Skip to main content


  • Research
  • Open Access
  • The combination of L-4F and simvastatin stimulate cholesterol efflux and related proteins expressions to reduce atherosclerotic lesions in apoE knockout mice

    • 1,
    • 1Email author,
    • 1,
    • 2,
    • 1,
    • 2,
    • 1 and
    • 1
    Lipids in Health and Disease201312:180

    • Received: 19 October 2013
    • Accepted: 25 November 2013
    • Published:



    Both L-4F, one apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic peptide, and statins can reduce progression of atherosclerosis by different mechanisms. The combination of the two drugs can cause lesion regression by rendering HDL anti-inflammatory. We postulated that combination of L-4F and simvastatin may stimulate cholesterol efflux and related proteins expressions to alleviate atherosclerosis.


    Thirty male wild-type (W-T) C57 BL/6 mice and apo E−/− mice were divided into five groups: W-T group, atherosclerosis (AS) group, simvastatin group, L-4F group and the combination of simvastatin and L-4F group. After 16 weeks, serum lipids, atherosclerotic lesion areas, cholesterol efflux and the expressions of related proteins including ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ were evaluated.


    The aortic atherosclerotic lesion areas were reduced more significantly by combination of both drugs than single agent, and cholesterol efflux was promoted more in combination group than simvastatin and L-4F group. Besides, the combination group promoted expressions of cholesterol efflux related proteins.


    The combination of L-4F and simvastatin reduced atherosclerotic lesions, which stimulates cholesterol efflux by promoting the expressions of related proteins. In addition, these results help us further understand that the regression of the atherosclerosis would be assessed by reduction in LDL-C with increase of cholesterol efflux.


    • Atherosclerosis
    • High density Lipoprotein
    • Coronary artery disease
    • Apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic peptide
    • Statins


    Randomized clinical trials have shown that statins reduce the progression of atherosclerosis (AS) and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Statins are appreciated and accepted by clinical staff as a first-line choice for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in humans. However, statins can reduce a part of cardiovascular events in spite of lowering effectively and efficiently low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). So it is high time to seek potent treatment strategy.

    A robust inverse association between the level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and the risk of cardiovascular disease has fostered intensive research seeking to target HDL metabolism for therapeutic gain [1, 2]. When it is challenging to reduce clinical CAD risk by pharmacologic increases in HDL-C levels, the functions of HDL are increasingly focused on, including the ability to mediate reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capacities, nitric oxide-promoting activity and so on. Although cholesterol efflux from macrophages represents only a small fraction of overall flux through the RCT pathway, it is probably the component that is most relevant to atheroprotection [3]. Amit V. Khera et al. reported that cholesterol efflux capacity from macrophages has a strong inverse association with subclinical atherosclerosis and CAD, independently of the HDL-C level. Cholesterol efflux capacity, as an integrated measure of HDL quantity and quality, is reflective of the role of HDL in atheroprotection [4]. Several lipid transporters have been showed to promote cholesterol efflux in vitro and vivo, and the key ones include ATP Binding Cassette A1 (ABCA1), ATP Binding Cassette G1 (ABCG1) and Scavenger Receptor Class B type I (SR-BI) [58]. Moreover, some nuclear receptors play central roles in cholesterol metabolism, such as Liver X receptors (LXRs) [9] and peroxisome proliferater-activated receptors (PPARs) [10]. When activated, they induce a series of genes that are involved in cholesterol efflux.

    Apo A-1, the main protein component of HDL, plays an essential role in anti-atherosclerosis. Apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic peptides are made to mimic the amphipathic alpha helix of ApoA-1 [11], and have the similar functions with apoA-1. L-4F, a type of apo A-1mimetic peptides, has a characteristic of high biological activity. Over the last several years, studies have illustrated the capacities of L-4F to imitate many of the protective functions associated with ApoA-1, such as promotion of vasodilation and anti-inflammatory effects [12, 13].

