Open Access

Associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma APOC3 and lipid levels: a meta-analysis

  • Yongyan Song1,
  • Liren Zhu2,
  • Mudwari Richa2,
  • Ping Li2,
  • Yang Yang2 and
  • Suping Li3Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201514:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0027-0

Received: 25 September 2014

Accepted: 30 March 2015

Published: 18 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Studies of the association between the apolipoprotein C3 gene (APOC3) rs5128 polymorphism and plasma levels of apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3) and lipids have reported apparently conflicting findings. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the associations of the rs5128 polymorphism with fasting APOC3 and lipid levels.

Methods

The following information was abstracted for each study: ethnicity, age, sex, health condition, sample size, genotyping and lipid assay methods, mean and standard deviation or standard error by genotypes for APOC3 and lipid variables. There were 42 eligible studies with 23846 subjects included in this meta-analysis. A dominant model was used for this meta-analysis.

Results

The results showed that the carriers of the variant allele G had higher levels of APOC3 [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.31, P < 0.00001], triglycerides (TG) (SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44, P < 0.00001), total cholesterol (TC) (SMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.22, P < 0.00001), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SMD: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17, P = 0.001) than the non-carriers. No significant association between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was detected under the dominant model (SMD: −0.03, 95% CI: −0.06-0.01, P = 0.156).

Conclusions

The results from the present meta-analysis demonstrate a significant association between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher levels of APOC3, TG, TC and LDL-C, but further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Keywords

Meta-analysisAPOC3rs5128PolymorphismLipid

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is now the leading cause of death worldwide, both in developed countries and in many developing countries [1]. After decades of study, a number of CVD risk factors have been identified. Among these risk factors, dyslipidemia, characterized by elevations of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and/or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or reduction of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, accounts for at least 50% of the population-attributable risk for CVD [2]. In recent years, much has been learned about the chromosomal regions and specific genes that influence plasma lipid or lipoprotein levels [3]. However, due to various reasons, it is difficult to identify the susceptibility genes and most associations have not been replicated across studies.

The apolipoprotein C3 gene (APOC3) is a member of the APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster and located on chromosome 11q23, an area in strong linkage with lipid metabolism [3]. Apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3) is an essential constituent of TG-rich particles including chylomicron and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), to a less extent of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Evidence from gene engineering studies suggested that the main role of APOC3 could be involved in the regulation of plasma TG levels [4],[5]. Additional copies of human APOC3 in transgenic pig were associated with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) [4], whereas APOC3 deficiency prevents hyperlipidemia induced by apolipoprotein E gene overexpression [5]. In vitro, APOC3 was found to delay the catabolism of VLDL by inhibiting the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) which is the rate-limiting enzyme for TG hydrolysis [6]. Furthermore, it also interferes the apolipoprotein E-mediated remnant removal by displacement of apolipoprotein E from VLDL particles in vivo[7],[8]. APOC3 also play important roles in modulating other lipid variables [9]. Given its role in plasma lipid metabolism, APOC3 is considered a candidate gene for dyslipidemia.

Of several variants within APOC3, a transversion from C to G in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of exon 4 results in a rs5128 polymorphism (also known as SstI, sacI, 3238C > G or 3175C > G). A recent meta-analysis [10] demonstrated that the rs5128 polymorphism is associated with CVD, but whether this polymorphism is also associated with dyslipidemia remains to be further examined. A large body of studies has investigated the associations of this polymorphism with plasma APOC3 and lipid levels [11]-[52]. Some studies found that this polymorphism is associated with higher plasma levels of APOC3 [14],[20],[27],[41],[42], TG[18],[20],[23],[25],[28],[30],[32],[33],[38],[41],[42],[44],[46],[51], TC[18],[32],[51] and LDL-C [30],[51], and lower levels of HDL-C[24]. However, the results from other studies were conflicting and inconclusive. In this paper, a meta-analysis was performed on previous reports to investigate the associations of the rs5128 polymorphism with APOC3 and fasting lipid levels. Our analysis results can provide the opportunity to elucidate the interrelationship among the rs5128 polymorphism, dyslipidemia and CVD.

Methods

Identification and eligibility of relevant studies

All articles published before May 2014 on the associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma APOC3 and lipid levels were identified. The language was limited to English. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out by using PubMed and EMBASE. The keywords used for this search were “APOC3 OR APOC-III OR apolipoprotein C-III OR apolipoprotein CIII OR apolipoprotein C3 OR APOC3 OR APO C3” concatenated with “polymorphism OR variant OR SNP OR mutation”. This meta-analysis is limited to APOC3 and the plasma lipid variables including TG, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C. The studies that fulfilled the following criteria were included: (1) data reported on fasting variables; (2) data reported on APOC3 and/or at least one of the four plasma lipid variables; (3) pre-intervention baseline data were used in interventional studies; (4) the studies in which mean plasma lipid levels and standard deviations (SD) or standard errors (SE) by genotype were available. In order to find other published work which was not indexed by PubMed and EMBASE, all references cited in the included articles were reviewed. Case reports, review articles, abstracts, animal studies, reports with incomplete data, and studies based on pedigree data were excluded.

Data extraction

The irrelevant and overlapping studies were excluded after being reviewed independently by two reviewers using a structured data collection form. The results were compared, and the disagreements were resolved by discussion. Regarding the overlapping articles, only those publications that reported the most extensive information were included. For each study included in the present meta-analysis, the following information was extracted: first author, year of publication, ethnicity, country of origin, age, sex, health condition, genotyping and lipid assay methods, sample size, mean APOC3 or lipid variables and SD or SE by genotypes.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± SD in this analysis. For those included articles in which mean ± SE was given, the value of the SD was calculated. The STATA software package v 10.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for the meta-analysis. Due to the low frequencies of the GG genotype, a dominant model [(CG + GG) versus CC] was employed to ensure adequate statistical power. When data was presented for more than one subpopulation (for example, female or male subjects, the subjects with CVD or type 2 diabetes, the subjects from different ethnicity) in one article, each subpopulation was treated as a separate comparison in this meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted by age, gender, ethnicity and health condition. Age subgroups were defined as adults and children (under 18 years old). Ethnic subgroups were defined as Caucasian, Asian, and the populations of other ethnic origins. The meta-analyses on the subgroup were only performed with at least four comparisons to ensure adequate statistical power.

