Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Free fatty acids and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are correlated with chronic inflammation in obesity

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 22, Article number: 93 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Obesity-related chronic inflammation is closely related to the ability of immune cells to adapt to the body’s needs, research has shown that excess FAs can further activate pro-inflammatory transcription factors in the nucleus by interacting with various receptors such as CD36 and TLR4, thereby affecting the inflammatory state of cells. However, how the profile of various fatty acids in the blood of obese individuals is associated with chronic inflammation remains unclear.

Objective

The biomarkers associated with obesity were identified from 40 fatty acids (FAs) in the blood, and analyze the relationship between the biomarkers and chronic inflammation. Furthermore, by analyzing the difference in the expression of CD36, TLR4 and NF-κB p65 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) between obese and standard weight people, understand that immunophenotype PBMC is associated with chronic inflammation.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited from the Yangzhou Lipan weight loss training camp from May 2020 to July 2020. The sample size was 52 individuals, including 25 in the normal weight group and 27 in the obesity group. Individuals with obesity and controls of normal weight were recruited to identify biomarkers associated with obesity from 40 fatty acids in the blood; correlation analysis was conducted between the screened potential biomarkers FAs and the chronic inflammation index hs-CRP to identify FA biomarkers associated with chronic inflammation. Changes in the fatty acid receptor CD36, inflammatory receptor TLR4, and inflammatory nuclear transcription factor NF-κB p65 in PBMC subsets were used to further test the relationship between fatty acids and the inflammatory state in individuals with obesity.

Results

23 potential FA biomarkers for obesity were screened, eleven of the potential obesity biomarkers were also significantly related to hs-CRP. Compared to the control group, in monocytes the obesity group expressed higher TLR4, CD36, and NF-κB p65 in lymphocytes, the obesity group expressed higher TLR4 and CD36; and in granulocytes the obesity group expressed higher CD36.

Conclusion

Blood FAs are associated with obesity and are associated with chronic inflammation through increased CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in monocytes.

Introduction

In the past 40 years, obesity and related diseases have increased dramatically, and 39% and 13% of adults worldwide are now overweight and obese [1]. Obesity is related to the risk of type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver, cardiovascular disease, tumors, and other diseases [2, 3]. Chronic inflammation plays a key role in the occurrence and development of obesity-related diseases [4, 5]. Understanding the mechanisms involved in obesity-related chronic inflammation is critical for prevention of obesity-related diseases.

Chronic inflammation is closely related to the ability of immune cells to adapt to the body’s needs [6, 7]. When nutrition is sufficient or energy is in surplus, the body accumulates energy, and immune cells react to this by altering their activity [8]. Thus, energy accumulation is closely related to obesity-related chronic inflammation. From the perspective of energy accumulation, excess energy is readily converted into fatty acids (FAs), which are synthesized into triglycerides and stored in adipose tissue. Despite the fact that fatty tissue has the capability to store triglycerides, its capacity to do so is constrained. The adipose tissue of obese individuals contains excessive triglycerides, resulting in a limited ability to absorb further FAs, resulting in an “overflow” into the blood, and higher concentrations of circulating FAs [9]. These FA changes not only offer potential biomarkers but also modulate the body’s immune function.

High concentrations of FAs in the blood cause ectopic fat accumulation in non-fat organs that harm health and trigger chronic inflammation by stimulating immune cells [10]. There are many kinds of FAs in the blood, including saturated FAs, monounsaturated FAs, polyunsaturated FAs, and others. FAs have different functions that are related to their chemical structure. For example, long-chain saturated FAs can cause an inflammatory activation in cultured mononuclear macrophages [11], while polyunsaturated FAs have anti-inflammatory effects [12]. Changes in the content of various blood FAs affect the physiological function of the body [13]. However, how the profile of various fatty acids in the blood of obese individuals is associated with chronic inflammation remains unclear [14]. Understanding these relationships would help guide the development of targeted interventions for obesity-related chronic inflammation and the subsequent prevention of related diseases.

