Skip to main content

Association between triglyceride glucose index and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes



The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index has been considered a new biomarker for the diagnosis of angiocardiopathy and insulin resistance. However, the association of the TyG index with subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction still lacks comprehensive exploration. This study was carried out to examine this relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).


A total of 150 T2DM patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) from June 2021 to December 2021 were included in this study. The subclinical LV function was evaluated through global longitudinal strain (GLS), with the predefined GLS < 18% as the cutoff for subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. The TyG index calculation was obtained according to ln (fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2), which was then stratified into quartiles (TyG index—Q).


Analyses of clinical characteristics in the four TyG indexes-Q (Q1 (TyG index ≤ 8.89) n = 38, Q2 (8.89 < TyG index ≤ 9.44) n = 37, Q3 (9.44 < TyG index ≤ 9.83) n = 38, and Q4 (TyG index > 9.83) n = 37) were conducted. A negative correlation of the TyG index with GLS (r = -0.307, P < 0.001) was revealed according to correlation analysis. After gender and age were adjusted in multimodel logistic regression analysis, the higher TyG index (OR 6.86; 95% CI 2.44 to 19.30; P < 0.001, Q4 vs Q1) showed a significant association with GLS < 18%, which was still maintained after further adjustment for related clinical confounding factors (OR 5.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 24.51, p = 0.036, Q4 vs Q1). Receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated a diagnostic capacity of the TyG index for GLS < 18% (area under curve: 0.678; P < 0.001).


A higher TyG index had a significant association with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients with preserved ejection fraction, and the TyG index may have the potential to exert predictive value for myocardial damage.


A causal relationship exists between diabetes mellitus and heart failure. For instance, diabetic cardiomyopathy as a diffuse cardiomyopathy resulting from glucose metabolism disorder has received increasing interest in recent years, which generally manifests as pathological cardiac remodeling and systolic and diastolic dysfunction and may eventually develop into overt heart failure [1, 2]. Studies have demonstrated insulin resistance and/or hyperinsulinemia as the source of the cascade that contributes to diabetic cardiomyopathy [3, 4]. The early stages of diabetic cardiomyopathy are usually ignored and underestimated in clinics. Some studies have shown the existence of asymptomatic systolic LV dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with hidden cardiac disease manifestations [5] and suggest the emergence of reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) at an early stage of this disorder process prior to the detectability of ejection fraction (EF) transformations [6]. Therefore, early identification followed by punctual intervention is of vital significance for individuals at high risk of diabetic cardiomyopathy. The TyG index is indicated to serve as an alternative biomarker of insulin resistance, which is convenient and reliable [7,8,9] and is closely related to cardiovascular disease [10]. However, there is not yet enough evidence to evaluate the clinical value of the TyG index on subclinical LV dysfunction in diabetes. Accordingly, our objective was to explore the correlation of the TyG index with LV longitudinal systolic function in T2DM patients without heart disease.


Study subjects

A total of 165 hospitalized patients with T2DM categorized by World Health Organization criteria [11] at the Department of Endocrinology of Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University during the period of June 2021 to December 2021 were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) LVEF < 50%; (2) moderate-to-severe aortic/mitral valve stenosis or insufficiency; (3) a coronary artery disease history or other heart disease; (4) arrhythmia such as left bundle-branch block, frequent ventricular premature complexes or atrial fibrillation; and (5) too poor speck tracking image quality for analysis. According to the exclusion criteria, 15 participants were excluded. Ultimately, 150 patients with T2DM were included in the present study.

Data collection

Demographic data were provided by the electronic medical record system, with diabetes duration, gender, age, systolic and diastolic pressures, and medication covered. All patients were measured for height and weight through specially assigned personnel on the admission day, with body mass index (BMI) defined as weight/height2 (kg/m2). Hypertension was described as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg without antihypertensive medication or with a previous hypertension physician identification. After an at least 8-h overnight fast, an evaluation of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid was performed with an automatic biochemical analyzer. The fasting glucose index was detected with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) checked by high-performance liquid chromatography. Immunoturbidimetry depending on a COBAS INTEGRA 400 plus autoanalyzer (Germany) was carried out to determine the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The ln[fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2] [7] was used to identify the TyG index, and the patients were grouped into Q1 (TyG index ≤ 8.89), Q2 (8.89 < TyG index ≤ 9.44), Q3 (9.44 < TyG index ≤ 9.83), and Q4 (TyG index > 9.83) based on the TyG index levels.

