Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase 1 in hearts of mice

Lipids in Health and Disease201211:22

  • Received: 17 December 2011
  • Accepted: 7 February 2012
  • Published:



Results from different trails have provided evidence of protective effects of cis- 9,trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on cardiovascular diseases. But the inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase 1 (PHD1) associated with induction of hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) by CLA in these protective effects has never been reported before. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the two predominant cis- 9,trans-11 (c9, t11), trans-10,cis-12 (t10, c12) CLA isomers and mixture of these two isomers can inhibit PHD1 with induction of HIFs in myocardium in mice and subsequent effects on myocardium metabolism.


CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA inhibited PHD1 protein expression and increased the levels of protein and mRNA in HIF-2α in myocardium in mice. Meanwhile, CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA also elevated the expression of HIF related transcriptional factors like PDK4 and PPARα. The reprogramming of basal metabolism in myocardium in mice was shown on increasing of GLUT4 gene expression by c9, t11 CLA supplemented group. UCP2 was increased by CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA for attenuating production of ROS.


CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA could inhibit PHD1 and induce HIF-2α in myocardium in mice, which is associated with upregulation of PDK4 by activation of PPARα. This process also implies a reprogramming of basal metabolism and oxidative damage protection in myocardium in mice. All the effects shown in hearts of mice are due to c9, t11 CLA but not t10, c12 CLA.


  • CLA
  • HIF-2α
  • PDK4
  • PPARα


Heart disease like myocardial infarction (MI) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart ischemia commonly are known as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are the interruption of blood supply to part of the heart, causing heart cells to die. In 2008, an estimated 17.3 million people died from CVDs in the world, in which over 80% of CVD deaths take place in low-and middle-income countries [1].

Oxygen availability is insufficient when inadequate blood supply happens. Cells undergo adaptive changes in gene expression that promote survival in low oxygen (hypoxic) environment. Cellular adaptation to oxygen availability is mediated by the hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs), a member of the basic helix-loop-helix-PAS superfamily which transactivate a host of genes in the nucleus involved in the adaption of hypoxic stress [2]. HIF consists of an unstable α subunit and a stable β subunit that binds DNA at specific locations termed hypoxia response elements (HERs) to regulate many genes expression related to hypoxia [3]. HIF-α subunit is regulatory and unique to the hypoxic response. HIF-β subunit is constitutive and also involved in xenobiotic response. Three different genes encoding HIF-α subunit are found in mammals: HIF-1α, HIF-2α and HIF-3α [2]. HIF-α proteins are maintained at low steady-state level under normoxic condition via hydroxylation by HIF prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) [4]. Among these three HIF-α isoforms, HIF-2α in particular shows a unique ability to induce metabolic reprogramming, which ultimately makes mitochondrion harmless but less active in certain conditions by regulating expression of numerous genes [5]. PHDs are 2-oxoglutarate dioxygenases, which are present in three forms in mammals, designated PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 [6]. Hydroxylated HIF recruits the E3-ubiquitin ligase, von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL) [7, 8], which in turn tags HIF with ubiquitin groups and targets it for degradation by proteasome [9, 10].

Many cardiovascular diseases including anemia, myocardial infarction and stroke are linked to inadequate tissue oxygen. So, up-regulation of HIFs by inhibition of PHDs may have beneficial effect on therapy for hypoxia dependent process involved in cardiovascular disease [10]. The availability of less cumbersome non-toxic inhibitors of PHDs has been proved very useful for therapeutic intervention [1113].

Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a group of positional and geometric isomers of the essential fatty acid-linoleic acid (LA), which is produced by the bacterial biohydrogenation of linoleic acid in the gut of ruminant animals via an enzymatic isomerase reaction [14]. CLA is found naturally in food products from these animals predominantly as the cis-9,trans-11 form, whereas synthetic CLA preparations consist of a few different isomers with approximately equal amount of cis-9,trans- 11 and trans-10,cis-12 CLA [15].

