxic environments [37]. In osteoblasts and osteocytes, hypoxia enhances reactive oxygen specie generation and oxidative stress [38,39,40]. Imamura et al. reported that hypoxia could enhance lipid uptake and foam cell formation in macrophages treated with native LDL [41], which is similar to the results in osteocytes in the present study. Considering the large difference between the circulating concentrations of LDL and ox-LDL [42, 43], it is reasonable to speculate that the accumulation of ox-LDL in osteocytes is mainly due to increased internalisation and oxidation of native LDL, rather than direct uptake of ox-LDL.

Comparisons with other studies and what does the current work add to the existing knowledge

Over the last decade, evidence been accumulating that ox-LDL is important in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis, another common joint disease that often requires surgical treatment [44]. It was reported that ox-LDL accumulated in chondrocytes in the pathological process of osteoarthritis and that LOX-1-deficient mice were resistant to osteoarthritis induced by instability or age [45, 46]. Whereas, few researches have studied the pathophysiological role of ox-LDL in ONFH. This study showed that greater accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL was found in the necrotic regions compared with healthy regions. In vitro studies showed that ox-LDL, but not native LDL, might be responsible for aggravating osteocyte viability and enhancing apoptosis. Because the accumulation of ox-LDL was associated with a reduced blood supply, the present study also investigated the impact of hypoxia on LDL/ox-LDL metabolism in vitro. The enhanced internalisation and oxidation of LDL by osteocytes in the hypoxic environment could at least partially explain the increased accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the necrotic region.

Because it may be difficult to improve oxygen and blood supply without surgery, treatments that reduce the concentration and cellular uptake of LDL in the femoral head, as well as antioxidant therapies [19, 21], may be promising conservative methods to prevent or treat early stage ONFH. Lipoprotein(a), a variant LDL particle, plays key roles in atherosclerosis, cardiovascular events, and lipid disorders [47, 48]. It was reported that high blood lipoprotein(a) levels and low-molecular-weight lipoprotein(a) isoform were associated with increased risk of ONFH [49, 50]. Thus, more attention should be paid to lipoprotein(a) in lipid accumulation and ONFH, beyond LDL/ox-LDL. Intriguingly, lipoprotein(a) is also internalised via LDLR, and therapies aimed at reducing the content of LDLR in osteocytes or LDLR antibodies may also be beneficial by regulating lipoprotein(a) metabolism.

Study strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, it is the first study to show that LDL and ox-LDL accumulated in the necrotic region and may participate in ONFH. Pathological and in vitro studies showed that ox-LDL could induce osteocyte apoptosis, and thus contributed to ONFH. The findings may shed new light on the prevention and treatment of ONFH. The main limitation is that the present study did not examine the relationship between the circulating LDL level and its level in the femoral head; this relationship is worth investigating in future studies. Because it is virtually impossible to obtain femoral head specimens in the initial stages of ONFH, the present study was unable to demonstrate whether the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL plays a crucial role in the onset of ONFH or just involved in the pathological process after onset. Animal experiments are needed to answer this question in the future. Further in vitro studies are also needed to investigate the oxidation of LDL in osteocytes in detail. Another limitation is that the sample size might not be enough to compare the LDL/ox-LDL accumulation among different types of ONFH. Thus, there may not be sufficient power to reach a conclusion that the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL is unrelated to the cause of ONFH. However, it can be concluded that the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL is a common pathological process in ONFH, at least for ONFH associated with trauma, GC, and alcohol.

Conclusions

This pilot study shows that the accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the femoral head participates in the pathological process of ONFH. Disordered LDL/ox-LDL metabolism in osteocytes induced by hypoxia could be a potential pathologic mechanism. With a lack of conservation therapies to slow down the pathological process of ONFH, the present study has identified a promising therapeutic target. Strategies that reduce the cellular uptake of LDL in the femoral head, perhaps by regulating LDLR levels or using LDLR antibodies, combined with antioxidants, merit further in vivo and clinical studies.

Availability of data and materials

All data for this study are contained within this article and in the supplemental data.