This study hypothesized that high concentrations of FAs in the blood are related to chronic inflammation, and immunophenotype peripheral of PBMC involved in obesity related chronic inflammation. The biomarkers associated with obesity were identified from 40 fatty acids in the blood, and analyze the relationship between the biomarkers and chronic inflammation. Furthermore, by analyzing the difference in the expression of CD36, TLR4 and NF-κB p65 in PBMC between obese and standard weight people, understand that immunophenotype PBMC is associated with chronic inflammation.

Materials and methods

Participants

Participants were recruited from the Yangzhou Lipan weight loss training camp from May 2020 to July 2020. Participants were divided into a normal weight group or obesity group. All participants were aged 18–45 years. Individuals in the normal weight group were required to have a BMI of 18.5–23.9, while the obesity group had a BMI of ≥ 28 (The Chinese BMI criteria [15, 16]). We excluded individuals with inflammatory events, infectious diseases, long-term medication, hypertension, diabetes, professional physical training, and sports contraindications. During training, the health records of the participants were obtained. This study was approved by Fujian Normal University with clinical trial registration number ChiCTR2200058959. The participants signed an informed consent form.

Outcome measures

We collected basic demographic information (name, gender, age, height, weight, and health history [physical examination, disease, medication, and sports injury]), BMI, blood lipid and chronic inflammation indicators, blood fatty acid content, and the expression of PBMC subsets surface receptor CD36, inflammatory receptor TLR4, and inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB p65.

The blood lipids of interested included total cholesterol (TC), total glyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC). We also measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of chronic inflammation. Blood was collected from volunteers on an empty stomach at 7:00–8:00 in the morning the day after they joined the camp (fasting from 22:00). 5ml of blood was collected from a vein in the antecubital fossa using a vacuum tube containing a serum gel separator. The blood coagulated at room temperature for 30 min, was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and extract supernatant (serum) was stored in Sterile centrifuge tube, stored at 4 °C. The serum samples were submitted to Nanjing Aidikang Medical Laboratory Center on the same day for analyses of TC, TG, HDLC, LDLC, and hs-CRP.

The concentrations of C4:0, C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C11:0, C12:0, C13:0, C14:0, C14:1N5, C15:1N5, C15:0, C16:1N7, C16:0, C17:1N7, C17:0, C18:1TN9, C18:1N9, C18:2TTN6, C18:3N6, C18:3N3, C18:0, C20:1N9, C20:2N6. C20:0, C20:3N6, C20:4N6, C20:3N3, C21:0, C22:0, C23:0, C24:0, C20:5N3, C22:2N6, C22:1N9, C22:4N6, C22:5N6, C22:5N3, C22:6N3, C24:1N9 (The fatty acids corresponding to the abbreviations are shown in Supplementary Table 1) in the serum samples were tested by an Agilent 7890/5975 C gas mass spectrometer (Agilent, USA). Total saturated fatty acids (SFA) were the sum of SFAs. Total monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) was the sum of MUFAs. Total polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) was the sum of PUFAs. Total-N3 was the sum of N3PUFAs. Total-N6 was the sum of N6PUFAs. FA concentrations were determined by Applied Protein Technology (APTBIO).

CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in PBMC subsets were tested by flow cytometry. The volunteers provided fasting blood as outlined previously into a heparin sodium tube, this was preserved at 4 °C, and PBMCs were extracted within 2 h.

CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 staining and flow cytometry was as follows. NF-κB p65 Fluorescent labeled antibody was purchased from CST, NF-κB p65 (D14E12) XP Rabbit mAb (Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugate), CD36 fluorescent labeled antibody was purchased from Biogene (APC anti human CD36 Antibody), TLR4 was purchased from BD bioscience (Hu TLR4 (CD284) PE TF901), and erythrocyte lysate, permeabilizing buffer, and fixative were purchased from Shanghai Yisheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