Since be found from 1980s, many research has been done with biological functions of these two predominant isomers of CLA. These isomers are both biologically active and known to have different physiological effects [16]. The original discovery of CLA was as an anticancer component, which was proven to be an effective prevention tool in a number of animal cancer models, such as skin, colon, mammary, lung and liver [17, 18]. Both isomers have proven to be effective in prevention of cancer, while others reported differences in anti-cancer activities between these isomers [19, 20]. t10, c12 CLA was reported to prevent cardiovascular disease [21, 22] and reduce body fat in animals [23], which is one of the most important activities of CLA. While c9, t11 CLA was not responsible for these effects [24, 25]. There was also research about CLA that it can reduce inflammatory and improve immune response [2628]. But the controversy was that t10, c12 CLA induced inflammatory responses in white adipose tissue [29]. Besides positive effects induced by CLA, there were also negative effects reported for CLA, especially t10, c12 CLA. Mice fed with CLA mixture or t10, c12 CLA resulted in lipodystrophy, hyperinsulinemia and liver steatosis, whereas, c9, t11 CLA had no negative effect like t10,12 CLA [3032].

There was research reported that c9, t11 CLA in adipose tissue was associated with a lower risk of MI in basic [33]. But the mechanism of this protective effect is still not fully defined. We estimated that CLA may have influence on PHDs, which is related to the protective effect on myocardium. The mice model was used by supplementing with individual isomers of CLA and the mixture of these two isomers in the diet to determine if these effects are associated with role of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor on myocardium.

Material and method


Semipurified diet (TD.04460) was from Harlan Teklad (Madison, WI). Antibodies for prolyl hydroxylase 1 (PHD1) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were purchased from Bethyl (Montgomery, TX). Antibodies for hypoxia inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and secondary antibody coupled to horse radish peroxidase (HRP) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Other solvents used were purchased from either Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburg, PA).

Animal and diet

Forty six-month old female ICR mice were randomized into four groups of ten mice each. Animals were housed in individual wire-bottomed cages in a temperature-controlled, humidified room maintained on a 12 h on/off light cycle and were provided free access to food and water. The mice were fed a semipurified powered diet (TD.04460) (Table 1). Diets were prepared at the beginning of the study and kept at -20°C until use. Fresh diet was provided three times a week. After 1 week adaptation, animals were fed one of the following diets; control, 0.5% CLA mixture (Mixture), and 0.20% cis-9,trans-11 CLA (c9, t11 CLA), or 0.20% trans-10,cis-12 CLA (t10, c12 CLA). 0.20% of the individual isomers are equivalent to the levels found in 0.5% CLA mixture diet. Body weight was measured weekly. All CLA preparations were purchased from Natural ASA (Hovdebygda, Norway). The composition of the CLA preparations is given in Table 2.
Table 1

TD.04460 Basal Mix (94%)



Casein, "Vitamin-Free" Test




Corn Starch






Soybean Oil




Mineral Mix, w/o Ca (04374)


Vitamin Mix, AIN-93-VX (94047)


Choline Bitartrate


TBHQ, antioxidant


Table 2

Composition (%) of CLA Preparations Used in this studya


CLA preparation


> 90% c9, t11

> 90% t10, c12


c9, t11 CLA




t10, c12 CLA




Oleic acid (18:1)








aAnalytical data provided by Natural ASA (Hovdebygda, Norway)

Sacrifice and tissue sample collection

After 8 weeks, animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation after 4 h fasting. Hearts were removed and frozen by immersion in liquid N2, stored at -80°C until needed for analysis.

mRNA expression analysis

From frozen hearts, mRNA expression levels of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), endothelial PAS domain-containing protein 1 (EPAS1), aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (ARNT2), egl nine homolog 2 (EGLN2), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1b (CPT1b), glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4), uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) were analyzed by real-time PCR using StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System with StepOne Software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Total RNA from heart was isolated with Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The reference sequence for the mRNAs, the housekeeping gene control (GAPDH) is shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Information of gene primers used for RT-PCR


Assay ID


Exon Boundary

Assay Location























































Western blot analysis

Tissue lysates were prepared in homogenization buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10%(v/v) glycerol, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)] and centrifuged at 12,000 r.p.m. for 20 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay (Hercules, CA) using 1.4 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. Proteins (25 μg) from each sample were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). After blocking with a specific primary antiserum in Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T) and 5% non-fat dry milk at 4°C overnight, the membrane was incubated with each antibody (anti-PHD1, anti-HIF-2α, anti-PPARα, anti-GAPDH) at 4°C overnight. Finally, after three washes with TBS-T, the blots were incubated with secondary antibody coupled to HRP for 1 h at room temperature, visualized using ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and quantified by Kodak Image Station Software (Scion, Frederick, MD). Relative protein levels were determined by comparison to GAPDH band intensity, which was used as internal control for western blotting analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as means and standard errors. All analyses were carried out using SAS software (Version 9.2, SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC) by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test.