Conventional echocardiography

The ultrasound measurements of all subjects were collected according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography [12]. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography (Philips Healthcare, iE33 system, X5-1 probe) was performed on each subject accompanied by electrocardiogram. LV fractional shortening (LVFS), LVEF, heart rate, and stroke volume of each subject were analyzed. Afterwards, the pulse Doppler sampling volume was located under the mitral valve to perform the measurement on the early diastolic blood flow velocity (E peak) and late diastole (A peak) to calculate the E/A ratio, then to measure the early diastolic mitral annulus motion velocity (E' peak) to calculate the E/E' ratio by placing it at the septal side of the mitral annulus.

Speck-tracking echocardiography

Echocardiography images for 2D speck-tracking echocardiography (STE) with a rate of 60–90 frames/s in three cardiac cycles were acquired. Then, the LV views of the apical four-chamber, apical two-chamber and apical three-chamber were analyzed using QLAB 8.1 2D imaging system. The trace of the endocardial border at end-diastole was performed in a manual manner to obtain the 2D strain‒time curve and bull's-eye plot of 17 segments of LV (Fig. 1). The trace was adjusted based on a visual assessment of the tracking quality by observer, and the untraceable images of spots elicited by atrial fibrillation were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The LV GLS for the average value of the three peak strains in systole was calculated for subclinical LV systolic function evaluation. Based on previous studies and the latest guidelines of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, the predefined cutoff of GLS < 18% was adopted to evaluate subclinical LV systolic dysfunction [12,13,14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Acquisition of left ventricular apical four-chamber strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in type 2 diabetic patients

Statistical analyses

A Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test was performed to test the normality of data, and a nonparametric test was implemented where data did not meet a normal distribution. Data satisfying normal distribution were expressed as the means ± SDs, and conversely, as median and interquartile range. Categorical variables were described in the form of percentages n (%). One-way ANOVA or the Kruskal‒Wallis test was used to test for differences between groups. The Bonferroni test was adopted for post hoc comparisons. Least Pearson's Chi-square test was performed on categorical variable comparisons. The correlation between the TyG index and GLS was evaluated according to Pearson correlation coefficients. Three forced-entry logistic regression models were performed to determine the independent association of GLS < 18% with TyG index: model 1 (an unadjusted model), mode 2 (a multivariable model) adjusted for age and gender, and model 3 (a multivariable model) adjusted for age, gender, diabetes duration, systolic pressure, HbA1c, BMI, hypertension, heart rate, logarithmic microalbuminuria, LVEF and insulin therapy. To confirm an alternative index for identifying reduced GLS < 18%, models covering the TyG index and HbA1c were established, followed by a comparison of both according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The measurement of GLS was performed by one professional physician to avoid interobserver and intraobserver variability. To prevent the ambiguity of negative size to a value, the GLS was given in the absolute value form. All statistical analyses were carried out on IBM SPSS statistics 26.0, with a P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.


Clinical characteristics

A total of 150 T2DM patients (mean age: 53.4 ± 13.8 years, diabetes duration: 10.25 ± 7.22 years, male: 96 (64.0%)) were included, with the clinical features across quartiles of the TyG index listed in Table 1, which indicated an increased hypertension prevalence in subjects with a higher TyG index, accompanied by higher levels of systolic pressure, fasting glucose, HbA1c, heart rate, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol (all P < 0.05). Moreover, insulin therapy statistically varied across the TyG index quartiles (P = 0.025) without obvious differences in sex, age, diabetes duration or BMI among groups (P > 0.05).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of participants by quartiles of TyG index

Association of the TyG index with GLS

Table 2 displays the characteristics of LV function stratified by quartiles of the TyG index. No statistically significant differences were observed in traditional echocardiographic parameters, that is, LVEF, LVFS, stroke volume, E, E', E/A and E/E' across TyG index quartiles (all P > 0.05). However, the GLS exhibited a stepwise decrease in line with the increase in TyG index quartile (19.23 ± 3.28 vs 18.87 ± 2.79 vs 17.22 ± 3.56 vs 16.67 ± 3.31, P = 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis indicated strong and negative correlations of the TyG index (r = -0.307, P < 0.001) and HbA1c (r = -0.470, P < 0.001) with GLS.