    Both simvastatin and apo A-1mimetic peptides can reduce atherosclerosis by different mechanisms, and the combination of them can promote anti-inflammatory function of HDL and alleviate atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, it has not been elucidated whether they can stimulate cholesterol efflux and reduce atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, we aimed to investigate the anti-atherogenic effect of the combination of L-4F and simvastatin, and determine the mechanisms including cholesterol efflux and the expressions of related proteins like ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ.


    Serum lipids

    The results of the serum lipids (Table 1) suggested that hypercholesterolemia model was successfully established. Serum HDL-C levels in simva group were significantly higher and TC, TG and LDL-C concentrations were significantly lower than AS group. In contrast, L-4F group only increased the concentration of apo A-1, but not changed other serum lipids. The combination group increased the HDL-C and apo A-1 levels and decreased TC, TG and LDL-C levels.
    Table 1

    Serum TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG and Apo A-I levels (n = 6)






    Apo A-I/(mg/ml)

    W-T group

    3.17 ± 0.532

    0.91 ± 0.322

    0.55 ± 0.102

    2.27 ± 0.322

    0.95 ± 0.142

    AS group

    22.42 ± 1.99

    2.68 ± 0.28

    12.45 ± 1.29

    1.60 ± 0.22

    0.73 ± 0.09

    Simva group

    14.89 ± 2.062

    2.34 ± 0.171

    7.59 ± 1.252

    2.03 ± 0.401

    0.86 ± 0.10

    L-4F group

    20.83 ± 2.11

    2.58 ± 0.27

    11.75 ± 0.92

    1.73 ± 0.23

    0.89 ± 0.091

    Simva + L-4F

    13.60 ± 2.502

    2.25 ± 0.292

    7.20 ± 0.682

    1.99 ± 0.202

    1.06 ± 0.162*

    1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group.

    *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    TC (total cholesterol), TG (Triglycerides), LDL-C (low density lipoprotein cholesterol), HDL-C (high density lipoprotein cholesterol).

    AS lesion areas

    The percentage plaque area was significantly higher in the AS group (44.30 ± 11.85%) than W-T group (2.54 ± 0.25%), which indicated that the expected atherosclerotic model were successful. Additionally, aortic lesion area was significantly reduced in all the treated groups (19.77 ± 1.95%, 22.58 ± 6.88% and 12.17 ± 1.90%) compared with the AS group (Figure 1).
    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Atherosclerotic lesion areas in ascending and thoracic aorta stained with Oil Red O (n = 6). a- e the aorta stained with Oil Red O in five groups, a: W-T group; b: AS group; c: Simva group; d: L-4F group; e: Simva + L-4F group. L-4F was administered intraperitoneally daily at a dose of 1 mg/kg/d, simvastatin intragastrically at a dose of 5 mg/kg/d and the combination group was given L-4F 1 mg/kg/d and simvastatin 5 mg/kg/d. f Lesion area was expressed as a percentage of total area. Simvastatin and L-4F equally reduced the lesion areas, and when they used together the lesion areas were the least.1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group;*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    Cholesterol efflux capacity

    Compared with the W-T group (20.51 ± 1.04%), the cholesterol efflux of atherosclerotic mice was impaired (16.82 ± 0.39%). Simvastatin (20.55 ± 0.98%) and L-4F (22.47 ± 1.16%) significantly increased cholesterol efflux capacity. The combination group of simvastatin and L-4F (25.26 ± 1.50%) promoted cholesterol efflux most effectively (Figure 2).
    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Cholesterol efflux capacity from RAW264.7 cells. The high-fat diet significantly reduced the cholesterol efflux, and L-4F and simvastatin both improved cholesterol efflux.

    mRNA expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in liver and macrophage