CD36 and TLR4 were stained in 100 µL of cell suspension with 5µL of fluorescent-labeled antibody in the dark at 4 °C for 15 min, centrifuged 5 min at 500 g, washed with PBS once, and resuspended in PBS for analysis. NF-κB p65 was stained in the fixed and permeabilized cell suspension (350µL of 4 °C fixative buffer, washed and centrifuged as above, 1ml of permeabilizing buffer at room temperature for 10 min, washed) in 70 µl of permeabilizing buffer with 1.5 µl of NF-κB p65 antibody in the dark for 30 min, washed and resuspended as above. Data were acquired on a BD FACS Aria III (APC on FL4, PE on FL2, and NF- κB-FITC on FL1) and analyzed with Flowjo 10.6.2 software. Gating was for single cells (forward scatter, FSC and side scatter, SSC), then using FSC-a vs. FSC-h, the mononuclear cells were selected while doublets were excluded. Based on cell size and granularity, the granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes were gated [17]. Subgrouped cell populations were then tested for TLR4-PE, CD36-APC, and NF-κB p65-FITC signals, with gating for positive expression being set above unstained control cells, and percentages of negative and positive populations were then recorded. The percentage of CD36 or TLR4, or NF-κB p65 positive cells was determined by calculating the difference between the percentage of positive cells in the test vial and that in the control vial.

Statistical analysis

The screening of potential biomarkers of obesity was completed by SIMCA-P 14.1 software. The fatty acid content data matrix was imported into SIMCA-P 14.1 software for unsupervised principal components analysis (PCA) and supervised orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) [18]; the principal component with the largest contribution to inter-group variability was identified through the OPLS-DA model. The permutation experiment and CV-ANOVA method further verified the validity of the model. If the R2Y and Q2 values of the model after random permutation were both less than the model values, the actual model was deemed to be valid. The CV-ANOVA gain at P < 0.05 indicated that the model was established successfully. The variable importance in projection (VIP) of each fatty acid variable was obtained according to the OPLS-DA model analysis, and the potential biomarkers were screened by using VIP > 1.0 as the standard [19]. The VIP of fatty acid > 1.0, and the mean comparison of fatty acid content between the obesity group and the normal weight group (P < 0.05) were used as the criteria for screening potential biomarkers of obesity.

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared by independent samples t-tests. Statistical Package R (The R Foundation, version 3.1.2) and Empower (R) were used for these analyses. P < 0.05 and p < 0.01 indicate statistically significant differences.

Evaluation of sample size

The discriminant analysis model was used to estimate the required study sample size. We determined that at n = 50, the specificity and sensitivity of discrimination could reach 0.85 [20]. The actual sample size was 52 individuals, including 25 (male:60%) in the normal weight group and 27 (male: 59.26%) in the obesity group, which meets the sample size requirements.

Results

Study population characteristics

25 control individuals (normal weight group) and 27 obese individuals (Obesity group) were enrolled. Study participant clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in age or height between the normal weight and the obesity group. There were significant differences in weight, BMI, TC, TG, HDLC, LDLC, and hs-CRP between the two groups.

Table 1 Participant characteristics by study group. Significant differences are indicated in bold
Full size table

Fatty acid concentrations in blood

The concentration of fatty acids is shown in Table 2. This study found no compared differences in serum C10:0, C12:0, C18:3N6, C20:0, C22:1N9, C22:2N6, C23:0, or C24:0 between the two groups, but the concentration of other 31 FAs, total SFA, total MUFA, total PUFA, total N3, and total N6 were higher in the obesity group compared to the normal weigh group.

Table 2 Comparison of blood FAs by group. Significant differences, VIP > 1 are indicated in bold and reflect potential obesity biomarkers
Full size table

Obesity accompanied by high concentrations of free fatty acids in blood

Potential biomarkers of obesity were screened. The FAs in the two groups were analyzed by PCA. It can be seen from the PCA score chart that FAs in the obese and normal weight groups were well differentiated in the chart (Supplementary Fig. 1-a), suggesting that there were variations in the profiles of fatty acids between the two groups.

By analyzing the score plot of the OPLS-DA model (Supplementary Fig. 1-b), it can be seen that the FA scores of the obese and normal weight groups are clustered, with perfect separation, no overlap, and almost no crossover, Q2 = 0.49 > 0.4, R2Y = 0.713, which shows that the model has good goodness of fit and predictive power.

The CV-ANOVA analysis results showed that the OPLS-DA model was significant (P < 0.01). The random array experiment carried out 200 array experiments on the model [21]. After the random array, the R2Y and Q2 values of the OPLS-DA model were smaller than the actual model values (Supplementary Fig. 1-c), which shows that the model was effective.