The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the differences of the variables between the genotypes. A random effects model was used for all analyses because both between-study and within-study heterogeneity is considered in this model; it provides a more conservative evaluation of the significance of the association than the fixed effects model [53]. Heterogeneity between studies was tested by Cochran's χ2-based Q-statistic at a significance level of P < 0.05. Galbraith plot was used to detect the potential sources of heterogeneity, and the pooled SMD was recalculated after removal of the outlier studies identified in the plot. The populations in the studies were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) by χ2 test; the significance level is defined as α < 0.05. Publication bias was assayed by Egger's linear regression test [54], and a significance level of 0.05 was used to indicate the presence of potential publication bias.

Results

Characteristics of the included studies

Initial search of the literature yielded 646 publications. Five hundred and eighteen studies were excluded according to title and abstract. Then full text articles were retrieved and assessed on the basis of the inclusion criteria. Eighty-six papers were ineligible for the following reasons: 57 papers did not provide complete data for this meta-analysis, 24 papers presented data on other polymorphisms, 2 papers had subjects overlap with other publications, and 3 studies were based on pedigree data. In the end, 42 studies were selected for this meta-analysis.

The characteristics of the 42 included studies were summarized in Table 1. Of these, 14 studies [11],[13],[14],[19],[20],[22]-[24],[26],[27],[30],[33],[41],[42], 40 studies [11]-[13],[15]-[39],[41]-[52], 31 studies [11],[13],[15],[17]-[19],[21]-[24],[26],[28]-[36],[38]-[40],[44],[45],[47]-[52], 27 studies [17],[18],[21]-[24],[26],[28],[30]-[34],[36]-[41],[44],[45],[47]-[52] and 34 studies [11],[15]-[19],[21]-[24],[26],[28],[30]-[41],[43]-[52] presented the data on APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively. Twenty-six studies [12],[14]-[18],[20]-[23],[25]-[30],[32],[35],[39]-[41],[43],[44],[46]-[48], 10 studies [11],[19],[24],[33],[34],[37],[38],[42],[45],[49] and 6 studies [13],[31],[36],[50]-[52] involved Caucasians, Asians, and the subjects of other ethnic origins, respectively. Seven studies [12],[16],[21],[22],[30],[35],[50] only involved males, and the other 35 studies involved both males and females, among which 9 studies [14],[23],[26],[28],[29],[36],[37],[43],[47] separately provided data for males and females. Three studies [20],[36],[47] involved children. Four studies [18],[33],[38],[48] and 9 studies [12],[15]-[17],[19],[34],[35],[38],[50] involved type 2 diabetes and CVD, respectively. Twenty-three studies [12],[14]-[17],[19],[23],[25],[26],[28],[29],[34]-[38],[43],[45],[47]-[50],[52] separately provided data for more than one subpopulation, and each subpopulation was treated as a separate comparison. Genotype distribution in 6 populations or subpopulations [25],[27],[31],[38],[50],[51] significantly deviated from HWE. The units of APOC3 or plasma lipids used in the eligible studies included mg/dl or mmol/L. The complete plasma APOC3 and lipid data by genotype can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Table 1

Characteristics of individual studies included in the meta-analysis

First author, reference

year

Ethnicity

Gender

Study population

Outcomes

Aburatani [11]

1988

Asian

M/F

Subjects with hyperlipidemia and controls

APOC3, TG, TC, HDL-C

Paulweber1 [12]

1988

Caucasian

M

Patients with CVD

TG

Paulweber2 [12]

1988

Caucasian

M

Subjects without CVD

TG

Ahn [13]

1991

Other

M/F

Random subjects

APOC3, TG, TC

Shoulders1 [14]

1991

Caucasian

M

Healthy subjects

APOC3

Shoulders2 [14]

1991

Caucasian

F

Healthy subjects

APOC3

Ordovas1 [15]

1991

Caucasian

M/F

Patients with CVD

TG, TC, HDL-C

Ordovas2 [15]

1991

Caucasian

M/F

Healthy population

TG, TC, HDL-C

Tybjaerg-Hansen1 [16]

1993

Caucasian

M

Subjects with CVD

TG, HDL-C

Tybjaerg-Hansen2 [16]

1993

Caucasian

M

Subjects without CVD

TG, HDL-C

Miettinen1 [17]

1994

Caucasian

M/F

Subjects with CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Miettinen2 [17]

1994

Caucasian

M/F

Subjects without CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Rigoli [18]

1995

Caucasian

M/F

Patients with type 2 diabetes

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Bai1 [19]

1995

Asian

M/F

Subjects with CVD

APOC3, TG, TC, HDL-C

Bai2 [19]

1995

Asian

M/F

Subjects without CVD

APOC3, TG, TC, HDL-C

Shoulders [20]

1996

Caucasian

M/F

Random healthy children

APOC3, TG

López-Miranda [21]

1997

Caucasian

M

Random healthy youth

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Kee [22]

1999

Caucasian

M

Random subjects

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Dallongeville1 [23]

2000

Caucasian

M

Random subjects

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Dallongeville2 [23]

2000

Caucasian

F

Random subjects

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Wu [24]

2000

Asian

M/F

Random subjects without CVD

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Waterworth1 [25]

