Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Antiobesity and lipid-lowering effects of Bifidobacterium spp. in high fat diet-induced obese rats

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201110:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-116

©  An et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

  • Received: 20 May 2011
  • Accepted: 12 July 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have reported the preventive effects of probiotics on obesity. Among commensal bacteria, bifidobacteria is one of the most numerous probiotics in the mammalian gut and are a type of lactic acid bacteria. The aim of this study was to assess the antiobesity and lipid-lowering effects of Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from healthy Korean on high fat diet-induced obese rats.

Methods

Thirty-six male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups as follows: (1) SD group, fed standard diet; (2) HFD group, fed high fat diet; and (3) HFD-LAB group, fed high fat diet supplemented with LAB supplement (B. pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204, B. longum SPM 1205, and B. longum SPM 1207; 108 ~ 109 CFU). After 7 weeks, the body, organ, and fat weights, food intake, blood serum levels, fecal LAB counts, and harmful enzyme activities were measured.

Results

Administration of LAB reduced body and fat weights, blood serum levels (TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, glucose, leptin, AST, ALT, and lipase levels), and harmful enzyme activities (β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, and tryptophanase), and significantly increased fecal LAB counts.

Conclusion

These data suggest that Bifidobacterium spp. used in this study may have beneficial antiobesity effects.

Keywords

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Lactic Acid Bacterium
  • High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
  • Intestinal Microflora
  • Bifidobacterium Longum

Background

Obesity, a condition in which an abnormally large amount of fat is stored in the adipose tissue, resulting in an increase in body weight, is one of the major public health problems in the United States and other developed countries. In general, it is accepted that obesity results from disequilibrium between energy intake and expenditure [1], and this condition has a great impact on several metabolic and chronic ailments including heart disease, cancer, arthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes associated with insulin resistance [2]. To date, pharmacological treatments do not appear to be effective in producing sustained long-term weight loss [3]. Therefore, further research is needed to discover new drug therapies that can be used to reduce the prevalence of obesity.

Probiotics are defined as viable microbial dietary supplements that exert beneficial effects on host health [4]. Probiotics have attracted public attention because of their potential effectiveness for both the prevention and the treatment of immune diseases [5]. In addition, recent experimental studies have demonstrated the preventive effects of some bacterial strains on obesity. Among commensal bacteria, bifidobacteria are one of the most numerous probiotics in the mammalian gut and are a type of lactic acid bacteria. Bifidobacteria are widely used and well tolerated. In one study, a strain of Bifidobacterium longum exhibited a more significant effect in lowering serum total cholesterol than a mixed culture of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus (SL) both in rats and humans [6]. Another study found that in probiotic treated-mice, Bifidobacterium spp. significantly and positively correlated with improved glucose-tolerance, glucose-induced insulin-secretion, and normalized inflammatory tone (decreased endotoxemia, plasma and adipose tissue pro-inflammatory cytokine) [7]. Finally, VSL no. 3, a mixture of viable lyophilized bifidobacteria, lactobacilli and Streptococcus thermophilus, improved diet-induced obesity and its related hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance by increasing hepatic natural killer T-cells and reducing inflammatory signaling in mice [8]. These data suggest that some specific strains of bifidobacteria related to lipid metabolism and body weight may be potential therapeutic candidates for management of obesity.

In the present study, we used a LAB supplement of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204 (immuno-enhancement and anti-microbial effects) [9], Bifidobacterium longum SPM 1205 (inhibitory effect on harmful enzyme activities of intestinal microflora) [10], and Bifidobacterium longum SPM 1207 (hypocholesteremia effect) [11], and investigated the antiobesity and lipid-lowering effects of Bifidobacterium spp. on high fat diet-induced obese rats.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains used in this study

The culture media and methods used in this study for the isolation and identification of bacterial strains are shown in Table 1. For isolation of B. pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204, B. longum SPM 1205, and B. longum SPM 1207 used in this study, fecal samples from healthy Koreans (20-30 years old) were collected by BBL's anaerobic sample collection and transport system to maintain anaerobic conditions, and were used within 24 h. Fecal samples were serially diluted 10-fold from 10-1 to 10-8, and 0.1 ml was spread onto selective Blood Liver (BL) agar medium containing 5% sheep blood. After 48-h incubation in anaerobic conditions at 37°C, brown or reddish-brown colonies 2-3 mm in diameter were selected for further identification [12]. A fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase (F6PPK) test was performed [13] to ensure that the colonies selected were bifidobacteria. To identify the isolated Bifidobacterium spp. at the species level, 16S rRNA sequencing was performed by Bioleaders (Daejeon, Korea).
Table 1

Culture media and methods

Media

Main enumerated microorganisms

Incubation time (day)

Anaerobic culturea

  

BL agar mediumb

Predominant anaerobes

3

GAM agar mediumc

Bifidobacterium spp.