The VIP value of each FA obtained by the OPLS-DA model and the difference test results of the average fatty acid content between the two groups are shown in Table 2. Among many FAs, the following conditions were required when screening potential biomarkers of obesity: in the OPLS-DA model, the contribution index VIP of fatty acid evaluation and discrimination effectiveness is > 1.0 and there is a significant difference in the mean value of fatty acid content between the two groups. In this study, C17:1N7, C15:0, C17:0, C14:0, C18:2N6, C20:2N6, C18:1N9, C16:0, C16:1N7, C20:5N3, C15:1N5, C18:0, C22:0, C22:5N3, C13:0, C24:1N9, C22:6N3, C22:4N6, C20:1N9, total PUFA, total SFA, total MUFA, and total N3 all met these requirements.

The relationship between potential biomarkers and chronic inflammation

This study used hs-CRP as an indicator of chronic inflammation and analyzed its relationship with FAs, found that C20:4N6, C15:1N5, C18:1N9, C11:0, C20:5N3, C16:0, total SFA, total-N6, C13:0, C18:0, C24:1N9, C21:0, C22:0, C22:4N6, C17:1N7, and C24:0 significantly related to hs-CRP (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between fatty acids and hs-CRP
Full size table

Based on these data, this study found that C17:1N7, C18:1N9, C16:0, C20:5N3, C15:1N5, C18:0, C22:0, C13:0, C24:1N9, C22:4N6, and total SFA are possible bridges that connect obesity and chronic inflammation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intersection between potential biomarkers of obesity and fatty acids related to chronic inflammation

Full size image

Expression of CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in PBMC subsets

To further understand the relationship between FAs and chronic inflammation, nine individuals from the normal weight group and the obesity group were respectively randomly selected for exploratory research. Peripheral blood was collected to obtain PBMCs, and the expression of CD36, TLR4 (Fig. 2), and NF-κB p65 (Supplementary Fig. 2) in PBMC subsets (monocytes, lymphocytes, and granulocytes) was analyzed by flow cytometry.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gating strategy. (a and b) Gating for single cells, (c) identification of PBMC subsets based on size and granularity, (d) quantification of CD36, TLR4 signals in each cell subtype with positivity determined based on an unstained sample, and (e) proportion of TLR4 and CD36 positive monocytes in obesity and standard weight, red: obesity group, green: normal weight group

Full size image

This study found that (Table 4), compared to the normal weight group, the obesity group expressed higher TLR4, CD36, and NF-κB p65 in monocytes; the obesity group expressed higher TLR4 and CD36 in lymphocytes; and the obesity group expressed higher CD36 in granulocytes.

Table 4 The percentage of CD36 or TLR4, or NF-κB p65 positive cells in PBMC subset (%)
Full size table

Discussion

Chronic inflammation severity is related to higher blood FAs in obese individuals

FAs provide a sensitive index of disordered lipid metabolism [22]. Blood FAs include non-esterified FAs and esterified FAs bound to triglycerides. Blood FAs are composed of exogenous FAs from dietary sources and endogenous FAs synthesized in the body. Many diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, tumors, and metabolic diseases, can show abnormal FAs profiles in the blood [23,24,25]. Our study shows that 31 FAs, total SFA, total PUFA, total MUFA, total N3, and total N6 are higher in obese individuals (Table 2). With the high fat and energy intake, once FAs are utilized to maintain physiological function, the surplus remains in the circulation resulting in higher measurable FA concentrations. As such, blood FAs are potential biomarkers of obesity.

We utilized Agilent 7890/5975 C gas mass spectrometer (Agilent, USA) to detect 39 out of our target 40 FAs (C4:0 was not detected) in serum. Potential biomarkers associated with obesity were identified including C17:1N7, C15:0, C17:0, C14:0, C18:2N6, C20:2N6, C18:1N9, C16:0, C16:1N7, C20:5N3, C15:1N5, C18:0, C22:0, C22:5N3, C13:0, C24:1N9, C22:6N3 C22:4N6, C20:1N9, total PUFA, total SFA, total MUFA, and total-N3, through PCA and OPLS-DA statistical strategies. These markers include SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs.