2000

Caucasian

M/F

Non-smokers

TG

Waterworth2 [25]

2000

Caucasian

M/F

Exsmokers (cessation for minimum of 1 year)

TG

Waterworth3 [25]

2000

Caucasian

M/F

Current smokers

TG

Russo1 [26]

2001

Caucasian

M

Framingham Offspring Study

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Russo2 [26]

2001

Caucasian

F

Framingham Offspring Study

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Olivieri [27]

2002

Caucasian

M/F

Subjects with or without CVD

APOC3, TG

Corella1 [28]

2002

Caucasian

M

Random healthy subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Corella2 [28]

2002

Caucasian

F

Random healthy subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Rodrigo1 [29]

2002

Caucasian

M

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation

TG, TC

Rodrigo2 [29]

2002

Caucasian

F

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation

TG, TC

Couillard [30]

2003

Caucasian

M

Abdominally obese subjects

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Brown [31]

2003

Other

M/F

Random subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Espino-Montoro [32]

2003

Caucasian

M/F

Hypertensive patients

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Chen [33]

2004

Asian

M/F

Patients with type 2 diabetes

APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Chhabra1 [34]

2004

Asian

M/F

Patients with CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Chhabra2 [34]

2004

Asian

M/F

Subjects without CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Liu1 [35]

2004

Caucasian

M

Subjects with CVD

TG, TC, HDL-C

Liu2 [35]

2004

Caucasian

M

Subjects without CVD

TG, TC, HDL-C

de França1 [36]

2005

Other

M

Healthy children

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

de França2 [36]

2005

Other

F

Healthy children

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Arai1 [37]

2005

Asian

M

Random subjects

TG, LDL-C, HDL-C

Arai2 [37]

2005

Asian

F

Random subjects

TG, LDL-C, HDL-C

Liu1 [38]

2005

Asian

M/F

Patients with CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Liu2 [38]

2005

Asian

M/F

Patients with type 2 diabetes

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Liu3 [38]

2005

Asian

M/F

Subjects without CVD and type 2 diabetes

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Islam [39]

2005

Caucasian

M/F

Random subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Stancáková [40]

2006

Caucasian

M/F

Patients with dyslipidemia of metabolic syndrome

TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Herron [41]

2006

Caucasian

M/F

Random subjects

APOC3, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C

Huang [42]

2006

Asian

M/F

Subjects with hypertriglyceridemia or normal

APOC3, TG

Fiegenbaum1 [43]

2007

Caucasian

M

Random healthy subjects

TG, HDL-C

Fiegenbaum2 [43]

2007

Caucasian

F

Random healthy subjects

TG, HDL-C

Nieminen [44]

2007

Caucasian

M/F

Random youth

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Parzianello1 [45]

2008

Asian

M/F

Subjects with hypertriglyceridemia

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Parzianello2 [45]

2008

Asian

M/F

Subjects free of hypertriglyceridemia

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Dallongeville [46]

2008

Caucasian

M/F

Random subjects

TG, HDL-C

Ruiz1 [47]

2008

Caucasian

M

Random healthy children

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Ruiz2 [47]

2008

Caucasian

F

Random healthy children

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Smith1 [48]

2009

Caucasian

M/F

Patients with type 2 diabetes

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Smith2 [48]

2009

Caucasian

M/F

Subjects free of type 2 diabetes

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Yiyang1 [49]

2010

Asian

M/F

Random subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Yiyang2 [49]

2010

Asian

M/F

Random subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Sediri1 [50]

2011

Other

M

Males with CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Sediri2 [50]

2011

Other

M

Males without CVD

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Abd El-Aziz3 [51]

2011

Other

M/F

Patients with CVD and controls

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Bandegi1 [52]

2011

Other

M/F

Subjects with primary hyperlipidemia

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

Bandegi2 [52]

2011

Other

M/F

Normolipidemic subjects

TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C

CVD: cardiovascular disease, M: male, F: female, TG: triglyceride, TC: total cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Summary statistics

Sixty-seven comparisons were distinguished according to the categories such as age, gender, smoking status, and health condition. Of these, 18, 64, 49, 42 and 54 comparisons were included for comparing the differences in APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively (Table 2). Totally, 23846 subjects were enrolled in this meta-analysis, 74% of them (17592 subjects) have the CC genotype, and 26% of them (6254 subjects) have the GC or GG genotype. 6523, 23528, 15891, 15310 and 19527 subjects were included in comparing the differences in APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 2

Meta-analysis of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and plasma APOC3 and lipids association

Groups or subgroups

Comparisons (n)

Q testPvalue

SMD (95% CI)

P

APOC3

    

All

18

0.004

0.22(0.12, 0.31)

<0.00001

All in HWE

15

0.007

0.20(0.09, 0.32)

0.001

Healthy

12

0.001

0.22(0.08, 0.35)

0.001

Male

5

0.135

0.11(−0.05, 0.27)

0.170

Caucasian

11

<0.00001

0.26(0.11, 0.40)

0.001

Asian

6

0.981

0.15(0.02, 0.29)

0.029

TG

    

All

64

<0.00001

0.33(0.23, 0.44)

<0.00001

All in HWE

48

<0.00001

0.31(0.20, 0.42)

<0.00001

Male

19

0.411

0.14(0.07, 0.21)

<0.00001

Female

8

0.062

0.17(0.04, 0.29)

0.011

Children

5

<0.00001

0.53(−0.37, 1.44)

0.249

Caucasian

38

<0.00001

0.39(0.24, 0.54)

<0.00001

Asian

17

0.302

0.18(0.12, 0.25)

< 0.00001

Other

9

< 0.00001

0.37(0.04, 0.69)

0.026

Healthy

39

< 0.00001

0.24(0.13, 0.35)