Table 2 Characteristics of LV function stratified by quartiles of the TyG index

Table 3 displays the logistic regression results based on the TyG index quartile. Taking Q1 as the reference, the risks in the Q3 and Q4 groups of GLS < 18% were found to be significantly higher in comparison to the Q1 group in the univariate model (Q3 vs Q1: OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.63 to 11.35, P = 0.003; Q4 vs Q1: OR 5.83, 95% CI 2.15 to 15.82, P < 0.001, respectively). After gender and age adjustment, the relation of the TyG index of the 3rd quartile and 4th quartile with GLS < 18% still existed (Q3 vs Q1: OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.78 to 13.28, P = 0.002; Q4 vs Q1: OR 6.86, 95% CI 2.44 to 19.30, P < 0.001, respectively). With further adjustment for confounders of age, gender, diabetes duration, systolic pressure, HbA1c, BMI, hypertension, heart rate, logarithmic microalbuminuria, LVEF and insulin therapy, the higher quartile of the TyG index remained an independent risk indicator related to GLS < 18% (Q3 vs Q1: OR 4.52, 95% CI 1.12 to 18.27, P = 0.034; Q4 vs Q1: OR 5.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 24.51, P = 0.036).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of GLS < 18% by TyG index quartiles

The ROC curves depicted in Fig. 2 demonstrate the diagnostic validity of the TyG index in identifying subclinical LV systolic dysfunction (GLS < 18%). Notably, the TyG index with a cutoff value of 9.6 (AUC: 0.678; P < 0.001) displayed a sensitivity of 73.8% with a specificity of 54.3% for predicting GLS < 18%. HbA1c also exhibited a high AUC of 0.742, a sensitivity of 62.9% and a specificity of 76.2% for reduced GLS < 18% (P < 0.001). Subsequently, the composite variable with the TyG index and HbA1c combined showed increased AUC and diagnostic values (AUC: 0.770; sensitivity: 65.7%, specificity: 80.0%, P < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Receiver‑operating characteristic curves for the prediction of reduced GLS (< 18%) in patients with type 2 diabetes using the TyG index and HbA1c. Abbreviations: GLS: global longitudinal strain; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin

Figure 3 shows three bull’s eye plots of representative cases with reduced GLS with high TyG index quartiles (Q2〜Q4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Three bull’s eye plots of representative cases with reduced GLS with high TyG index quartiles (Q2〜Q4). Abbreviations: GLS: global longitudinal strain; Q: quartile


To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to explore the association of the TyG index with LV longitudinal myocardial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction. The results demonstrated a close relationship of the increased TyG index with an elevated risk of LV longitudinal myocardial dysfunction. Moreover, it was found that the composite parameters of the TyG index and HbA1c exhibited a certain value for the identification of reduced GLS < 18%.

The correlation between heart failure and diabetes has been notably confirmed by epidemiological and clinical studies [15,16,17]. However, among diabetes-related complications, diabetic cardiomyopathy, as an "entity", remains poorly understood. An increasing number of studies have indicated a hidden subclinical period in diabetic cardiomyopathy, featuring subtle abnormalities in function and structure [18]. In this context, asymptomatic LV dysfunction, defined as abnormal diastolic or systolic function without clinically detectable heart disease, is frequently reported in T2DM patients, which is expected to be between 50 and 70% [19] and presented as LV systolic dysfunction in one-third of patients [20]. Recently, GLS has been adopted as a preferred indicator to evaluate global LV systolic function, considering the longitudinal subendocardial fibers as the most vulnerable fibers that are first damaged by metabolic disorders in the early stage of diabetic heart disease [21, 22]. Ernande et al. also proposed the presence of LV longitudinal dysfunction in T2DM patients with preserved LVEF but normal LV diastolic function, which was defined as GLS < 18% [23]. The specific mechanism of this disorder remains to be uncovered. Metabolic characterizations have indicated that impaired insulin metabolic signaling is a contributing pathophysiological abnormality associated with diabetic cardiomyopathy [3, 4].