    In liver, simvastatin increased the mRNA expressions of ABCA1, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ; L-4F and the combination group promoted the expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ (Table 2). In macrophage, we just detected the expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI and ABCG1 because of the limited cells. The results suggested that simvastatin just increased the expression of ABCA1 and L-4F and the combination group increased the expressions of ABCA1 and ABCG1 (Figure 3).
    Table 2

    mRNA expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in liver







    W-T group






    AS group

    0.52 ± 0.08

    0.64 ± 0.06

    0.75 ± 0.12

    0.40 ± 0.07

    0.50 ± 0.08

    Simva group

    0.98 ± 0.14 2

    0.69 ± 0.11

    1.23 ± 0.192

    0.71 ± 0.072

    0.96 ± 0.072

    L-4F group

    1.38 ± 0.12 2b

    1.01 ± 0.142b

    1.46 ± 0.162b

    1.08 ± 0.102b

    1.19 ± 0.202b

    Simva + L-4F

    1.51 ± 0.13 2b

    1.96 ± 0.492**

    1.73 ± 0.242b**

    1.31 ± 0.202b**

    1.52 ± 0.102b**

    1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group.

    *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Fold change in mRNA levels of ABCA1, SR-BI and ABCG1 in macrophage by RT- PCR. Simvastatin and L-4F could not change the expression of SR-BI in macrophages. L-4F increased the mRNA expressions ABCA1 and ABCG1, and simvastatin improved the expression of ABCA1. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group;*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    Protein expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI and ABCG1 in liver and macrophage

    In liver, simvastatin increased the protein expressions of ABCA1 and ABCG1; L-4F and the combination group promoted the expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI and ABCG1. In macrophage, the expression of SR-BI in all the three treated groups was not altered. Simvastatin increased the expression of ABCA1 and L-4F and the combination group elevated the expressions of ABCA1 and ABCG1 (Figure 4).
    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Protein expressions of ABCA1, SR- BI and ABCG1 in liver and macrophage by Western blot. Simvastatin increased the expressions of ABCA1 and ABCG1 in liver and ABCA1 in macrophage, Both L-4F and the combination group improved the expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI and ABCG1 in liver and ABCA1 and ABCG1 in macrophage. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group;*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    Protein expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in abdominal aorta

    There are expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in abdominal aorta in mice. Simvastatin increased the expressions of ABCA1, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in aorta. L-4F and the combination group promoted the expressions of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ (Figure 5).
    Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Immunochemical staining of ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in abdominal aortic. a- y representative light microscopy images of abdominal aorta (X400). a-e ABCA1 staining; f-j SR-BI; k-o ABCG1; p-t LXRα; u-y PPARγ.I-V statistical results of positive staining (n = 6). 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.001, vs. AS group; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.001, vs. Simva group;*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, vs. L-4F group.

    Correlation analysis

    Both cholesterol efflux (r = 0.579, P < 0.001) and HDL-C (r = 0.568, P < 0.001) were inversely correlated with AS lesion area by Pearson correlation analysis.


    Reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is considered to be important in preventing the buildup of lipids that predisposes to atherosclerosis [14]. The process of RCT can be divided into three stages [15]. RCT begins with cellular cholesterol efflux to HDL from peripheral cells; Subsequently, the cholesterol in HDL in blood is transported to the liver. At last, the cholesterol is delivered to hepatocytes from HDL, and excreted through the bile. Although cholesterol efflux from macrophages is only the initial stage of the RCT, it has emerged as a biomarker of RCT. In this study, we confirmed that cholesterol efflux was inversely associated with the lesion of AS and we also believed that cholesterol efflux could serve as a stronger predictor of AS and coronary disease status even than serum HDL-C in different populations including normal or lipid disordered or drug-treated people. The results of this study help us further understand that the regression of the atherosclerotic plaque would be observed by reduction in LDL-C together with increase of cholesterol efflux.

    Statins are largely used in patients with atherosclerosis, and lower the rate of cardiovascular death. The majority of trials with statins investigated patients with CAD, in whom the reduction in cardiovascular events appeared to be related to the cholesterol-lowering effect of statins and ultimately to plaque stabilization [16]. However, emerging evidence suggests that statins do more than act as inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis. Many other actions have been attributed to statins including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, anti-proliferative and antithrombotic effects and so on [17]. In this study, we found that simvastatin could promote cholesterol efflux, which might be one of the mechanisms of anti-atherosclerosis of simvastatin. It increased the expressions of ABCA1, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ in liver and aorta and ABCA1 in macrophage that probably facilitated the cholesterol efflux. Several reports showed statins enhances the cholesterol efflux capacity [18, 19], and simvastatin promoted the expression of hepatic genes associated with reverse cholesterol transport [20]. However, no increase was noted after patients had been treated with pravastatin and atorvastatin [4]. We assumed that the discrepancy might be partly attributable to different models.