1-2

aCulture media were prepared and dispensed into Petri dishes on a clean bench. Dishes were stored in a bactron anaerobic chamber (Sheldon Manufacturing Inc., USA) containing 90% N2, 5% CO2 and 5% H2 until plating. A sample of each dilution was plated on each medium in an anaerobic glove box. Plated dishes were incubated in a bactron anaerobic chamber filled with CO2 gas. The presence of O2 was monitored with steel wool soaked in acidified copper sulfate solution.

bBL, Blood Liver (Nissui Pharm. Co. Ltd., Japan).

cGAM, General Anaerobic Medium (Nissui Pharm. Co. Ltd., Japan).

Animals and treatment

A total of 36 male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Central Lab Animal Inc. (Korea) at three weeks of age and fed a standard diet (AIN-76A #100000, Dyets Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) for 1 week to stabilize all metabolic conditions. Food and water were supplied ad libitum. Each cage contained two rats. The rats were exposed to a 12-h light/dark cycle and maintained at a constant temperature of 32 ± 2°C and humidity of 55 ± 5%. All animal experimentation was performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals approved by Sahmyook University. The rats were randomly selected and assigned to three groups (12 rats per group) according to the type of diet and test-material. As shown in Table 2, Group 1 SD was fed a standard diet and PBS (as control); Group 2 HFD was fed a high fat diet (40% beef tallow modified AIN-76A purified rodent diet #101556, Dyets Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) and PBS; and Group 3 HFD-LAB was fed a high fat diet and LAB (B. pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204, B. longum SPM 1205, and B. longum SPM 1207; 1:1:1 ratio) supplement. The composition of the experimental diet is shown in Table 3. All rats were acclimatized to the respective diets for a week before the experiment started. Then the rats were orally administered 0.2 ml of PBS or LAB (108 ~ 109 CFU) once a day for 5 weeks. Their body weight and food intake were measured daily.
Table 2

Feeding schedules used in the present study

Groups

Rats (n)

Food

Treatment (oral administration for 5 weeks)

SD

12

Standard Diet

0.2 ml of sterilized PBS

HFD

12

40% High Fat Diet

0.2 ml of sterilized PBS

HFD-LAB

12

40% High Fat Diet

0.2 ml of LAB (108 ~109 CFU) in sterilized PBS

Table 3

Compositions of experimental diet

 

Standard Diet

High Fat Diet

Ingredients

(AIN-76A diet #100000)

(AIN-76A diet #101556)

 

g

kcal

g

kcal

Casein

200

720

200

720

Beef tallow

0

0

400

3600

Methionine

3

12

3

12

Starch

150

540

150

540

Sucrose

500

2000

150

600

Cellulose

50

0

50

0

Corn oil

50

450

0

0

Salt mixture

35

30.8

35

30.8

Vitamin mixture

10

39

10

39

Choline bitartrate

2

0

2

0

Total

1000

3791.8

1000

5541.8

Analysis of blood serum and organ weight

At the end of the 7-week experimental period, blood samples from each rat were collected into tubes using cardiac puncture. The serum was separated from the blood by centrifugation at 3,500 rpm for 10 min. The total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride, glucose, leptin, alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (ALT) levels in the serum were analyzed by Korea Animal Medical Science Institute (Korea). Also, the fat (epididymal and retroperitoneal), liver, spleen and kidney were removed immediately after the sacrifice and weighed.

Measurement of α-amylase and lipase activities

The activities of α-amylase and lipase were measured with the α-Amylase Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, USA) and Lipase Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, USA), respectively.

Fecal sampling and bacteriological analysis

Fecal samples were collected from the rats weekly to determine the total LAB counts and harmful enzyme activities. Fecal samples were taken directly from the rectum by rectal stimulation and immediately transferred into sterile tubes and stored at 4°C.