Body weight

No significant difference in body weight was observed with the exception of week 4, where CLA mixture-fed animal had significant lower weight compared to control (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on body weight in the mice












25.90 ± 0.65a

29.68 ± 0.44a

29.49 ± 0.51a

30.19 ± 0.60a

30.40 ± 0.64a

30.29 ± 0.41a

31.94 ± 0.44a

32.93 ± 0.52ab

33.17 ± 0.58ab

CLA mixture

25.90 ± 0.65a

28.58 ± 0.46a

28.03 ± 0.58a

28.68 ± 0.68a

28.44 ± 0.77b

29.29 ± 0.77a

32.00 ± 0.73a

32.30 ± 0.71b

31.88 ± 0.79b

c9, t11 CLA

25.92 ± 0.65a

29.82 ± 0.61a

29.41 ± 0.68a

30.23 ± 0.62a

29.93 ± 0.67ab

30.04 ± 0.82a

32.36 ± 0.69a

34.36 ± 0.82a

34.29 ± 0.89a

t10,12 CLA

25.63 ± 0.63a

29.31 ± 0.41a

28.92 ± 0.43a

29.79 ± 0.45a

29.20 ± 0.32ab

30.93 ± 0.32a

32.82 ± 0.41a

34.05 ± 0.44ab

33.26 ± 0.60ab

Body weight (BW) in grams was measured weekly (0-8 weeks). Female mice were fed one of the treatment diets for 8 weeks: control, 0.5% CLA mixture, 0.2% c9, t11 CLA and 0.2% t10, c12 CLA. Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. Numbers are mean ± S.E. (n = 10)

Gene expressions of HIFs and PHD1

The effect of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on gene expressions of three types of HIF-α subunits, HIF-β subunit and HIF-α subunit hydroxylase were determined. As shown in Figure 1A, c9, t11 CLA had effect on HIF-1α gene expression. As seen in Figure 1B, 1-fold increase in EPAS1 (HIF-2α) gene expression was noted in mice fed with c9, t11 CLA and the same effect was also seen in CLA mixture-fed mice (P < 0.05). HIF-3α gene expression was undetermined among all treatments. ARNT2 (HIF-β) and EGLN2 (PHD1) gene expressions were unaltered by all treatment (Figure 1C and 1D).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Effects of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on gene expressions of HIFs and PHD1 from the heart: (A) HIF-1α, (B) EPAS1 (HIF-2α), (C) ARNT2 (HIF-β) and (D) EGLN2 (PHD1). Female mice were fed one of the treatment diets for 8 weeks: control, 0.5% CLA mixture, 0.2% c9, t11 CLA and 0.2% t10, c12 CLA. Different letters in each figure indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. Numbers are mean ± S.E. (n = 5).

Protein expressions of HIF-2α and PHD1

After determining the effect of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on HIFs and PHD1 in mRNA level, protein expressions of HIF-2α and PHD1 from animals were also determined. As shown in Figure 2A and 2C, the highest PHD1 protein expression was observed in control-fed animal compared to other groups. The effect of CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA on increasing HIF-2α protein expression was shown in Figure 2B and 2E.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Effects of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on protein expressions from the heart: (A) PHD1 and (B) HIF-2α; relative band intensity statistical results: (D) PHD1 and (E) HIF-2α. (C) GAPDH was used as internal control for western blotting analysis. Female mice were fed one of the treatment diets for 8 weeks: control, 0.5% CLA mixture, 0.2% c9, t11 CLA and 0.2% t10, c12 CLA. Different letters in each figure indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. Numbers are mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

