Skip to main content

Pioglitazone prevents cholesterol gallstone formation through the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in guinea pigs with a lithogenic diet



The cholesterol gallstones diseases (CGD) is highly correlated with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. The present study aimed to investigate preventive effects of pioglitazone (PIO), an antidiabetic drug, on the CGD in guinea pigs fed with a lithogenic diet (LD).


The guinea pigs were fed with the LD for 8 weeks. All guinea pigs were grouped as follows: low fat diet; LD; LD plus PIO (4 mg/kg); LD plus PIO (8 mg/kg); LD plus ezetimibe (EZE) (2 mg/kg). Gallbladder stones were observed using microscopy. The profile of biliary composition, and blood glucose, insulin and lipid were analyzed. The liver or ileum was harvested for determinations of hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), sterol regulatory element-binding proteins 2 (SREBP2), 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) sterol transporters G5 and G8 (ABCG5, ABCG8), bile salt export pump (BSEP), Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) and acetyl-coenzyme A cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT2) by Western blot. The gallbladders were used for histological examination.


The LD successfully induced gallstone. Both pioglitazone and ezetimibe prevented gallstone formation, as well as hepatic and cholecystic damages. Pioglitazone significantly decreased HMGCR and SREBP2, but increased CYP7A1, ABCG5, ABCG8, and BSEP in the liver. Pioglitazone also remarkably decreased NPC1L1 and ACAT2, while increased ABCG5/8 in the intestine. The beneficial alterations of cholesterol and bile acids in the bile, as well as profile of glucose, insulin and lipid in the blood were found in the guinea pigs treated with pioglitazone.


Pioglitazone has a noticeable benefit towards the CGD, which is involved in changes of synthesis, transformation, absorption, and transportation of cholesterol.


Cholesterol gallstone disease (CGD) is one of the most prevalent and costly diseases. Aging, high calorie diet, hyperinsulinism and metabolic syndrome are among the preeminent risk factors for developing CGD [1]. Major pathogenetic mechanisms are involved in hepatic hypersecretion of cholesterol [2], gallbladder motility disturbances [3], gallbladder inflammation [4], and increased intestinal absorption of cholesterol [2], and altered gut microbiota [5]. Precipitation of excess cholesterol in bile as solid crystals is a prerequisite for cholesterol gallstone formation. Novel approaches against these pathogenetic factors are urgently needed to be developed for the prevention and treatment of the CGD.

Dietary cholesterol is trafficked into enterocyte by Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) protein [6], and can be reversely transported to the intestinal lumen by adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) sterol transporters G5 and G8 (ABCG5, ABCG8) [7, 8]. After cholesterol passes through the enterocyte membrane, it is esterified by acetyl-coenzyme A cholesterol acyltransferase 2 (ACAT2), and subsequently transported in the chylomicrons circulating then reaches the liver for biliary secretion [9, 10]. HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) play important roles in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis. HMGCR is a rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis while CYP7A1 is a rate-limiting enzyme transforming cholesterol to bile acid (BA). The ABCG5/8 effluxes sterols including cholesterol from hepatocytes and enterocytes into the bile and intestine, respectively, and may therefore simultaneously increase biliary cholesterol excretion and lower plasma cholesterol levels [8]. The bile salt export pump (BSEP), also known as ABCB11, is the major canalicular BA transporter [11]. Cholesterol gallstone formation is associated with downregulation of BSEP expression on the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes [12]. In addition, cholesterol metabolism is tightly controlled by some feedback mechanisms, including regulation of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and liver X receptor α (LXRα) [13,14,15].

Pioglitazone, a thiazoledinedione (TZD), is a highly selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) agonist. Widely used as antidiabetic agent, pioglitazone not only has an impact on glycemic control but also has been shown to increase HDL and decrease LDL and TG in diabetes [16]. All anti-diabetic drugs have varying effects on lipid profile but overall pioglitazone has shown more favorable lipid lowering effect compared to other antidiabetics including rosiglitazone [17, 18]. In more recent years, the focus on pioglitazone has been intensified due to its novel biological roles. Herein, we investigated effects of pioglitazone on cholesterol gallstone formation as well as NPC1L1, ACAT2, HMGCR, CYP7A1, ABCG5/8, and BSEP in the guinea pigs with a lithogenic diet.