    The beneficial effects of HDL on atherosclerosis have greatly been attributed to its major protein, apoA-I. 4 F has the similar functions to apo A-I and high biological activity, including L-4F and D-4 F. They have the similar functions such as reduction of lesion formation and anti-inflammation, but L-4F is not orally efficacious because of digestion of L-4F by gut proteases. D-4 F was reported to stimulate cholesterol efflux [21], however it is not determined whether L-4F has the same effect or not. Our finding indicated L-4F improves cholesterol efflux capacity. Moreover, in this experiment, we observed for the first time that L-4F had the atheroprotective effect in parallel with simvastatin in mice. Though, of course, its effects on humans need further research.

    There are multiple pathways by which excess cholesterol from peripheral tissue or cells can be removed by HDL including ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI. One important pathway for cholesterol-mediated efflux involves interaction between ABCA1 and cholesterol-deficient and phospholipid-depleted apo A-I complexes [2224]. In our research, we observed that both L-4F and simvastatin up-regulated the expressions of ABCA1 in macrophages, livers and aortic walls (Figure 6). That indicated that they accelerated cholesterol removal from macrophages and plaques and facilitated biliary excretion of cholesterol in livers. Subsequently, ABCG1 mediates macrophage cholesterol efflux through interactions with spherical, cholesterol -containing HDL particles, medium HDL, large HDL, and very large HDL [6, 25]. Our results inferred that the expression of ABCG1 in macrophages, livers and aortic walls were up-regulated by L-4F, and simvastatin increased the expression of ABCG1 in livers and aortic walls, not macrophages. ABCG1 might be expected to be inhibitory of atherosclerosis development by promoting macrophage efflux. In contrast, SR-BI is a multifunctional receptor that mediates bidirectional lipid transport in the macrophage, which is dependent on the content of cholesterol in lipid-laden macrophages. The present study suggested that L-4F up-regulated the expression of SRBI in livers and aortic walls but not macrophages, and simvastatin did not alter the expression of SR-BI. SR-BI is known to promote cholesterol efflux from macrophage to HDL as an acceptor [26], but this flux can be bidirectional and has uncertain effects on macrophage cholesterol mass which accounted for failing to up-regulate the expression of SRBI in macrophages in our research.
    Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Deduced mechanisms by which L- 4F and simvastatin promote reverse cholesterol transportation ( RCT). The red arrows mean only L-4F increases the expressions of proteins, and black arrows mean both L-4F and simvastatin up-regulate the expressions of proteins. Neither L-4F nor simvastatin promote the expressions of proteins when it is fine dotted line.

    At present, clinical staff shows a strong interest in ligands for LXRS and PPARs for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, and they are ligand-activated transcription factors that plays well-established roles in up-regulating transcription of ABCA1 and ABCG1 [27, 28]. Our current study suggested that L-4F and simvastatin up-regulated the expression of LXRα and PPARγ in livers and aorta. Several studies have shown that synthetic LXR agonists induce cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport by up-regulating ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression [29, 30]. LXR agonists also improve glucose metabolism, antagonize inflammatory responses, inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and protect against the development of atherosclerosis in mice [31]. PPARs regulate diverse aspects of lipid and glucose metabolism. Agonists for the PPAR have also been reported to increase ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression through up-regulating LXR expression [28].

    D-4 F and Statins has been previously showed to cause lesion regression by render HDL anti-inflammatory [32]. This is the first report of regression of atherosclerotic lesions in mice administered L-4F and simvastatin by an apparent activation of cholesterol efflux. That means the combination of a statin and apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic peptide can alleviate atherosclerosis by increasing the functions of HDL like anti-inflammatory and cholesterol efflux.