Gene and protein expressions of PPARα pathway

As recently noted [5], enhanced expressions of PDK4 and PPARα associated with stabilized HIF-2α were shown in mouse skeletal muscle. To determine if the effect of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on stabilization of HIF-2α might be mediated by PPARα pathway, PDK4 and PPARα expressions in myocardium in mice were measured. Compared with control group (P < 0.05), a significant elevation of PDK4 gene expression was evident in mice fed with CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA, as shown in Figure 3A. The same trend of PPARα gene expression was also observed as PDK4 gene expression (P < 0.05) (Figure 3B). Similar as PPARα gene expression, CLA mixture, c9, t11 CLA but also 10,12 CLA increased PPARα protein expression in comparison with control (Figure 3C and 3D).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Effects of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on gene and protein expressions of PPARα pathway from the heart: (A) PDK4 gene expression, (B) PPARα gene expression, (C) protein relative band intensity statistical result of PPARα and (D) PPARα protein expression. (E) GAPDH was used as internal control for western blotting analysis. Female mice were fed one of the treatment diets for 8 weeks: control, 0.5% CLA mixture, 0.2% c9, t11 CLA and 0.2% t10, c12 CLA. Different letters in each figure indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. Numbers are mean ± S.E. (n = 5 for gene expressions and n = 3 for protein expression).

Gene expressions of glucose and lipid metabolism enzymes

As a marker for glucose metabolism, GLUT4 gene expression was only increased by c9, t11 CLA fed group compared with the other groups (P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). For a key enzyme of fatty acid β-oxidation, CPT1b gene expression was not altered by all treatments (Figure 4B). CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA significantly increased UCP2 gene expression (P < 0.05) relative to control and t10, c12 CLA fed animals (Figure 4C).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Effects of individual isomers of CLA and CLA mixture on gene expressions of glucose and lipid metabolism enzymes from the heart: (A) GLUT4, (B) CPT1b and (C) UCP2. Female mice were fed one of the treatment diets for 8 weeks: control, 0.5% CLA mixture, 0.2% c9, t11 CLA and 0.2% t10, c12 CLA. Different letters in each figure indicate significant difference at P < 0.05. Numbers are mean ± S.E. (n = 5).


In this study, CLA mixture and the two predominant isomers of CLA showed the ability to inhibit PHD1 protein expression. But interestingly, only CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA played a role in stabilizing HIF-2α in the normoxia environment and affected expressions of HIF related transcriptional genes with inhibition of PHD1 in hearts of mice. This is a new discovery of well-studied CLA on myocardium protective effect.

One of the important effects of CLA is on decreasing body weight gain, which was proved in various animal models like mice and rats [25, 34]. However, these findings were shown when those animals were given high amount of CLA, in which t10, c12 CLA was contributed to this effect [35, 36]. When animals were supplemented with low amount of CLA mixture (≤ 0.5% in the diet) or the two predominant isomers of CLA, the body weights were not affected [3739], which is consistent with our study.

Since PHD1 is a direct oxygen sensor, alternation of expression of PHD-1 is expected to change hypoxic adaptation [40]. Most of the PHD inhibitors reported so far, e.g. DMOG [41], 3,4-DHB [42], FG-0041 [43] are chemicals. None of them is from natural food like CLA which is contained in milk or beef. Inhibition of PHD1 associated with stabilized expression HIF-2α expression in normoxia condition was seen in CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA fed mice, which is consistent with a former study that mice lacking PHD1 (PHD1-null mice) showed significant expression of HIF-2α in the absence of hypoxia [5].

Specifically, CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA increased HIF-α expression like HIF-1α and HIF-2α in mRNA or protein level. The protective effect of HIFs within different tissues has already been noted before [5, 44, 45]. However, there is a debate about the expression of HIF-α in mRNA and in protein level. Research indicated that there was no significant increase in the mRNA expression of EPAS1 [46, 47]. This may be due to posttranscriptional regulation as found in specific cell types [48, 49]. From the results showing in the experiment, the regulation of expression of EGLN2 (PHD1) in different levels may share the same mechanism as HIF-α. Interesting, t10, c12 CLA also down-regulated PHD1 protein expression, but it was not as potent as 19, t11 CLA on EPAS1 expression, which may be the difference of bioactivity of these two isomers of CLA. In general, HIF-β is constitutively expressed and heterodimerizes with HIF-α subunit in the nucleus to form a complex, which binds to hypoxia-responsive elements in enhancers and promoters of oxygen-responsive genes under hypoxic conditions [47]. Consistent with the former research, the expression of ARNT2 was not altered by all treatments in this study.

