Open Access

Positive association of the hepatic lipase gene polymorphism c.514C > T with estrogen replacement therapy response

  • Alvaro PulchinelliJr1Email author,
  • Ana Maria Massad Costa1,
  • Cristina V de Carvalho1,
  • Naiara Correa Nogueira de Souza1,
  • Mauro A Haidar2,
  • Adagmar Andriolo3 and
  • Ismael DC Guerreiro da Silva1
Lipids in Health and Disease201110:197

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-197

Received: 7 September 2011

Accepted: 2 November 2011

Published: 2 November 2011

Abstract

Background

Hepatic lipase (HL), an enzyme present in the hepatic sinusoids, is responsible for the lipolysis of lipoproteins. Human HL contains four polymorphic sites: G-250A, T-710C, A-763G, and C-514T single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). The last polymorphism is the focus of the current study. The genotypes associated with the C-514T polymorphism are CC (normal homozygous - W), CT (heterozygous - H), and TT (minor-allele homozygous - M). HL activity is significantly impaired in individuals of the TT and CT genotypes. A total of 58 post-menopausal women were studied. The subjects were hysterectomized women receiving hormone replacement therapy consisting of 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen once a day. The inclusion criteria were menopause of up to three years and normal blood tests, radiographs, cervical-vaginal cytology, and densitometry. DNA was extracted from the buccal and blood cells of all 58 patients using a commercially available kit (GFX® - Amersham-Pharmacia, USA).

Results

Statistically significant reductions in triglycerides (t = 2.16; n = 58; p = 0.03) but not in total cholesterol (t = 0.14; n = 58; p = 0.89) were found after treatment. This group of good responders were carriers of the T allele; the CT and TT genotypes were present significantly more frequently than in the group of non-responders (p = 0.02 or p = 0.07, respectively). However, no significant difference in HDL-C (t = 0.94; n = 58; p = 0.35) or LDL-C (t = -0.83; n = 58; p = 0.41) was found in these patients.

Conclusions

The variation in lipid profile associated with the C-514T polymorphism is significant, and the T allele is associated with the best response to ERT.

Keywords

Hepatic lipase gene Menopause Hormone replacement therapy Lipid metabolism SNP

Background

Hepatic lipase (HL), an enzyme present in the hepatic sinusoids, is responsible for the lipolysis of lipoproteins. Although also expressed in other tissues, over 95% percent of the total HL activity is found in the liver [1]. As a key enzyme in lipoprotein metabolism, HL hydrolyzes triglycerides (TG), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), and the surface phospholipids and core TG of small very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-C) remnants. HL also aids in the binding of lipoproteins to cellular receptors. In vitro studies have demonstrated that HL facilitates the binding and entrance of chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, VLDL-cholesterol (VLDL-C), LDL-C [2, 3] and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) [46] into a number of different cell types. Fertile females have lower HL activity than males [7, 8].

Patients with HL deficiency often present with hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and increased levels of VLDL-C, remnant chylomicrons, IDL-C, TG-rich LDL-C, and HDL-C [911]. However, because not all patients with HL deficiency show these metabolic changes, the condition is sometimes confused with other genetic disorders [12].

The human HL gene, a 60 kb gene with a 1.6 kb exon, is present on chromosome 15 [13, 14]. The gene possesses four known polymorphic sites, and these four sites are in complete linkage disequilibrium. The most common polymorphisms are G-250A, T-710C, A-763G and C-514T [7], and the most common haplotypes are GTAC and ACGT. Because the C-514T polymorphism occurs in the promoter region of the HL gene, it has been suggested that this polymorphism may influence the metabolic activity of the enzyme [1517] but not influence transcription [18]. Some authors have found that the polymorphisms do not cause phenotypic changes in females, although they have noted a HDL-C difference in men [18, 19]. Because HL activity may also be controlled by circulating estrogen [16], it is likely that further studies of the HL gene polymorphisms will provide additional genetic information that may be useful in developing more successful hormone replacement therapies [20].