< 0.00001

CVD

9

0.188

0.29(0.16, 0.43)

< 0.00001

TC

    

All

49

< 0.00001

0.15(0.09, 0.22)

< 0.00001

All in HWE

41

0.06

0.12(0.07, 0.18)

< 0.00001

Male

13

0.52

0.06(−0.01, 0.14)

0.105

Female

6

0.23

0.20(0.07, 0.33)

0.002

Children

4

0.062

0.30(0.05, 0.55)

0.021

Caucasian

26

0.08

0.11(0.05, 0.18)

0.001

Asian

14

0.19

0.15(0.06, 0.24)

0.001

Other

9

< 0.00001

0.25(−0.03, 0.53)

0.081

Healthy

39

0.53

0.10(0.06, 0.14)

< 0.00001

CVD

7

0.46

0.15(0.04, 0.26)

0.008

Type 2 diabetes

4

0.18

0.24(0.05, 0.43)

0.013

LDL-C

    

All

42

< 0.00001

0.11(0.04, 0.17)

0.001

All in HWE

34

0.043

0.07(0.01, 0.13)

0.021

Male

11

0.069

0.06(−0.10, 0.12)

0.847

Female

6

0.197

0.13(0.02, 0.24)

0.021

Children

4

0.109

0.28(0.05, 0.51)

0.016

Caucasian

21

0.134

0.06(0.00, 0.13)

0.051

Asian

13

0.262

0.09(0.01, 0.16)

0.021

Other

8

< 0.00001

0.22(−0.06, 0.50)

0.119

Healthy

28

0.159

0.06(0.01, 0.11)

0.012

CVD

4

0.115

0.07(−0.13, 0.27)

0.482

Type 2 diabetes

4

0.996

0.22(0.08, 0.36)

0.002

HDL-C

    

All

54

0.314

−0.03(−0.06, 0.01)

0.156

All in HWE

42

0.195

−0.01(−0.06, 0.03)

0.597

Male

16

0.474

−0.01(−0.13, 0.00)

0.062

Female

7

0.663

−0.03(−0.11, 0.06)

0.540

Children

4

0.989

0.03(−0.13, 0.19)

0.733

Caucasian

30

0.763

−0.06(−0.10, −0.02)

0.007

Asian

16

0.173

0.06(−0.02, 0.13)

0.156

Other

8

0.562

−0.03(−0.06, 0.01)

0.536

Healthy

35

0.332

−0.03(−0.07, 0.011)

0.160

CVD

8

0.632

−0.02(−0.13, 0.09)

0.729

Type 2 diabetes

4

0.656

0.01(−0.14, 0.15)

0.915

CVD: cardiovascular disease, TG: triglyceride, TC: total cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with APOC3 and lipid levels

The outcomes of the analyses on all comparisons showed that the G carriers had higher levels of APOC3 (SMD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.31, P < 0.00001), TG (SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44, P < 0.00001), TC (SMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.22, P < 0.00001), and LDL-C (SMD: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17, P = 0.001) than the non-carriers (Table 2, Figures 1, 2, 3, 4). No statistically significant difference in the levels of HDL-C (SMD: −0.03, 95% CI: −0.06-0.01, P = 0.156) was detected between the G carriers and the non-carriers (Table 2, Figure 5). In the available studies in HWE, the associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher levels of APOC3 (SMD: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09-0.32, P = 0.001), TG (SMD: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20-0.42, P < 0.00001), TC (SMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07-0.18, P < 0.00001) and LDL-C (SMD: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.13, P = 0.021) were also significant (Table 2).
Figure 1

Forest plot of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and the plasma levels of APOC3 association. Result from the analysis on all 18 comparisons.

Figure 2

Forest plot of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and plasma levels of triglycerides association. Result from the analysis on all 64 comparisons.

Figure 3

Forest plot of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and the plasma levels of total cholesterol association. Result from the analysis on all 49 comparisons.

Figure 4

Forest plot of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and plasma levels of LDL-C association. Result from the analysis on all 42 comparisons.

Figure 5

Forest plot of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and plasma levels of HDL-C association. Result from the analysis on all 54 comparisons.

Then the subgroup analyses stratified by the characteristics of the subjects were performed. The associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher levels of APOC3 and TG were found to be significant across all subpopulations except that in male subjects for APOC3 (SMD: 0.11, 95% CI: −0.05-0.27, P = 0.170) and children for TG (SMD: 0.53, 95% CI: −0.37-1.44, P = 0.249) (Table 2). The associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher TC levels were significant across all subpopulations except that in males (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: −0.01-0.14, P = 0.105) and other ethnic origins (SMD: 0.25, 95% CI: −0.03-0.53, P = 0.081). The significant associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher LDL-C levels were detected in females (SMD: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24, P = 0.021), children (SMD: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.05-0.51, P = 0.016), Asians (SMD: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.16, P = 0.021), and marginally in Caucasians (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.00-0.13, P = 0.051). The associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher levels of LDL-C were also significant in healthy subjects (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11, P = 0.012) and diabetic patients (SMD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.36, P = 0.002) (Table 2). The associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and lower levels of HDL-C were not significant across all subgroups except that in Caucasians (SMD: −0.06, 95% CI: −0.10--0.02, P = 0.007).