    In summary, our results showed that the combination of L-4F and simvastatin can alleviate atherosclerosis more significantly than given as single agents in mice, which stimulates cholesterol efflux by promoting the expressions of related proteins. Thus, we put forward that the combination of simvastatin and L-4F may be a particularly potent treatment strategy.


    There are limitations in extrapolating results from murine models to humans. Mice are relatively resistant to statins [33] but respond well to 4 F [34], which may account for the paralleled anti-atherosclerotic effect of L-4F and simvastatin in mice. Future studies will be required to determine whether the combination of L-4F and simvastatin produces results in humans similar to the present results here for mice and if so, which regimen will be superior.

    L-4F and simvastatin were showed to have the similar anti-atherosclerotic effect, but the conclusion was limited due to the absence of a dose–response experiment to precisely prove it. However, we used the regular dosage of each drug to compare their effects with each other which we thought was convincing.

    Our research is teamwork. In other parts of our experiments, we observed that the combination of L-4F and simvastatin significantly increased paraoxonase-1 activity, rendered HDL anti-inflammatory, decreased Dil-Ox-LDL influx from macrophages and reduced the concentrations of cholesterol and cholesteryl ester in macrophages. All of them with the results presented here may have more complete explanations for the effects of the combination of both drugs.



    Thirty 8-week-old male wild-type C57 BL/6 and apo E−/− mice (C57 BL/6 background), purchased from Southern Medical University institute of animals, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 6/group) after acclimatization for several weeks, (1) wild type (W-T) group (C57 BL/6 mice receiving vehicle and normal diet), (2) atherosclerosis (AS) group (apo E−/− mice receiving vehicle and high-fat diet), (3) simvastatin (Simva) group (apo E−/− mice receiving high-fat diet and simvastatin), (4)L-4F group (apo E−/− mice receiving high-fat diet and L-4F) and (5) the combination (Simva + L-4F) group (apo E−/− mice receiving high-fat diet and simvastatin and L-4F). All animal studies were performed using the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southern Medical University at Guangzhou. L-4F was administered intraperitoneally daily at a dose of 1 mg/kg/d [12]. Peptides L-4F contained 18 amino acids with the sequence DWFKAFYDKVAEKFKEAF.

    Serum lipids analysis

    Blood was collected by cardiac puncture under anesthesia of diethyl ether after 8-h fast. Triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C and LDL-C were measured by using an automated biochemical analyzer. Apo A-1 concentrations were determined by ELISA kit.

    Isolation of peritoneal macrophages

    Four days after intraperitoneal thioglycollate injection, peritoneal macrophages were harvested from the experimental mice. Following collecting, peritoneal macrophages were immediately frozen at −80°C until analysis.

    Lesion quantification

    After the blood, peritoneal macrophage and liver samples were taken, the aorta was cut into two sections separately prepared for quantification of aortic lesion area and immunohistochemistry. The ascending aorta and thoracic aorta were then stained with Oil Red O and lesions were quantified by video capture under a stereo dissecting microscope. Lesion and total areas were determined using Image-Pro Plus software 6.0.

    Cholesterol efflux analysis

    Experiments were performed as previously described [4]. RAW264.7 cells, derived from a murine macrophage cell line, were plated in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and radiolabeled with 30 μg /ml acetylated-LDL and 1 μCi/ml 3H-cholesterol (Perkin-Elmer) for 24 h, and incubated with 0.3 mM 8-Br-cAMP for 6 hours. Thereafter, cells were washed again and equilibrated in DMEM medium supplemented with 2% bovine serum albumin for 18 h. Subsequently, efflux mediums containing 2% mice serum were added for 4 hours. Liquid scintillation counting was used to quantify the efflux of radioactive cholesterol from the cells. Percent efflux was calculated by the following formula: [(microcuries of 3H-cholesterol in mediums containing mice serum − microcuries of 3H-cholesterol in serum-free mediums) ÷ microcuries of 3H-cholesterol in cells extracted before the efflux step] × 100.