Fecal samples (0.1 g) were suspended in 0.9 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8 containing 0.5% cysteine) by vortexing, and 0.1 ml was then serially diluted 10-fold from 10-1 to 10-7. 1 ml was then poured into selective General Anaerobic Medium (GAM) agar medium (Table 1). After 48 h of incubation under anaerobic conditions, colonies were counted as Bifidobacterium spp. [10]. The numbers of colony forming units (CFU) are expressed as log10 CFU per gram.

Harmful enzyme activities of intestinal microflora

The harmful activities of enzymes such as β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, tryptophanase, and urease of intestinal microflora related to colon cancer were tested in fecal samples of rats as previously described [14–16].

Assay of β-glucosidase activity

β-glucosidase activity was assayed in a 2-ml reaction mixture containing 0.8 ml of 2 mM p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside and 0.2 ml of enzyme solution (suspended fecal sample). The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37°C and then stopped by adding 1 ml of 0.5 N NaOH. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Enzyme activity was measured by monitoring absorbance at 405 nm.

Assay of β-glucuronidase activity

β-glucuronidase activity was assayed in a 2-ml reaction mixture consisting of 0.8 ml of 2 mM p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucuronide and 0.2 ml of the enzyme solution. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37°C and then stopped by adding 1 ml of 0.5 N NaOH. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Enzyme activity was measured by monitoring absorbance at 405 nm.

Assay of tryptophanase activity

Tryptophanase activity was assayed in a 2.5-ml reaction mixture consisting of 0.2 ml of complete reagent solution (2.75 mg of pyridoxal phosphate, 19.6 mg of disodium EDTA dihydrate, and 10 mg of bovine serum albumin in 100 ml of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5), 0.2 ml of 20 mM tryptophan, and 0.1 ml of the enzyme solution. The reaction was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then stopped by adding 2 ml of color reagent solution (14.7 g p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 52 ml H2SO4 and 948 ml 95% ethanol). The reaction mixture was then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Enzyme activity was measured by monitoring absorbance at 550 nm.

Assay of urease activity

Urease activity was assayed in a 0.5-ml reaction mixture consisting of 0.3 ml of urea substrate solution (4 mM urea in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) and 0.1 ml of the enzyme solution. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37°C and then stopped by adding 0.1 ml of 1 N (NH4)2SO4. Phenolnitroprusside reagent (1 ml) and alkaline hypochlorite reagent (NaClO, 1 ml) were added to the stopped reaction mixture and incubated for 20 min at 65°C. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Enzyme activity was measured by monitoring absorbance at 603 nm.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences among groups were determined using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (SAS ver. 8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Body weight, organ weight, fat weight, and food intake

The body weight of all groups was increased every week, especially that of the HFD fed groups compared to that of the SD group. The high fat diet promoted a significant increase in body weight over the seven-week period (Figure 1A). Differences in body weight among groups became noticeable at the fourth week of the diet and became significant after the seventh week. In the HFD-LAB group, significant differences occurred after seven weeks of age. At the end of the experiment, the gain in body weight was higher in the HFD group than in the HFD-LAB group (Figure 1B). The mean body weight increased by 315.86 ± 12.42 g in the SD group, 349.14 ± 29.14 g in the HFD group, and 339.70 ± 26.75 g in the HFD-LAB group. The average food intake of the HFD-fed groups was higher than that of the SD group, but did not differ between the HFD and HFD-LAB groups (Figure 1C). This indicates that the HFD-fed groups had similar caloric consumption. This is a clear sign that the high fat diet induced a profound accumulation of energy in the form of body fat, including epididymal and retroperitoneal fat masses (Table 4). In addition, spleen, kidney, and liver were weighed, but no significant differences were observed.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Effects of LAB during experimental periods. (A) Body weight, (B) Weight gain, and (C) Food intake. Data are presented as means and standard deviation.

Table 4

Weights of body, fat, spleen, kidney, and liver

 

SD

HFD

HFD-LAB

Body weight (g)

381.00 ± 11.95B

413.86 ± 30.28A

402.20 ± 29.23AB

Fat weight (g) (epididymal + retroperitoneal)

13.94 ± 2.66B

20.94 ± 4.08A

18.47 ± 2.02A

Fat pad weight (g/100 g body weight)

3.63 ± 0.65B

5.11 ± 0.60A

4.83 ± 0.40A

Spleen (g)

0.66 ± 0.03

0.60 ± 0.07

0.64 ± 0.10

Kidney (g)

2.59 ± 0.15

2.60 ± 0.18

2.61 ± 0.08

Liver (g)

18.47 ± 1.95AB

20.04 ± 2.27A

17.59 ± 2.33B

Each value provided is the mean ± standard deviation. Values of each group with the same letters for each serological factor were not significantly different (P < 0.05).