Heterogeneity analysis and publication bias

There was significant heterogeneity among the total comparisons for APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C. Seven comparisons (shoulders, 1996, Russo1, 2001, Dallongeville1, 2000, Aburatani, 1988, Olivieri, 2002, Dallongeville2, 2000, Herron, 2006), 12 comparisons (shoulders, 1996, Smith1, 2009, Smith2, 2009, Abd El-Aziz3, 2011, Parzianello2, 2008, Sediri1, 2011, Dallongeville, 2008, Waterworth1, 2000, Bandegi1, 2011, Espino-Montoro, 2003, Chhabra1, 2004, Waterworth3, 2000), 3 comparisons (Abd El-Aziz3, 2011, Russo1, 2001, Liu1, 2005) and 4 comparisons (Nieminen, 2007, Abd El-Aziz3, 2011, de França1, 2005, Liu1, 2005) were respectively identified as the main contributors of the heterogeneity for APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C by using Galbraith plot. The heterogeneity was effectively removed or decreased after exclusion of these outlier studies, but the SMD values and their 95% CI did not change significantly (APOC3: SMD: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.26, P = 0.018, Pheterogeneity = 0.158; TG: SMD: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.14-0.21, P < 0.00001, Pheterogeneity = 0.311; TC: SMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.08-0.17, P < 0.00001, Pheterogeneity = 0.152; LDL-C: SMD: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.12, P = 0.002, Pheterogeneity = 0.270). No significant heterogeneity was found among the total comparisons and the subgroup analyses for HDL-C.

The Egger’s test revealed that no publication bias was present in the analyses for APOC3 (t: 1.94, 95% CI: −0.14-3.13, P = 0.071), TG (t: 1.57, 95% CI: −0.37-3.09, P = 0.121), TC (t: 1.13, 95% CI: −0.44-1.56, P = 0.264), LDL-C (t: 0.85, 95% CI: −0.66-1.61, P = 0.402), and HDL-C (t: −0.85, 95% CI: −0.92-0.38, P = 0.402). Figures A-E of the Additional file 2: Figure S1 are the Egger’s plots for APOC3, TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively.

Discussion

A genome-wide association study has suggested that the polymorphisms in or near the APOC3 gene are among the strongest genetic determinants of plasma lipid concentrations [55]. A large body of literature has investigated the associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma APOC3 and/or lipid levels [11]-[52]. Associations of this polymorphism with increased levels of APOC3 [14],[20],[27],[41],[42], TG [18],[20],[23],[25],[28],[30],[32],[33],[38],[41],[42],[44],[46],[51], TC [18],[32],[51] and LDL-C [30],[51], and/or decreased levels of HDL-C [24] have been reported in some, but not all studies. The lack of consistency across these studies reflects some existed limitations such as small sample size, ethnic differences and research methodology. In the present meta-analysis, the associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma APOC3 and lipid levels were investigated to examine these discrepancies.

The frequencies of the GG homozygote were very low across the populations. Most of the included studies only provided data for CC genotype and G allele carriers (GC + GG), and did not provide data separately for heterozygote CG and homozygote GG. Therefore, a dominant model (CC vs. CG + GG) was employed for this meta-analysis to ensure adequate statistical power. The results suggested that the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism was significantly associated with fasting plasma levels of APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C under the dominant model. The carriers of G allele had higher levels of APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C than the non-carriers. A recent meta-analysis [10] demonstrated that the rs5128 polymorphism is associated with CVD risk. CVD is recognized as a multifactorial disease, and dyslipidemia accounts for at least 50% of the population-attributable risk [2]. Taken our results together, it is possible that the association between the rs5128 polymorphism and CVD is mediated by the dyslipidemia caused by the G allele of the rs5128 polymorphism.

Subgroup analyses by age, gender, ethnicity and health condition were performed since they might be important variables in determining associative risk with dyslipidemia. For example, the present analyses indicated that age might modulate the association between the rs5128 polymorphism and TG levels since the significant association especially exists in males and females, but not in children (Table 2). In addition, the significant effects of the rs5128 polymorphism on TC and LDL-C exist in females and children, but not in males; the significant effect of the polymorphism on LDL-C exists in healthy subjects and diabetic patients, but not in CVD patients. More studies should be conducted to further examine the association of this polymorphism with LDL-C in CVD patients. The associations of the rs5128 polymorphism with plasma levels of APOC3, TG, TC and LDL-C were very robust, which did not vary greatly when the analyses were performed only with the available studies in HWE. However, the significant association of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma HDL-C levels was not detected in this meta-analysis.

Significant heterogeneity was found across the analyses for APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C. The main sources of heterogeneity were from ethnic origin, study design, gender and health condition of the subjects, etc. Subgroup analyses stratified by the characteristics of the subjects were performed to explore the potential source of the observed heterogeneity, and significant heterogeneity was still observed in some subgroups. Galbraith plot was employed to further evaluate the sources of heterogeneity. Outlier studies were identified by using the plot, and the heterogeneity was effectively removed or decreased after exclusion of these outlier studies. No significant changes of the SMD value were found after excluding the outlier studies.

The associations of the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism with plasma APOC3, TG, TC and LDL-C were not likely to be type I errors (false-positive results). Firstly, the results from this meta-analysis were based on the random effects model. Comparing with fixed effects model, the random effects model is a more conservative method and less likely to produce false-positive results. Secondly, 42 studies with 23846 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Among the subjects, 26% of them were the carriers of the rs5128 G allele. Since the incidence of the G allele carriers was sufficiently high, type I error may have been prevented.

The possible mechanism under which the rs5128 polymorphism modulates plasma APOC3 has not been clarified yet. One explanation could be that the G allele enhances the transcriptional activity of APOC3 and leads to a higher plasma APOC3 level since the rs5128 polymorphism is located in the 3'UTR of exon 4 of this gene. In the present analyses, a significant higher level of APOC3 was found in G carriers comparing with the CC genotype subjects. Previous studies have shown that APOC3 can increase plasma TG levels. Three mechanisms are involved in the elevation of TG levels by APOC3. Firstly, APOC3 promotes the assembly and secretion of VLDL in liver [56]-[58]. Overexpression of APOC3 in McA-RH7777 cells by recombinant adenovirus expression vector resulted in significantly increased VLDL assembly and secretion with a dose-dependent effect [56]. APOC3 gene knockout mice showed no increase in VLDL secretion after two weeks of high-fat diet [57]. Functional analysis found that two regions on the APOC3 polypeptide chain are closely related to VLDL synthesis and secretion [57],[58]. Secondly, APOC3 inhibits LPL, which is located on the inner side of capillaries and is the main enzyme to hydrolyze TG-rich particles [59]. Thirdly, APOC3 inhibits hepatic lipase. Hepatic lipase is located on the endothelial side of liver sinusoids, and its main function is to remove the remnants of chylomicron and VLDL.