When basic physiological requirements are fulfilled, excess energy is stored in the form of fat that ultimately increases body size and weight. We show that both protective and harmful FA concentrations are increased in obese individuals. This suggests that during energy surplus, FAs are stored without preference for their function and their abundance is reflected in a higher blood FA concentration. In addition to reflecting the energy surplus, high blood FA concentrations also play other roles, specifically in chronic inflammation.

This study screened FAs as a potential biomarker of obesity and correlated them with hs-CRP, a chronic inflammatory marker, found that C17:1N7, C18:1N9, C16:0, C20:5N3, C15:1N5, C18:0, C22:0, C13:0, C24:1N9, C22:4N6, and total SFA were both potential biomarkers of obesity and significantly associated with chronic inflammation. These FAs may partly explain the relationship between obesity and chronic inflammation. Obese individuals have rich fat stores. When excess fat cannot enter lipid droplets, it results in a chronic increase in blood FAs. The correlation between FAs and chronic inflammation can be analyzed from the fatty acid receptors on the surface of cells and inflammatory transcription factors in the nucleus [26]. Research has shown that excess FAs can further activate pro-inflammatory transcription factors in the nucleus by interacting with various receptors such as CD36 [27] and TLR4 [28], thereby affecting the inflammatory state of cells. However, the influence of FAs on cellular inflammatory pathways may differ among different cells [7]. This study starts with the inflammatory phenotype of PBMC cell subpopulations and analyzes the impact of fatty acids on cellular inflammatory signaling pathways.

Increased FAs were associated with increased CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in monocytes in obese individuals

The proinflammatory effects of blood FAs can be determined by assessing for immune cell phenotype differences. The entry of FAs, especially long-chain FAs, into cells requires the coordination of cell surface receptors. CD36 is a scavenger receptor with a high affinity for long-chain FAs, which can help cell internalization of FAs. Increases in its expression are closely related to high concentrations of FAs [29,30,31]. Moreover, CD36 has a variety of ligands and signal transduction capabilities and can participate in inflammation [32, 33].

TLR4 is an immune-related cell surface receptor that can link excess nutrition with inflammation. CD36 participates in TLR4-dependent inflammatory responses induced by various ligands [34,35,36]. CD36 plays an important role in helping TLR4 recognize LPS, ox LDLC, long-chain fatty acids, and other ligands to transmit signals to cells [37]. When TLR4 recognizes ligand transmission signals on the cell surface, CD36 can form a polymer with TLR4 through tyrosine kinase to amplify the downstream proinflammatory signal pathway [38, 39]. MyD88, TRIF downstream of TLR4 is activated to promote the expression and secretion of the NF-κB p65 inflammatory pathway [40, 41]. Changes in CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 expression are related to high concentrations of extracellular FAs.

This study showed that the blood concentrations of FAs were higher in the obesity group and that this was related to chronic inflammatory. However, the relationship between the pro-inflammatory effect of fatty acid receptors on immune cells and obesity requires further investigation. In this study, we randomly selected 9 participants to explore the differences in PBMC inflammatory phenotypes between obese and non-obesity group, find that CD36 and TLR4 were increased on the surface of lymphocytes and granulocytes in the obesity group, but this was not associated with changes in intracellular NF-κB p65. On the other hand, in monocytes, increases in CD36 and TLR4 were associated with increased NF-κB p65 in the cells. Changes in CD36 and TLR4 on monocytes may lead to the secondary signal transductions that activate NF-κB p65, increasing the expression of downstream inflammatory genes, a pro-inflammatory cell phenotype, the promotion of chronic inflammation.

The mechanisms of obesity-associated chronic inflammation are complex, and currently tissue hypoxia, oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, insulin resistance, and gut microbial changes are among the pathways that can explain obesity-associated chronic inflammation [42]. This study synthesized multiple mechanisms mentioned above and found that most of them are related to energy metabolism and immune cell function. Therefore, the relationship between changes in energy metabolism and the pro-inflammatory state of immune cells in obese individuals may be an important idea to understand the mechanisms of obesity-associated chronic inflammation [43]. This study found that high concentrations of fatty acids, potential markers of obesity, in the blood of obese individuals may be responsible for chronic inflammation, while different immune phenotypes of PBMC cell subpopulations may be a potential mechanism chronic inflammation induced by obesity. The present study analyzed the potential mechanism from the perspective of the relationship between energy accumulation and immune cells, however, its molecular mechanism needs to be investigated in depth.