Abbreviations

ARCO:

Association Research Circulation Osseous

BMSC:

Bone marrow stromal cell

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CCK-8:

Cell Counting Kit-8

CS:

Calf serum

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GC:

Glucocorticoid

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

IRS:

Immunoreactive score

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

LDLR:

Low-density lipoprotein receptor

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

MLO-Y4:

Murine long-bone osteocyte Y4

ONFH:

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head

ox-LDL:

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

SD:

Standard deviation

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

References

  1. Aldridge JR, Urbaniak JR. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: etiology, pathophysiology, classification, and current treatment guidelines. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004;33(7):327–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao DW, Yu M, Hu K, Wang W, Yang L, Wang BJ, et al. Prevalence of Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head and its Associated Risk Factors in the Chinese Population: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey. Chin Med J. 2015;128(21):2843–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Petek D, Hannouche D, Suva D. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(3):85–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World J Orthop. 2015;6(8):590–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu F, Wang W, Yang L, Wang B, Wang J, Chai W, et al. An epidemiological study of etiology and clinical characteristics in patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaharir SS, Chua SH, Mohd R, Mustafar R, Noh MM, Shahril NS, et al. Risk factors for symptomatic Avascular Necrosis (AVN) in a multi-ethnic Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) cohort. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e248845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng X, Zhan K, Zhang L, Zeng D, Yu W, Zhang X, et al. The impact of high total cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein on avascular necrosis of the femoral head in low-energy femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Poznyak AV, Nikiforov NG, Markin AM, Kashirskikh DA, Myasoedova VA, Gerasimova EV, et al. Overview of OxLDL and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Health: Focus on Atherosclerosis. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:613780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chernetsky SG, Mont MA, LaPorte DM, Jones LC, Hungerford DS, McCarthy EF. Pathologic features in steroid and nonsteroid associated osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;368:149–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drexler R, Fahy R, Kuchler M, Wagner KC, Reese T, Ehmke M, et al. Association of subcellular localization of TEAD transcription factors with outcome and progression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology. 2021;21(1):170–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kato Y, Windle JJ, Koop BA, Mundy GR, Bonewald LF. Establishment of an osteocyte-like cell line, MLO-Y4. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(12):2014–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lara-Guzman OJ, Gil-Izquierdo A, Medina S, Osorio E, Alvarez-Quintero R, Zuluaga N, et al. Oxidized LDL triggers changes in oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in human macrophages. Redox Biol. 2018;15:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanda GM, Deleanu M, Toma L, Stancu CS, Simionescu M, Sima AV. Oxidized LDL-Exposed Human Macrophages Display Increased MMP-9 Expression and Secretion Mediated by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(4):661–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Catala A, Diaz M. Editorial: Impact of Lipid Peroxidation on the Physiology and Pathophysiology of Cell Membranes. Front Physiol. 2016;7:423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodeur MR, Brissette L, Falstrault L, Ouellet P, Moreau R. Influence of oxidized low-density lipoproteins (LDL) on the viability of osteoblastic cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44(4):506–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brodeur MR, Brissette L, Falstrault L, Moreau R. HDL3 reduces the association and modulates the metabolism of oxidized LDL by osteoblastic cells: a protection against cell death. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(6):1374–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asmis R, Begley JG. Oxidized LDL promotes peroxide-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death in human macrophages: a caspase-3-independent pathway. Circ Res. 2003;92(1):e20–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawodu D, Patecki M, Dumler I, Haller H, Kiyan Y. oxLDL inhibits differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts via the CD36 mediated suppression of Wnt signaling pathway. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(3):3487–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maziere C, Savitsky V, Galmiche A, Gomila C, Massy Z, Maziere JC. Oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibits phosphate signaling and phosphate-induced mineralization in osteoblasts. Involvement of oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802(11):1013–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sul OJ, Kim JE, Ke K, Suh JH, Choi HS. Atherogenic diet-induced bone loss is primarily due to increased osteoclastogenesis in mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2020;79:108337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maziere C, Salle V, Gomila C, Maziere JC. Oxidized low density lipoprotein enhanced RANKL expression in human osteoblast-like cells. Involvement of ERK, NFkappaB and NFAT. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832(10):1756–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng N, Meng N, Wang S, Zhao F, Zhao J, Su L, et al. An activator of mTOR inhibits oxLDL-induced autophagy and apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells and restricts atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E(-)/(-) mice. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang K, Luo Y, Lu S, Hu R, Du Y, Liao P, et al. Salvianolic acid B and ginsenoside Re synergistically protect against Ox-LDL-Induced endothelial apoptosis through the antioxidative and antiinflammatory mechanisms. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Z, Li J, Zhang X. Astragaloside IV Protects Against Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein (ox-LDL)-Induced Endothelial Cell Injury by Reducing Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:2132–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Imanishi T, Hano T, Sawamura T, Nishio I. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein induces endothelial progenitor cell senescence, leading to cellular dysfunction. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004;31(7):407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Veas C, Jara C, Willis ND, Perez-Contreras K, Gutierrez N, Toledo J, et al. Overexpression of LOXIN Protects Endothelial Progenitor Cells From Apoptosis Induced by Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016;67(4):326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chu L, Hao H, Luo M, Huang Y, Chen Z, Lu T, et al. Ox-LDL modifies the behaviour of bone marrow stem cells and impairs their endothelial differentiation via inhibition of Akt phosphorylation. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(2):423–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henriksen T, Mahoney EM, Steinberg D. Enhanced macrophage degradation of low density lipoprotein previously incubated with cultured endothelial cells: recognition by receptors for acetylated low density lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(10):6499–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang D, Yang Y, Lei Y, Tzvetkov NT, Liu X, Yeung A, et al. Targeting Foam Cell Formation in Atherosclerosis: Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products. Pharmacol Rev. 2019;71(4):596–670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Luchetti F, Crinelli R, Nasoni MG, Benedetti S, Palma F, Fraternale A, et al. LDL receptors, caveolae and cholesterol in endothelial dysfunction: oxLDLs accomplices or victims? Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(16):3104–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Niemeier A, Kassem M, Toedter K, Wendt D, Ruether W, Beisiegel U, et al. Expression of LRP1 by human osteoblasts: a mechanism for the delivery of lipoproteins and vitamin K1 to bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(2):283–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Palmieri M, Kim HN, Gomez-Acevedo H, Que X, Tsimikas S, Jilka RL, et al. A Neutralizing Antibody Targeting Oxidized Phospholipids Promotes Bone Anabolism in Chow-Fed Young Adult Mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(1):170–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brodeur MR, Brissette L, Falstrault L, Luangrath V, Moreau R. Scavenger receptor of class B expressed by osteoblastic cells are implicated in the uptake of cholesteryl ester and estradiol from LDL and HDL3. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(3):326–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalajzic I, Staal A, Yang WP, Wu Y, Johnson SE, Feyen JH, et al. Expression profile of osteoblast lineage at defined stages of differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(26):24618–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wada Y, Sugiyama A, Yamamoto T, Naito M, Noguchi N, Yokoyama S, et al. Lipid accumulation in smooth muscle cells under LDL loading is independent of LDL receptor pathway and enhanced by hypoxic conditions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(10):1712–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Menard JA, Christianson HC, Kucharzewska P, Bourseau-Guilmain E, Svensson KJ, Lindqvist E, et al. Metastasis Stimulation by Hypoxia and Acidosis-Induced Extracellular Lipid Uptake Is Mediated by Proteoglycan-Dependent Endocytosis. Cancer Res. 2016;76(16):4828–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rydberg EK, Krettek A, Ullstrom C, Ekstrom K, Svensson PA, Carlsson LM, et al. Hypoxia increases LDL oxidation and expression of 15-lipoxygenase-2 in human macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(11):2040–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang CN, Kok SH, Wang HW, Chang JZ, Lai EH, Shun CT, et al. Simvastatin alleviates bone resorption in apical periodontitis possibly by inhibition of mitophagy-related osteoblast apoptosis. Int Endod J. 2019;52(5):676–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang C, Lin S, Kok S, Wang H, Lee Y, Shun C, et al. The possible role of sirtuin 5 in the pathogenesis of apical periodontitis. Oral Dis. 2021;27(7):1766–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang Y, Han B, Ding J, Qiu C, Wang W. Endoplasmic reticulum stress mediates osteocyte death under oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro. Acta Histochem. 2020;122(6):151577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Imamura T, Poulsen O, Haddad GG. Intermittent hypoxia induces murine macrophage foam cell formation by IKK-beta-dependent NF-kappaB pathway activation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016;121(3):670–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bachi A, Barros MP, Vieira RP, Rocha GA, de Andrade P, Victorino AB, et al. Combined Exercise Training Performed by Elderly Women Reduces Redox Indexes and Proinflammatory Cytokines Related to Atherogenesis. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:6469213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baziar N, Nasli-Esfahani E, Djafarian K, Qorbani M, Hedayati M, Mishani MA, et al. The Beneficial Effects of Alpha Lipoic Acid Supplementation on Lp-PLA2 Mass and Its Distribution between HDL and apoB-Containing Lipoproteins in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind. Placebo-Controlled Trial OXID MED CELL LONGEV. 2020;2020:5850865.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hashimoto K, Akagi M. The role of oxidation of low-density lipids in pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: A narrative review. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(6):1220731161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hashimoto K, Mori S, Oda Y, Nakano A, Sawamura T, Akagi M. Lectin-like oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor 1-deficient mice show resistance to instability-induced osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016;45(5):412–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hashimoto K, Oda Y, Nakamura F, Kakinoki R, Akagi M. Lectin-like, oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1-deficient mice show resistance to age-related knee osteoarthritis. Eur J Histochem. 2017;61(1):2762.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Cesaro A, Schiavo A, Moscarella E, Coletta S, Conte M, Gragnano F, et al. Lipoprotein(a): a genetic marker for cardiovascular disease and target for emerging therapies. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021;22(3):151–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gragnano F, Fimiani F, Di Maio M, Cesaro A, Limongelli G, Cattano D, et al. Impact of lipoprotein(a) levels on recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with premature coronary artery disease. Intern Emerg Med. 2019;14(4):621–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Posan E, Szepesi K, Gaspar L, Csernatony Z, Harsfalvi J, Ajzner E, et al. Thrombotic and fibrinolytic alterations in the aseptic necrosis of femoral head. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003;14(3):243–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hirata T, Fujioka M, Takahashi KA, Asano T, Ishida M, Akioka K, et al. Low molecular weight phenotype of Apo(a) is a risk factor of corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head after renal transplant. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(3):516–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81871742, 82172413), Shanghai Hospital Development Center Emerging Advanced Technology Joint Research Project (grant number SHDC12017107), and Three-year Action Plan Major Clinical Research Project (grant number SHDC2020CR3075B).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin-Yuan Wang