The present meta-analysis also suggested the significant associations of the rs5128 polymorphism with higher levels of LDL-C and TC. There is interrelationship between TG metabolism and cholesterol metabolism in the body, so the elevation of VLDL-TG by APOC3 might have disturbed the cholesterol metabolism and increased plasma LDL-C and TC levels. For example, LDL particles are formed in the bloodstream as VLDL particles lose TG through the action of LPL. Hence, the increase of VLDL Levels can cause the elevation of LDL levels, and accordingly the LDL-C levels. Since approximately 70% of plasma cholesterol molecules are resided in LDL particles, the elevation of LDL-C can lead to higher levels of TC. In addition, it is likely that the rs5128 polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with other causative mutations involved in the metabolism of LDL. APOC3 is a member of the APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster which is the key component in modulating lipid metabolism [60]. Several polymorphism sites in the APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster have been found to significantly affect plasma LDL-C levels [61].

In the current study, we did not find significant association between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and lower levels of HDL-C by meta-analysis. One reason could be that HDL is metabolized independently of APOC3 [4],[5]. Unlike VLDL and LDL, nascent HDL particles are mainly formed in liver, matured in bloodstream and go back to liver with full load of cholesteryl ester molecules. In this process, HDL is mainly regulated by the proteins such as apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), ATP-Binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) [62]. Therefore, the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism was found to be associated with the plasma levels of APOC3, TG, LDL-C and TC, but not HDL-C.

The limitations of the present meta-analysis should be noted. Firstly, dyslipidemia is involved in a number of genes as well as some environmental factors. However, the interactions of the rs5128 polymorphism with other polymorphic loci or environmental factors on plasma APOC3 and lipid levels have not been investigated in this analysis due to the lack of the original data of the included studies. In other words, the more precise results could have been gained if more detailed individual data were available or the stratification analyses based on the environmental factors such as diet, exercise, and smoking status were performed. Secondly, a relatively small number of subjects were included for the association analysis between the rs5128 polymorphism and plasma APOC3 levels due to the limited available studies, which may reduce the statistic power and even cause the type II errors (false-negative results). More studies with larger sample size are required to further investigate the association. Thirdly, this meta-analysis only included the studies published in English because it was very difficult to get the full papers published in various languages.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the significant associations between the APOC3 rs5128 polymorphism and higher levels of APOC3, TG, TC, and LDL-C were found in the present meta-analysis.