Analysis of blood serum levels

The TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, glucose, leptin, AST, ALT, α-amylase and lipase levels in serum in each group are summarized in Tables 5 and 6. Compared with the HFD group, the HFD-LAB group had slightly decreased TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, glucose, leptin, AST, ALT, and lipase levels. α-Amylase levels were not different.
Table 5

Serum levels of cholesterol, triglyceride, glucose, leptin, AST, and ALT

 

SD

HFD

HFD-LAB

TC (mg/dl)

88.20 ± 12.24

92.20 ± 11.02

89.70 ± 17.33

HDL-C (mg/dl)

54.40 ± 9.25A

47.40 ± 7.55AB

46.09 ± 7.25B

LDL-C (mg/dl)

19.15 ± 2.96A

16.75 ± 3.27AB

15.22 ± 4.40B

Triglyceride (mg/dl)

146.18 ± 33.76B

262.40 ± 110.75A

246.70 ± 74.18A

Glucose (mg/dl)

230.40 ± 41.31AB

236.50 ± 35.53A

200.36 ± 37.09B

Leptin (pg/ml)

433.88 ± 117.15B

575.68 ± 149.86A

538.08 ± 158.12AB

AST (U/L)

98.50 ± 33.78AB

111.00 ± 13.39A

84.45 ± 13.77B

ALT (U/L)

38.00 ± 5.25B

65.00 ± 8.16A

62.70 ± 4.35A

Each value provided is the mean ± standard deviation. Values of each group with the same letters for each serological factor were not significantly different (P < 0.05).

Table 6

Serum levels of α-amylase and lipase

 

SD

HFD

HFD-LAB

α-amylase (U/L)

182.36 ± 10.73

172.33 ± 12.51

191.57 ± 16.16

Lipase (U/L)

91.10 ± 21.38B

224.25 ± 33.21A

216.52 ± 22.52A

Each value provided is the mean ± standard deviation. Values of each group with the same letters for each serological factor were not significantly different (P < 0.05).

Fecal total LAB counts

Fecal total LAB counts are shown in Figure 2. The fecal total LAB counts were clearly lower in the HFD-fed groups than in the SD group over the experimental period. However, after treatment with LAB, the counts in the HFD-LAB group were significantly increased compared with those in the HFD group.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Changes of total LAB counts during experimental periods. Data are presented as means and standard deviation. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 significantly different compared with HFD group.

Harmful enzyme activities of intestinal microflora

As shown in Figure 3, the harmful enzyme activities of intestinal microflora in the HFD-LAB group were obviously decreased compared with those in the other groups. After LAB treatment, β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, and tryptophanase activities were decreased by 28%, 26% and 10%, respectively. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in β-glucosidase (P = 0.023), β-glucuronidase (P = 0.050), and tryptophanase (P = 0.002) activities. However, urease activities were increased.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Inhibitory effects of LAB on fecal harmful enzymes in each experimental group. (A) β-glucosidase activity, (B) β-glucuronidase activity, (C) Tryptophanase activity, and (D) Urease activity. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 significantly different compared with before LAB treatment.

Discussion

Many studies have reported antiobesity effects of some bacterial strains such as Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. [17–19, 8]. In the present study, we observed that feeding of a high fat diet for 5 weeks produced significant increases in body weight, and administration of LAB reduced body weight gain and fat weight. However, there was no significant difference in spleen, kidney, and liver weights.

Our results demonstrated that the TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels in serum were decreased in the HFD-LAB group. The reduction of TC or LDL in serum is reported to lower the risk of coronary heart disease [20]. Recent studies showed that probiotics, including Bifidobacterium longum [6], Lactobacillus acidophilus [21], had hypocholesteremic effects in both rat and human. The mechanisms involved may be as follows [22–27]: (1) fermentation products of lactic acid bacteria inhibit cholesterol synthesis enzymes and thus reduce cholesterol production; (2) the bacteria facilitate the elimination of cholesterol in feces; (3) the bacteria inhibit the absorption of cholesterol back into the body by binding with cholesterol; (4) the bacteria interfere with the recycling of bile salt (a metabolic product of cholesterol) and facilitate its elimination, which raises the demand for bile salt made from cholesterol and thus results in body cholesterol consumption; and (5) the assimilation of lactic acid. In addition, we found that levels of triglyceride, glucose, AST, and ALT in serum were reduced in HFD-LAB group. Similar results have been observed with some specific probiotics strains [19, 8, 17].