The possible mechanism inducing protective effect of HIFs, especially HIF-2α, is linked to an increase in the expression of PDK4 [50]. In the normoxic environment, pyruvate enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle inside the mitochondrion where it generates ATP in the presence of oxygen. But with the inhibition of PHD1 or in the hypoxia environment like heart ischemia, entry of pyruvate is restricted by expression of PDK4, which is associated with induction of HIF-2α [5, 51]. In this study, PDK4 gene expression was upregulated in mice fed with CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA.

PPARα is known to activate the PDK4 gene [51]. Research on the hibernating mammal model also showed the level of PDK4 mRNA increased greatly by activation of PPARα during hibernation [52]. Hearts from PPAR agonist clofibrate-treated rats had an improved recovery of post-ischemic contractile function and reduced ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced infarct size. The coincident upregulation of PPARα and PDK4 in PHD1-deficient was also demonstrated by knockdown of PPARα in muscles of PHD1-deficient mice in vivo and feeding wild-type mice with PPARα agonist [5]. In this study, we found that CLA mixture and the two predominant isomers of CLA significantly increased PPARα protein expression. This result, combined with PDK4 gene expression and HIF-2α expression, suggests that PPARα activated by CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA, with induction of HIF-2α, can initiate PDK4 gene expression.

Induction of HIF-2α by inhibition of PHD1 implies a reprogramming of basal metabolism in mice, especially in energy production and utilization like glucose metabolism and fatty acid metabolism. Glycolytic flux was increased in mouse muscle fiber in low oxygen conditions [5]. As a marker for glucose metabolism, c9, t11 CLA fed mice increased GLUT4 gene expression significantly in this study. Combined, c9, t11 CLA may induce more glucose entering cell cytoplasm to generate ATP by glycolysis when PHD1 was inhibited. But for t10, c12 CLA, which promoted dysregulation of lipid and glucose metabolism in hepatic tissue while c9, t11 CLA had not effect [32]. There was also another research reported that mice supplemented 0.5% CLA mixture showed different effect on GLUT4 gene expression in adipose and skeletal muscle tissue [53]. All the evidences showed in experiments suggested that the two predominant isomers of CLA may have diverse effect on glucose metabolism in different tissues. CPT1b is known as a rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid β-oxidation which transfers fatty acids through mitochondrial membrane to be oxidized within the mitochondrial matrix [54]. A former research showed that fatty acid oxidation was not altered in PHD1-deficient mice [5], which is consistent with our research that CPT1 mRNA expression was not changed during PHD1 inhibition by CLA mixture and the two predominant isomers of CLA supplementation in the diet.

As an important energy expenditure parameter, the effect of uncoupling proteins (UCPs) has become prominent in the field of thermogenesis, especially UCP1 [55]. But for UCP2 and UCP3, there is a consensus that the primary function of UCP2 and UCP3 is to attenuate mitochondrial production of free radical to protect against oxidative damage, degenerative disease and aging rather than to promote gross thermogenesis or energetic inefficiency [56, 57]. Oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) is produced in mitochondrion, which can trigger the toxic effects living with oxygen. In contrast, oxygen depletion (hypoxia) also increases mitochondrial ROS that is detrimental to cells unless attenuated [58]. In this study, the UCP2 gene expression in mice fed with CLA mixture and c9, t11 CLA was elevated greatly, which is consistent with former research done on effect of elucidating UCP2 on attenuating ROS production [59, 60].


To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the effect of CLA on inhibition of PHD1 in vivo. One of the two predominant isomers of CLA- c9, t11 CLA showed more potent effect than the other CLA isomer- t10, c12 CLA. This inhibitory effect is associated with induction of HIF-2α. Several lines of evidence suggest the protective effect of c9, t11 CLA on inhibition of PHD1 plays a part by upregulation of PDK4 gene expression, which is activated by PPARα. This process can imply a reprogramming of basal metabolism in hearts of mice by increasing glycolysis. Meanwhile, c9, t11 CLA also increased UCP2 gene expression to attenuate the damage of ROS. This study provides a new interpretation of protective effect in myocardium in vivo by CLA, especially one of the predominant isomers-c9, t11 CLA.