    Quantitative real-time PCR

    Total RNA from mice livers and macrophages was extracted by TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA synthesis was performed from 1ug of total RNA using reagents from TOYOBO. Real-time PCR was performed using a SYBR-green PCR master mix kit (Takara). Real-time quantitative PCR was carried out on an ABI-Prism 7500 (BioRad, American) sequence detector with the defaults settings. The primers, designed with the Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems) and synthesized by Invitrogen Ltd, were listed in Table 3. PCRs for each sample were performed in duplicate. Relative mRNA levels were calculated by the method of 2-Ct.
    Table 3

    Primers used for real-time PCR analysis



    Sequence (5′-3′)





































    ABCA 1 (ATP Binding Cassette A1); SR-BI (Scavenger Receptor Class B type I); ABCG1 (ATP Binding Cassette G1); LXRα (Liver X receptor α); PPARγ (peroxisome proliferater-activated receptor γ).

    Western blots

    Tissues and cells were harvested and protein extracts prepared. They were then subjected to Western blot analyses (10% SDS-PAGE; 25 μg per lane) using anti-ABCA1, SR-BI (Novus), ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ (Abcam Co. Ltd, American) and β-actin antibodies. The proteins were visualized and quantified using the Image J analysis software program.

    Abdominal aortic immunohistochemistry

    All segments were embeded in paraffin and cut into 4-μm cross sections for histological examination. Experiments were performed as previously described [35]. Immunostaining for ABCA1, SR-BI, ABCG1, LXRα and PPARγ was performed in paraffin-embedded. Antibody binding was visualized with SABC kits (Boster Biotechnology Co. Ltd), Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as the nuclear counterstain. All sections for microscopic quantification were captured under an Olympus BX51 light microscope equipped with a DP70 digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and were measured with Image Proplus 6.0 image analysis software.


    Data are expressed as means ± SE. Differences between groups were evaluated using the SPSS 13.0. Groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc comparisons were made among the various groups using least significant difference (LSD) method when variances are not homogeneity, and Dunnett’s T3 method when variances are homogeneity. Coefficients of correlation (r) were calculated by Pearson correlation analysis. A probability value of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.





    Coronary artery disease


    Low density lipoprotein cholesterol


    High density lipoprotein cholesterol


    Reverse cholesterol transport


    ATP binding cassette A1


    ATP binding cassette G1


    Scavenger receptor class B type I


    Liver X receptors


    Peroxisome proliferater-activated receptors




    Total cholesterol.



    The study was supported by the key Scientific and Technological Research Fund of Zhongshan city in Guangdong province (20102A016).

    Authors’ Affiliations

    Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan hospital, Sun Yat- Sen University, Zhongshan, Guang Dong, China
    Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China