A meta-analysis of 24,000 cases has demonstrated that HL activity is significantly lower in individuals with the TT and CT genotypes for the C-514T polymorphism than in individuals with the CC genotype [20]. Despite its association with high HDL cholesterol, the presence of the T allele results in a slightly increased risk of atherosclerosis [7]. Human and animal studies have found both atherogenic and anti-atherogenic activities for the enzyme [21]. While low HL activity is associated with a greater risk of arterial coronary disease (ACD) [22], it is not directly responsible for this disorder [23]. Although there seems to be an inverse relationship between HL level and atherosclerotic disease, a consensus is lacking on this point; some studies have found increased HL in patients with ACD [24]. In humans, increased HL is associated with small, dense LDL-C particles and with lower levels of antiatherogenic large HDL-C particles [24, 25]. However, studies using animal models have not confirmed this relationship, which suggests that other factors may contribute to the development of ACD. Because HL hydrolyzes phospholipids and triglycerides and releases Fatty Acids (FA) from phospholipids and triglycerides [26], increased HL expression may cause more cholesterol to enter cells and sub-endothelial LDL-C deposits, thus promoting phagocytosis by macrophages and increasing the risk of atherosclerotic lesions. As has been mentioned, HL can have both pro- and anti-atherogenic effects. As an enzymatic or binding protein, it can change the level, composition or metabolism of lipoproteins in ways that can either increase or decrease atherogenesis. In the presence of hypertriglyceridemia and increased LDL-C, high HL activity (the formation of small, dense LDL-C) has a pro-atherogenic effect. However, low levels of LDL-C and high levels of HL may be due to the anti-atherogenic effect of increased VLDL-C remnants and IDL-C catabolism [2729]. The pro- and anti-atherogenic effects of HL may be mediated by the formation of increased levels of small dense LDL-C in the presence of hypertriglyceridemia and by the increased catabolism of VLDL-C remnants and IDL-C, respectively. A number of researchers believe that HL plays an important role in the reverse transport of cholesterol and that its role in this process may be the primary mechanism responsible for the development of atherosclerotic disease [3034]. There is still great controversy in the literature regarding the pro- and anti-atherogenic roles of HL [32].

Findings that suggest that high HL is responsible for increased atherogenic potential include smaller LDL-C particle size with increased HL activity, enzyme activity that is inversely proportional to HDL-C level, greater activity in males than in fertile females, and a positive correlation of HL level with insulin resistance and/or abdominal fat. Two findings that support an anti-atherogenic role for the enzyme include its reverse cholesterol transport activity and its role in TG clearing after meals [35]. Environmental factors must also be taken into account. There may be a strong interaction effect of HL polymorphisms and the amount and type of dietary fat on HDL-C level [36]. Body mass index (BMI), or adiposity, also appears to affect HL activity, and this effect is additive with the effects of the genetic polymorphisms that have been analyzed [37]. There is also evidence that HL activity is specifically related to the amount of intra-abdominal fat [17, 38].

A number of recent studies have failed to support the efficacy of hormone replacement therapy [3942]. The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) conducted by Hulley in 1998 did not recommend the use of HRT for the secondary prevention of arterial coronary disease (ACD); however, due to good ACD outcomes in women taking HRT for several years, HRT continues to be used [39]. A recent study has found that taking estrogen for a mean of 5.9 years was not associated with any change in a woman's ACD risk [43]. Other studies have suggested that hormone replacement therapy may cause pro-thrombotic susceptibility in women with prior atherosclerosis [44].

Estrogen increases plasma levels of apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1) and HDL-C, possibly by increasing ApoA-1 expression in the liver, and it modulates the expression of proteins involved in HDL-C metabolism. Thus, we can expect a high degree of inter-individual variability in HRT response [45]. In rats, estrogen also seems to be associated with the modulation of HL gene expression, and raising HL level decreases HDL-C level [15]. The mechanism by which estrogen reduces LDL-C and increases HDL-C is different from the mechanism of lipid-lowering drugs. This difference may explain why HRT is not effective in preventing the progression of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women [46, 47]. HL activity is susceptible to variations in endogenous sexual steroids. Estrogenic steroids suppress HL activity, while androgenic steroids increase it [8, 48]. The effect of the C514T polymorphism on HL activity is independent of androgen action [49].

The current study was motivated by the controversy regarding the pro- and anti-atherosclerotic effects of HL in women undergoing estrogen replacement therapy. The objective of the study was to optimize hormone replacement therapy by establishing the genetic patterns associated with better responses to such treatment.

Results

Comparative analysis before and after treatment

The results are presented as the mean and standard deviation of the variables (Table 1). Table 1 shows the influence of estrogen replacement treatment on the group as a whole. The values for cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides were analyzed independently of genotype for the both pre- and post-treatment conditions.
Table 1

Comparative analysis of the variables before and after treatment, independent of genotype

Groups

N

Mean (mg/dL)

Standard deviation

t

p

TotalChol

58

210.31

45.47

0.14

0.89

TotalChol2

58

209.41

43.19

  

HDL-C

58

58.95

13.45

0.94

0.35

HDL-C2

58

57.76

14.44

  

LDL-C

58

120.052

38.71

-0.83

0.41

LDL-C2

58

125.52

38.08

  

TG

58

138.07

65.40

2.16

0.03

TG2

58

122.07

66.50

  

TotalChol: total pre-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C: pre-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: pre-treatment triglycerides; TotalChol2: total post-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C2: post-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C2: post-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG2: post-treatment triglycerides.

