Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Characterization of a lipid droplet and endoplasmic reticulum stress related gene risk signature to evaluate the clinical and biological value in hepatocellular carcinoma

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 21, Article number: 146 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Lipid metabolism and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress play an important role in the progression and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to establish lipid droplet (LD)-associated and ER stress-related gene risk signature as prognostic indicators.

Materials and methods

Literature searches for LD-associated proteins was screened and validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Collaboratory (ICGC) databases. A total of 371 samples were enrolled from the TCGA RNA-seq dataset (training cohort) and 240 samples from IGGC RNA-seq dataset (validation cohort). A 10-gene risk signature was established by the last absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. The prognostic value of the risk signature was evaluated by Cox regression, Kaplan–Meier and ROC Curve analyses. Biological features associated with LD and ER stress-related factors were explored by functional analysis and in vitro experiment.

Results

Based on the medical literatures, 124 lipid droplet-associated proteins were retrieved, and three genes failed to establish a valid prognostic model. ER stress was considered as an important component by functional analysis. A 10-gene risk signature compared the clinicopathology characteristics, immunosuppressive events and a nomogram in HCC patients.

Conclusion

LD-associated and ER stress-related gene risk signatures highlighted poor prognosis for clinicopathological features, positively correlate with macrophages and T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-3 (TIM-3) expression in the tumor microenvironment, and might act as independent prognostic factors.

Introduction

HCC is the fourth highest cancer-related mortality worldwide [1, 2] and the second leading cause of cancer mortality [3]. As we known, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a key undesirable factor but does not accurately predict the risk of causing HCC [3]. Contemporary epidemiological observations suggest that the etiology of cirrhosis and HCC is gradually changing from viral hepatitis to non-alcoholic fatty liver Disease (NAFLD)/ non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) with the increase of metabolic diseases such as overweight and diabetes [4, 5]. Thus, viral pathogenesis and metabolic disease are jointly involved in the transition from NAFLD/NASH to HCC, a process that may be related to tissue lipid metabolism at least [6]. The presence of abnormal LD metabolism contributes to the development of HCC due to the involvement of the microbiota, insulin resistance, inflammation, and important cellular physiological processes, including cell division, expansion, differentiation, and motility [7, 8].

In addition, ER stress arises in the folding of proteins within the secretion pathway [9]. In a very recent study, an ER stress has been determined to be an important factor in HCC promoted by NAFLD [10] and involved in the promotion and advancement in many cancers [11, 12], as well as in the growth of cancer proliferation and resistance to radiation or chemotherapy in a hypoxic environment [13]. ER stress may be a worthy therapeutic candidate. Currently, the relationship between ER stress and the biologic features and prognosis of HCC is not yet clear. In addition, molecular characterization still does not predict prognosis, surgical success or risk of recurrence after ablation [14] or optimal treatment options [15]. It is becoming increasingly important whether the characterization of molecular mechanisms can guide clinicians in the comprehensive assessment of survival and biological features.

In this paper, no valid prognostic model was found when the differential genes after literature search were analyzed based on TCGA and ICGC datasets for LD-associated genes. In contrast, functional enrichment analysis by CRISPR/cas9 knockout library screening of Hep3B and SNU398 identified ER stress as an important factor involved. Therefore, a genetic risk signature was established by cross-genes of LD-associated and ER stress. This study explored clinicopathological features, immunological events and nomograms, which were found to be prominent in estimating 1, 3, and 5-year survivals in patients with HCC.

Materials and methods

Literature search for selecting LD-associated factors

The literature was searched in the PubMed database with the search formula "((LD Proteins or) AND Proteins, LD or) AND LD Coat Proteins" (last search date: February 22, 2022). There was no restriction on when the article was published, and the original publication date was detected as 1983. The categories "full text" and "free full text" were selected, excluding the categories "Review" and "Systematic review".

Data collection

LD-associated genes and ER stress genes from Genecards (https://www.genecards.org/) and select these genes with correlation scores ≥ 7 as screening criteria. Tumor RNA-seq material (level 3) and medical data were obtained from TCGA (https://portal.gdc.com) and ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/releases/current/Projects) datasets.

UALCAN analysis

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), protein and survival analyses in the Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) were undertaken in the UALCAN platform (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) [16, 17]. Then, univariate Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis were utilized to determine LD-associated genes.

Assistant for Clinical Bioinformatics (ACLBi) analysis

DEGs and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted on the ICGC dataset (RIKEN, Japan) using the ACLBi (http://www.acbi.com) platform [18,19,20,21,22]. Box-line plots, univariate Cox regression, and Kaplan–Meier analysis were applied to identify LD-associated genes.

Survival Analysis

Crossover genes were selected in TCGA and ICGC datasets, OS was compared across groups using the survival and survminer R packages, and time-dependent ROC curves predicting prognosis of HCC patients were created using the survROC R package to create time-dependent ROC curves in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients.

Functional enrichment analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were obtained from the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [23] (http://david.ncifcrf.gov/) to identify biological processes that are closely associated with risk signature. Further analysis of GO and KEGG pathways for risk scoring was performed using the following R software clusterProfiler package for differentially expressed genes.

Construction and validation of LD and ER stress-related signature

The genes were narrowed down by performing LASSO regression by using the glmnet R package of the TCGA database. The risk score of each sample was determined using the formulas below:

$${\sum }_{\mathrm{i}=1}^{\mathrm{N}}\mathrm{\beta iXi}$$

In this equation, where βi is the value of expression of the LD-associated genes with χi being the Cox regression coefficients calculated by multivariate regression. Subsequently, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) method was used to perform the optimal survival risk model for LD-related genes and ER stress genes upon a linear integrated multivariate derived regression coefficients.

cBioportal analysis of genetic alterations

The cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/) [24, 25] was chosen to explore the list of 8 studies containing genetic alterations characteristic of HCC.

The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) protein expression

The HPA website (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). was used to demonstrate protein expression for each of the 10 genes and to use the "Pathology" section to show the impact of protein levels on survival in HCC patients.

Clinicopathological features

To determine whether risk features were correlated with clinicopathologic factors (including age, sex, and race, histological grade, T and TNM stage), correlations among these factors were presented as box plots.