    1. Gordon DJ, Probstfield JL, Garrison RJ, Neaton JD, Castelli WP, Knoke JD, Jacobs DJ, Bangdiwala S, Tyroler HA: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies. Circulation. 1989, 79 (1): 8-15. 10.1161/01.CIR.79.1.8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    2. Duffy D, Rader DJ: Update on strategies to increase HDL quantity and function. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009, 6 (7): 455-463. 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.94View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    3. Cuchel M, Rader DJ: Macrophage reverse cholesterol transport: key to the regression of atherosclerosis?. Circulation. 2006, 113 (21): 2548-2555. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.475715View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    4. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, Rodrigues A, Burke MF, Jafri K, French BC, Phillips JA, Mucksavage ML, Wilensky RL: Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364 (2): 127-135. 10.1056/NEJMoa1001689PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    5. Wang N, Silver DL, Thiele C, Tall AR: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) functions as a cholesterol efflux regulatory protein. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (26): 23742-23747. 10.1074/jbc.M102348200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    6. Wang N, Lan D, Chen W, Matsuura F, Tall AR: ATP-binding cassette transporters G1 and G4 mediate cellular cholesterol efflux to high-density lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (26): 9774-9779. 10.1073/pnas.0403506101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    7. Rigotti A, Miettinen HE, Krieger M: The role of the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI in the lipid metabolism of endocrine and other tissues. Endocr Rev. 2003, 24 (3): 357-387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    8. Miyamoto-Sasaki M, Yasuda T, Monguchi T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Toh R, Ishida T, Hirata KI: Pitavastatin Increases HDL Particles Functionally Preserved with Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Antioxidative Actions in Dyslipidemic Patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013, 20 (9): 708-716. 10.5551/jat.17210View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    9. Repa JJ, Mangelsdorf DJ: The liver X receptor gene team: potential new players in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2002, 8 (11): 1243-1248. 10.1038/nm1102-1243View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    10. Weiss K, Mihaly J, Liebisch G, Marosvolgyi T, Schmitz G, Decsi T, Ruhl R: Effect of synthetic ligands of PPAR alpha, beta/delta, gamma, RAR, RXR and LXR on the fatty acid composition of phospholipids in mice. Lipids. 2011, 46 (11): 1013-1020. 10.1007/s11745-011-3593-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    11. Datta G, Chaddha M, Hama S, Navab M, Fogelman AM, Garber DW, Mishra VK, Epand RM, Epand RF, Lund-Katz S: Effects of increasing hydrophobicity on the physical-chemical and biological properties of a class A amphipathic helical peptide. J Lipid Res. 2001, 42 (7): 1096-1104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    12. Ou J, Ou Z, Jones DW, Holzhauer S, Hatoum OA, Ackerman AW, Weihrauch DW, Gutterman DD, Guice K, Oldham KT: L-4F, an apolipoprotein A-1 mimetic, dramatically improves vasodilation in hypercholesterolemia and sickle cell disease. Circulation. 2003, 107 (18): 2337-2341. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070589.61860.A9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    13. Imaizumi S, Grijalva V, Navab M, Van Lenten BJ, Wagner AC, Anantharamiah GM, Fogelman AM, Reddy ST: L-4F differentially alters plasma levels of oxidized fatty acids resulting in more anti-inflammatory HDL in mice. Drug Metab Lett. 2010, 4 (3): 139-148. 10.2174/187231210791698438PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    14. Shah PK, Yano J, Reyes O, Chyu KY, Kaul S, Bisgaier CL, Drake S, Cercek B: High-dose recombinant apolipoprotein A-I(milano) mobilizes tissue cholesterol and rapidly reduces plaque lipid and macrophage content in apolipoprotein e-deficient mice Potential implications for acute plaque stabilization. Circulation. 2001, 103 (25): 3047-3050. 10.1161/hc2501.092494View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    15. Zhong JK, Guo ZG, Li C, Wang ZK, Lai WY, Tu Y: Probucol alleviates atherosclerosis and improves high density lipoprotein function. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 210- 10.1186/1476-511X-10-210PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    16. Ludman A, Venugopal V, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ: Statins and cardioprotection–more than just lipid lowering?. Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 122 (1): 30-43. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.01.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    17. Pedersen TR: Pleiotropic effects of statins: evidence against benefits beyond LDL-cholesterol lowering. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): 10-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    18. Miyamoto-Sasaki M, Yasuda T, Monguchi T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Toh R, Ishida T, Hirata KI: Pitavastatin Increases HDL Particles Functionally Preserved with Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Antioxidative Actions in Dyslipidemic Patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013, 20 (9): 708-716. 