All of the genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2).
Table 2

Numbers of expected and observed genotypes according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

 

CC (N)

CT (N)

TT (N)

Chi-Square

p*

Observed

15

29

14

0.000005

0.998

Expected

15.00

28.99

14.00

  

CC (major-allele homozygote); CT (heterozygote); TT (minor-allele homozygote)

*p= 0,998

Comparative analysis of different genotypes before and after treatment

To evaluate whether the baseline values of any of the variables were influenced by genotype, Table 3 presents the lipid profiles by genotype (major-allele homozygote, heterozygote, and minor-allele homozygote).
Table 3

Influence of genotype on baseline lipid levels

Genotype

Variable

N

Mean

Standard Deviation

t-test

p

CC

TotalChol

15

216.27

47.36

0.15

0.89

CT

TotalChol

29

205.42

44.03

0.08

0.94

TT

TotalChol

14

214.07

48.65

0.03

0.98

CC

HDL-C

15

57.87

12.56

1.31

0.21

CT

HDL-C

29

57.17

12.18

0.21

0.84

TT

HDL-C

14

63.78

16.44

0.36

0.72

CC

LDL-C

15

134.40

42.83

-0.09

0.93

CT

LDL-C

29

118.21

31.19

-0.14

0.89

TT

LDL-C

14

108.50

45.96

-1.26

0.23

CC

TG

15

132.60

45.50

1.07

0.30

CT

TG

29

136.41

70.19

1.20

0.24

TT

TG

14

147.36

76.01

1.71

0.11

TotalChol: total pre-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C: pre-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: pre-treatment triglycerides.

To further study this potential influence, Table 4 compares the means of the variables by genotype (shows the results of testing). For this purpose, we used an ANOVA model and compared the means by group.
Table 4

An ANOVA model comparing the mean baseline lipid levels by genotype (major-allele homozygote, heterozygote, and minor-allele homozygote)

ANOVA

  

Sum of squares

df

Mean square

F

Sig

TotalChol

Between Groups

1425.517

2

712.759

0.337

0.716

 

Within Groups

116446.9

55

2117.216

  
 

Total

117872.4

57

   

HDL-C

Between Groups

436.616

2

218.308

1.216

0.304

 

Within Groups

9874.228

55

179.531

  
 

Total

10310.845

57

   

LDL-C

Between Groups

5054.986

2

2,527.493

1.73

0.187

 

Within Groups

80373.859

55

1461.343

  
 

Total

85428.845

57

   

TG

Between Groups

1735.875

2

867.938

0.197

0.822

 

Within Groups

242037.8

55

4400.688

  
 

Total

243773.7

57

   
We also analyzed the lipid levels before and after ERT; these results are shown according to genotype in Table 5. In this analysis, we studied the influence of the treatment on lipid levels. Table 6 shows the influence of the T allele on the lipid profile and response to estrogen treatment.
Table 5

Results of the paired-samples t-tests (before and after treatment) according to genotype

Genotype

Variable

(mg/dL)

N

Mean

Standard Deviation

t-test

p

CC

TotalChol

15

216.27

47.36

0.15

0.89

 

TotalChol 2

15

214.60

39.09

  

CT

TotalChol

29

205.41

44.03

0.08

0.94

 

TotalChol 2

29

204.66

39.76

  

TT

TotalChol

14

214.07

48.65

0.03

0.98

 

TotalChol 2

14

213.71

55.03

  

CC

HDL-C

15

57.87

12.56

1.31

0.21

 

HDL-C 2

15

54.87

15.47

  

CT

HDL-C

29

57.17

12.18

0.21

0.84

 

HDL-C 2

29

56.76

13.38

  

TT

HDL-C

14

63.79

16.44

0.36

0.72

 

HDL-C 2

14

62.93

15.16

  

CC

LDL-C

15

134.40

42.83

-0.09

0.93

 

LDL-C2

15

135.40

34.27

  

CT

LDL-C

29

118.21

31.19

-0.14

0.89

 

LDL-C2

29

19.62

38.01

  

TT

LDL-C

14

108.50

45.96

-1.26

0.23

 

LDL-C2

14

127.14

42.28

  

CC

TG

15

132.60

45.50

1.07

0.30

 

TG2

15

121.13

44.02

  

CT

TG

29

136.41

70.19

1.20

0.24

 

TG2

29

121.83

73.78

  

TT

TG

14

147.36

76.01

1.71

0.11

 

TG2

14

123.57

74.68

  

TotalChol: total pre-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C: pre-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: pre-treatment triglycerides; TotalChol2: total post-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C2: post-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C2: post-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG2: post-treatment triglycerides; CC: homozygous major-allele genotype; CT: heterozygous genotype; TT: homozygous minor-allele genotype.