Comparisons with other studies and what does the current work add to the existing knowledge

Among the 23 potential biomarkers of obesity, 11 biomarkers were also significantly associated with chronic inflammation, including C17:1N7, C18:1N9, C16:0, C20:5N3, C15:1N5, C18:0, C22:0, C13:0, C24:1N9, C22:4N6, and total SFA.

Study strengths and limitations

This pilot study’s strength lies in its novel and interesting findings, but its main limitation is the small sample size. Since the study is observational, it’s only possible to establish a correlation between fatty acids, immune phenotypes of PBMC and chronic inflammation based on correlation analyses or difference comparisons. Therefore, it’s essential to conduct larger prospective trials in the future to establish potential causality.

Conclusions

23 potential biomarkers of obesity were identified by screening for serum fatty acids. These biomarkers were more highly concentrated in obese individuals. Within a certain range, the concentrations of these potential biomarkers were associated with increases in obesity. Among the 23 potential biomarkers of obesity, 11 biomarkers were also significantly associated with chronic inflammation. The high expression of CD36, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in monocytes may be involved in chronic inflammation caused by obesity. In the future, additional studies must be conducted in larger populations, with primary endpoints based on clinical events, to determine whether estimated blood lipid profiles and immune phenotypes of PBMC subsets can be used widely in the clinical care of patients with obesity.

Data Availability

The datasets are available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Romieu I, Dossus L, Barquera S, Blottiere HM, Franks PW, Gunter M, Hwalla N, Hursting SD, Leitzmann M, Margetts B, et al. Energy balance and obesity: what are the main drivers? Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28:247–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z, Aguilar EG, Luna JI, Dunai C, Khuat LT, Le CT, Mirsoian A, Minnar CM, Stoffel KM, Sturgill IR, et al. Paradoxical effects of obesity on T cell function during tumor progression and PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Nat Med. 2019;25:141–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quan M, Xun P, Wu H, Wang J, Cheng W, Cao M, Zhou T, Huang T, Gao Z, Chen P. Effects of interrupting prolonged sitting on postprandial glycemia and insulin responses: a network meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10:419–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu L, Li Y, Du C, Zhao W, Zhang H, Yang Y, Sun A, Song X, Feng Z. Pattern recognition receptor-mediated chronic inflammation in the development and progression of obesity-related metabolic Diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:5271295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva Borges D, Fernandes R, Thives Mello A, da Silva Fontoura E, Soares Dos Santos AR. Santos de Moraes Trindade EB: Prebiotics may reduce serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and ghrelin in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2020;78:235–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaber T, Strehl C, Buttgereit F. Metabolic regulation of inflammation. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13:267–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mogilenko DA, Haas JT, L’Homme L, Fleury S, Quemener S, Levavasseur M, Becquart C, Wartelle J, Bogomolova A, Pineau L, et al. Metabolic and innate Immune Cues merge into a specific inflammatory response via the UPR. Cell. 2019;177:1201–1216e1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Widenmaier SB, Snyder NA, Nguyen TB, Arduini A, Lee GY, Arruda AP, Saksi J, Bartelt A, Hotamisligil GS. NRF1 is an ER membrane sensor that is central to cholesterol homeostasis. Cell. 2017;171:1094–1109e1015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bickerton AS, Roberts R, Fielding BA, Hodson L, Blaak EE, Wagenmakers AJ, Gilbert M, Karpe F, Frayn KN. Preferential uptake of dietary fatty acids in adipose tissue and muscle in the postprandial period. Diabetes. 2007;56:168–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedenreich CM, Ryder-Burbidge C, McNeil J. Physical activity, obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms. Mol Oncol 2020.

  11. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. Immunology. Neutrophil-macrophage communication in inflammation and atherosclerosis. Science. 2015;349:237–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghasemi Darestani N, Bahrami A, Mozafarian MR, Esmalian Afyouni N, Akhavanfar R, Abouali R, Moradian A, Lorase S. Association of Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake on inflammatory gene expression and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14.