Immune cell fractions and immune checkpoints

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [26], Regulatory T (Treg) cells [26], natural killer (NK) T cells [27] and neutrophils [28] within the HCC micromanage were thought in association with immune suppression. Considering the key role played by tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumor immunosuppression and immunotherapy, correlations among risk characteristics and immune infiltrating cells, immune checkpoints, TMB and MSI were analyzed.

Development and evaluation of the nomogram

Age, sex, race, viral infection, tumor grade, TNM and T stage, and risk score were combined to create the nomograms using the survivals and rms R packages. Calibration curves were used to assess the accuracy of nomograms in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in patients with HCC [29, 30].

Statistical analysis

This study mainly used R software (version 3.6.1) and GraphPad Prism v7.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Wilcoxon test was used in comparing the variances among both groups, and the Kruskal- Wallis H test was applied for comparing multiple for multiple groups. Two-sided Mann–Whitney U test was performed for two-way comparisons in clinicopathological characteristics, and two-sided chi-square test or exact test for 2-independent samples was used for categorical variables. Quantitative data were calculated as the mean values with standard deviation (SD). P < 0.05 it was considered to be statistical significances.

Results

Selection of LD-associated factors

Based on the literature search and analysis, 124 results were found for LD- associated factors (Table S1, Fig. S1). The selection criteria included not only LD factors but also some protein-mediated LD related organelles, such as ER, mitochondria, Golgi apparatus and lysosomes.

Differences of gene expression and OS are significant based on the TCGA dataset

RNA-seq expression data of 124 genes related to lipid metabolism based on the TCGA dataset were analyzed. A genetic heat map was drawn between HCC patient specimens and normal tissues (Fig. S2). Ninety-six DEGs were identified, including 71 up-regulated and 25 down-regulated genes (Table 1). Fourteen of these genes were selected due to differences in gene expression, OS, and univariate COX analysis (Figs. S3, S4, S5, S8a).

Table 1 The differences in gene expression, protein expression, and survival analysis of 125 genes in TCGA dataset
Full size table

Six genes (annexin A2 (ANXA2), b cell receptor-associated protein 31 (BCAP31), cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 (CKAP4), hydroxysteroid 13 (HSD17B13), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK1), squalene epoxidase (SQLE)) was screened by the ICGC database (Table 2). ANXA2 is correlated with therapeutic resistance to various cancer forms [31]; BCAP31 encoded protein involved to transport membrane proteins from ER to Golgi [32]; CKAP4 is an obsolete signal transducer activity and involved in protein metabolism [33]; HSD17B13 has steroid dehydrogenase activity and functions within the upstream or positive regulation of lipid biosynthetic progress [34, 35]; IRAK1 provides protein kinase activity and contributes to the partial upregulation of the IL 1-induced transcription factor NF-kappa B [36]; SQLE acquires oxidoreductase activity, the first oxygenative step in sterol biosynthesis [37]. In terms of ER activity and protein-lipid metabolism, these six genes play different roles in regulating cell growth and signal transduction pathways.

Table 2 The differences in gene expression, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and COX analysis of 114 genes in ICGC dataset
Full size table

In HCC cells, these genes were upregulated except for HSD17B13 (Fig. S6). The high expression of this gene indicated a good prognosis of patients (Fig. S7) and was considered as a protective factor (Fig. S8b). Based on the available literature, six genes were identified, but similar results could not be obtained in both databases by further prognostic analysis. Finding intrinsic association mechanisms to optimize risk models for genes becomes critical.

Valueless prognostic model in TCGA and ICGC database and biological function in HCC

Three genes (ANXA2, CKAP4, and IRAK1) from the TCGA and ICGC datasets were screened. The higher level of these genes presented the poorer prognosis, and the AUC of these genes predicting OS decreased gradually over time in both datasets (Fig. S9a, b, S10a, b, c, d). However, these genes did not serve as valid factors for the nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival probabilities of patients in the TCGA dataset (Fig. S11a, b, c, d). In other words, the high expression of the three genes in the TCGA and ICGC databases represented a poor prognosis, but did not establish a valid prognostic model. Therefore, these three genes do not serve as valuable markers to improve clinical guidance.

To explore more information about lipid related information in HCC, GO and KEGG pathway analysis was performed by DAVID online tool based on the list of genes provided above. As shown in Fig. 1, the functions of these genes were mainly focused on processes such as protein transport and lipid granulation from the ER to the cytoplasm (Fig. 1a); the KEGG pathway showed that this signal was positively correlated with the glycerophospholipid metabolic signaling pathway (Fig. 1b). However, KEGG and GO analyses were not performed for HCC. Therefore, the intrinsic association associated with HCC was verified and screened in the next cellular experiments performed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Functional enrichment analysis based on differentially expressed genes from literature research. a GO analysis. b KEGG pathway analysis. GO: Gene Ontology, KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, BP: biological processes, CC: cellular components, MF: molecular function

Full size image

CRISPR/cas9 library screening identify ER stress as a strong correlate factor of LDs

The specific process of CRISPR/cas9 knockout library screening was reported in our previous study [38]. Sixty-seven LD-associated genes were found in Hep3B cells and 57 LD-associated genes were enrolled in SNU398 cells from the Genecards tool. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that in Hep3B cells, the top 5 positions of GO analysis were protein binding, plasma membrane, ER, mitochondria and active regulatory of RNA Polymerase II initiator transcription and membrane components, plasma membrane, cytoplasm, ER membrane and ER and mitochondria were revealed in SNU398 cells (Fig. 2a, b). The ER protein pathway and cholesterol metabolism were illustrated in KEGG pathway of the Hep3B cells and the SNU398 cells, separately (Fig. 2c, d). This part of the results is more indicative of the fact that the strongest intrinsic link to LDs correlation in HCC is ER stress, further validating the results obtained from online database. Screening for crossover genes for LDs and ER stress was next continued.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functional enrichment analysis based on differentially expressed genes from CRISPR/cas9 knockout library screening of Hep 3B cells and SNU398 cells about lipid droplet-associated genes from Genecards tool. a, b GO analysis in Hep 3B and SNU 398 cells in the TCGA cohorts. c, d KEGG pathway analysis in Hep 3B and SNU 398 cells in the TCGA cohorts. GO: Gene Ontology, KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Full size image

Establishing and evaluating the risk signature of LD and ER stress- associated genes

A total of 1959 LD-associated genes (search formula: LD-associated liver carcinoma) and 7235 ER stress genes (search formula: ER stress liver carcinoma) was selected in liver cancer patient specimens, and 203 crossover genes were performed by LASSO regression analysis (Fig. 3b, c) between 250 LD-associated genes and 937 ER stress genes from the TCGA database (Fig. 3a). Subsequently, 10 genes were identified, namely: stanniocalcin 2 (STC2), secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 1 (PSMD1), peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1), lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1), karyopherin subunit alpha 2 (KPNA2), heparin binding growth factor (HDGF), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), dynein cytoplasmic 1 light intermediate chain 1 (DYNC1LI1), beta-1,3-glucuronyltransferase 3 (B3GAT3). Risk score (TCGA) = (0.3901)* B3GAT3 + (0.1809)* DYNC1LI1 + (-0.0227)* G6PD + (0.3367)* HDGF + (0.1425)* KPNA2 + (0.0557)* LPCAT1 + (0.1757)* PRDX1 + (0.161)* PSMD1 + (0.0263)* SPP1 + (0.0725)* STC2; AIC (ICGC) = 414.2736; risk score (ICGC) = (0.066)* B3GAT3 + (-0.7061)* DYNC1LI1 + ( 0.0469)* G6PD + (0.1462)* HDGF + (0.8041)* KPNA2 + (0.1403)* LPCAT1 + (-0.1)* PRDX1 + (0.2207)* PSMD1 + (0.0254)* SPP1 + (0.0245)* STC2 (Fig. 3d, e). The high-risk signatures of 10 genes in both datasets suggested poor prognosis (TCGA: HR 2.331, 95%CI 1.629–3.335, P = 3.67e-06; ICGC: HR 5.6, 95%CI 2.586–12.125, P = 1.24e-05) (Fig. 4a, b). The AUCs for 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year OS in the TCGA dataset were 0.797, 0.716, 0.73 and 0.713, respectively. The AUCs for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year OS in the ICGC data set were 0.763, 0.753, 0.754 and 0.831, respectively (Fig. 4c, d). These represented a decrease in the ability of the TCGA dataset to predict OS, but an increase in the ability of the ICGC dataset to predict OS. In addition to screening for valid genetic risk scores, the expression of these genes and their correlations were subsequently analyzed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Identifying prognostic genes for developing a risk model. a Intersecting genes associated with HCC OS in the TCGA and ICGC datasets. b LASSO coefficient profiles of the 203 genes in the TCGA data set. c Selection of the optimal parameter (lambda) in the LASSO model. d The distribution of the risk score and survival overview about the ten genes chosen for establishing a prognosis signature in the TCGA cohort. e The distribution of the risk score and survival overview about the ten genes chosen for establishing a prognosis signature in the ICGC cohort. LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, OS, overall survival; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ICGC, International Cancer Genome Collaboratory

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The prognostic value of the LD-associated and ER stress-related gene risk signature in TCGA and ICGC datasets. a, b K-M survival analyses of the risk signature in HCC patients. c, d The time ROC curve analyses were performed to predict 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS according to risk score in the TCGA and ICGC datasets. LD lipid droplet, ER endoplasmic reticulum, TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas, ICGC International Cancer Genome Collaboratory

Full size image

Gene alteration and protein expression of the risk signature

The correlation of these 10 genes in the TCGA and ICGC datasets was analyzed (Fig. S12a, b). Among them, STC2 to be expressed in a diverse variety of tissues and related pathways are protein metabolism and regulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) transport [39]; SPP1 is the cytokine to upregulate the expression of interferon-gramma and interleukin-12, cytokine activity and extracellular matrix binding [40]; PSMD1 is proteasome that works in a non-lysosomal pathway in an ATP/ubiquitin-dependent process cleaves peptides [41]; PRDX1 encoded a protein that probably functions as an antioxidant protector in cells and might facilitate the anti-viral activity of CD8( +) T cells [42]; LPCAT1 encoded an enzyme that acts in the metabolism of phospholipids, in particular the transformation of lysophophatidylcholine into phosphatidylcholine when acyl-CoA is present [43]; PNA2 protein interacts with nuclear localization sequence (NLSs) of DNA helicases and may participate in protein nuclear transport [44]; HDGF encoded a protein with mitogenic and DNA-binding activities that possibly serves a need for cell proliferation and differentiation [45]; The main function of G6PD is the production of NADPH, which is a defense against oxidants and reductive biosynthetic reactions in key electron donor [46]; BYNC1LI1 encoded a protein that is involvement in intrastromal transport and chromosomal separation in mitosis. This protein could potentially in turn intermediate association with additional cargo molecules in order to promote transport of intracellular vesicles. [47]; B3GAT3 catalyzes the formation of the glycosaminoglycan-protein linkages through glucuronide transfer reactions in the final step of the linkage region biosynthesis of proteoglycans [48]. Together, these 10 genes are involved in the progression of RNA binding, transport and metabolism related to three substances (proteins, lipids and glucose) and cell proliferation. The roles of these genes are consistent with lipid metabolism and ER stress-related functions.

DYNC1LI1 and KPNA2 showed the highest correlation in both datasets (correlation coefficient: 0.7). In the online database, cBioportal, a total of 1571 patients/samples were found to have genetic alterations in HCC. Gene alterations were found in 250 (15.90%) of the interviewed patients/samples (Fig. S12c). HDGF (6%) had the highest frequency of genetic alterations. In addition, these 7 genes had high levels of protein expression and were risk factors that demonstrated a poorer prognosis in HCC patients (Fig. S13). A risk score for the 10 gene signature was subsequently screened and identified, which was further known to be associated with a poorer prognosis for HCC based on protein expression and correlation analysis. Therefore, does this risk score correlate to the clinicopathologic characteristics for HCC? This was analyzed below.

Clinicopathological features

Clinicopathological presentation according to the risk score, gender, age, race, HBV/HCV, T and TNM-stage, and histological grading from TCGA and ICGC datasets. There were no differences between risk scores and patients' age, gender, and race (Fig. 5a, b, c, Fig. S14a, b). In addition, risk scores were higher in patients with HBV/HBV + HCV infection than in patients without viral infection in the TCGA dataset (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Association between the signature and clinicopathologic features in the TCGA datasets. The association between risk score and gender (a), age (b), race (c), virus infection (d), TNM and T stage (e) and grade (f) of HCC patients. **** P < 0.001, *** P < 0.01, ** P < 0.05, * P ≥ 0.05. TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma

Full size image

Risk scores were higher in T-stage with deeper local infiltration, especially with significant differences among early (T1, I) and advance (T3, T4, II, IIIA, IIIC) stage. The stage IV had the lowest score, but was not different from the early stage (Fig. 5e). Unlike the results of the TCGA dataset, risk scores were not well differentiated among T-stage and stages III and IV. However, early (I and II) and advanced (III and IV) stages could be more clearly distinguished (Fig. S14c). In the TCGA dataset, this risk score could effectively distinguish difference among histological grades except for grades 3 and 4 (Fig. 5f, S14d). This result suggests that this risk score can effectively differentiate between early- and late- stage patients and there are significant differences in patients with chronic viral infections. As we know, the treatment of HCC is still focused on the combination of immune drugs, so is there a correlation between this risk score and immune checkpoints and immune cells to assist in clinical guidance?

Immune checkpoints and immune cells

Previous investigations reported that LDs has an important effect in the immune and inflammatory response in a variety of diseases [49]. Several immune checkpoint genes were included in this study, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, TIM-3 and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3). Risk scores were positively correlated with most immune checkpoint genes and several immune cells, especially TIM-3 (Fig. 6a, S15a), neutrophils, and macrophages (Fig. 6b). This suggested that neutrophil-and macrophage-mediated immune or inflammatory responses are associated with samples from high-risk populations [50, 51]. Unfortunately, there was no difference in TMB expression levels between low- and high- risk scores (Fig. 6c), but there was a significant positive correlation between MSI and TMB expression levels in the high-risk population (Fig. 6d, e, f). TIM-3 expression was significantly increased in HCC tissues and promoted Treg cell proliferation and induced apoptosis of CD8 + T lymphocytes. In addition, TIM-3 expression was significantly increased on macrophages in HCC tissues, and its expression was positively correlated with HCC stage and negatively correlated with patient survival [52]. Thus, TIM-3 may downregulate the immune response of patients to HCC and promote the continued the development and spread of cancer cells. Meanwhile, patients with high genetic risk have more MSI and high TMB, which seems to contradict the status of the immune microenvironment. In the ICGC data set, the levels of TMB did not reach statistical differences either in distinguishing the high-risk and low-risk groups or in each patient (Fig. S15b, c). In both TCGA and ICGC databases, an analysis of the correlation of risk score with common immune checkpoints and immune cells told us that this score had strongest correlation with TIM3, neutrophils, and macrophages, while at low and high levels, the correlation of the risk score with TMB is inconsistent in both databases. Whether this risk score is meaningful for the prognostic model is discussed next.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Relationship between the risk signature and immune checkpoints and immune cells in the TCGA cohort (Pearson correlation analysis). a Correlation between the risk scores and the expression of PD-L1, CTLA-4, TIM3, LAG-3, PD-1 and PD-L2. b Correlation between the risk scores and the expression of B cell, CD4 + T cell, CD8 + T cell, neutrophil, macrophage and dendritic cells. Correlation between the risk score and the expression of TMB in each patient (c) and low- and high- groups (d). Correlation between the risk score and the expression of MSI-high in each patient (e) and low- and high- groups (f). **** P < 0.001, *** P < 0.01, ** P < 0.05, * P ≥ 0.05. TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas, PD-L1/2 programmed death ligands 1/2, CTLA-4 cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, TIM-3 T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-3, LAG-3 lymphocyte-activation gene 3, PD-1 programmed death 1

Full size image

Construction and validation of the nomogram

It is necessary to understand whether risk characteristics can serve as independent predictive factors for prognosis. In the TCGA dataset, univariate Cox analysis showed that OS in HCC patients showed a significant negative correlation with risk scores. Furthermore, T-stage, TNM-stage, and viral infection status suggested worse OS (Fig. 7a). Subsequent multifactorial Cox analysis showed that risk scores with T stage and viral infection could be independent prognostic factors (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The prognostic value of the LD-associated and ER stress-related genetic risk signature in TCGA dataset. a Univariate and (b) multivariable analyses of 10 genes in the TCGA dataset. c The nomogram and (d) the calibration curve analyses were performed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS according to risk score. LD lipid droplet, ER endoplasmic reticulum, TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas, OS overall survival

Full size image

In addition, the nomogram created integrated the above factors to predict OS at 1, 3, and 5 years (Fig. 7c). The calibrated curve indicated a notable consensus that real time to survival in the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year TCGA cohort showed good agreement with the predicted survival rate although its ability to predict OS diminished over time (Fig. 7d). And similar results were validated in the ICGC dataset (Fig. S16a, b, c, d).

Discussion

The etiopathogenesis and the progress in HCC is a multifactorial systematic and multistep process [53]. Due to the highly aggressive and heterogeneity of viral oncogenic cells, treatment strategies vary across geographic regions, mainly due to the lack of a relatively strong scientific basis [54,55,56]. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective immune responses to eliminate tumor cells [57, 58]. In the near future, immune checkpoint-based therapies may also improve the efficacy of local and radical treatments for liver cancer as well as neoadjuvant therapy. In this process, researches to translate molecular and immune categories into biomarkers to guide therapy are still ongoing. Among them, more concrete progress has been made in understanding the underlying mechanisms of adiposity disease-associated HCC, with new insights into the role of the tumor microenvironment, particularly the immune system, in the pathophysiology of the disease [59]. Lipid aggregation is associated with ER stress, oxidative stress, mitochondrial defects, cholesterol efflux factors, ER autophagy, protein post-translational modifications and autophagy [60]. Among them, ER stress induces the release of pro-inflammatory factors from immune cells, while inhibiting the ability of antigen delivery. ER stress function is emphasized due to stress signals, such as inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1α) and protein kinase RNA like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), leading to the suppression of immune cells [61, 62]. In conclusion, lipid disorders provide a large "lipid pool" for the development of HCC, and specific mechanisms of aberrant lipid metabolism in hepatic regulation could greatly improve the efficiency of immunotherapy, but clinicians are not yet able to apply molecular profiles to guide dosing, so LD-related factors were summarized. Therefore, by summarizing LD-related factors, it is imperative to understand the factors that are critical for OS.

In this study, 124 LD-associated genes were searched based on the available medical literature and subsequently differentially expressed in three genes (ANXA2, CKAP4, IRAK1) in the TCGA and ICGC datasets, and survival analysis and time-dependent ROC analysis showed the same survival trends and ability to predict survival probabilities in both datasets, but prognostic models for 1-,3-, and 5-year survival was not a valid guide. Further functional analysis in the TCGA dataset suggested ER stress is an important component and function of LD, which was also validated in the CRISPR/cas9 screening library. Therefore, a 10-genes risk signature associated with LD and ER stress was created from the Genecards website based on survival and COX regression analyses and showed that this risk model is an independently identified factor for prognosis that is associated with regulation of the tumor immune microenvironment, specifically M2-type macrophage infiltration and TIM-3 expression.

First, genes associated with LD in the literature search, and three genes were screened by differential gene expression and survival analysis with TCGA and ICGC datasets. These genes were expressed at high levels in tumor tissues, suggesting poor survival, but further prognostic risk modeling showed that these genes were not superior in predicting survival probability. This may be explained by two reasons: 1. the different regions and prevalence of HCC patients in the two databases, as well as the different variations in life and dietary habits, prevent homogenization of the analysis. 2. the current molecular mechanisms of LD are mainly focused on metabolic diseases [63], while malignancies have been studied relatively singularly [64], especially the specificity of lipid metabolism in HCC [65], leading to gene inconsistent expression and survival analyses.

Considering that this risk model from literature data has a strong predictive power for survival in HCC patients and its limitations, the functional mechanisms of these genetic features were further evaluated. Functional analysis revealed important effects on ER stress response and ubiquitin-dependent ER-associated degradation (ERAD) actions. These findings suggest that LD-associated genes are closely related to the process of ER stress activation. ER stress is triggered when there is a mismatch between the ability of the ER to process proteins and its ability to fold proteins [66]. Acute ER stress primarily causes cellular damage, whereas chronically ER stress can be a hallmark of many diseases, even tumors [67]. It is known that ER stress state induced signaling and regulation can enhance tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, vaccine escapes and tolerance to radiotherapy [68]. In HCC, ER stress leads to activation of corresponding genes due to rapid proliferation of cancer cells resulting in ischemic hypoxia and oxidative stress in tumor tissue. Therefore, aberrant ER stress gene expression may be of prognostic value in HCC cases.

Furthermore, Hep3B and SNU398 cell screens were constructed by CRISPR/cas9 knockout library, and functional enrichment analysis by GO and KEGG revealed that these genes were extremely strongly associated with ER stress, similar to the results of functional enrichment methods obtained from literature searches. CRISPR/cas9 technology has significant promise for identifying important genes when screening genomic functions in biologic processing in varied biologic models. It is already being used in a genome-wide context as an alternate screen of RNA interferences to target alterations in gene function [69]. The promise of CRISPR screens for function in genomics is to help researchers discover one or more gene functions and potentially enable their alteration, for example to conduct cancer research such as molecular mechanistic analyses and therapy explorations. CRISPR technology has been used in viral infections [70], genetic diseases [71], antibiotic resistant bacteria [72].

Risk score is often a common method for developing meaningful signatures. The main purpose of analyzing genes screened from the TCGA dataset is to understand whether LD and ER stress gene risk scores are of value. ER stress-related risk scores have been less studied, and two studies of glioma simultaneously illustrate that activation of ER stress genes has important implications on patient prognosis and immune status [73, 74]. Therefore, the results screened by comparing the two datasets may be able to provide some value to clinicians for decision making.

Models using risk score can accurately predict not only the outcome, but also distinguish between different clinicopathological features. Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that risk characteristics performed well in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of HCC patients in the TCGA dataset. Survival analysis confirmed that risk scores accurately predicted patient survival, and similar results were found in the ICGC dataset.

In the TCGA dataset, the results of clinicopathologic features are suggestive of HBV infection, deeper local infiltration, higher histologic grade, and higher risk scores in patients with advanced HCC. These suggestive risk features are usually associated with poor prognosis and allow accurate differentiation of varying clinicopathological features in HCC patients. Currently, despite the new direct-acting antiviral drug treatments now available, epigenetic dysregulation of residual risk after HCV infection or after cure induces alterations in the host cell transcriptome [75] and direct carcinogenesis of viral infection [76], as well as on the accumulation of hepatocytes in the inflammatory process and the generation of inflammatory oxygen species [76], leading to a process that displays dysregulation via HCV infection, called cancer marker [76]. However, there was no difference in risk scores between HCV infection and those without viral infection, contrary to previous studies [77]. A possible explanation is that HCV-infected patients have a relatively small sample size and do not show a trend of poor prognosis. In addition, stage IV patients had the lowest risk scores because only five stage IV patients were available in the TCGA dataset, which would not better explain the full characteristics.

Immunological and inflammatory reactions together with biological processes of biological synthesis and biodegradation were enclosed in the higher risk group. High expression of TIM-3 in tumor immune checkpoints and M2-type macrophages was more pronounced in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk score. TIM-3 plays an immunosuppressive role in the immune microenvironment, not only inducing depletion of CD8 + T cells [78], but also promoting activation of Treg cell [79] and massive proliferation of MDSCs [80], implying that LDs upregulation may inhibit the antitumor immune response in HCC. Furthermore, consider that immune cell infiltrates are an essential element of the immunological microenvironment [81], further studies investigated the relationship between risk scores and immunocells, like macrophages, dendritic cells, B cells, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, and neutrophils. This suggests that lipid aggregation and activation of ER stress can regulate changes in the immune microenvironment by affecting patient prognosis.

To exploit the full potential of the risks model, a nomogram was prepared to combine risk characteristics, age, sex, race, histological class, T and TNM stage. The calibration curves based on the TCGA dataset demonstrated good predictive performance. Thus, the established LD-associated and ER stress gene risk signature can predict 1-, 3-, and 5- OS probabilities for individualized treatment strategies.

The comparison and novelty of this paper with the current studies is reflected in three aspects. Firstly, previous studies [82] showed the analysis of prognostic characteristics of lipid-related genes in the TCGA database for pancreatic cancer in literature searches and found that some genetic mutations were prompt for worse prognosis. In this paper, we used a similar method and conducted the prognostic analysis of lipid-related genes using the TCGA database and the ICGC database as a training cohort and a validation cohort, respectively. Unfortunately, negative results were obtained in this paper. This shows the need for validation of the results obtained by database analysis. Secondly few studies [73, 74] have shown that activation of ER stress genes has an important impact on the prognosis and immune status of cancer patients, and this paper combines both ER stress and LDs through functional analysis of public databases, which is less common in previous studies. This combined approach accurately refined the study direction and optimized the study population. Finally, our institute [38] constructed an HCC knockout library by CRISPR/cas9 technology, and this paper verified the strong association between LDs and ER stress, which was rare in previous CRISPR/cas9-related publications [69, 70, 72] and increased the scope of CRISPR/cas9 utilization.

The important strengths include the association of LD and ER stress, and for the first time in HCC, common genes associated with LD and ER stress have been analyzed and a 10-gene risk model has been developed that can effectively predict prognostic and biological characteristics. Moreover, this paper validated ER stress as the strongest correlate of LDs by CRISPR/cas9 technology in HCC cell lines. In addition, it was found that the currently available literature supported LD-related genes do not establish consistent prognostic features in TCGA and ICGC databases. However, our study has a number of limitations. This risk model was not screened at this step due to too few genes were obtained by multifactorial COX regression analysis. Although the results were similar in distinguishing survival differences, clinicopathological features and immunological events in both datasets, the accuracy of such risk model in other datasets remains to be investigated.

Conclusion

In the present study, the prognosis of HCC patients was assessed by risk scores for LD-related and ER stress genes constructed by functional analysis to determine the significance of ER stress on lipid function, despite the failure of genetic risk models obtained from the existing literature. This risk model suggested that high risk scores were related to worse prognosis, closely related to M2 macrophage and TIM-3 expression. Thus, these provide a certain molecular basis for the prognostic prediction and biological characterization of HCC patients, and add a valuable reference direction for molecular studies. Especially in patients with lipid-associated HCC, this risk score can be a more effective and visual indication of the prognostic impact. we can design appropriate targeted drugs.

Availability of data and materials

Genecards (https://www.genecards.org/); TCGA (https://portal.gdc.com); ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/releases/current/Projects); UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/); ACLBi (http://www.acbi.com); DAVID (http://david.ncifcrf.gov/); cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (https://www.cbioportal.org/); HPA website (https://www.proteinatlas.org/).

Abbreviations

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LD:

Lipid droplet

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

ICGC:

International Cancer Genome Collaboratory

LASSO:

Last absolute shrinkage and selection operator

TIM-3:

T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-3

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

NASH:

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

CPTAC:

Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium

OS:

Overall survival

DAVID:

The Database for Annotation, visualization and integrated discovery

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

AIC:

Akaike information criterion

HPA:

The human protein atlas

MDSCs:

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

T:

Treg regulatory

NK:

Natural killer

TMB:

Tumor mutation burden

MSI:

Microsatellite instability

SD:

Standard deviation

ANXA2:

Annexin A2

BCAP31:

B cell receptor-associated protein 31

CKAP4:

Cytoskeleton-associated protein 4

HSD17B13:

Hydroxysteroid 13

IRAK1:

Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase

SQLE:

Squalene epoxidase, STC2 stanniocalcin 2

SPP1:

Secreted phosphoprotein 1

PSMD1:

Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 1

PRDX1:

Peroxiredoxin 1

LPCAT1:

Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1

KPNA2:

Karyopherin subunit alpha 2

HDGF:

Heparin binding growth factor

G6PD:

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

DYNC1LI1:

Dynein cytoplasmic 1 light intermediate chain 1

B3GAT3:

Beta-1,3-glucuronyltransferase 3

IGF:

Insulin-like growth factor

NLSs:

Nuclear localization sequence

PD-1:

Programmed death 1

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4

LAG-3:

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3

IRE1α:

Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha

PERK:

Protein kinase RNA like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

ERAD:

ER-associated degradation

References

  1. McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021;73:4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary Epidemiology of Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(12):2650–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn J, Lim JK, Lee HM, Lok AS, Nguyen M, Pan CQ, et al. Lower observed hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in chronic hepatitis b patients treated with entecavir: results of the ENUMERATE Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(9):1297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valery PC, Laversanne M, Clark PJ, Petrick JL, McGlynn KA, Bray F. Projections of primary liver cancer to 2030 in 30 countries worldwide. Hepatology. 2018;67(2):600–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrick JL, Florio AA, Loomba R, McGlynn KA. Have incidence rates of liver cancer peaked in the United States? Cancer. 2020;126(13):3151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park J, Morley TS, Kim M, Clegg DJ, Scherer PE. Obesity and cancer–mechanisms underlying tumour progression and recurrence. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(8):455–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agosti P, Sabbà C, Mazzocca A. Emerging metabolic risk factors in hepatocellular carcinoma and their influence on the liver microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(2):607–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos CR, Schulze A. Lipid metabolism in cancer. FEBS J. 2012;279(15):2610–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakatsukasa K, Huyer G, Michaelis S, Brodsky JL. Dissecting the ER-associated degradation of a misfolded polytopic membrane protein. Cell. 2008;132(1):101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakagawa H, Umemura A, Taniguchi K, Font-Burgada J, Dhar D, Ogata H, et al. ER stress cooperates with hypernutrition to trigger TNF-dependent spontaneous HCC development. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(3):331–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joo JH, Liao G, Collins JB, Grissom SF, Jetten AM. Farnesol-induced apoptosis in human lung carcinoma cells is coupled to the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Cancer Res. 2007;67(16):7929–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Obacz J, Avril T, Le Reste PJ, Urra H, Quillien V, Hetz C, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis in glioblastoma-From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic perspectives. Sci Signal. 2017;10(470):eaal2323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao X, Tu Y, Xu Y, Guo Y, Yao F, Zhang X. Endoplasmic reticulum stress confers 5-fluorouracil resistance in breast cancer cell via the GRP78/OCT4/lncRNA MIAT/AKT pathway. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(3):838–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinyol R, Montal R, Bassaganyas L, Sia D, Takayama T, Chau GY, et al. Molecular predictors of prevention of recurrence in HCC with sorafenib as adjuvant treatment and prognostic factors in the phase 3 STORM trial. Gut. 2019;68(6):1065–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singal AG, Hoshida Y, Pinato DJ, Marrero J, Nault JC, Paradis V, et al. International liver cancer association (ILCA) white paper on biomarker development for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(7):2572–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi BVSK, et al. UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19(8):649–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen F, Chandrashekar DS, Varambally S, Creighton CJ. Pan-cancer molecular subtypes revealed by mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of more than 500 human cancers. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Z, Lin E, Zhuang H, Xie L, Feng X, Liu J, et al. Construction of a novel gene-based model for prognosis prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin W, Wu S, Chen X, Ye Y, Weng Y, Pan Y, et al. Characterization of hypoxia signature to evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment and predict prognosis in glioma groups. Front Oncol. 2020;10:796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong W, Yuan H, Gu Y, Liu M, Ji Y, Huang Z, et al. Immune-related prognosis biomarkers associated with osteosarcoma microenvironment. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Bajari R, Andric D, Gerthoffert F, Lepsa A, Nahal-Bose H, et al. The international cancer genome consortium data portal. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):367–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang JY, Wang DS, Lin HC, Chen XX, Yang H, Zheng Y, et al. A novel ferroptosis-related gene signature for overall survival prediction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(13):2430–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiao X, Sherman BT, da Huang W, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC, et al. DAVID-WS: a stateful web service to facilitate gene/protein list analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(13):1805–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):pl1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu C, Rong D, Zhang B, Zheng W, Wang X, Chen Z, et al. Current perspectives on the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang F, Xiao W, Tian Z. NK cell-based immunotherapy for cancer. Semin Immunol. 2017;31:37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang W, Tao Y, Wu Y, Zhao X, Ye W, Zhao D, et al. Neutrophils promote the development of reparative macrophages mediated by ROS to orchestrate liver repair. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rousson V, Zumbrunn T. Decision curve analysis revisited: overall net benefit, relationships to ROC curve analysis, and application to case-control studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Drücker P, Pejic M, Galla HJ, Gerke V. Lipid segregation and membrane budding induced by the peripheral membrane binding protein annexin A2. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(34):24764–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi K, Jin M, Zouboulis CC, Lee Y. Increased lipid accumulation under Hypoxia in SZ95 human sebocytes. Dermatology. 2021;237(1):131–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sabbisetti V, Di Napoli A, Seeley A, Amato AM, O’Regan E, Ghebremichael M, et al. p63 promotes cell survival through fatty acid synthase. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6): e5877.

  34. Horiguchi Y, Araki M, Motojima K. 17beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 13 is a liver-specific lipid droplet-associated protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;370(2):235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Landowski M, Bhute VJ, Takimoto T, Grindel S, Shahi PK, Pattnaik BR, et al. A mutation in transmembrane protein 135 impairs lipid metabolism in mouse eyecups. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lei Y, Yang T, Shan A, Di W, Dai M, Nan J, et al. Altered inflammatory pathway but unaffected liver fibrosis in mouse models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis involving interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 knockout. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26: e926187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu D, Wong CC, Zhou Y, Li C, Chen H, Ji F, et al. Squalene epoxidase induces nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis via binding to carbonic anhydrase III and is a therapeutic target. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(7):2467–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Li L, Lan J, Cui Y, Rao X, Zhao J, et al. CRISPR screens uncover protective effect of PSTK as a regulator of chemotherapy-induced ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li S, Huang Q, Li D, Lv L, Li Y, Wu Z. The significance of Stanniocalcin 2 in malignancies and mechanisms. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):7276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oliveira L, Tavares P, Alonso JC. Headful DNA packaging: bacteriophage SPP1 as a model system. Virus Res. 2013;173(2):247–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moutkine I, Collins EL, Béchade C, Maroteaux L. Evolutionary considerations on 5-HT2 receptors. Pharmacol Res. 2019;140:14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ding C, Fan X, Wu G. Peroxiredoxin 1 - an antioxidant enzyme in cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(1):193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang B, Tontonoz P. Phospholipid Remodeling in Physiology and Disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2019;81:165–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Han Y, Wang X. The emerging roles of KPNA2 in cancer. Life Sci. 2020;241: 117140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakamura H, Enomoto H, Kishima Y, Yoshida K, Kuroda T. Hepatoma-derived growth factor (HDGF) and HDGF family. Nihon Rinsho. 2001;59(Suppl 6):834–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang HC, Wu YH, Yen WC, Liu HY, Hwang TL, Stern A, et al. The redox role of g6pd in cell growth, cell death, and cancer. Cells. 2019;8(9):1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rahman F, Johnson JL, Zhang J, He J, Pestonjamasp K, Cherqui S, et al. DYNC1LI2 regulates localization of the chaperone-mediated autophagy receptor LAMP2A and improves cellular homeostasis in cystinosis. Autophagy. 2022;18(5):1108–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang YL, Ding C, Sun L. High expression B3GAT3 is related with poor prognosis of liver cancer. Open Med (Wars). 2019;14:251–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lake AD, Novak P, Hardwick RN, Flores-Keown B, Zhao F, Klimecki WT, et al. The adaptive endoplasmic reticulum stress response to lipotoxicity in progressive human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Toxicol Sci. 2014;137(1):26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang SC, Smith AM, Everts B, Colonna M, Pearce EL, Schilling JD, et al. Metabolic reprogramming mediated by the mTORC2-IRF4 signaling axis is essential for macrophage alternative activation. Immunity. 2016;45(4):817–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Malech HL, DeLeo FR, Quinn MT. The role of neutrophils in the immune system: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2087:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yan W, Liu X, Ma H, Zhang H, Song X, Gao L, et al. Tim-3 fosters HCC development by enhancing TGF-β-mediated alternative activation of macrophages. Gut. 2015;64(10):1593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, Daniele B, Llovet JM, Meyer T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):238–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kelley RK, Sangro B, Harris W, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, Kang YK, et al. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: randomized expansion of a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(27):2991–3001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Galle PR, Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Zhu AX, Kim TY, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave150): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(7):991–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E, Govaere O, Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(7):411–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Blanchette-Mackie EJ, Dwyer NK, Barber T, Coxey RA, Takeda T, Rondinone CM, et al. Perilipin is located on the surface layer of intracellular lipid droplets in adipocytes. J Lipid Res. 1995;36(6):1211–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mohamed E, Sierra RA, Trillo-Tinoco J, Cao Y, Innamarato P, Payne KK, et al. The unfolded protein response mediator PERK governs myeloid cell-driven immunosuppression in tumors through inhibition of STING signaling. Immunity. 2020;2(4):668–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Song M, Sandoval TA, Chae CS, Chopra S, Tan C, Rutkowski MR, et al. IRE1α-XBP1 controls T cell function in ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity. Nature. 2018;562(7727):423–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Preuss C, Jelenik T, Bódis K, Müssig K, Burkart V, Szendroedi J, et al. A new targeted lipidomics approach reveals lipid droplets in liver, muscle and heart as a repository for diacylglycerol and ceramide species in non-alcoholic fatty liver. Cells. 2019;8(3):277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang T, Zhang Y, Liu J, Ma Y, Ye Q, Yan X, et al. MicroRNA-377-3p inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis through negative regulation of CPT1C-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Cancer Metab. 2022;10(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Budhu A, Roessler S, Zhao X, Yu Z, Forgues M, Ji J, et al. Integrated metabolite and gene expression profiles identify lipid biomarkers associated with progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and patient outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(5):1066–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liao Z, Luo R, Li G, Song Y, Zhan S, Zhao K, et al. Exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells modulate endoplasmic reticulum stress to protect against nucleus pulposus cell death and ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo. Theranostics. 2019;9(14):4084–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang S, Kaufman RJ. The impact of the unfolded protein response on human disease. J Cell Biol. 2012;197(7):857–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Urra H, Dufey E, Avril T, Chevet E, Hetz C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the hallmarks of cancer. Trends Cancer. 2016;2(5):252–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ford K, McDonald D, Mali P. Functional genomics via CRISPR-Cas. J Mol Biol. 2019;431(1):48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lee C. CRISPR/Cas9-based antiviral strategy: current status and the potential challenge. Molecules. 2019;24(7):1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu Y, Zeng J, Roscoe BP, Liu P, Yao Q, Lazzarotto CR, et al. Highly efficient therapeutic gene editing of human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):776–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang K, Nicholaou M. Suppression of antimicrobial resistance in MRSA using CRISPR-dCas9. Am Soc Clin Lab Sci. 2017;30:207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang Q, Guan G, Cheng P, Cheng W, Yang L, Wu A. Characterization of an endoplasmic reticulum stress-related signature to evaluate immune features and predict prognosis in glioma. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(8):3870–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Huang R, Li G, Wang K, Wang Z, Zeng F, Hu H, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the clinical and biological significances of endoplasmic reticulum stress in diffuse gliomas. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 619396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jühling F, Hamdane N, Crouchet E, Li S, El Saghire H, Mukherji A, et al. Targeting clinical epigenetic reprogramming for chemoprevention of metabolic and viral hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2021;70(1):157–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Rusyn I, Lemon SM. Mechanisms of HCV-induced liver cancer: what did we learn from in vitro and animal studies? Cancer Lett. 2014;345(2):210–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Domovitz T, Gal-Tanamy M. Tracking down the epigenetic footprint of HCV-Induced Hepatocarcinogenesis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(3):551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Chiba S, Baghdadi M, Akiba H, Yoshiyama H, Kinoshita I, Dosaka-Akita H, et al. Tumor-infiltrating DCs suppress nucleic acid-mediated innate immune responses through interactions between the receptor TIM-3 and the alarmin HMGB1. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(9):832–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tan C, Ramaswamy M, Shi G, Vistica BP, Siegel RM, Gery I. Inflammation-inducing Th1 and Th17 cells differ in their expression patterns of apoptosis-related molecules. Cell Immunol. 2011;271(2):210–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(3):162–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Gabrusiewicz K, Rodriguez B, Wei J, Hashimoto Y, Healy LM, Maiti SN, et al. Glioblastoma-infiltrated innate immune cells resemble M0 macrophage phenotype. JCI Insight. 2016;1(2): e85841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Bai R, Rebelo A, Kleeff J, Sunami Y. Identification of prognostic lipid droplet-associated genes in pancreatic cancer patients via bioinformatics analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not available.

Funding

Project supported by Peking University International Hospital Research Funds (No. YN2022QN12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China

    Ziwei Guo & Jun Liang

  2. Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China

    Ziwei Guo & Jun Liang

Authors
  1. Ziwei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ziwei Guo designed and concepted this study, and provided the study materials, collected data or patients, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; Jun Liang supported and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All ethical approval, guidelines, and informed consent are available in each article, which is published and searchable in a public database. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. And there is not direct human participation in these databases.

Consent for publication

Not available.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Flow chart of literature search. Fig. S2. Gene heat map in HCC patients. Fig. S3. Gene expression differences in the TCGA dataset. Fig. S4. Differential expression of proteins in the TCGA dataset. Fig. S5. Prognosis value for overall survival in the TCGA dataset. Fig. S6. Gene expression differences in the ICGC dataset. Fig. S7. Prognosis value for overall survival in the ICGC dataset. Fig. S8. Univariate COX regression analysis. Fig. S9. The expression pattern of the 3 genes. Fig. S10. The prognostic value of the ER stress-related signature in TCGA and CGGA datasets. Fig. S11. The prognostic value of the ER stress-related signature in TCGA dataset. Fig. S12. Correlation between the 10 genes and their genetic alteration status. Fig. S13. The expression profiles of the proteins. Fig. S14. Association between the signature and clinicopathologic features in ICGC datasets. Fig. S15. Relationship betweenthe risk signature and immune checkpoints. Fig. S16. Forest plot of the univariate and multivariate Cox regressionanalysis in the ICGC cohorts. TableS1. 124 factors were identified as lipiddroplet-associated factors by literature search.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Z., Liang, J. Characterization of a lipid droplet and endoplasmic reticulum stress related gene risk signature to evaluate the clinical and biological value in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lipids Health Dis 21, 146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01759-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01759-y

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X