    Present address: Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China

  2. Xin-Yuan Wang, Tian-Le Ma and Kang-Ning Chen contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China

    Xin-Yuan Wang, Tian-Le Ma, Kang-Ning Chen, Zhi-Ying Pang, Hao Wang, Jun-Ming Huang, Guo-Bin Qi, Chen-Zhong Wang, Zeng-Xin Jiang, Zhe Wang, Chang Jiang & Zuo-Qin Yan

  2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China

    Lin-Jing Gong

Authors
  1. Xin-Yuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tian-Le Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kang-Ning Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhi-Ying Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun-Ming Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guo-Bin Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chen-Zhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zeng-Xin Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lin-Jing Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhe Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Zuo-Qin Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: XW, TM, KC, LG, CJ, and ZY. Study conduct: XW, TM, and KC. Sample collection: XW, KC, ZP, HW, JH, GQ, and CW. Data collection: XW, ZJ, ZW, and CJ. Data interpretation: LG, ZW, and CJ. Writing manuscript: XW, LG, and ZY. Revising manuscript content: XW, CJ, and ZY. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chang Jiang or Zuo-Qin Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, XY., Ma, TL., Chen, KN. et al. Accumulation of LDL/ox-LDL in the necrotic region participates in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a pathological and in vitro study. Lipids Health Dis 20, 167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01601-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01601-x

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X