The author is grateful for the suggestions during drafting manuscript by Dr. Linda Meccouri.

Authors’ Affiliations

National Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
College Animal Science and Technology, 2-Yuan-Ming-Yuan West Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China


  1. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control: WHO; World Heart Federation; World Stroke Organization. 2011Google Scholar
  2. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control: Hypoxia-inducible factor as a physiological regulator. Exp Physiol. 2005, 90 (6): 791-797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wiesener MS, Maxwell PH: HIF and oxygen sensing; as important to life as the air we breathe?. Ann Med. 2003, 35 (3): 183-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaakkola P, Mole DR, Tian YM, Wilson MI, Gielbert J, Gaskell SJ, Kriegsheim A, Hebestreit HF, Mukherji M, Schofield CJ, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliff PJ: Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science. 2001, 292 (5516): 468-472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aragonés J, Schneider M, Van Geyte K, Fraisl P: Deficiency or inhibition of oxygen sensor Phd1 induces hypoxia tolerance by reprogramming basal metabolism. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 170-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein AC, Gleadle JM, McNeill LA, Hewitson KS, O'Rourke J, Mole DR, Mukherji M, Metzen E, Wilson MI, Dhanda A, Tian YM, Masson N, Hamilton DL, Jaakkola P, Barstead R, Hodgkin J, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ: C. Elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell. 2001, 107 (1): 43-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hon WC, Wilson MI, Harlos K, Claridge TDW, Schofield CJ, Pugh CW, Maxwell PH, Ratcliffe PJ, Stuart DI, Jones EY: Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL. Nature. 2002, 417: 975-978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ivan M, Kondo K, Yang H, Kim W, Valiando J, Ohh M, Salic A, Asara JM, Lane WS, Kaelin WG: HIFα targeted for VHL-mediated destruction by proline hydroxylation: implications for O2 sensing. Science. 2001, 292 (5516): 464-468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe RJ: The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature. 1999, 399: 271-275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohh M, Park CW, Ivan M, Hoffman MA, Kim TY, Huang LE, Pavletich N, Chau V, Kaelin WG: Ubiquitination of hypoxia-inducible factor requires direct binding to the beta-domain of the von Hippel-Lindau protein. Nat Cell Biol. 2000, 2 (7): 423-427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaelin William G, Ratcliffe Peter J: Oxygen Sensing by Metazoans: The Central Role of the HIF Hydroxylase Pathway. Mol Cell. 2008, 30 (4): 393-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Giaccia A, Siim BG, Johnson RS: HIF-1 as a target for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003, 2 (10): 803-811.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hewitson KS, Schofield CJ: The HIF pathway as a therapeutic target. Drug Discov Today. 2004, 9 (16): 704-711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kepler CR, Hirons KP, McNeill JJ, Tove SB: Intermediates and products of biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrivibrio fibrisolven. J Biol Chem. 1966, 241: 1350-1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Priza MW, Park Y, Cook ME: The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog Lipid Res. 2001, 40 (4): 283-298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Priza MW, Park Y, Cook ME: Mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid: evidence and speculation. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2000, 223 (1): 8-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee KW, Lee HJ, Cho HY, Kim YJ: Role of the conjugated linoleic acid in the prevention of cancer. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2005, 45 (2): 251-258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly NS, Hubbard NE, Erickson KL: Conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cancer. J Nutr. 2007, 137 (12): 2599-2607.Google Scholar
  19. Ip C, Dong Y, Ip MM, Banni S, Carta G, Angioni E, Murru E, Spada S, Melis MP, Saebo A: Conjugated linoleic acid isomers and mammary cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer. 2002, 43 (1): 52-58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Masso-Welch PA, Zangani D, Ip C, Vaughan MM, Shoemaker S, Ramirez RA, Ip MM: Inhibition of angiogenesis by the cancer chemopreventive agent conjugated linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (15): 4383-4389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee KN, Pariza MW, Ntambi JM: Conjugated linoleic acid decreases hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase mRNA expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 248 (3): 817-821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kritchevsky D, Tepper SA, Wright S, Czarnecki SK, Wilson TA, Nicolosi RJ: Conjugated linoleic acid isomer effects in atherosclerosis: growth and regression of lesions. Lipids. 