  13. Tvrzicka E, Kremmyda LS, Stankova B, Zak A. Fatty acids as biocompounds: their role in human metabolism, health and disease–a review. Part 1: classification, dietary sources and biological functions. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011;155:117–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravaut G, Légiot A, Bergeron KF, Mounier C. Monounsaturated fatty acids in obesity-related inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 22.

  15. Zhou BF. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in chinese adults–study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2002;15:83–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan XF, Wang L, Pan A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:373–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coen PM, Flynn MG, Markofski MM, Pence BD, Hannemann RE. Adding exercise to rosuvastatin treatment: influence on C-reactive protein, monocyte toll-like receptor 4 expression, and inflammatory monocyte (CD14 + CD16+) population. Metabolism. 2010;59:1775–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muhsen Ali A, Burleigh M, Daskalaki E, Zhang T, Easton C, Watson DG. Metabolomic profiling of Submaximal Exercise at a standardised relative intensity in healthy adults. Metabolites 2016, 6.

  19. Zhao L, Ni Y, Su M, Li H, Dong F, Chen W, Wei R, Zhang L, Guiraud SP, Martin F-P, et al. High throughput and quantitative measurement of Microbial Metabolome by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry using automated Alkyl Chloroformate Derivatization. Anal Chem. 2017;89:5565–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Saccenti E, Timmerman ME. Approaches to sample size determination for Multivariate Data: applications to PCA and PLS-DA of Omics Data. J Proteome Res. 2016;15:2379–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi R, Zhang J, Fang B, Tian X, Feng Y, Cheng Z, Fu Z, Zhang J, Wu J. Runners’ metabolomic changes following marathon. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2020;17:19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cvijanovic N, Isaacs NJ, Rayner CK, Feinle-Bisset C, Young RL, Little TJ. Lipid stimulation of fatty acid sensors in the human duodenum: relationship with gastrointestinal hormones, BMI and diet. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41:233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Currie E, Schulze A, Zechner R, Walther TC, Farese RV. Jr.: Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 2013;18:153–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connell TD, Murphy KA, Zhang N, Puccini SJ, Healy CL, Harsch BA, Zhang MJ, Shearer GC. Signaling through free fatty acid receptor 4 attenuates Cardiometabolic Disease. Physiol (Bethesda). 2022;37:311–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Calder PC. Functional roles of fatty acids and their Effects on Human Health. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39:18s–32s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ringseis R, Eder K, Mooren FC, Kruger K. Metabolic signals and innate immune activation in obesity and exercise. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2015;21:58–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao L, Zhang C, Luo X, Wang P, Zhou W, Zhong S, Xie Y, Jiang Y, Yang P, Tang R, et al. CD36 palmitoylation disrupts free fatty acid metabolism and promotes tissue inflammation in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2018;69:705–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eguchi K, Manabe I. Toll-like receptor, lipotoxicity and chronic inflammation: the pathological link between obesity and cardiometabolic disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21:629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hong YP, Yu J, Su YR, Mei FC, Li M, Zhao KL, Zhao L, Deng WH, Chen C, Wang WX. High-Fat Diet Aggravates Acute Pancreatitis via TLR4-Mediated Necroptosis and Inflammation in Rats. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020, 2020:8172714.