To date, the standard estimation of insulin resistance, the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEGC) test, still requires diagnostic technology, which is expensive and is not available for basic-level hospital utilization. The TyG index, as an ideal surrogate of insulin resistance regardless of insulin treatment status, has been widely validated to be robustly related to cardiovascular events [24,25,26]. However, evidence on the validity of the TyG index on LV longitudinal myocardial function in those without prominent symptoms of heart failure is still not sufficient. Indeed, individuals with insulin resistance tend to develop systematic metabolic disorders, including dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension, which were also reported by the present study, as the highest quartile of the TyG index tended to be associated with a high prevalence of hypertension, poor blood glucose control and lipid levels. These interactions will significantly promote insulin resistance. Notably, these patients were more prone to suffering from reduced GLS than those in the lowest quartile. Subsequently, the multimodel logistics regression analysis demonstrated the independent association of a higher TyG index (ORs: 4.52 and 5.23 in the Q3 and Q4 groups compared with the Q1 group) with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction assessed by GLS < 18%. This result was consistent with the view of Ikonomidis et al., who reported that insulin resistance was related to GLS and resulted in LV longitudinal dysfunction in the immediate family of T2DM patients [27]. In fact, reduced coronary flow reserve has been shown to be a crucial determinant of LV longitudinal subendocardial myocardial fiber deformation. In addition, insulin resistance may induce myocardial injury through various other mechanisms, including oxidative stress, fibrosis, autonomic nervous dysfunction and inefficient energy metabolism [28, 29]. Accordingly, the TyG index may serve as the contributing reference for detecting cardiac involvement at a relatively earlier stage of diabetic heart disease.

In a study with a large cohort followed for 10 years, Sánchez-Íñigo et al. first proposed a positive correlation of the TyG index (AUC: 0.708) with heart events [30]. Similarly, the ROC curve plotted here indicated the clinical validity of the TyG index (AUC: 0.678) for reduced GLS. More interestingly, compared to HbA1c and the composite index, the TyG index with a cutoff value of 9.6 showed the highest sensitivity but the lowest specificity in predicting subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. This finding is in agreement with previous studies in which insulin resistance has been recognized as both a pathogenic trigger and a predictor of cardiovascular events [10]. Moreover, the AUC of the TyG index binding to HbA1c (AUC: 0.770) observed in this study provided an incremental predictive value for poor cardiac outcomes. Despite the absence of an absolute illustration of the underlying mechanisms of this relationship, it has been determined that the TyG index represents the combined effect of "glycotoxicity" and "lipid toxicity", which prominently contribute to the reduced endocardial collateral flow density and the impaired coronary microcirculation in patients with T2DM [4, 31]. Consequently, it is not unexpected to observe systemic lipid disturbances, including elevated total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and apolipoproteins in the present study, which in turn evoke oxidative stress and inflammation, with the potential to elicit lipotoxic cardiomyopathy [32]. These pathologies further support the triggering role of insulin resistance in the early initiation of myocardial function changes in diabetic patients, such as hyperglycemia and dysfunction of lipid oxidation and utilization [33].

Study strengths and limitations

Previous studies have mostly focused on patients with existing symptoms of heart failure. In contrast, more emphasis was placed on early attention to the LV subclinical phase of T2DM patients in the present study. The relatively time-consuming requirement, high cost, and professional features of speckle tracking echocardiography and the accumulated training to perform effective measurement and analysis may limit its application in daily clinical practice for general diabetes physicians without enough experience with this technique. As stated above, the hyperglycemia elicited by insulin resistance activates the cascade of diabetic heart dysfunction, which induces metabolic disorders, followed by endothelial dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [34, 35]. HEGC has been confirmed to be closely related to poor prognosis in type 2 diabetes, exerting a praisable validity for the prevention and treatment of those patients. However, the complex operation and uneconomical test limit its wide availability in clinical practice. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is considered another preferential index, which requires the measurement of fasting insulin. Because of the absence of a standardized method for insulin measurement or the recognized cutoff value, it is relatively difficult to apply in primary hospitals. Promisingly, the TyG index has been validated as a more accurate novel measurement of insulin resistance compared to HOMA⁃IR [36]. More prominently, this index is available and inexpensive in reality. The outcomes of this study demonstrated the validity of the TyG index to assist clinicians in screening people at high risk of cardiovascular events, exerting a more prominent role in the prevention and intervention of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Thus, it is recommended to perform punctual monitoring of the TyG index as soon as possible. For people in the T2DM population with a high TyG index in particular, metabolic disorders are suggested to be controlled earlier, and advanced hypoglycemic medicines for cardiovascular protection should be administered to effectively avoid and delay the occurrence and development of diabetic heart disease and ultimately bring clinical benefits to patients.