10.5551/jat.17210View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    19. Argmann CA, Edwards JY, Sawyez CG, O’Neil CH, Hegele RA, Pickering JG, Huff MW: Regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux through hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition: a role for RhoA in ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (23): 22212-22221. 10.1074/jbc.M502761200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    20. Song G, Liu J, Zhao Z, Yu Y, Tian H, Yao S, Li G, Qin S: Simvastatin reduces atherogenesis and promotes the expression of hepatic genes associated with reverse cholesterol transport in apoE-knockout mice fed high-fat diet. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 8- 10.1186/1476-511X-10-8PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    21. Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Reddy ST, Hama S, Hough G, Grijalva VR, Wagner AC, Frank JS, Datta G, Garber D: Oral D-4 F causes formation of pre-beta high-density lipoprotein and improves high-density lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport from macrophages in apolipoprotein E-null mice. Circulation. 2004, 109 (25): 3215-3220. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134275.90823.87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    22. Oram JF, Lawn RM, Garvin MR, Wade DP: ABCA1 is the cAMP-inducible apolipoprotein receptor that mediates cholesterol secretion from macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (44): 34508-34511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    23. Wang N, Silver DL, Costet P, Tall AR: Specific binding of ApoA-I, enhanced cholesterol efflux, and altered plasma membrane morphology in cells expressing ABC1. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (42): 33053-33058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    24. Bortnick AE, Rothblat GH, Stoudt G, Hoppe KL, Royer LJ, McNeish J, Francone OL: The correlation of ATP-binding cassette 1 mRNA levels with cholesterol efflux from various cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (37): 28634-28640.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    25. Kennedy MA, Barrera GC, Nakamura K, Baldan A, Tarr P, Fishbein MC, Frank J, Francone OL, Edwards PA: ABCG1 has a critical role in mediating cholesterol efflux to HDL and preventing cellular lipid accumulation. Cell Metab. 2005, 1 (2): 121-131. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.01.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    26. Rothblat GH, de la Llera-Moya M, Atger V, Kellner-Weibel G, Williams DL, Phillips MC: Cell cholesterol efflux: integration of old and new observations provides new insights. J Lipid Res. 1999, 40 (5): 781-796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    27. Schmitz G, Langmann T: Transcriptional regulatory networks in lipid metabolism control ABCA1 expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1735 (1): 1-19. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.04.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    28. Chawla A, Boisvert WA, Lee CH, Laffitte BA, Barak Y, Joseph SB, Liao D, Nagy L, Edwards PA, Curtiss LK: A PPAR gamma-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Mol Cell. 2001, 7 (1): 161-171. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00164-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    29. Sparrow CP, Baffic J, Lam MH, Lund EG, Adams AD, Fu X, Hayes N, Jones AB, Macnaul KL, Ondeyka J: A potent synthetic LXR agonist is more effective than cholesterol loading at inducing ABCA1 mRNA and stimulating cholesterol efflux. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (12): 10021-10027. 10.1074/jbc.M108225200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    30. Jaye M: LXR agonists for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2003, 4 (9): 1053-1058.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    31. Bruemmer D, Law RE: Liver x receptors: potential novel targets in cardiovascular diseases. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2005, 5 (6): 533-540. 10.2174/156800605774961988View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    32. Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Hama S, Hough G, Reddy ST, Frank JS, Garber DW, Handattu S, Fogelman AM: D-4 F and statins synergize to render HDL antiinflammatory in mice and monkeys and cause lesion regression in old apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25 (7): 1426-1432. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000167412.98221.1aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    33. Sparrow CP, Burton CA, Hernandez M, Mundt S, Hassing H, Patel S, Rosa R, Hermanowski-Vosatka A, Wang PR, Zhang D: Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21 (1): 115-121. 10.1161/01.ATV.21.1.115View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    34. Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Hama S, Garber DW, Chaddha M, Hough G, Lallone R, Fogelman AM: Oral administration of an Apo A-I mimetic Peptide synthesized from D-amino acids dramatically reduces atherosclerosis in mice independent of plasma cholesterol. Circulation. 2002, 105 (3): 290-292. 10.1161/hc0302.103711View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    35. Speidl WS, Cimmino G, Ibanez B, Elmariah S, Hutter R, Garcia MJ, Fuster V, Goldman ME, Badimon JJ: Recombinant apolipoprotein A-I Milano rapidly reverses aortic valve stenosis and decreases leaflet inflammation in an experimental rabbit model. Eur Heart J. 2010, 31 (16): 2049-2057. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq064View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


    © Ying et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.