  30. Pillon NJ, Azizi PM, Li YE, Liu J, Wang C, Chan KL, Hopperton KE, Bazinet RP, Heit B, Bilan PJ, et al. Palmitate-induced inflammatory pathways in human adipose microvascular endothelial cells promote monocyte adhesion and impair insulin transcytosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;309:E35–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan KL, Boroumand P, Milanski M, Pillon NJ, Bilan PJ, Klip A. Deconstructing metabolic inflammation using cellular systems. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017;312:E339–e347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pepino MY, Kuda O, Samovski D, Abumrad NA. Structure-function of CD36 and importance of fatty acid signal transduction in fat metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2014;34:281–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Luiken JJ, Chanda D, Nabben M, Neumann D, Glatz JF. Post-translational modifications of CD36 (SR-B2): implications for regulation of myocellular fatty acid uptake. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862:2253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Di Gioia M, Zanoni I. Toll-like receptor co-receptors as master regulators of the immune response. Mol Immunol. 2015;63:143–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rocha DM, Caldas AP, Oliveira LL, Bressan J, Hermsdorff HH. Saturated fatty acids trigger TLR4-mediated inflammatory response. Atherosclerosis. 2016;244:211–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim Y-C, Lee SE, Kim SK, Jang H-D, Hwang I, Jin S, Hong E-B, Jang K-S, Kim H-S. Toll-like receptor mediated inflammation requires FASN-dependent MYD88 palmitoylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:907–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rao X, Zhao S, Braunstein Z, Mao H, Razavi M, Duan L, Wei Y, Toomey AC, Rajagopalan S, Zhong J. Oxidized LDL upregulates macrophage DPP4 expression via TLR4/TRIF/CD36 pathways. EBioMedicine. 2019;41:50–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stewart CR, Stuart LM, Wilkinson K, van Gils JM, Deng J, Halle A, Rayner KJ, Boyer L, Zhong R, Frazier WA, et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wood LG, Li Q, Scott HA, Rutting S, Berthon BS, Gibson PG, Hansbro PM, Williams E, Horvat J, Simpson JL, et al. Saturated fatty acids, obesity, and the nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143:305–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciesielska A, Matyjek M, Kwiatkowska K. TLR4 and CD14 trafficking and its influence on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:1233–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin C, Wang H, Zhang M, Mustafa S, Wang Y, Li H, Yin H, Hutchinson MR, Wang X. TLR4 biased small molecule modulators. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;228:107918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mogilenko DA, Haas JT, L’Homme L, Fleury S, Quemener S, Levavasseur M, Becquart C, Wartelle J, Bogomolova A, Pineau L, et al. Metabolic and innate Immune Cues merge into a specific inflammatory response via the UPR. Cell. 2019;177:1201–1216e1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Billi AC, Gudjonsson JE. Overriding the Immune System’s Sweet tooth: fatty acids rile up innate immunity. Cell. 2019;177:1088–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.cn) for revising the manuscript and polishing the language.

Funding

The funded was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971099) and Jiangsu Federation of philosophy and Social Sciences(21WRA001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Lab of Aquatic Sports Training Monitoring and Intervention of General Administration of Sport of China, Physical Education College, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, 330022, Jiangxi, China

    Su Liqiang & Yang Yanan

  2. School of Sport Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China

    Li Fang-Hui

  3. School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China

    Quan Minghui

  4. Key Lab of Aquatic Sports Training Monitoring and Intervention of General Administration of Sport of China, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China

    Chen Haichun

Authors
  1. Su Liqiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Fang-Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Quan Minghui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Yanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chen Haichun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SL and CH designed the study;LF and QM was responsible for Collecting sample and testing indicators;SL, YY and LF performed the statistical; SL and CH contributed to interpreting the results; SL wrote the first manuscript draft; SL, CH, LF, QM, YY contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Haichun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The trial received ethical approval from Fujian Normal University and was assigned clinical trial registration number ChiCTR2200058959. The participants signed an informed consent form, and all the methods employed were conducted in compliance with the applicable Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12944_2023_1842_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1. Screening of potential biomarkers of obesity, (a) PCA (green: Normal weigh, blue: Obesity), (b) OPLS-DA (green: Normal weigh, blue: Obesity), (c) model of random array experiment (n: 200, green: R2, blue: Q2).

12944_2023_1842_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 2. Gating strategy. (a) use the control cells without antibody as the control, define the range of negative cells (NF- κB marked with FITC), (b) Proportion of NF-κB p65 positive monocytes in normal weight, and (c) Proportion of NF-κB p65 positive monocytes in obesity. PBMC subsets (Monocytes, Lymphocytes, Granulocytes) were determined by combining cell size and the number of cellular particles to determine their position, the gating strategy of NF-κB p65 is the same as that of CD36 and TLR4.

Supplementary Table 1. The fatty acids corresponding to the abbreviations.

Supplementary Material 4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liqiang, S., Fang-Hui, L., Minghui, Q. et al. Free fatty acids and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are correlated with chronic inflammation in obesity. Lipids Health Dis 22, 93 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-023-01842-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-023-01842-y

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X