The limitations of this study should also be considered. First, as a result of the cross-sectional study, the specific causal relationship of the TyG index with reduced GLS remains unclear. Second, not all patients without coronary artery disease have undergone invasive coronary angiography. Third, despite the analysis on the medication of the patients, the underlying contributions of medications for lipid-lowering and LV function improvements failed to be controlled in this study. Fourth, insulin resistance parameters were not analyzed in this study. Last, covariates involved in the multivariable regression models were taken as potential confounders based on previous studies [37, 38] or their biological plausibility, which partly limits the further application of the research findings.


In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a close relationship between an elevated TyG index and decreased GLS, which could be adopted as a sensitive and practical index to predict subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. Therefore, the TyG index should be punctually monitored for T2DM patients with preserved LVEF, which is expected to effectively identify the occurrence of diabetic heart disease and delay its development.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Triglyceride glucose


Left ventricular ejection fraction


Type 2 diabetes mellitus


Global longitudinal strain




Body mass index


Systolic blood pressure


Diastolic blood pressure


Glycosylated hemoglobin


Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio


Left ventricular fractional shortening

E peak:

Early diastolic blood flow velocity

A peak:

Late diastolic blood flow velocity

E' peak:

Early diastolic mitral annulus motion velocity


Two-dimensional speck-tracking echocardiography


Area under the curve


Receiver operating characteristic


Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp


Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance


  1. Tan Y, Zhang Z, Zheng C, Wintergerst KA, Keller BB, Cai L. Mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy and potential therapeutic strategies: preclinical and clinical evidence. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:585–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson LR, Gropler RJ. Metabolic and Molecular Imaging of the Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2020;126:1628–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia G, Whaley-Connell A, Sowers JR. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: a hyperglycaemia- and insulin-resistance-induced heart disease. Diabetologia. 2018;61:21–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jia G, Demarco VG, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:144–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faden G, Faganello G, De Feo S, Berlinghieri N, Tarantini L, Di Lenarda A, et al. The increasing detection of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without overt cardiac disease: data from the SHORTWAVE study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;101:309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Minciună IA, Hilda Orășan O, Minciună I, Lazar AL, Sitar-Tăut AV, Oltean M, et al. Assessment of subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy by speckle-tracking imaging. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51:e13475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, et al. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dikaiakou E, Vlachopapadopoulou EA, Paschou SA, Athanasouli F, Panagiotopoulos Ι, Kafetzi M, et al. Τriglycerides-glucose (TyG) index is a sensitive marker of insulin resistance in Greek children and adolescents. Endocrine. 2020;70:58–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sánchez-García A, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez R, Mancillas-Adame L, González-Nava V, Díaz González-Colmenero A, Solis RC, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Triglyceride and Glucose Index for Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review. Int J Endocrinol. 2020;2020:4678526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tao LC, Xu JN, Wang TT, Hua F, Li JJ. Triglyceride-glucose index as a marker in cardiovascular diseases: landscape and limitations. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.e14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ernande L, Bergerot C, Girerd N, Thibault H, Davidsen ES, Gautier Pignon-Blanc P, et al. Longitudinal myocardial strain alteration is associated with left ventricular remodeling in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:479–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P, et al. Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: definition of normal range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:80–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenny HC, Abel ED. Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circ Res. 2019;124:121–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mchugh K, Devore AD, Wu J, Matsouaka RA, Fonarow GC, Heidenreich PA, et al. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Diabetes: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:602–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jankauskas SS, Kansakar U, Varzideh F, Wilson S, Mone P, Lombardi A, et al. Heart failure in diabetes. Metabolism. 2021;125:154910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Falcão-Pires I, Leite-Moreira AF. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: understanding the molecular and cellular basis to progress in diagnosis and treatment. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17:325–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Natali A, Nesti L, Fabiani I, Calogero E, Di Bello V. Impact of empagliflozin on subclinical left ventricular dysfunctions and on the mechanisms involved in myocardial disease progression in type 2 diabetes: rationale and design of the EMPA-HEART trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cioffi G, Giorda CB, Chinali M, Di Lenarda A, Faggiano P, Lucci D, et al. Analysis of midwall shortening reveals high prevalence of left ventricular myocardial dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus: the DYDA study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19:935–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikonomidis I, Tzortzis S, Triantafyllidi H, Parissis J, Papadopoulos C, Venetsanou K, et al. Association of impaired left ventricular twisting-untwisting with vascular dysfunction, neurohumoral activation and impaired exercise capacity in hypertensive heart disease. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:1240–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dillmann WH. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2019;124:1160–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ernande L, Bergerot C, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Thibault H, Pignonblanc PG, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: is it really the first marker of diabetic cardiomyopathy? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1268-75.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garofolo M, Gualdani E, Scarale MG, Bianchi C, Aragona M, Campi F, et al. Insulin Resistance and Risk of Major Vascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes: A 10-Year Follow-up Study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:e139–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Laakso M, Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia in cardiovascular disease development. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lebovitz HE. Insulin resistance–a common link between type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8:237–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ikonomidis I, Pavlidis G, Lambadiari V, Kousathana F, Varoudi M, Spanoudi F, et al. Early detection of left ventricular dysfunction in first-degree relatives of diabetic patients by myocardial deformation imaging: The role of endothelial glycocalyx damage. Int J Cardiol. 2017;233:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao CT, Wang M, Siu CW, Hou YL, Wang T, Tse HF, et al. Myocardial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: role of endothelial progenitor cells and oxidative stress. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11:147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Witteles RM, Fowler MB. Insulin-resistant cardiomyopathy clinical evidence, mechanisms, and treatment options. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:93–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sánchez-Íñigo L, Navarro-González D, Fernández-Montero A, Pastrana-Delgado J, Martínez JA. The TyG index may predict the development of cardiovascular events. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46:189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adameova A, Dhalla NS. Role of microangiopathy in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19:25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakamura M, Sadoshima J. Cardiomyopathy in obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes. J Physiol. 2020;598:2977–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pan Y, Zhong S, Zhou K, Tian Z, Chen F, Liu Z, et al. Association between Diabetes Complications and the Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:8757996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. El Hayek MS, Ernande L, Benitah JP, Gomez AM, Pereira L. The role of hyperglycaemia in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;114:748–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Avagimyan A, Popov S, Shalnova S. The Pathophysiological Basis of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Development. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022;47:101156.

  36. Son DH, Lee HS, Lee YJ, Lee JH, Han JH. Comparison of triglyceride-glucose index and HOMA-IR for predicting prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;32:596–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mochizuki Y, Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, Sano H, Toki H, Shimoura H, et al. Clinical features of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamauchi Y, Tanaka H, Yokota S, Mochizuki Y, Yoshigai Y, Shiraki H, et al. Effect of heart rate on left ventricular longitudinal myocardial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070839 to J.Z.) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi, China (2020JZ-31 to J.Z.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Yanyan Chen analyzed and wrote the manuscript. Jianfang Fu, Yi Wang, Ying Zhang and Min Shi performed the research. Cheng Wang, Mengying Li, Li Wang and Xiangyang Liu were responsible for data collection. Shengjun Ta and Zeping Li were responsible for statistical analysis. Liwen Liu, Xiaomiao Li and Jie Zhou were responsible for the overall guidance, the revisions and the administration of the article as a whole. All authors gave their final approval of the final version of the manuscript. Xiaomiao Li and Jie Zhou contributed equally to this work as cocorresponding authors. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaomiao Li or Jie Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University (No. XJLL -KY20222107).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Fu, J., Wang, Y. et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis 22, 35 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Triglyceride glucose index
  • Global longitudinal strain
  • Left ventricular systolic function
  • Insulin resistance