Table 6

Paired-samples t-tests (before and after treatment) for the CT and TT genotypes

(mg/dL)

Paired differences

t

df

Sig (2-tailed)

  

Mean

SD

Mean Standard Error

95% Confidence interval

   
     

Lower

Upper

   

Pair 1

TotalChol -TotalChol2

0.62791

50.96685

7.77237

-15.05738

16.31319

0.081

42

0.936

Pair 2

HDL-C - HDL-C-C2

0.55814

9.9506

1.51745

-2.5042

3.62048

0.368

42

0.715

Pair 3

LDL-C - LDL-C2

7.02326

53.53614

8.16419

-23.49925

9.45274

-0.86

42

0.395

HDL: pre-treatment high-density lipoprotein; LDL: pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein; VLDL: pre-treatment very-low-density lipoprotein; HDL2: post-treatment high-density lipoprotein; LDL2: post-treatment low-density lipoprotein

No statistically significant differences in total cholesterol, HDL-C, or LDL-C were found after re-grouping the genotypes into CT and TT (Table 6). Table 6 shows the influence the T allele on the lipid profile and estrogen treatment.

Table 7 summarizes the data and shows the correlations between the C and T alleles and the baseline lipid values. An ANOVA model was used to compare the mean lipoprotein levels in the patients with C and T alleles.
Table 7

An ANOVA model comparing the baseline means of the lipid variables between the C and T alleles

ANOVA

  

Sum of squares

df

Mean square

F

Sig

TotalChol

Between Groups

46.432

1

46.432

0.022

0.881

 

Within Groups

235698.4

114

2067.53

  
 

Total

235744.8

115

   

HDL-C

Between Groups

243.083

1

243.083

1.36

0.246

 

Within Groups

20378.607

114

178.76

  
 

Total

20621.69

115

   

LDL-C

Between Groups

4901.112

1

4901.112

3.367

0.069

 

Within Groups

165956.6

114

1455.759

  
 

Total

170857.7

115

   

TG

Between Groups

1551.263

1

1551.263

0.364

0.548

 

Within Groups

485996.2

114

4263.124

  
 

Total

487547.4

115

   
Table 8 shows the influence of the C and T alleles on the lipoprotein levels of the patients receiving hormone replacement with estrogen. A multivariate ANOVA model was used to compare the means of the patients with the C and T alleles. We then compared the lipoprotein changes in response to the treatment, according to genotype.
Table 8

Results of the paired-samples t-tests for lipoproteins before and after treatment, by allele

Allele

Variable

mg/dL

N

Mean

SD

t-test

p

C

TotalChol

59

210.93

45.26

0.20

0.85

 

TotalChol2

59

209.71

39.06

  

T

TotalChol

57

209.67

45.68

0.08

0.93

 

TotalChol2

57

209.11

47.08

  

C

HDL-C

59

57.53

12.16

1.37

0.18

 

HDL-C2

59

55.80

14.24

  

T

HDL-C

57

60.42

14.52

0.50

0.62

 

HDL-C2

57

59.79

14.35

  

C

LDL-C

59

126.44

37.70

-0.20

0.84

 

LDL-C2

59

127.44

36.44

  

T

LDL-C

57

113.44

38.62

-1.39

0.17

 

LDL-C2

57

123.32

39.58

  

C

TG

59

134.47

58.15

1.85

0.07

 

TG2

59

121.47

59.69

  

T

TG

57

141.79

71.95

2.46

0.02

 

TG2

57

122.68

72.88

  

TotalChol: total pre-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C: pre-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: pre-treatment triglycerides; TotalChol2: total post-treatment cholesterol; HDL-C2: post-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C2: post-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG2: post-treatment triglycerides; CC: homozygous major-allele genotype; CT: heterozygous genotype; TT: homozygous minor-allele genotype.

Discussion

A statistically significant difference in triglyceride level was observed after ERT compared to baseline (Table 1). To examine the efficacy of ERT, we did not differentiate the subjects by genotype. No statistically significant differences in lipoprotein levels were observed. The p values for lipoprotein levels before and after treatment were p = 0.89 and p = 0.35 for HDL-C and LDL-C, respectively; in other words, HDL-C and LDL-C levels did not change significantly after treatment. These findings are probably related to the fact that the major substrates of HL are TG and HDL-C rather than LDL-C [17, 26, 27].

No statistically significant differences in the baseline level of total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, or triglycerides were observed among patients of different genotypes (Tables 3 and 4). This finding is interesting because the current literature suggests that polymorphisms can directly influence HL activity, as revealed by differences in lipid levels [48]. Recent results are consistent with our findings regarding total cholesterol [18]. Our findings were obtained using an ANOVA model that compared the baseline means of the three different groups (CC, CT and TT). The T allele was associated with higher HDL-C in those individuals with a higher proportion of fat in their diets. No significant differences were observed among CC and CT individuals [36]. Because the patients in this study did not follow a specific diet, we believe that potential differences may have been overshadowed by the variation in the patients' dietary habits. This factor may account for the published data showing associations of the 514C > T polymorphism with measures of HDL-C metabolism, depending on the amount and type of fat consumed [36].