2004, 39 (7): 611-616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Park Y, Pariza MW: Mechanisms of body fat modulation by conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Food Res Int. 2007, 40 (3): 311-323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Arbonés-Mainar JM, Navarro MA, Acín S, Guzmán MA, Arnal C, Surra JC, Carnicer R, Roche HM, Osada J: Tran-10, ci-12- and ci-9, tran-11-conjugated linoleic acid isomers selectively modify HDL-apolipoprotein composition in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. J Nutr. 2006, 136 (2): 353-359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Park Y, Storkson JM, Albright KJ, Liu W, Pariza MW: Evidence that the trans-10, cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid induces body composition changes in mice. Lipids. 1999, 34 (3): 235-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cook ME, Miller CC, Park Y, Pariza M: Immune modulation by altered nutrient metabolism: nutritional control of immune-induced growth depression. Poult Sci. 1993, 72 (7): 1301-1305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bassaganya-Riera J, Hontecillas R, Beitz DC: Colonic anti-inflammatory mechanisms of conjugated linoleic acid. Clin Nutr. 2002, 21 (6): 451-459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Luongo D, Bergamo P, Rossi M: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on growth and cytokine expression in Jurkat T cells. Immunol Lett. 2003, 90 (2-3): 195-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Poirier H, Shapiro JS, Kim RJ, Lazar MA: Nutritional supplementation with tran-10, ci-12-conjugated linoleic acid induces inflammation of white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2006, 55 (6): 1634-1641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, Takahashi M, Tanemura K, Kim HJ, Tange T, Okuyama H, Kasai M, Ikemoto S, Ezaki O: Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation reduces adipose tissue by apoptosis and develops lipodystrophy in mice. Diabetes. 2000, 49 (9): 1534-1542.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Clément L, Poirier H, Niot I, Bocher V, Guerre-Millo M, Krief S, Staels B, Besnard P: Dietary trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulinemia and fatty liver in the mouse. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43 (9): 1400-1409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Navarro MA, Badimon L, Rodriguez C, Arnal C, Noone EJ, Roche HM, Osada J, Martinez-Gonzalez J: Trans-10, cis-12-CLA dysregulate lipid and glucose metabolism and induce hepatic NR4A receptors. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2010, 2: 87-97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Smit LA, Baylin A, Campos H: Conjugated linoleic acid in adipose tissue and risk of myocardial infarction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 92 (1): 34-40.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. West DB, Delany JP, Camet PM, Blohm F, Truett AA, Scimeca J: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat and energy metabolism in the mouse. Am J Physiol. 1998, 275 (3 Pt 2): R667-672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Park Y, Albright KJ, Liu W, Storkson JM, Cook ME, Pariza MW: Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids. 1997, 32 (8): 853-858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Terpstra AH, Beynen AC, Everts H, Kocsis S, Katan MB, Zock PL: The decrease in body fat in mice fed conjugated linoleic acid is due to increases in energy expenditure and energy loss in the excreta. J Nutr. 2002, 132: 940-945.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bissonauth V, Chouinard Y, Marin J, Leblanc N, Richard D, Jacques H: The effects of t10, c12 CLA isomer compared with c9, t11 CLA isomer on lipid metabolism and body composition in hamsters. J Nutr Biochem. 2006, 17 (9): 597-603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. de Deckere EA, van Amelsvoort JM, McNeill GP, Jones P: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on lipid levels and peroxisome proliferation in the hamster. Br J Nutr. 1999, 82 (4): 309-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sisk MB, Hausman DB, Martin RJ, Azain MJ: Dietary conjugated linoleic acid reduces adiposity in lean but not obese Zucker rats. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 1668-1674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Berra E, Ginouvès A, Pouysségur J: The hypoxia-inducible-factor hydroxylases bring fresh air into hypoxia signaling. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7 (1): 41-45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lomb David J, Desouza Lynette A, Franklin James L, Freeman Robert S: Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors depend on extracellular glucose and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-2 to inhibit cell death caused by Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) deprivation: evidence that HIF-2 has a role in NGF-promoted survival of sympathetic neurons. Mol Pharmacol. 