Leptin has been identified as an antiobesity hormone that regulates body weight by controlling food intake and energy expenditure via the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [28–30]. It appears that leptin may be an important factor in obesity management. Leptin is a 16 KDa secreted protein produced by the ob gene. Adipose tissue produces leptin and releases it into the bloodstream. As fat deposits grow, blood leptin levels tend to increase. Thus, leptin levels are closely related to the percentage of body fat; markedly higher serum leptin levels have been found in obese individuals compared with non-obese individuals [31, 32]. In contrast, leptin levels are severely reduced in underweight individuals compared with normal weight individuals [33, 34]. In the present study, leptin levels were higher in the HFD-fed groups than in the SD group, but were lower in the HFD-LAB group than in the HFD group. Similar effects have been observed in other studies using mouse [17] and human [32]. The results of these studies suggest that reductions in fat mass and body weight are associated with a reduction in leptin.

α-Amylase, a digestive enzyme secreted from the pancreas and salivary gland, is involved in important biological processes such as digestion of carbohydrates. Many crude drugs inhibit α-amylase activity [35]. Natural α-amylase inhibitors are beneficial in reducing post-prandial hyperglycemia by slowing down the digestion of carbohydrates and, consequently, the absorption of glucose. Reducing post-prandial hyperglycemia prevent glucose uptake into adipose tissue to inhibit synthesis and accumulation of triacylglycerol [36]. On the other hand, it is well known that dietary lipid is not directly absorbed from the intestine unless it has been subjected to the action of pancreatic lipase. The two main products formed by the hydrolysis of pancreatic lipase are fatty acid and 2-monoacylglycerol. Inhibition of these digestive enzymes is therefore beneficial in the treatment of obesity [37]. Our results showed that lipase levels were slightly decreased in the HFD-LAB group, whereas α-amylase levels were increased. That is, LAB had an inhibitory effect on lipase.

In our study, fecal LAB counts were obviously decreased in the HFD-fed groups compared with those in the SD group. Similarly, Cani et al. [38] demonstrated that a high fat diet changed the intestinal microbiota composition; in particular, the number of Bifidobacterium spp. was reduced. Kalliomaki et al. [39] also observed that fecal Bifidobacterium spp. counts were higher in children who remained at normal weight at the age of seven, while this was not the case in overweight children. After treatment with LAB, we found that the LAB counts in the HFD-LAB group were significantly increased compared with those in the HFD group. This result means that LAB survive passage through the upper-gastrointestinal tract after oral feeding, and ingested LAB affect the intestinal environment to favor LAB colonization [40].