Additional files

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grants from the Basic and Applied Research Project of Sichuan Province (2013JY0072) and Key Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province (12ZA232).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Preclinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College
(2)
School of clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College
(3)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K: Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009, 119: 480-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F: INTERHEART Study Investigators: Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet. 2004, 364: 937-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossé Y, Chagnon YC, Després JP, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C: Genome-wide linkage scan reveals multiple susceptibility loci influencing lipid and lipoprotein levels in the Quebec Family Study. J Lipid Res. 2004, 45: 419-26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wei J, Ouyang H, Wang Y, Pang D, Cong NX, Wang T: Characterization of a hypertriglyceridemic transgenic miniature pig model expressing human apolipoprotein CIII. FEBS J. 2012, 279: 91-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gerritsen G, Rensen PC, Kypreos KE, Zannis VI, Havekes LM: Willems van Dijk K: ApoC-III deficiency prevents hyperlipidemia induced by apoE overexpression. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46: 1466-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang CS, McConathy WJ, Kloer HU, Alaupovic P: Modulation of lipoprotein lipase activity by apolipoproteins. Effect of apolipoprotein C-III. J Clin Invest. 1985, 75: 384-90.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aalto-Setälä K, Weinstock PH, Bisgaier CL, Wu L, Smith JD, Breslow JL: Further characterization of the metabolic properties of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins from human and mouse apoC-III transgenic mice. J Lipid Res. 1996, 37: 1802-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aalto-Setälä K, Fisher EA, Chen X, Chajek-Shaul T, Hayek T, Zechner R: Mechanism of hypertriglyceridemia in human apolipoprotein (apo) CIII transgenic mice. Diminished very low density lipoprotein fractional catabolic rate associated with increased apo CIII and reduced apo E on the particles. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90: 1889-900.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pollin TI, Damcott CM, Shen H, Ott SH, Shelton J, Horenstein RB: A null mutation in human APOC3 confers a favorable plasma lipid profile and apparent cardioprotection. Science. 2008, 322: 1702-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin B, Huang Y, Zhang M, Wang J, Wu Y: Association between apolipoprotein C3 Sst I, T-455C, C-482 T and C1100T polymorphisms and risk of coronary heart disease. BMJ Open. 2014, 4: Article ID e004156Google Scholar
  11. Aburatani H, Matsumoto A, Itoh H, Murase T, Takaku F, Itakura H: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymorphism in the apolipoprotein AI gene: a study in a Japanese population. Jpn J Med. 1988, 27: 56-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paulweber B, Friedl W, Krempler F, Humphries SE, Sandhofer F: Genetic variation in the apolipoprotein AI-CIII-AIV gene cluster and coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis. 1988, 73: 125-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ahn YI, Valdez R, Reddy AP, Cole SA, Weiss KM, Ferrell RE: DNA polymorphisms of the apolipoprotein AI/CIII/AIV gene cluster influence plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the Mayans of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Hum Hered. 1991, 41: 281-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shoulders CC, Harry PJ, Lagrost L, White SE, Shah NF, North JD: Variation at the apo AI/CIII/AIV gene complex is associated with elevated plasma levels of apo CIII. Atherosclerosis. 1991, 87: 239-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ordovas JM, Civeira F, Genest J, Craig S, Robbins AH, Meade T: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the apolipoprotein A-I, C-III, A-IV gene locus. Relationships with lipids, apolipoproteins, and premature coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 1991, 87: 75-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, Gerdes LU, Faergeman O, Humphries SE: Genetic markers in the apo AI-CIII-AIV gene cluster for combined hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and predisposition to atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1993, 100: 157-69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miettinen HE, Korpela K, Hämäläinen L, Kontula K: Polymorphisms of the apolipoprotein and angiotensin converting enzyme genes in young North Karelian patients with coronary heart disease. Hum Genet. 1994, 94: 189-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rigoli L, Raimondo G, Di Benedetto A, Romano G, Porcellini A, Campo S: Apolipoprotein AI-CIII-AIV genetic polymorphisms and coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 1995, 32: 251-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bai H, Saku K, Liu R, Imamura M, Arakawa K: Association between coronary heart disease and the apolipoprotein A-I/C-III/A-IV complex in a Japanese population. Hum Genet. 1995, 95: 102-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shoulders CC, Grantham TT, North JD, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, de Fazio A: Hypertriglyceridemia and the apolipoprotein CIII gene locus: lack of association with the variant insulin response element in Italian school children. Hum Genet. 1996, 98: 557-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. López-Miranda J, Jansen S, Ordovas JM, Salas J, Marín C, Castro P: Influence of the SstI polymorphism at the apolipoprotein C-III gene locus on the plasma low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol response to dietary monounsaturated fat. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997, 66: 97-103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kee F, Amouyel P, Fumeron F, Arveiler D, Cambou JP, Evans A: Lack of association between genetic variations of apo A-I-C-III-A-IV gene cluster and myocardial infarction in a sample of European male: ECTIM study. Atherosclerosis. 1999, 145: 187-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dallongeville J, Meirhaeghe A, Cottel D, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P, Helbecque N: Gender related association between genetic variations of APOC-III gene and lipid and lipoprotein variables in northern France. Atherosclerosis. 2000, 150: 149-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu JH, Kao JT, Wen MS, Lo SK: DNA polymorphisms at the apolipoprotein A1-CIII loci in Taiwanese: correlation of plasma APOCIII with triglyceride level and body mass index. J Formos Med Assoc. 2000, 99: 367-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Waterworth DM, Talmud PJ, Bujac SR, Fisher RM, Miller GJ, Humphries SE: Contribution of apolipoprotein C-III gene variants to determination of triglyceride levels and interaction with smoking in middle-aged men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000, 20: 2663-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Russo GT, Meigs JB, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Otvos JD, Wilson PW: Association of the Sst-I polymorphism at the APOC3 gene locus with variations in lipid levels, lipoprotein subclass profiles and coronary heart disease risk: the Framingham offspring study. Atherosclerosis. 2001, 158: 173-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Olivieri O, Stranieri C, Bassi A, Zaia B, Girelli D, Pizzolo F: ApoC-III gene polymorphisms and risk of coronary artery disease. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43: 1450-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Corella D, Guillén M, Sáiz C, Portolés O, Sabater A, Folch J: Associations of LPL and APOC3 gene polymorphisms on plasma lipids in a Mediterranean population: interaction with tobacco smoking and the APOE locus. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43: 416-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodrigo E, González-Lamuño D, Ruiz JC, Fernández-Fresnedo G, Isla D, González-Cotorruelo J: Apolipoprotein C-III and E polymorphisms and cardiovascular syndrome, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2002, 2: 343-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Couillard C, Vohl MC, Engert JC, Lemieux I, Houde A, Almeras N: Effect of apoC-III gene polymorphisms on the lipoprotein-lipid profile of viscerally obese men. J Lipid Res. 2003, 44: 986-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Brown S, Ordovás JM, Campos H: Interaction between the APOC3 gene promoter polymorphisms, saturated fat intake and plasma lipoproteins. Atherosclerosis. 