When the three genotypes were analyzed separately, no significant changes in the triglycerides following ERT were observed. Moreover, this reduction was primarily observed in T allele carriers (Table 5). To explore the hypothesis that the T allele may have influenced the results, the genotypes were re-classified as either CT or TT. Although a reduction in lipoprotein was observed, it was not statistically significant (t = 1.889, p = 0.06).

The significant decrease in triglycerides observed in the first analysis was seen only in the CT (t = 1.20; p = 0.24) and TT (t = 1.71; p = 0.11) genotypes. A significant decrease in triglycerides (t = 3.22; p = 0.02) in T carriers was also found when the CT and TT genotypes were grouped together. In contrast, those with the CC genotype did not show a significant decrease in triglycerides after the treatment (t = 1.07; p = 0.30) [50].

HDL-C and LDL-C did not differ among genotypes either before or after treatment, even after dividing analyzing the CT and TT genotypes separately (Table 6). All of the two-tailed p values associated with these comparisons were greater than 0.05. There is speculation about the relationships between HDL-C metabolism and HL polymorphisms. However, these polymorphisms result in only minor variations in HDL-C levels [51], which is consistent with our findings.

We next examined the influence of the C and T alleles on the baseline values and on the pre- and post-treatment conditions. No statistically significant differences in any of the baseline variables were observed between the patients with the C allele and those with the T allele (Tables 6 and 7). This finding suggests that the presence of the T allele (and low hepatic lipase activity) may be associated with a slightly increased risk of atherosclerosis, despite the high HDL cholesterol in individuals with the T allele.

The T allele was associated with a significant reduction in triglycerides. Reduced triglycerides after ERT were observed in individuals of both the TT and CT genotypes, but the reduction was more significant in T than C alleles. These results are indirectly expressed with respect to genotype; the comparison of the CT and TT patients showed a trend toward a similar level of triglyceride reduction (t = 1.889; p = 0.06) (Table 8). These findings indicate that the mechanism of HRT differs from that of the typical lipid-lowering drugs; if the mechanism were the same, the treatment would be expected to have a greater effect on those with the C allele [7, 8, 50].

The limitation of our study is the relatively small number of patients included. However, a strength of our study is that it is a prospective study of the Brazilian population, comparing the same women before and after HRT to address the question of whether or not lipid levels are associated with the alleles C or T.

Conclusions

In conclusion, HRT seems to reduce triglyceride levels regardless of the genotype at the C-514T polymorphic locus. Although individuals with the T allele who receive HRT appear to have a positive lipid profile, the antiatherogenic effect of the T allele is not clear [52, 53]. However, the T allele (p-values = 0.93 and 0.02 for cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively) does seem to be a better genetic marker for total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than the C allele (p values = 0.85 and 0.07 for cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively). According to the literature [47], there is large inter-individual variability in the plasma lipid response to HT. A similar effect was not observed for LDL-C or HDL-C.

Methods

Subjects

The study population was derived from a larger study of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. The larger study included a total of 200 patients from a tertiary outpatient clinic. One hundred of these women had undergone hysterectomy for myomas and were receiving HRT consisting of a single daily dose (0.625 mg) of conjugated equine estrogen The 100 non-hysterectomized women in the study received hormone replacement therapy consisting of a daily combination of 0.625 mg estrogen and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone (estrogen and progestin replacement therapy). Only those patients who received conjugated equine ERT exclusively and who presented lipid profiles within the reference range were enrolled in our study. A total of 58 patients with a mean age of 54 years were selected for DNA extraction and the subsequent study of the C-514T HL gene polymorphism both before and after ERT.

The inclusion criteria included the following: 1) a maximum three-year history of menopause; 2) complete chart information with annual blood work (complete blood count with differential, total cholesterol and fractions, triglycerides, urea, creatinine, blood glucose, estradiol, progestin, FSH, and LH) that was within the reference range since the onset of menopause; 3) a bilateral mammogram with BI-RADS classification 1 or 2; 4) abdominal and pelvic ultrasounds with normal findings; 5) cervical-vaginal cytology that was normal by the Bethesda classification; and 6) bone densitometry (patients within one standard deviation of the age-adjusted mean).

Women who did not comply with the proposed hormone replacement therapy were excluded from the study, as were those who did not meet the above criteria.

Information on alcohol use and other lifestyle factors, such as physical activity and dietary saturated fat, was not collected. The patients were not instructed to follow any specific dietary guidelines.

All patients gave free and informed consent to participate, and the project was approved by the Committee of Ethics in Research at the Federal University of São Paulo, with the number CEP 1114/08

Methods

Buccal tissue samples were obtained with a cytobrush. Samples were placed in Falcon tubes with Tris-EDTA buffer and frozen at -80°C for subsequent genomic DNA extraction. Blood samples were obtained before and after ERT using a Vacutainer®. The patients were instructed how to prepare for sampling so as to minimize interference from pre-analytical factors. The patients were instructed to fast from 10 to 14 hours, to maintain their usual diet, not to use alcohol within 72 hours prior to the collection and not to perform strenuous exercise on the collection day [54]. Total cholesterol was measured using the oxidase method. HDL-C was measured by the direct method and by a homogenous assay. Triglycerides were measured using an enzymatic colorimetric method (Advia 1650; Bayer®, USA). The LDL-C concentration was obtained using Friedwald's formula [55]. The intra-assay coefficients of variability were less than 5%.

DNA of the buccal mucosa was analyzed using a commercially available PCR kit (GFX®; Amersham-Pharmacia, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was carried out using primers to detect the C-T change, as described by Somekawa et al. [56]. The following primers were used in this study: LipR, 5'-TCACTTGGCAAGGGCATCTTTG-3'; and LipF, 5'-GGTCGGGGTAGGTGGCTTCCA-3'. The PCR protocol included 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 60 s and 72°C for 90 s, after 2 min of denaturation at 95°C. PCR fragments were digested with 1.5 U of NiaIII restriction enzyme, followed by electrophoresis in a 3% low-melting agarose gel that was then stained with ethidium bromide. The size of the amplified fragment was 274 bp. Fragments of 226 and 48 bp were obtained for allele T, and fragments of 274 bp were obtained for allele C. The genotypes were expressed as CC (major-allele homozygote (W), 274 bp), CT (heterozygote (H), 274, 226, and 48 bp), and TT (minor-allele homozygote (M), 226 and 48 bp).

Statistical analysis

Because each individual had more than one set of observations, we used the paired-samples t-test to compare the quantitative data; this test is equivalent to a standard Student's t-test but is specifically designed for related samples. It requires that the data have a normal distribution. Thus, we initially used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to verify that the data were normally distributed. The p value of the non-normality hypothesis was > 0.05 for all of the variables. The results are presented as mean and standard deviation.

To determine whether genotype influenced the baseline levels of the variables, we used analysis of variance (ANOVA). We compared the average values for the three genotypes in the samples taken before and after treatment with ERT. The variables included age, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C and TGL. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was checked for the entire sample.

Abbreviations

ACD: 

arterial coronary disease

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance

ApoA-1: 

apolipoprotein A-1

BMI: 

body mass index

ERT: 

estrogen replacement therapy

FA: 

fatty acids

HRT: 

hormone replacement therapy

HL: 

hepatic lipase

HDL-C: 

high-density lipoprotein

IDL-C: 

intermediate-density lipoprotein

LDL-C: 

low-density lipoprotein

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

SNP: 

single-nucleotide polymorphism

TG: 

triglycerides

VLDL-C: 

very-low-density lipoprotein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by a grant from the São Paulo Research Aid Foundation [Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)].

AFIP - Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
(2)
Setor de Climatério, Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
(3)
Setor de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial, Departamento de Medicina, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