Several studies have shown that these specific bacteria reduce the intestinal endotoxin levels and improve mucosal barrier function [41–43]. Furthermore, LAB have anti-tumor effects and block harmful intestinal enzyme activities, a recognized risk factor for colon cancer [44, 45]. The results of the present study showed the harmful enzyme activities of intestinal microflora in the HFD-LAB group were clearly decreased compared with those in the other groups; in particular, the activities of β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, and tryptophanase were significantly decreased.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we suggest that the LAB supplement (B. pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204, B. longum SPM 1205, B. longum SPM 1207) used in this study may have beneficial antiobesity effects. Further clinical trials to confirm these effects should therefore be conducted.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Sahmyook University Research Fund in 2010. The authors are grateful to the Department of Pharmacy of Sahmyook University and for the financial support provided by the Sahmyook University Research Fund.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, 139-742, Republic of Korea
(2)
Jahayun oriental medicine clinic, Seoul, 135-897, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Wood SC, Seeley RJ, Porte JD, Schwarts MW: Signal that regulate food intake and energy homeostasis. Sci. 1998, 280: 1378-1383. 10.1126/science.280.5368.1378.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wickelgren I: Obesity; how big a problem?. Sci. 1998, 280: 1364-1367. 10.1126/science.280.5368.1364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenny AM, OĭMeara S, Melville A, Sheldon TA, Wilson C: The treatment and prevention of obesity; a systematic review of the literature. Int J Obes. 1997, 21: 715-737. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Fuller R: Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989, 66: 365-378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchers AT, Selmi C, Meyers FJ, Keen CL, Gershwin ME: Probiotics and immunity. J Gastroenterol. 2009, 44: 26-46. 10.1007/s00535-008-2296-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Xiao JZ, Kondo S, Takahashi N, Miyaji K, Oshida K, Hiramatsu A, Iwatsuki K, Kokubo S, Hosono A: Effects of milk products fermented by Bifidobacterium longum on blood lipids in rats and healthy adult male volunteers. J Dairy Sci. 2003, 86: 2452-2461. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73839-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, Knauf K, Burcelin RG, Tuohy KM: Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improves high-fat diet induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxemia. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 2374-2383. 10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ma X, Hua J, Li Z: Probiotics improve high fat diet induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance by increasing hepatic NKT cells. J Hepatol. 2008, 49: 821-830. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.025PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Han SH, Cho KH, Lee CK, Song YC, Park SH, Ha NJ, Kim KJ: Enhancement of antigen presentation capability of dendritic cells and activation of macrophages by the components of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204. J Appl Pharm. 2005, 13: 174-180.Google Scholar
  10. Choi SS, Kang BY, Chung MJ, Kim SD, Park SH, Kim JS, Kang CY, Ha NJ: Safety assessment of potential lactic acid bacteria Bifidobacterium longum SPM 1205 isolated from healthy Koreans. J Microbiol. 2005, 43: 493-498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee DK, Jang S, Baek EH, Kim MJ, Lee KS, Shin HS, Chung MJ, Kim JE, Lee KO, Ha NJ: Lactic acid bacteria affect serum cholesterol levels, harmful fecal enzyme activity, and fecal water content. Lipids Health Dis. 2009, 8: 21-28. 10.1186/1476-511X-8-21PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scardovi V: Genus Bifidobacterium. Bergey's Manual of Systemic Bacteriology. Edited by: Krieg NR, Holt JG. 1986, 2: 1418-1434. Williams & Willikins, MD,Google Scholar
  13. Ahn JB: Isolation and characterization of Bifidobacterium producing exopolysaccharide. Food Eng Prog. 2005, 9: 291-296.Google Scholar
  14. Gutmann I, Bergmeyer HU: Urea. In methods of enzymatic analysis. Edited by: Bergmeyer HU. 1974, 1791-1794. New York: Academic Press,View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim DH, Kang HJ, Kim SW, Kobayashi K: pH-inducible β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase of intestinal bacteria. Chem Pharm Bull. 1992, 40: 1967-1969.Google Scholar
  16. Kim DH, Lee JH, Bae EA, Han MJ: Induction and inhibition of indole of intestinal bacteria. Arch Pharm Res. 1995, 18: 351-533. 10.1007/BF02976331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee HY, Park JH, Seok SH, Baek MW, Kim DJ, Lee KE, Paek KS, Lee YH, Park JH: Human originated bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus PL60, produce conjugated linoleic acid and show anti-obesity effects in diet-induced obese mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1761: 736-744.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Takemura N, Okubo T, Sonoyama K: Lactobacillus plantarum strain No. 14 reduces adipocyte size in mice fed high fat diet. Exp Biol Med. 2010, 235: 849-856. 10.1258/ebm.2010.009377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Yin YN, Yu QF, Fu N, Liu XW, Lu FG: Effects of four Bifidobacteria on obesity in high fat diet induced rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16: 3394-3401. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3394PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor GRJ, Williams CM: Effects of probiotics and prebiotics on blood lipids. Br J Nutr. 1998, 80: S225-230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Park YH, Kim JG, Shin YW, Kim SH, Whang KY: Effect of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 on cholesterol metabolism in rats. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 17: 655-662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Beena A, Prasad V: Effect of yogurt and bifidus yogurt fortified with skim milk powder, condensed whey and lactosehydrolysed condensed whey on serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels in rats. J Dairy Res. 1997, 64: 453-457. 10.1017/S0022029997002252View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fukushima M, Nakao M: The effect of a probiotic on faecal and liver lipid classes in rats. Br J Nutr. 1995, 73: 701-710. 10.1079/BJN19950074View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grunewald KK: Serum cholesterol levels in rats fed skim milk fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Food Sci. 1982, 47: 2078-2079. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb12955.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hashimoto H, Yamazaki K, Arai Y, Kawase M, He F, Hosoda M, Hosono A: Effect of lactic acid bacteria on serum cholesterol level in rats fed cholesterol diet. Anim Sci Technol. 1998, 69: 702-707.Google Scholar
  26. Rao DR, Chawan CB, Pulusani SR: Influence of milk and Thermophilus milk on plasma cholesterol levels and hepatic cholesterogenesis in rats. J Food Sci. 1981, 46: 1339-1341. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04168.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Suzuki Y, Kaizu H, Yamauchi Y: Effect of cultured milk on serum cholesterol concentrations in rats which fed high cholesterol diets. Anim Sci Technol. 1991, 62: 565-571.Google Scholar
  28. Jéquier E: Leptin signaling, adiposity, and energy balance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 967: 379-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Frederich RC, Hamann A, Anderson S: Leptin levels reflect body lipid content in mice; Evidence for diet-induced resistance to leptin action. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 1311-1314. 10.1038/nm1295-1311View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman JM: The function of leptin in nutrition, weight, and physiology. Nutr Rev. 2002, 60: S1-S14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamilton BS, Paglia D, Kwan AY, Deitel M: Increased obese mRNA expression in omental fat cells from massively obese humans. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 953-956. 10.1038/nm0995-953View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Considine RV, Shinha MK, Heiman ML: Serum immunoreactive leptin concentrations in normal weight and obese humans. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 292-295. 10.1056/NEJM199602013340503View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grinspoon S, Gulick T, Askari H: Serum leptin levels in women with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81: 3861-3863. 10.1210/jc.81.11.3861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferron F, Considine RV, Peino R: Serum leptin concentrations in patients with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and non-specific eating disorders correlate with the body mass index but are independent of the respective disease. Clin Endocrinol. 1997, 46: 289-293. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1260938.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kobayashi K, Saito Y, Nakazawa I, Yoshizaki F: Screening of crude drugs for influence on amylase activity and postprandial blood glucose in mouse plasma. Biol Pharm Bull. 2000, 23: 1250-1253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maury J, Issad T, Perdereau D, Gouhot B, Ferre P, Girard J: Effect of acarbose on glucose homeostasis, lipogenesis and lipogenic enzyme gene expression in adipose tissue of weaned rats. Diabetologia. 1993, 36: 503-509. 10.1007/BF02743265View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ono Y, Hattori E, Fukaya Y, Imai S, Ohizumi Y: Anti-obesity effect of Nelumbo nucifera leaves extract in mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 106: 238-244. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.12.036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cani PD, Delzenne NM, Amar J, Burcelin R: Role of gut microflora in the development of obesity and insulin resistance following high-fat diet feeding. Pathol Biol. 2008, 56: 305-309. 10.1016/j.patbio.2007.09.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalliomaki M, Collado MC, Salminen S, Isolauri E: Early differences in fecal microbiota composition in children may predict overweight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 534-538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pochart P, Marteau P, Bouhnik Y, Goderel I, Bourlioux P, Rambaud JC: Survival of bifidobacteria ingested via fermented milk during their passage through the human small intestine: and in vivo study using intestinal perfusion. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992, 55: 78-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Griffiths EA, Duffy LC, Schanbacher FL, Qiao H, Dryja D, Leavens A: In vivo effects of bifidobacteria and lactoferrin on gut endotoxin concentration and mucosal immunity in Balb/c mice. Dig Dis Sci Apr. 2004, 49: 579-589.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Z, Xiao G, Yao Y, Guo S, Lu K, Sheng Z: The role of bifidobacteria in gut barrier function after thermal injury in rats. J Trauma Sep. 2006, 61: 650-657.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang ZT, Yao YM, Xiao GX, Sheng ZY: Risk factors of development of gut-derived bacterial translocation in thermally injured rats. World J Gastroenterol Jun. 2004, 10: 1619-1624.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee DK, Jang S, Kim MJ, Kim JH, Chung MJ, Kim KJ, Ha NJ: Anti-proliferative effects of Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM 0212 extract on human colon cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 310- 10.1186/1471-2407-8-310PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Goldin BR, Gualtieri LJ, Moore RP: The effect of Lactobacillus GG on the initiation and promotion of DMH-induced intestinal tumors in the rat. Nutr Cancer. 1996, 25: 197-204. 10.1080/01635589609514442View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© An et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X