2003, 170: 307-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Espino-Montoro A, Barrios-Artillo M, López-Chozas JM, Cayuela A, Stiefel P, Villar J: Influence of polymorphism (RFLP-sstI) at the apolipoprotein C-III gene locus on the lipoprotein metabolism and insulin resistance in essential hypertensive patients. Interaction between gender and genetic polymorphism. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2003, 13: 194-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen X, Tian H, Liu R: Association of serum apolipoprotein C III levels and apolipoprotein C III gene Sst I polymorphism with carotid intima-media thickness in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004, 66: 41-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chhabra S, Narang R, Lakshmy R, Vasisht S, Agarwal DP, Srivastava LM: Apolipoprotein C3 SstI polymorphism in the risk assessment of CAD. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004, 259: 59-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu S, Song Y, Hu FB, Niu T, Ma J, Gaziano M: A prospective study of the APOA1 XmnI and APOC3 SstI polymorphisms in the APOA1/C3/A4 gene cluster and risk of incident myocardial infarction in men. Atherosclerosis. 2004, 177: 119-26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. de França E, Alves JG, Hutz MH: APOA1/C3/A4 gene cluster variability and lipid levels in Brazilian children. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005, 38: 535-41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Arai H, Yamamoto A, Matsuzawa Y, Saito Y, Yamada N, Oikawa S: Polymorphisms in four genes related to triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels in the general Japanese population in 2000. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005, 12: 240-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu HK, Li XF, Zhang SZ, Ren Y: Association of Sst I polymorphism in apolipoprotein C3 gene with hypertriglyceridaemia in coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and type II diabetes mellitus in Chinese population. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005, 32: 11-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Islam MS, Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kähönen M, Hutri-Kähönen N, Collings A: Apolipoprotein A-I/C-III/A-IV SstI and apolipoprotein B XbaI polymorphisms and their association with carotid artery intima-media thickness in the Finnish population. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 180: 79-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stancáková A, Baldaufová L, Javorský M, Kozárová M, Salagovic J, Tkác I: Effect of gene polymorphisms on lipoprotein levels in patients with dyslipidemia of metabolic syndrome. Physiol Res. 2006, 55: 483-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Herron KL, Lofgren IE, Adiconis X, Ordovas JM, Fernandez ML: Associations between plasma lipid parameters and APOC3 and APOA4 genotypes in a healthy population are independent of dietary cholesterol intake. Atherosclerosis. 2006, 184: 113-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Huang MC, Wang TN, Liu YL, Pa TH, Tu HP, Huang YC: Effect of SstI polymorphism of the apolipoprotein CIII gene and environmental factors on risks of hypertriglyceridemia in Taiwan aborigines. Circ J. 2006, 70: 1030-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fiegenbaum M, de Andrade FM, Hutz MH: Association between plasma lipid parameters and APOC3 genotypes in Brazilian subjects: effect of gender, smoking and APOE genotypes. Clin Chim Acta. 2007, 380: 175-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nieminen T, Kähönen M, Islam S, Raitakari OT, Hutri-Kähönen N, Marniemi J: Apolipoprotein A-I/C-III/A-IV SstI and apolipoprotein B XbaI polymorphisms do not affect early functional and structural changes in atherosclerosis: the Cardiovascular risk in young finns study. Circ J. 2007, 71: 741-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Parzianello L, Oliveira G, Coelho JC: Apolipoprotein CIII polymorphism and triglyceride levels of a Japanese population living in Southern Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008, 41: 462-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Dallongeville J, Cottel D, Wagner A, Ducimetière P, Ruidavets JB, Arveiler D: The APOA5 Trp19 allele is associated with metabolic syndrome via its association with plasma triglycerides. BMC Med Genet. 2008, 9: 84-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruiz JR, Labayen I, Ortega FB, Moreno LA, González-Lamuño D, Martí A: AVENA Study group: birth weight and blood lipid levels in Spanish adolescents: influence of selected APOE, APOC3 and PPARgamma2 gene polymorphisms. The AVENA Study. BMC Med Genet. 2008, 9: 98-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith CE, Tucker KL, Scott TM, Van Rompay M, Mattei J, Lai CQ: Apolipoprotein C3 polymorphisms, cognitive function and diabetes in Caribbean origin Hispanics. PLoS One. 2009, 4: Article ID e5465Google Scholar
  49. Yiyang L, Ruixing Y, Meng L, Kela L, Xingjiang L, Lin Z: Apolipoprotein C-III gene polymorphism and several environmental factors with serum lipid levels in the Guangxi Hei Yi Zhuang and Han populations. J Investig Med. 2010, 58: 777-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sediri Y, Kallel A, Feki M, Mourali S, Elasmi M, Abdessalem S: Association of a DNA polymorphism of the apolipoprotein AI-CIII-AIV gene cluster with myocardial infarction in a Tunisian population. Eur J Intern Med. 2011, 22: 407-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Abd El-Aziz TA, Mohamed RH, Hashem RM: Association of lipoprotein lipase and apolipoprotein C-III genes polymorphism with acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011, 354: 141-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bandegi AR, Firoozrai M, Akbari Eidgahi MR, Kokhaei P: SstI Polymorphism of the Apolipoprotein CIII Gene in Iranian hyperlipidemic patients: a study in Semnan Province. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2011, 14: 506-13.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fleiss JL: The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993, 2: 121-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997, 315: 629-34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Adams JN, Raffield LM, Freedman BI, Langefeld CD, Ng MC, Carr JJ: Analysis of common and coding variants with cardiovascular disease in the Diabetes Heart Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014, 13: 77-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sundaram M, Zhong S, Bou Khalil M, Links PH, Zhao Y, Iqbal J: Expression of apolipoprotein CIII in McA-RH7777 cells enhances VLDL assembly and secretion under lipid-rich conditions. J Lipid Res. 2010, 51: 150-61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Qin W, Sundaram M, Wang Y, Zhou H, Zhong S, Chang CC: Missense mutation in APOC3 within the C-terminal lipid binding domain of human ApoCIII results in impaired assembly and secretion of triacylglycerol-rich very low density lipoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 27769-80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sundaram M, Zhong S, Bou Khalil M, Zhou H, Jiang ZG, Zhao Y: Functional analysis of the missense APOC3 mutation Ala23Thr associated with human hypotriglyceridemia. J Lipid Res. 2010, 51: 1524-34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Larsson M, Vorrsjö E, Talmud P, Lookene A, Olivecrona G: Apolipoproteins C-I and C-III inhibit lipoprotein lipase activity by displacement of the enzyme from lipid droplets. J Biol Chem. 2013, 288: 33997-4008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lai CQ, Parnell LD, Ordovas JM: The APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster, lipid metabolism and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005, 16: 153-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamada Y, Matsuo H, Warita S, Watanabe S, Kato K, Oguri M: Prediction of genetic risk for dyslipidemia. Genomics. 2007, 90: 551-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Niesor EJ, Kallend D, Bentley D, Kastelein JJ, Kees Hovingh G, Stroes ES: Treatment of low HDL-C subjects with the CETP modulator dalcetrapib increases plasma campesterol only in those without ABCA1 and/or ApoA1 mutations. Lipids. 2014, 49: 1245-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Song et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement