Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Increased visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio is positively associated with the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in a Chinese population

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 23, Article number: 104 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis and comprehension of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently redefined as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are gaining a better understanding. In this study, we examined the association between visceral fat area and skeletal muscle mass ratio (VSR) and the prevalence of MASLD in a Chinese population.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 10,916 individuals who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis, along with anthropometric and biochemical measurements, from January 2022 to June 2023. According to the VSR distribution, sex-specific quartiles of VSR within the study population were defined. Linear trend tests were performed for the categorized VSR variables. Logistic regression models were performed to estimate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals between VSR distribution and MASLD prevalence stratified by sex.

Results

The prevalence of MASLD was 37.94% in the overall population (56.34% male), and it gradually increased with higher VSR levels in both genders (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between VSR and MASLD prevalence after adjusting for confounders. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for MASLD, comparing the lowest to the highest VSR quartile, was 3.159 (2.671, 3.736) for men and 2.230 (1.764, 2.819) for women (all P < 0.001). Restricted cubic splines also indicated significant non-linear relationships between VSR and MASLD prevalence.

Conclusions

VSR is positively associated with the prevalence of MASLD in this Chinese population, with a notably higher risk for men as VSR increases compared to women.

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) stands as the most prevalent liver condition worldwide, with a prevalence rate around 38% in recent years [1, 2]. NAFLD is intricately linked to type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, increasing the odds of liver-specific conditions [2,3,4]. NAFLD nomenclature has been under discussion recently. Following rounds of Delphi surveys, the new designation, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), has been selected to replace NAFLD [5]. Recently, two cohort studies found minimal disparity in the prevalence between MASLD and NAFLD, suggesting previous NAFLD research remain applicable with the new MASLD definition [6, 7]. Additionally, a large cohort study concluded that the change in nomenclature did not impact credibility of research findings presented under the NAFLD terminology in previous decades [8]. Therefore, the new term and criteria were utilized in the study while referencing some earlier NAFLD research.

Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is strongly related to NAFLD [9, 10]. The measurement of visceral fat area (VFA) provides a precise and consistent assessment of abdominal obesity [11, 12]. The presence of visceral fat has been associated with an increasing likelihood of developing NAFLD [13] and has become another contributing factor for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [14]. Concurrently, reduced skeletal muscle mass (SMM), a key aspect of sarcopenia, also plays a role in increasing NAFLD risks [15].

Moreover, insulin resistance (IR) and NAFLD are closely linked [16]. Both visceral adipose tissue and SMM contribute to IR. SMM plays a significant role in the disposal of glucose mediated by insulin, and reduced SMM may induce relative IR [17, 18]. Similarly, visceral adipose tissue is closely linked with IR [19]. The combined effect of increased VFA and decreased SMM may exhibit a synergistic effect on metabolism, increasing the possibility of MASLD. Additionally, recent genetic insights, notably the identification of the TM6SF2 gene, contribute to our understanding of NAFLD development by revealing its role in hepatic lipid metabolism, particularly in the process of lipidating very low-density lipoprotein within a pre-Golgi compartment [20, 21]. To date, no research has explored the impact of both components in relation to MASLD in the Chinese population. Whether the combined effect of these aspects of body composition varies across sexes remains unclear.

The study seeks to evaluate the correlation between visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio (VSR) and the prevalence of MASLD within the Chinese population undergoing regular health examinations. The hypothesis posits that individuals with a higher VSR may have an increased prevalence of MASLD, given the potential synergistic effects of visceral adiposity and skeletal muscle alterations on metabolic health. In addition, the investigation aims to explore potential gender-specific differences in this association.

Methods

Study design and subjects

This cross-sectional study recruited participants who performed electrical impedance analysis (BIA) in the Health Management Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2022 and June 2023. A total of 13,815 subjects were included. The exclusion criteria included (1) incomplete anthropometric measurements or laboratory data (n = 185), or missing medical history data or personal health history data (n = 2664); (2) with a history of severe heart disease, brain disease, blood disease, lung disease, kidney disease, psychiatric disease, and malignancy (n = 50). In the end, 10,916 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The research obtained ethical approval from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. An informed consent waiver was granted by the ethics committee because anonymized retrospective data from health check-ups were utilized. The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical and lab measurements

Demographic data were gathered, and anthropometric measurements such as height, weight, and waist circumference were recorded. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight (kg) by the square of the height (m). Body composition, including SMM and VFA, was assessed by the BIA method (InBody 770, Korea) [22]. To improve the accuracy of the result, subjects were required to fast for 12 h and refrain from drinking for 8 h before undergoing the measurement [23]. According to manufacturer’s instruction, subjects were light dressed and instructed to hold the analyzer’s handles, making contact with the electrodes on each limb. They extended their limbs to prevent their arms from touching the torso, kept their thighs from making contact and maintained a still position throughout the measurement [24]. The BIA method was validated as the reliable technique for assessing body composition, showing strong correlations with measurements obtained utilizing abdominal computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), including VFA and SMM [25, 26]. In individuals with obesity, it proves sufficiently reliable for estimating fat mass, exhibiting a strong correlation and minimal bias compared to DXA [27]. Two cross-sectional studies, involving over 400,000 Korean adults, employed BIA as a dependable option for measuring skeletal muscle, further affirming its reliability in the diverse populations [28, 29]. In this study, VSR was computed as an indicator of MASLD risk by dividing the VFA (cm2) by SMM (kg).

Blood samples were collected following an 8-hour fasting period from subjects to measure the following parameters: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting insulin, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), uric acid, homocysteine (hcy) and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). All assessments were performed using standard laboratory methods. Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) was derived by multiplying FPG (mmol/L) by the fasting insulin level (µIU/mL), then dividing the result by 22.5 [30]. Central obesity was determined based on the criteria established by the World Health Organization: waist circumference (WC) of 94 cm or more for men and 80 cm or more for women [31].

Diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Hepatic steatosis was assessed using abdominal ultrasound performed by experienced radiologists. Steatosis diagnosis was established dichotomously based on the presence of a hyperechogenic liver parenchyma [32].

MASLD is defined as hepatic steatosis and one or more of the five cardiometabolic risk factors with no other causes of steatosis [5]:

  1. i)

    body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m2 for Asians or WC > 94 cm for men and > 80 cm for women or ethnically adjusted;

  2. ii)

    fasting serum glucose ≥ 5.6mmol/L(100 mg/dL) or 2-hour post-load glucose levels ≥ 7.8 mmol/L (≥ 140 mg/dL) or glycated hemoglobin ≥ 5.7% (39 mmol/L) or type 2 diabetes or treatment for type 2 diabetes;

  3. iii)

    blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or specific anti-hypertensive drug treatment;

  4. iv)

    plasma TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L (150 mg/dL) or lipid-lowering treatment;

  5. v)

    plasma HDL-C ≤ 1.0 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) for men and ≤ 1.3mmol/L (50 mg/dL) for women or lipid-lowering treatment.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were indicated as the number of subjects (%), and chi-square test was preformed between groups. Normally distributed data are shown as means ± standard deviation values and comparison between groups was used by student’s t-test; otherwise indicated as inter-quartile range median (P25, P75) for non-normal distribution data and the Mann–Whitney U-test was conducted between groups. According to the VSR distribution, sex-specific quartiles of VSR within the study population were defined as follows: ≤2.26, 2.27 ~ 2.75, 2.76 ~ 3.29, and > 3.29 for men, and ≤ 2.85, 2.86 ~ 3.62, 3.63 ~ 4.88, > 4.88 for women. The first quartile representing the lowest VSR was used as the reference group. Based on logistic regression models, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to estimate the odds of MASLD associated with VSR distribution levels by sex. Model 1 was adjusted for age. Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 variables plus current smoking, current drinking and exercise (never versus occasional or regular). Model 3 was adjusted for model 2 variables plus TC, LDL-C, ALT, AST\(,\gamma -\)GGT, hcy, and uric acid. Linear trend analyses were conducted for the categorized VSR variables. Restricted cubic splines of continuous VSR with knots at 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles were applied to graphically assess the potential non-linear association between VSR levels and MASLD prevalence following adjustment for all potential confounding factors. Moreover, subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of age, smoking, drinking, hcy and uric acid on MASLD outcomes among different gender groups. The potential interactions between each stratified variable and VSR levels were investigated using an interaction test in the subgroup analysis. All data analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R version 4.2.2, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The study comprised a total of 10,916 participants, including 6,150 males and 4,766 females. Table 1 displayed the baseline characteristics of study subjects categorized into MASLD and Non-MASLD groups. MASLD was prevalent in 37.94% of the participants. The findings revealed that the MASLD group had higher proportions of males, smokers, alcohol consumers, and individuals with a medical history of hypertension and diabetes compared to the Non-MASLD group (all P < 0.001). Additionally, in comparison to the Non-MASLD group, individuals in the MASLD group were older and exhibited higher for waist circumference, BMI, body fat percentage, VFA, VSR, TC, TG, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ALT, AST, γ-GGT, LDL-C, hcy, FPG, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and uric acid levels, while skeletal muscle index and HDL-C levels were lower (all P < 0.05). However, it should be noted that even if these values are higher in the MASLD group, a number of them still fall within the normal range.

Table 1 Comparison of subject baseline characteristics according to MASLD
Full size table

Prevalence of MASLD according to VSR values

Subjects were divided into quartiles according to their VSR values for different genders. Those in the highest VSR quartiles had lower SMM and higher VFA. In both genders, the prevalence of MASLD progressively increased with rising VSR levels (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). In Table 2, following adjustment for confounding factors, the odds ratio (95% CIs) for MASLD, comparing the lowest to the highest VSR quartile, were 3.138 (2.652, 3.713) for males and 2.108 (1.664, 2.668) for females (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, the test for trend showed statistically significant results for both males and females (all P for trend < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of MASLD grouped by VSR quartiles in male and female. Quartiles of VSR in men, Q1: ≤ 2.26, Q2: 2.27 ~ 2.75, Q3: 2.76 ~ 3.29, Q4 > 3.29; quartiles of VSR in women, Q1: ≤2.85, Q2: 2.86 ~ 3.62, Q3: 3.63 ~ 4.88, Q4: >4.88. Abbreviations: MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; VSR, visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio

Full size image
Table 2 OR with 95% CI for associations between VSR and MASLD according to sex
Full size table

Based on logistic regression results adjusted for confounders, a restricted cubic spline model with four knots was employed to assess the dose-response relationship between VSR and the prevalence of MASLD (Fig. 2). In males, the possibility of MASLD increased across the range of VSR. However, in females, the non-linear relationship between VSR and odds ratio showed a J-shaped pattern, with an overall tendency suggesting a positive association between VSR and MASLD prevalence (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Non-linear relationships between VSR and prevalence of MASLD. (A) in male. (B) in female. Data were OR (solid line) and 95%CI (shadow area) from logistic regression analysis with restricted cubic splines. Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; OR, odds ratio; VSR, visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass

Full size image

Subgroup analysis

In the subgroup analysis, stratified analysis was conducted on the correlation between VSR and prevalence of MASLD in different genders (as shown in Table 3). The findings revealed a significant interaction: age and central obesity in both sex, uric acid in females, interact significantly with VSR (P for interaction < 0.05), increasing the prevalence of MASLD. However, due to the limited number of smokers, alcohol drinkers and individuals with high hcy levels, subgroup analysis was not conducted for these three factors in females.

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for the association of VSR with the prevalence of MASLD according to sex
Full size table

Discussion

This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between VSR and the prevalence of MASLD in Chinese adults underwent health check-up. We found decreased SMM and increased VFA may have a synergistic effect on the prevalence of MASLD. As VSR elevated from Q1 to Q4, there was a significant rise in MASLD prevalence even after adjusting for confounders. Additionally, the relation between VSR and MASLD was more pronounced in men than women. To our knowledge, this research represents the first investigation into the association of VFA and SMM in relation to the prevalence of MASLD, a new term chosen to replace NAFLD, across both genders in a Chinese population. Several cohort studies have shown that earlier research into NAFLD remain applicable even with the adoption of the new MASLD definition [6,7,8]. The results align with prior research indicating that visceral fat and skeletal muscle may exert opposing influences on each other and both significantly contribute to the risk of NAFLD [15, 33,34,35], a pattern observed consistently across different populations including the Chinese. Specifically, a study conducted among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes observed strong associations between low SMM and high visceral adiposity with the highly prevalent lean NAFLD [36]. Another study conducted among middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults identified the fat-to-muscle ratio as an independent contributor to the risk of NAFLD [37]. Additionally, Yu et al.’s study concluded that a lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio is linked to a higher prevalence of subtypes of metabolic associated fatty liver disease [38]. Some mechanisms could elucidate the combined impact of reduced SMM and increased VFA on NAFLD risk, including IR, impaired lipid metabolism, and low-grade inflammation [24, 39]. Skeletal muscles serve as a site for insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Therefore, the decrease in skeletal muscle mass can result in reduced insulin sensitivity, a key factor in the development of steatotic liver disease [17]. In addition, decreased muscle mass hinders the effective clearance of TG and free fatty acids, resulting in elevated lipid transport to the liver and subsequent hepatic fat accumulation. Steatotic liver disease often involves low-grade inflammation, where certain inflammatory mediators originating from the liver and other pro-inflammatory cytokines have been associated with decreased muscle mass [40]. Visceral fat, on the other hand, disrupts adipocyte function and adipocytokine secretion, potentially increasing proinflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6, which are correlated with muscle atrophy and could heighten the risk of progressing NAFLD [41]. Therefore, as visceral adipose tissue increases and SMM decreases, the ability of insulin to mediate glucose uptake and storage in both skeletal muscle and adipose tissue decreases. This phenomenon may contribute to the development of NAFLD.

VSR, combining two body composition measures can be used as a proxy for sarcopenic obesity. The current study found that a higher VSR value was in relation to a greater prevalence of MASLD compared to the lower VSR value group, irrespective of gender. However, our research found gender disparities, with the association between VSR and MASLD being stronger in men compared to women. The J-shaped association was observed only in women, indicating when VSR was around 2.2–3.7, the association of VSR and MASLD was relatively weak in women, but the risk began to rise significantly afterward. This contrasts with previous research where associations are typically stronger in women, leading to increased VSR levels, and are more likely to develop sarcopenic obesity, cardiometabolic diseases, and NAFLD [39, 42, 43]. The mechanisms are mainly explained by the variations in fat distribution and skeletal muscle mass, which are influenced by varying levels of sex hormones between different genders [44]. Men are predisposed to central obesity as a result of increased visceral fat accumulation, while women tend to exhibit a ‘pear-shaped’ body profile, characterized by preferential fat deposition in the lower body [45]. When VSR falls within the first and second quartiles, women are more likely to maintain normal levels of SMM and VFA. Furthermore, there were fewer women than men (n = 4766 versus n = 6150), and the rate of MASLD prevalence is a much higher among men than among women (75.91% versus 24.09%). Given the variations in diagnostic methods for hepatic steatosis and sarcopenia, a conclusion has yet to be reached. Further investigation utilizing comprehensive assessments of fat distribution and SMM measurements will provide insights into the varying impact of VSR on MASLD prevalence between genders.

The diagnostic criteria of MASLD requires one or more of the five cardiometabolic risk factors, including weight status, glucose/HbA1c level, blood pressure, HDL-C, and TG levels. These risk factors can be influenced by both SMM and VFA with different pathways. SMM is linked to improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, reducing risk of abnormal glucose/HbA1c levels. Furthermore, it contributes to overall energy expenditure, facilitating weight management and favorable lipid profiles. In contrast, VFA primarily impacts cardiometabolic risk factors through mechanisms related to inflammation, IR, and unfavorable lipid metabolism. The release of pro-inflammatory substances, IR, and adverse lipid profiles are consequences of excessive visceral fat, resulting in an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and CVD. These two components of body composition have unique roles in regulating cardiometabolic health. When examining gender disparities, it’s evident that men tend to accumulate more abdominal fat [45], a known predictor of unfavorable metabolic characteristics that elevate the risk of CVD. Conversely, increased fat deposition in the legs may be linked to a reduced risk of metabolic dysfunction [46,47,48]. These observations highlight the significance of considering fat distribution patterns in the onset of cardiometabolic diseases, potentially explaining the higher prevalence of MASLD among men.

In subgroup analysis, it was observed that only uric acid in women interacted with VSR, increasing the possibility of MASLD. Yang et al. found that uric acid levels were positively related to NAFLD prevalence, with a stronger correlation observed in elderly women relative to men [49]. Similarly, in a large cross-sectional study, women exhibited a more robust correlation between uric acid levels and elevated ALT compared to men [50]. Conversely, Lin’s group found that hyperuricemia was associated with increased ALT levels in young men, but this association was not observed in women [51]. Although the mechanism underlying this sex difference requires further investigation, it suggests that individuals with elevated uric acid levels might warrant screening for MASLD prevalence.

Study strengths and limitations

The study has several strengths. Firstly, this is the first study to explore the combined impact of VFA and SMM on MASLD, a new term chosen to replace NAFLD, among a large number of Chinese population. Second, this study illuminates gender disparities in these associations, taking into account the substantial differences in body composition between men and women. Third, restricted cubic spline curves are used to vividly illustrate the non-linear associations between VSR and the prevalence of MASLD as they are not linearly related. These findings underscore the relevance of considering both visceral fat and SMM in assessing MASLD prevalence, pointing towards the need for a more gender-specific approach in disease prevention and intervention. Dietitians and other healthcare professionals can utilize these findings to optimize personalized dietary interventions and nutrition prescriptions, ultimately advancing the field’s knowledge and enhancing strategies for the prevention and management of MASLD.

This study also has several limitations. First of all, while our findings suggest an association between VSR and MASLD prevalence, the study design prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions regarding causality. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate how VSR contributes to the prevalence of MASLD and to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their relationships. Second, BIA results may be influenced by various factors, including fluid status, malnutrition, and pregnancy [52]. Nonetheless, any inaccuracies in the BIA assessment would apply uniformly to all study participants. In addition, while BIA may not be the gold standard for assessing muscle mass, it offers simple, cost-effective, and dependable estimates of SMM [53]. When conducting the measurements, the hydration level and food intake were regulated to control the variables. Finally, the study population consist of only healthy Chinese ethnicity, who typically have a great access to healthcare facilities and are more likely to be motivated to enhance their health for various reasons. However, it’s important to note that this population may not fully reflect the broader demographic variations. Future comparative research involving diverse ethnic populations is needed to confirm the findings, enhance the results’ generalizability and gain a better understand the nuances of the outcomes observed.

Conclusions

In summary, the current study reveals a notable positive relationship between high VSR and MASLD prevalence, particularly notable in males compared to females. This association remains independent of age, lipid levels, and other potential confounding factors within a large Chinese ethnic population. These findings underscore the clinical relevance of considering VSR as a potential risk factor for MASLD. Healthcare providers can tailor interventions to target both visceral fat reduction and skeletal muscle preservation or enhancement, potentially through lifestyle modifications, exercise programs, and dietary interventions. Further research involving diverse ethnic groups is necessary to validate and replicate the findings.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

BIA:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis

BMI:

Body mass index

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

γ-GGT:

γ-glutamyl transferase

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin

Hcy:

Homocysteine

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HOMA-IR:

Insulin resistance index

IR:

Insulin resistance

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

MASLD:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

PBF:

Percent body fat

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

SMI:

Skeletal muscle mass index

SMM:

Skeletal muscle mass

SUA:

Serum uric acid

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

VFA:

Visceral fat area

VSR:

Visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio

WC:

Waist circumference

References

  1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology. 2023;77(4):1335–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Staufer K, Stauber RE. Steatotic liver disease: metabolic dysfunction, Alcohol, or both? Biomedicines. 2023;11(8):2108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Su X, Xu J, Zheng C. The relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver and skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio in women with type 2 diabetes. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019;19(1):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD: a multisystem disease. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S47–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. 2023;79(6):1542–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song SJ, Che-To Lai J, Lai-Hung Wong G, Wai-Sun Wong V, Cheuk-Fung Yip T. Can we use old NAFLD data under the new MASLD definition? J Hepatol. 2024;80(2):e54–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagstrom H, Vessby J, Ekstedt M, Shang Y. 99% of patients with NAFLD meet MASLD criteria and natural history is therefore identical. J Hepatol. 2024;80(2):e76–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perazzo H, Pacheco AG, Griep RH. Collaborators. Changing from NAFLD trough MAFLD to MASLD: similar prevalence and risk factors in a large Brazilian cohort. J Hepatol. 2024;80(2):e72–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;313(22):2263–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jakobsen MU, Berentzen T, Sorensen TI, Overvad K. Abdominal obesity and fatty liver. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:77–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao D, Cui H, Shao Z, Cao L. Abdominal obesity, chronic inflammation and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2023;28(4):100726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kouvari M, Polyzos SA, Chrysohoou C, Skoumas J, Pitsavos CS, Panagiotakos DB, et al. Skeletal muscle mass and abdominal obesity are independent predictors of hepatic steatosis and interact to predict ten-year cardiovascular disease incidence: data from the ATTICA cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(6):1281–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Batsis JA, Mackenzie TA, Barre LK, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and mortality in older adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(9):1001–07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444(7121):881–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cai C, Song X, Chen Y, Chen X, Yu C. Relationship between relative skeletal muscle mass and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(1):115–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii H, Kawada N, Japan Study Group Of Nafld J-N. The role of insulin resistance and diabetes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A, Vanni E, Gambino R, Cassader M, Baldi S, et al. Insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: sites and mechanisms. Diabetologia. 2005;48(4):634–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Severinsen MCK, Pedersen BK. Muscle-organ crosstalk: the emerging roles of Myokines. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(4):594–609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mirza MS, Obesity V, Fat. Querying the role of Adipokines in the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011;2011:592404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo F, Oldoni F, Das A. TM6SF2: a Novel Genetic Player in nonalcoholic fatty liver and Cardiovascular Disease. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6(3):448–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo F, Smagris E, Martin SA, Vale G, McDonald JG, Fletcher JA, et al. Hepatic TM6SF2 is required for Lipidation of VLDL in a Pre-golgi Compartment in mice and rats. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;13(3):879–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung GE, Kim MJ, Yim JY, Kim JS, Yoon JW. Sarcopenia is significantly Associated with Presence and Severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019;28(2):129–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seo JY, Cho EJ, Kim MJ, Kwak MS, Yang JI, Chung SJ, et al. The relationship between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and low muscle mass in an asymptomatic Korean population. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(6):2953–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, Gunn DA, Stokkel MP, Westendorp RG, et al. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(5):610–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogawa H, Fujitani K, Tsujinaka T, Imanishi K, Shirakata H, Kantani A, et al. InBody 720 as a new method of evaluating visceral obesity. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58(105):42–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ballesteros-Pomar MD, Gonzalez-Arnaiz E, Pintor-de-la Maza B, Barajas-Galindo D, Ariadel-Cobo D, Gonzalez-Roza L, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of fat mass and appendicular lean mass in patients with obesity. Nutrition. 2022;93:111442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park JH, Lee MY, Shin HK, Yoon KJ, Lee J, Park JH. Lower skeletal muscle mass is associated with diabetes and insulin resistance: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;39(7):e3681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo JH, Park SW, Jun JE, Jin SM, Hur KY, Lee MK, et al. Relationship between low skeletal muscle mass, sarcopenic obesity and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in Korean adults. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021;37(1):e3363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee YH, Kim SU, Song K, Park JY, Kim DY, Ahn SH, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with significant liver fibrosis independently of obesity and insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008–2011). Hepatology. 2016;63(3):776–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Organization WH. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip ratio: report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organaization; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Itoh Y, Harano Y, Fujii K, Nakajima T, et al. The severity of ultrasonographic findings in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease reflects the metabolic syndrome and visceral fat accumulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(12):2708–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moon JS, Yoon JS, Won KC, Lee HW. The role of skeletal muscle in development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Metab J. 2013;37(4):278–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsing JC, Nguyen MH, Yang B, Min Y, Han SS, Pung E, et al. Associations between Body Fat, muscle Mass, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a Population-based study. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3(8):1061–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim G, Lee SE, Lee YB, Jun JE, Ahn J, Bae JC, et al. Relationship between relative skeletal muscle Mass and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 7-Year longitudinal study. Hepatology. 2018;68(5):1755–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang X, He Z, Si Q, Hu X, Yang L, Gu X, et al. The Association of Sarcopenia and visceral obesity with lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2022;2022:2229139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan F, Nie G, Zhou N, Zhang M, Peng W. Association of fat-to-muscle ratio with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a single-centre retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(10):e072489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Xing M, Ni Y, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Yu X. The relationship between skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease subtypes in middle-aged and elderly population: a single-center retrospective study. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1246157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cho Y, Chang Y, Ryu S, Jung HS, Kim CW, Oh H, et al. Skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio as a predictor of NAFLD in lean and overweight men and women with effect modification by sex. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6(9):2238–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schaap LA, Pluijm SM, Deeg DJ, Visser M. Inflammatory markers and loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) and strength. Am J Med. 2006;119(6):e5269–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boutari C, Perakakis N, Mantzoros CS. Association of Adipokines with Development and Progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(1):33–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick E, Goodpaster B, Nevitt M, et al. Sarcopenia: alternative definitions and associations with lower extremity function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(11):1602–09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang S, Huang Y, Li J, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang M, et al. Increased visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio is positively associated with the risk of cardiometabolic diseases in a Chinese natural population: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;39(2):e3597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gavin KM, Bessesen DH. Sex differences in adipose tissue function. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49(2):215–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fried SK, Lee MJ, Karastergiou K. Shaping fat distribution: new insights into the molecular determinants of depot- and sex-dependent adipose biology. Obes (Silver Spring). 2015;23(7):1345–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Pelt RE, Jankowski CM, Gozansky WS, Schwartz RS, Kohrt WM. Lower-body adiposity and metabolic protection in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4573–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vasan SK, Osmond C, Canoy D, Christodoulides C, Neville MJ, Di Gravio C, et al. Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018;42(4):850–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen GC, Arthur R, Iyengar NM, Kamensky V, Xue X, Wassertheil-Smoller S, et al. Association between regional body fat and cardiovascular disease risk among postmenopausal women with normal body mass index. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(34):2849–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang H, Li D, Song X, Liu F, Wang X, Ma Q, et al. Joint associations of serum uric acid and ALT with NAFLD in elderly men and women: a Chinese cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zelber-Sagi S, Ben-Assuli O, Rabinowich L, Goldstein A, Magid A, Shalev V, et al. The association between the serum levels of uric acid and alanine aminotransferase in a population-based cohort. Liver Int. 2015;35(11):2408–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin JW, Tsai KZ, Chen KW, Su FY, Li YH, Lin YP, et al. Sex-specific Association between serum uric acid and elevated alanine aminotransferase in a military cohort: the CHIEF study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2019;19(3):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Buchholz AC, Bartok C, Schoeller DA. The validity of bioelectrical impedance models in clinical populations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004;19(5):433–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;89(2):465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Chenbing Liu, Nan Li, Di Sheng, Yahong Shao, Lihong Qiu, Chao Shen & Zhong Liu

Authors
  1. Chenbing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Di Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yahong Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lihong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chao Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.L. and C.L. designed the research; C.L. wrote the main manuscript; N.L. carried out data analysis; D.S. and Y.S. conducted the study and collected the data; C.S. and L.Q. drafted tables and figures. All authors revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to accountable for all aspects of the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participants

This study passed the ethical approval of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The informed consent waiver was also approved by the ethics committee due to the use of anonymized retrospective data that were collected during the health check-up process.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Li, N., Sheng, D. et al. Increased visceral fat area to skeletal muscle mass ratio is positively associated with the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in a Chinese population. Lipids Health Dis 23, 104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02100-5

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X