2009, 75 (5): 1198-1209.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ivan M, Haberberger T, Gervasi DC, Michelson KS, Gunzler V, Kondo K, Yang H, Sorokina I, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Kaelin WG: Biochemical purification and pharmacological inhibition of a mammalian prolyl hydroxylase acting on hypoxia-inducible factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002, 99: 13459-13464.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Warnecke C, Griethe W, Weidemann A, Jurgensen JS, Willam C, Bachmann S, Ivashchenko Y, Wagner I, Frei U, Wiesener M, Eckardt KU: Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-pathway and stimulation of angiogenesis by application of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors. FASEB J. 2003, 17 (9): 1186-1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hyvarinen Jaana, Hassinen Ilmo, Sormunen Raija, Maki Joni, Kivirikko Kari, Koivunen Peppi, Myllyharju Johanna: Hearts of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase-2 hypomorphic mice show protection against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem.Google Scholar
  45. Natarajan R, Salloum FN, Fisher BJ, Kukreja RC, Fowler AA: Hypoxia inducible factor-1 activation by prolyl 4-hydroxylase-2 gene silencing attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2006, 98 (1): 133-140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Forsyth NR, Kay A, Hampson K, Downing A, Talbot R, McWhir J: Transcriptome alterations due to physiological normoxic (2% O2) culture of human embryonic stem cells. Regen Med. 2008, 3: 817-833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Westfall SD, Sachdev S, Das P, Hearne LB, Hannink M, Roberts RM, Ezashi T: Identification of oxygen-sensitive transcriptional programs in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 869-882.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Huang LE, Gu J, Schau M, Bunn HF: Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is mediated by an O2-dependent degradation domain via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (14): 7987-7992.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lang KJ, Kappel A, Goodall GJ: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha mRNA contains an internal ribosome entry site that allows efficient translation during normoxia and hypoxia. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13 (5): 1792-1801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kelly D: Hypoxic reprogramming. Nat Genet. 2008, 40 (2): 132-134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu P, Peters JM, Harris RA: Adaptive increase in pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 during starvation is mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 287 (2): 391-396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Buck MJ, Squire TL, Andrews MT: Coordinate expression of the PDK4 gene: a means of regulating fuel selection in a hibernating mammal. Physiol Genomics. 2002, 8 (1): 5-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Park Y, Park Y: Conjugated nonadecadienoic acid is more potent than conjugated linoleic acid on body fat reduction. J Nutr Biochem. 2010, 21 (8): 764-773.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. McGarry D, Brown NF: The Mitochondrial Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase System-From Concept to Molecular Analysis. Eur J Biochem. 1997, 244 (1): 1-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Brand MD, Esteves TC: Physiological functions of the mitochondrial uncoupling proteins UCP2 and UCP3. Cell Metab. 2005, 2 (2): 85-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Brand MD, Pamplona R, Portero-Otín M, Requena JR, Roebuck SJ, Buckingham JA, Clapham JC, Cadenas S: Oxidative damage and phospholipid fatty acyl composition in skeletal muscle mitochondria from mice underexpressing or overexpressing uncoupling protein 3. Biochem J. 2002, 368 (Pt 2): 597-603.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Casteilla L, Rigoulet M, Pénicaud L: Mitochondrial ROS metabolism: modulation by uncoupling proteins. IUBMB life. 2001, 52 (3-5): 181-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Guzy RD, Schumacker PT: Oxygen sensing by mitochondria at complex III: the paradox of increased reactive oxygen species during hypoxia. Exp Physiol. 2006, 91 (5): 807-819.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Arsenijevic D, Onuma H, Pecqueur C, Raimbault S, Manning BS, Miroux B, Couplan E, Alves-Guerra MC, Goubern M, Surwit R, Bouillaud F, Richard D, Collins S, Ricquier D: Disruption of the uncoupling protein-2 gene in mice reveals a role in immunity and reactive oxygen species production. Nat Genet. 2000, 26 (4): 435-439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Cortez-Pinto H, Zhi Lin H, Qi Yang S, Odwin Da Costa S, Diehl AM: Lipids up-regulate uncoupling protein 2 expression in rat hepatocytes. Gastroenterol. 1999, 116 (5): 1184-1193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zhang and Li; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.