References

  1. Santamarina-Fojo S, Gonzalez-Navarro H, Freeman L, Wagner E, Nong Z: Hepatic lipase, lipoprotein metabolism, and atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24: 1750-1754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shafi S, Brady SE, Bensadoun A, Havel RJ: Role of hepatic lipase in the uptake and processing of chylomicron remnants in rat liver. J Lipid Res. 1994, 35: 709-720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Krapp A, Ahle S, Kersting S, Hua Y, Kneser K, Nielsen M, Gliemann J, Beisiegel U: Hepatic lipase mediates the uptake of chylomicrons and VLDL into cells via the LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). J Lipid Res. 1996, 37: 926-936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Marques-Vidal P, Azéma C, Collet X, Vieu C, Chap H, Perret B: Hepatic lipase promotes the uptake of HDL esterified cholesterol by the perfused rat liver: A study using reconstituted HDL particles of defined phospholipid composition. J Lipid Res. 1994, 35: 373-384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lambert G, Chase MB, Dugi K, Bensadoun A, Brewer HB, Santamarina-Fojo S: Hepatic lipase promotes the selective uptake of high density lipoprotein-cholesteryl esters via the scavenger receptor B1. J Lipid Res. 1999, 40: 1294-1303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Diard P, Malewiak M-I, Lagrange D, Griglio S: Hepatic lipase may act as a ligand in the uptake of artificial chylomicron remnant-like particles by isolated rat hepatocytes. Biochem J. 1994, 299: 899-894.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zambon A, Deeb SS, Pauletto P, Crepaldi G, Brunzell JD: Hepatic lipase: a marker for cardiovascular disease risk and response to therapy. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2003, 14: 179-189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deeb SS, Zambon A, Carr MC, Ayyobi AF, Brunzell JD: Hepatic lipase and dyslipidemia: interactions among genetic variants, obesity, gender, and diet. J Lipid Res. 2003, 44: 1279-1286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jansen H, Verhoeven AJ, Weeks L, Kastelein JJ, Halley DJ, van den Ouweland A, Jukema JW, Seidell JC, Birkenhäger JC: Common C-to-T substitution at position -480 of the hepatic lipase promoter associated with a lowered lipase activity in coronary artery disease patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 2837-2842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hegele RA, Little JA, Vezina C, Maguire GF, Tu L, Wolever TS, Jenkins D|J, Connelly PW: Hepatic lipase deficiency: Clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic characteristics. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993, 13: 720-728.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Breckenridge WC, Little JA, Alaupovic P, Wang CS, Kuksis A, Kakis G, Lindgren F, Gardiner G: Lipoprotein abnormalities associated with a familial deficiency of hepatic lipase. Atherosclerosis. 1982, 45: 161-179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruel IL, Couture P, Gagne C, Deshaies Y, Simard J, Hegele RA, Lamarche B: Characterization of a novel mutation causing hepatic lipase deficiency among French Canadians. J Lipid Res. 2003, 44: 1508-1514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Datta S, Luo CC, Li WH, VanTuinen P, Ledbetter DH, Brown MA, Chen SH, Liu SW, Chan L: Human hepatic lipase. Cloned cDNA sequence, restriction fragment length polymorphisms, chromosomal localization, and evolutionary relationships with lipoprotein lipase and pancreatic lipase. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 1107-1110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ameis D, Stahnkel G, Kobayashi J, McLean J, Lee G, Biischerl M, Schotz MC, Will H: Isolation and characterization of the human hepatic lipase gene. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 6552-6555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Srivastava N, Chowdhury PR, Averna M, Srivastava RA: Estrogen increases hepatic lipase levels in inbred strains of mice: A possible mechanism for estrogendependent lowering of high density lipoprotein. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001, 220: 87-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jansen H, Verhoeven AJ, Sijbrands EJ: Hepatic lipase: a pro- or anti-atherogenic protein?. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43: 1352-1362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deeb SS, Peng R: The C-514T polymorphism in the human hepatic lipase gene promoter diminishes its activity. J Lipid Res. 2000, 41: 155-158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaacs A, Aulchenko YS, Hofman A, Sijbrands EJ, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Klungel OH, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Stricker BH, Oostra BA, Witteman JC, van Duijn CM: Epistatic effect of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and hepatic lipase on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 92: 2680-2687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guerra R, Wang J, Grundy SM, Cohen JC: A hepatic lipase (LIPC) allele associated with high plasma concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 4532-4537.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaacs A, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Njajou OT, Witteman JC, van Duijn CM: The -514 C- > T hepatic lipase promoter region polymorphism and plasma lipids: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 3858-3863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Santamarina-Fojo S, Haudenschild C, Amar M: The role of hepatic lipase in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1998, 9: 211-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dugi KA, Brandauer K, Schmidt N, Nau B, Schneider JG, Mentz S, Keiper T, Schaefer JR, Meissner C, Kather H, Bahner ML, Fiehn W, Kreuzer J: Low hepatic lipase activity is a novel risk factor for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001, 104: 3057-3062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shohet RV, Vega GL, Anwar A, Cigarroa JE, Grundy SM, Cohen JC: Hepatic lipase (LIPC) promoter polymorphism in men with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999, 19: 1975-1978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zambon A, Deeb SS, Brown BG, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: Common hepatic lipase gene promoter variant determines clinical response to intensive lipid-lowering treatment. Circulation. 2001, 103: 792-798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruel IL, Couture P, Cohn JS, Bensadoun A, Marcil M, Lamarche B: Evidence that hepatic lipase deficiency in humans is not associated with proatherogenic changes in HDL composition and metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2004, 45: 1528-1537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yasuda T, Ishida T, Rader DJ: Update on the role of endothelial lipase in high-density lipoprotein metabolism, reverse cholesterol transport, and atherosclerosis. Circ J. 2010, 74: 2263-2270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zambon A, Bertocco S, Vitturi N, Polentarutti V, Vianello D, Crepaldi G: Relevance of hepatic lipase to the metabolism of triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003, 31: 1070-1074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Saxena U, Klein MG, Vanni TM, Goldberg LI: Lipoprotein lipase increases low density lipoprotein retention by subendothelial cell matrix. J Clin Invest. 1992, 89: 373-380.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Babaev VR, Patel MB, Semenkovich CF, Fazio S, Linton MF: Macrophage lipoprotein lipase promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 26293-26299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. von Eckardstein A, Nofer JR, Assmann G: High density lipoproteins and arteriosclerosis. Role of cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 13-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. von Eckardstein A, Nofer JR, Assmann G: Acceleration of reverse cholesterol transport. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000, 15: 348-354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jansen H: Hepatic lipase: friend or foe and under what circumstances?. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004, 6: 343-347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill SA, McQueen MJ: Reverse cholesterol transport-A review of the process and its clinical implications. Clin Biochem. 1997, 30: 517-525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Annema W, Tietge UJ: Role of hepatic lipase and endothelial lipase in high-density lipoprotein-mediated reverse cholesterol transport. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011, 13: 257-265.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Anderson JL, Carlquist JF: Genetic polymorphisms of hepatic lipase and cholesteryl ester transfer protein, intermediate phenotypes, and coronary risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 41: 1990-1993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ordovas JM, Corella D, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Couture P, Coltell O, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ, Tucker KL: Dietary fat intake determines the effect of a common polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene promoter on high-density lipoprotein metabolism: evidence of a strong dose effect in this gene-nutrient interaction in the Framingham study. Circulation. 2002, 106: 2315-2321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nie L, Wang J, Clark LT, Tang A, Vega GL, Grundy SM, Cohen JC: Body mass index and hepatic lipase gene (LIPC) polymorphism jointly influence postheparin plasma hepatic lipase activity. J Lipid Res. 1998, 39: 1127-1130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Carr MC, Hokanson JE, Zambon A, Deeb SS, Barrett PH, Purnell JQ, Brunzell JD: The contribution of intraabdominal fat to gender differences in hepatic lipase activity and low/high density lipoprotein heterogeneity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 2831-2837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E: Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998, 280: 605-613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Brosnihan KB, Sharp PC, Shumaker SA, Snyder TE, Furberg CD, Kowalchuk GJ, Stuckey TD, Rogers WJ, Givens DH, Waters D: Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343: 522-529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Herrington DM, Klein KP: Randomized clinical trials of hormone replacement therapy for treatment or prevention of cardiovascular disease: a review of the findings. Atherosclerosis. 2003, 166: 203-212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH: Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use and the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Eng J Med. 1996, 335: 453-461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. LaCroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Johnson KC, Martin L, Margolis KL, Stefanick ML, Brzyski R, Curb JD, Howard BV, Lewis CE, Wactawski-Wende J, : Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy. JAMA. 2011, 305: 1305-1314.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mosca L, Collins P, Herrington DM, Mendelsohn ME, Pasternak RC, Robertson RM, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Smith SC, Taubert KA, Wenger NK, : Hormone replacement and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001, 104: 499-503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamon-Fava S, Asztalos BF, Howard TD, Reboussin DM, Horvath KV, Schaefer EJ, Herrington DM: Association of polymorphisms in genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism with plasma concentrations of remnant lipoproteins and HDL subpopulations before and after hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010, 72: 169-175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Newby LK, Piña IL, Roger VL, Shaw LJ, Zhao D, Beckie TM, Bushnell C, D'Armiento J, Kris-Etherton PM, Fang J, Ganiats TG, Gomes AS, Gracia CR, Haan CK, Jackson EA, Judelson DR, Kelepouris E, Lavie CJ, Moore A, Nussmeier NA, Ofili E, Oparil S, Ouyang P, Pinn VW: Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association. Circulation. 2011, 123: 1243-1262.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lamon-Fava S, Herringtonb DM, Reboussinc DM, Sherman M, Horvath K, Schaefer EJ, Asztalos BF: Changes in remnant and high-density lipoproteins associated with hormone therapy and progression of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Atherosclerosis. 2009, 205: 325-330.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Chamberlain AM, Folsom AR, Schreiner PJ, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne CM: Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in relation to genetic polymorphisms and menopausal status: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 200: 322-328.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Vega GL, Gao J, Bersot TP, Mahley RW, Verstraete R, Grundy SM, White A, Cohen JC: The -514 polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene (LIPC) does not influence androgen mediated stimulation of hepatic lipase activity. J Lipid Res. 1998, 39: 1520-1524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zambon A, Deeb SS, Brown BG, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: Common hepatic lipase gene promoter variant determines clinical response to intensive lipid-lowering treatment. Circulation. 2001, 792-798.Google Scholar
  51. Couture P, Otvos JD, Cupples LA, Lahoz C, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ, Ordovas JM: Association of the C-514T polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene with variations in lipoprotein subclass profiles: The Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000, 20: 815-822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Somekawa Y, Fujimura M, Tomura S, Arinami T, Hamaguchi H: Relation of the -514CT polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene to serum HDL and LDL cholesterol levels in postmenopausal women under hormone replacement therapy. Atherosclerosis. 2002, 162: 17-21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fan YM, Dastidar P, Jokela H, Punnonen R, Lehtimäki T: Hepatic lipase C480t genotype-dependent benefit from long-term hormone replacement therapy for atherosclerosis progression in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 3786-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. , , : Third report of the national cholesterol education program expert panel on detection evaluation and, treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults final report. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.Google Scholar
  55. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Somekawa Y, Umeki H, Kobayashi K, Tomura S, Aso T, Hamaguchi H: Effects of hormone replacement therapy and hepatic lipase polymorphism on serum lipid profiles in postmenopausal Japanese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 4766-4770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pulchinelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.