Materials and methods


Pioglitazone (PIO) was purchased from MSD Pharma (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Ezetimibe (EZE) was purchased from DEYUAN PHARM Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The antibodies of SREBP-2(sc-13,552), CYP7A1 (sc-293,193), FXR (sc-25,309), LXR (sc-271,064), BSEP (sc-74,500), CCK-AR(sc-514,303) and NPC1L1(sc-166,802) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Santa Cruz, CA). The antibodies of HMGCR (ab174830), ABCG5 (ab87116) and ABCG8 (ab126493) were from Abcam Technology Co. Ltd. (Cambridge, UK). The antibodies of ACAT2 (13294S) and PPARγ (2443S) were from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Boston, USA). Histone H3, β-actin and the secondary antibodies were from Bioworld Technology Co. Ltd. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). BCA assay kit was from Beyotime (Nanjing China). Amplex Red cholesterol (CH) assay kit was from the Invitrogen (USA). All other chemical or Biological reagents were commercially available.


Male guinea pigs (350 ± 20 g) were obtained from the Yangzhou University Medical Center (Yangzhou, China) and were housed under the environmentally controlled conditions of 12-h light-dark cycles in a full-barrier facility with a relative humidity of 60 ± 5% and temperature of 22 ± 2 °C. The guinea pigs had free access to water and food. All diets were prepared and pelleted by Yangzhou University Medical Center. The lithogenic diet (LD) refers to chow diet supplemented with approximately 1.25% cholesterol, 0.5% bile salt and 15% fat as well as 0.0033% or 0.0067% pioglitazone or 0.0017% ezetimibe. After 1 week of adaptation, the guinea pigs were randomly divided into 5 groups and treated as follows: low fat diet (CTRL), LD, LD plus PIO 4 mg/kg (PIO-L), LD plus PIO 8 mg/kg (PIO-H), LD plus EZE 2 mg/kg. The guinea pigs were fed with the LD containing pioglitazone or ezetimibe for 8 weeks. The experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication No. 86–23, revised 1996), and approved by the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of China Pharmaceutical University.

Biochemical assays

The levels of blood glucose, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein CH (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein CH (HDL-C) were measured according to the instructions of their assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The serum insulin was measured using the insulin ELISA kit (Millipore, USA). The CH, BA, phospholipid (PL) in the serum or bile were measured using the respective kits. Furthermore, the CH saturation index (CSI) was calculated using the following equation: actual molar percentage of CH in bile/the largest soluble CH concentration at a given bile molarity in the Carey table [19].

Histological evaluation of the liver and gallbladder

The liver and gallbladder specimens were prepared and fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde overnight. The specimens were embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-μm-thick slices, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H & E). After dewaxing, staining, dehydration, transparency and sealing, the specimens of liver and gallbladder were examined under a light microscope.

Western blot analysis

Liver and ileum were chopped into small pieces and homogenized in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF): RIPA = 1:9). The dissolved proteins were collected from the supernatant after centrifugation at 12,000×g for 15 min. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay kit (Beyotime, Nanjing China). The protein was separated on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto the PVDF membrane. After blocking the nonspecific site with blocking solution (5% nonfat dry milk), the membrane was incubated overnight with specific primary antibody at 4 C with primary antibodies: HMGCR (1:300), SREBP-2 (1:500), CYP7A1 (1:500), ABCG5 (1:600), ABCG8 (1:300), LXRα (1:500), BSEP(1:500), NPC1L1(1:500) and ACAT2(1:1000). Histone H3 (1:1000) and β-actin (1:3000) served as an internal control, respectively. Subsequently, the membrane was washed with TBST followed by incubation with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) at the room temperature for 1 h. The blots were again washed with TBST and then developed with the ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (Tanon Science & Technology Co. Ltd.)

Statistical analyses

The data were expressed as means ± SD All data, unless specified, were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. All analyses were carried out using SPSS, version 20.0. A probability value (P) of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Pioglitazone treatment inhibits cholesterol gallstone formation in the Guinea pigs fed with LD

In our study, the CTRL group had a cholesterol gallstone formation rate of 9.1%, the LD group showed a cholesterol gallstone formation rate of 85.7%, a statistically significant increase over the rate of the CTRL group. The gallstone formation rate in the PIO-L and PIO-H groups were 53.8 and 38.5%, respectively. The gallstone formation rate was 25.0% in the guinea pigs treated with a hypolipidemic agent, ezetimibe, as positive control. Thus, both of pioglitazone and ezetimibe reduced the rates of gallstone formation in the guinea pigs. The Fig. 1c shows photomicrographs of the bile, liquid crystals, and gallstone samples. The bile of control guinea pigs did not contain any crystals or sludge, while the bile of the LD-fed guinea pigs contained sludge particles and crystals. The PIO-L, PIO-H or EZE group contained few crystals and sludge in their bile samples.

Fig. 1

Pioglitazone treatment inhibits cholesterol gallstone formation in the guinea pigs fed with LD. a lithogensis rate; b macroscopic appearances of the gallbladders; c photomicrographs of bile, liquid crystals and gallstones

Pioglitazone treatment alters biliary composition and CSI in the Guinea pigs fed with LD

As shown in Table 1, the levels of both CH and BA were significantly increased in gallbladder bile of the guinea pigs in the LD group (**P < 0.01), compared with those in the CTRL group. The CH level significantly declined and BA level further increased in the gallbladder bile after treatment with high-dose pioglitazone or ezetimibe (**P < 0.01). Treatment with low-dose pioglitazone also changed levels of biliary CH and BA, but there were not statistical significances. In addition, treatment with low- or high-dose pioglitazone and ezetimibe significantly inhibited the LD-induced increase in CSI in the guinea pigs.

Table 1 Pioglitazone treatment alters biliary composition and CSI in the guinea pigs fed with LD

Effects of pioglitazone on metabolic parameters

As shown in Table 2, compared with CTRL group, treatment with the LD had no significant effects on blood glucose and insulin, while treatment with high-dose pioglitazone significantly decreased levels of blood glucose and insulin (blood glucose: **P < 0.01; insulin: *P < 0.05). The levels of CH, LDL-C and TG increased and HDL-C level decreased in the peripheral blood of the guinea pigs after feeding LD for 8 weeks (**P < 0.01). Treatment with high-dose pioglitazone or ezetimibe significantly decreased CH, LDL-C and TG levels, and increased HDL-C level in the serum of guinea pigs (CH: **P < 0.01; LDL-C: *P < 0.05; TG: **P < 0.01; HDL-C: *P < 0.05). Treatment with low-dose pioglitazone showed some tendency of regulation in blood glucose, insulin and lipid profile, but did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Effects of pioglitazone on metabolic parameters

Pioglitazone treatment prevents the histological damages of liver or gallbladders in the Guinea pigs fed with LD

The structure of the normal liver was as follows: hepatic plates radiate from the central vein, and the plates are separated at irregular intervals by sinusoids without abnormal morphological changes. Some characteristic histology features of the CGD were observed in the livers of the guinea pigs fed with LD for 8 weeks, including steatosis, spotty necrosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and lobular inflammation. Compared with the LD group, the extents of hepatocellular steatosis, necrosis and hepatocyte ballooning were markedly decreased in the PIO-H and EZE groups. These results indicated that both ezetimibe and pioglitazone treatment produced protective effects on the liver damage induced by the LD (Fig. 2a). Gallbladder inflammation is indicated by thickened gallbladder wall, infiltrated inflammatory cells in the stromal layer, and submucosal vasodilatation in the CGD. All these signs were seen in the LD group, but few inflammatory signs were observed in the PIO-H and EZE groups (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

Pioglitazone treatment prevents the histological damages of liver or gallbladder in the guinea pigs fed with LD. a Histological examination of the liver by H&E staining. b Histological examination of the gallbladder by H&E stainin

Pioglitazone promoted LD-induced decrease in HMGCR or SREBP-2 and inhibited the decrease in CYP7A1 in the liver

Western blot was employed to examine the expression of HMGCR or SREBP-2 in the liver of guinea pigs challenged with LD plus different drugs or the LD alone for 8 weeks. The Fig. 3 showed that LD caused significant decreases in HMGCR and SREBP-2 (*P < 0.05), and high-dose pioglitazone enhanced the decreases in both proteins in the liver of guinea pigs (*P < 0.05). However, ezetimibe didn’t produce same effects. In addition, LD induced significant reduction of CYP7A1 expression in the liver (**P < 0.01), and this effect was reversed by pioglitazone (*P < 0.05). Ezetimibe also produced similar effect. These results show that pioglitazone like ezetimibe reduces biosynthesis and transformation of CH in liver.

Fig. 3

Pioglitazone promotes LD-induced decrease of HMGCR or SREBP-2 and inhibited decrease in CYP7A1 in liver. a Western blot analysis of HMGCR, SREBP-2 and CYP7A1 protein; b Quantification of HMGCR expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; c Quantification of SREBP-2 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; d Quantification of CYP7A1 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control. Values shown are means ± SD, n = 4. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus LD group

Pioglitazone increased the expression of hepatic ABCG5, ABCG8 and BSEP

As shown in Fig.4, LD didn’t change the expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8, but LD plus low- high- dose pioglitazone significantly increased expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 in the liver (ABCG5:**P < 0.01; ABCG8: *P < 0.05). Ezetimibe didn’t show these effects. Pioglitazone and ezetimibe remarkably inhibited the LD-induced decrease of BSEP in liver (BSEP: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). These results suggest that pioglitazone could increase the transport of CH or BA in liver.

Fig. 4

Pioglitazone increases expression of hepatic ABCG5, ABCG8 and BSEP. a Western blot analysis of ABCG5, ABCG8 and BSEP protein; b Quantification of ABCG5 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; c Quantification of ABCG8 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; d Quantification of BSEP expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control. Values shown are means ± SD, n = 4. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus LD group

Pioglitazone increased ABCG5 and ABCG8 and decreased NPC1L1 and ACAT2 in the intestine

As shown in Fig. 5, pioglitazone rather than ezetimibe obviously increased the expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 (**P < 0.01), and pronouncedly inhibited the LD-induced elevation of NPC1L1 and ACAT2 in the intestine (NPC1L1: **P < 0.01; ACAT2: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). These results suggest that pioglitazone would reduce cholesterol absorption in intestine.

Fig. 5

Pioglitazone increases ABCG5 and ABCG8 and decreases NPC1L1 and ACAT2 in intestine. a Western blot analysis of ABCG5, ABCG8, NPC1L1 and ACAT2 protein; b Quantification of ABCG5 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; c Quantification of ABCG8 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; d Quantification of NPC1L1 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; e Quantification of ACAT2 expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control. Values shown are means ±SD, n = 4. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus LD group

Pioglitazone changed PPARγ, LXRα and FXR in the liver or intestine

As shown in Fig.6, pioglitazone rather than ezetimibe obviously increased expression of PPARγ and LXRα in both liver and intestine (liver: PPARγ: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; LXRα: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; intestine: PPARγ: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; LXRα: **P < 0.01), while pioglitazone and ezetimibe obviously inhibited LD-induced decrease in expression of FXR in the liver (*P < 0.05), suggesting that LXRα and FXR might be involved in regulation of the expression of the genes related to cholesterol homeostasis.

Fig. 6

Pioglitazone changes PPARγ, LXRα and FXR in liver or intestine. a Western blot analysis of PPARγ, LXRα and FXR protein in liver; b Quantification of PPARγ expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; c Quantification of LXRα expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; d Quantification of FXR expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; e Western blot analysis of PPARγ and LXRα protein in intestine; f Quantification of PPARγ expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control; g Quantification of LXRα expressed as the ratio (as a percentage) of control. Values shown are means ±SD, n = 4. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus LD group


The present study clearly indicated that pharmacological treatment with pioglitazone effectively prevented the formation of CGD induced by the LD in guinea pigs, accompanied by decreased CH, increased BA, and lower CSI in the bile as well as lower blood glucose, insulin, TG and CH levels. Pioglitazone also ameliorated hepatic and gallbladder tissue damage induced by the LD, which could also influence the formation of CGD. The further studies showed that pioglitazone treatment resulted in remarkable decreases in NPC1L1 and ACAT2, and increases in ABCG5/8 in the ileum as well as significant decreases in HMGCR and SREBP2, increases in CYP7A1, ABCG5/8, and BSEP in the liver. All of these effects are contributive to restoration of cholesterols homeostasis and prevention of the CGD.

The formation of CGD refers to three main pathophysiological mechanisms including the supersaturation of bile with cholesterol, gallbladder hypomotility and destabilization of bile by proteins or pathogens. Among these, cholesterol supersaturation of bile remains the most critical determinant of the CGD. During the process of the CGD, the homeostasis of cholesterol is highly disrupted, and events involve cholesterol intake, metabolism, and synthesis. It is known that cholesterol derived from the intestine provides the first major source for cholesterol pool and influences biliary cholesterol secretion [20], and that high absorption of cholesterol contributes to gallstone formation through this pathway [21]. Animal studies indicate that high cholesterol absorption efficiency and subsequent rapid biliary secretion of cholesterol promote cholesterol gallstone disease [21]. The LD-induced CH gallstone models are widely used to elucidate the mechanism of CGD pathogenesis [22, 23]. Herein, administration to guinea pigs for 8 successive weeks disrupted the homeostasis of cholesterol indicated by higher levels of CH in both the blood and the bile, which results mainly from the increase in cholesterol intake. Our results showed that the LD-fed guinea pigs had a 85.7% gallstone formation rate. The present data also further confirmed the preventive effects of pioglitazone on the CGD in the model of guinea pigs as shown in the mouse model [24]. As a key protein controlling intestinal cholesterol absorption, NPC1L1 was expressed by enterocytes, identified as a target of ezetimibe [25]. Ezetimibe, a selective NPC1L1 inhibitor, prevents gallstone formation in mice, indicates that NPC1L1 is a valid therapeutic target against the CGD [26]. Free cholesterol absorbed in the intestine through NPC1L1 forms a cholesterol ester catalyzed by ACAT2 and then enters the blood circulation through the lymphatic system, while the unesterified cholesterol is secreted into the intestinal lumen by ABCG5/8, which is the opposite to action of NPC1L1. In the present studies, we found that LD induced significant upregulation of both NPC1L1 and ACAT2 rather than ABCG5/G8 in the ileum, and pioglitazone, like ezetimibe, markedly inhibited expression of NPC1L1 and ACAT2. Importantly, pioglitazone instead of ezetimibe significantly increased intestinal ABCG5/G8 expression. These suggest that pioglitazone might more effective than ezetimibe in reduction of cholesterol intake in intestine.

The hepatocyte is the major site for peripheral uptake and synthesis of cholesterol, and excess cholesterol is directly secreted into bile or converted into bile salts [27]. Endogenous synthesis of cholesterol is regulated at the transcriptional level by the SREBP-2 pathway and is regulated at the post-transcriptional level by the rate-limiting enzyme HMGCR [28]. When the intracellular cholesterol level is high, SREBP-2 forms a complex structure with Scap (SREBP cleavage-activating protein) and Insig-1 (insulin-induced gene-1) through the C-terminal domain, thereby inhibiting SREBP-2 regulation of HMGCR transcription. Our data also showed that expression of HMGCR or SREBP-2 was decreased through feedback regulation in the guinea pigs fed with LD, and pioglitazone instead of ezetimibe make HMGCR and SREBP-2 further deceases in the liver. These are supported by the previous data that PPARγ activation caused reductions of the SREBP-2 and its target genes HMGCR, as well as the reduction of cholesterol synthesis in vitro [29, 30]. Synthesis of bile acids from cholesterol is the dominant pathway for eliminating excess cholesterol in the body. Bile acids may reduce the synthesis of itself through feedback inhibition of CYP7A1, when they are too much [31]. It is known that the expression of CYP7A1 can be regulated by several negative feedback loops, such as FXR-SHP-LRH-1 pathway [32]. It was found that there is a feedback repression of CYP7A1 when the guinea pigs fed with LD, and both of pioglitazone and ezetimibe reversed this inhibition in the present studies. The conversion of cholesterol into bile acids is regulated by LXRα-mediated stimulation of CYP7A1 transcription [33]. LXRα is the predominant receptor in the liver, and is directly regulated by PPARγ [34, 35]. Therefore, this might explain the up-regulation of CYP7A1 after PPARγ upregulation resulting from the treatment with pioglitazone. BSEP is the major hepatic BA canalicular efflux transporter. Both of pioglitazone and ezetimibe increased gallbladder biliary BA content, which is involved in the enhancement of BSEP-mediated BA transport.

ABCG5 and ABCG8 are target genes of LXRs [7, 36]. LXRα is directly regulated by PPARγ [34], and thus this might explain how LXRα cooperates with PPARγ to expedite cholesterol efflux in the intestine and liver. FXR plays a key role in the regulation of BA levels in enterohepatic circulation and has been shown important in preventing gallstone formation in susceptible mice. FXR deficient mice were found to be more susceptible to cholesterol gallstone formation than wild-type mice when fed with a lithogenic diet [37]. Moreover, treatment of C57L mice, which are susceptible to cholesterol gallstone formation, with a potent FXR agonist prevents gallstone formation [37]. FXR activation also reduced hepatic expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c, resulting in reductions of triglyceride and cholesterol content in the liver and amelioration of hyperlipidemia [38]. There is a cross-talk between FXR and PPARγ, which is necessary for a proper response to PPARγ activation [39]. Thus, FXR also participate in the improvement of cholesterol homeostasis by pioglitazone.


In summary, as shown in Fig. 7, as a PPARγ agonist, pioglitazone prevented the LD-induced formation of the CGD, and restored cholesterol homeostasis. These effects are associated with regulating expression of HMGCR and SREBP2, CYP7A1, ABCG5/8, BSEP, NPC1L1 and ACAT2 in the liver or intestine as well as amelioration of hepatic and gallbladder tissue damage induced by the LD. PPARγ, LXRα and FXR participated in regulation of these genes associated with absorption, synthesis, transformation, and transportation of CH together or independently. We thus suggest that PPARγ agonist pioglitazone might have beneficial effects for the CGD.

Fig. 7

The illustration shows the mechanism of pioglitazone (PIO) on regulation of cholesterol homeostasis

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article.



Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) sterol transporters G5 and G8


Acetyl-Coenzyme A cholesterol acyltransferase


Bile acid


Bile salt export pump


Cholesterol gallstone disease




CH saturation index






High-density lipoprotein CH


Hydroxyl-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase


Lithogenous diet


Low-density lipoprotein CH


Liver X receptor α


Niemann-Pick C1-like 1






Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ


Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins 2






  1. 1.

    Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G. Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet. 2006;368:230–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Portincasa P, Wang DQ. Intestinal absorption, hepatic synthesis, and biliary secretion of cholesterol: where are we for cholesterol gallstone formation? Hepatology. 2012;55(5):1313–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lavoie B, Nausch B, Zane EA, et al. Disruption of gallbladder smooth muscle function is an early feature in the development of cholesterol gallstone disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(7):e313–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Maurer KJ, Carey MC, Fox JG. Roles of infection, inflammation, and the immune system in cholesterol gallstone formation. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(2):425–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fremont-Rahl JJ, Ge Z, Umana C, et al. An analysis of the role of the indigenous microbiota in cholesterol gallstone pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70657.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lauridsen BK, Stender S, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Genetic variation in the cholesterol transporter NPC1L1, ischaemic vascular disease, and gallstone disease. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1601–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Repa JJ, Berge KE, Chris P, Richardson JA, Helen H, Mangelsdorf DJ. Regulation of ATP-binding cassette sterol transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8 by the liver X receptors alpha and beta. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:18793–800.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stefan S, Ruth F-S, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. The ABCG5/8 cholesterol transporter and myocardial infarction versus gallstone disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(20):2121–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grenier E, Garofalo C, Delvin E, Levy E. Modulatory role of PYY in transport and metabolism of cholesterol in intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40992.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jahangir I, Mohamed B, Rudel LL, M Mahmood H. Intestine-specific MTP and global ACAT2 deficiency lowers acute cholesterol absorption with chylomicrons and HDLs. J Lipid Res. 2014;55:2261–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fuchs CD, Paumgartner G, Wahlström A, et al. Metabolic preconditioning protects BSEP/ABCB11−/− mice against cholestatic liver injury. J Hepatol. 2017;66:95–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jing K, Bin-Bin L, Shuo-Dong W, Yu W, Qing-Quan J, En-Ling G. Enhancement of interaction of BSEP and HAX-1 on the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes in a mouse model of cholesterol cholelithiasis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1644–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bengoechea-Alonso MT, Ericsson J. SREBP in signal transduction: cholesterol metabolism and beyond. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(2):215–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goedeke L, Fernándezhernando C. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(6):915–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhao C, Dahlmanwright K. Liver X receptor in cholesterol metabolism. J Endocrinol. 2010;204(3):233–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Spanheimer R, Betteridge DJ, Tan MH, Ferrannini E, Charbonnel B, PROactive Investigators. Long-term lipid effects of pioglitazone by baseline anti-hyperglycemia medication therapy and statin use from the PROactive experience (PROactive 14). Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:234–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Betteridge DJ. Effects of pioglitazone on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9:640–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Inbaraj SD, Josephine IG. Comparative study of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone, rosiglitazone with glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Global J Pharmacol. 2014;8:107–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carey MC. Critical tables for calculating the cholesterol saturation of native bile. J Lip Res. 1978;19:945–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang HH, David Q-HW. Reduced susceptibility to cholesterol gallstone formation in mice that do not produce apolipoprotein B48 in the intestine. Hepatology. 2010;42:894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang QH, Zhang L, Wang HH. High cholesterol absorption efficiency and rapid biliary secretion of chylomicron remnant cholesterol enhance cholelithogenesis in gallstone-susceptible mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1733;2005:90–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ja Kyung K, Soo Min C, So Hee K, et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid attenuates cholesterol gallstones by suppressing mucin production with a high cholesterol diet in mice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1745–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Song XY, Xu S, Hu JF, et al. Piperine prevents cholesterol gallstones formation in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;751:112–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang G, Han T, Wang S, Chen M, Sun Y, Fu Z. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ prevents cholesterol gallstone formation in C57bl mice by regulating bile acid synthesis and enterohepatic circulation. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7475626.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dimova LG, de Boer JF, Plantinga J, et al. Inhibiting cholesterol absorption during lactation programs future intestinal absorption of cholesterol in adult mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:382–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Silvia Z, Héctor M, Lorena A, et al. Ezetimibe prevents cholesterol gallstone formation in mice. Liver Int. 2010;28:935–47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Russell DW, Setchell KD. Bile acid biosynthesis. J Biochem. 1992;31:4737–449.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jeon TI, Osborne TF. SREBPs: metabolic integrators in physiology and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23:65–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Klopotek A, Hirche F, Eder K. PPAR gamma ligand troglitazone lowers cholesterol synthesis in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells via a reduced concentration of nuclear SREBP-2. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2006;231:1365–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Han T, Lv Y, Wang S, Hu T, Hong H, Fu Z. PPARγ overexpression regulates cholesterol metabolism in human L02 hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Sci. 2019;139:1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shapiro H, Kolodziejczyk AA, Halstuch D, Elinav E. Bile acids in glucose metabolism in health and disease. J Exp Med. 2018;15:383–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Goodwin B, Jones SA, Price RR, et al. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol Cell. 2000;6:517–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chiang JY, Kimmel R, Stroup D. Regulation of cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) transcription by the liver orphan receptor (LXRalpha). Gene. 2001;262:257.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chawla A, Boisvert WA, Lee CH, et al. A PPAR gamma-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Mol Cell. 2001;7:161–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhu Y, Li Y. Liver X receptors as potential therapeutic targets in atherosclerosis. Clin Invest Med. 2009;32(5):E383–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Guorong X, Hai L, Lu-Xing P, et al. FXR-mediated down-regulation of CYP7A1 dominates LXRalpha in long-term cholesterol-fed NZW rabbits. J Lip Res. 2003;44:1956–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Moschetta A, Bookout AL, Mangelsdorf DJ. Prevention of cholesterol gallstone disease by FXR agonists in a mouse model. Nat Med. 2004;10:1352–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mencarelli A, Renga B, Distrutti E, Fiorucci S. Antiatherosclerotic effect of farnesoid X receptor. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;296:H272–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mouaadh A, Sandrine C, Christian D, et al. The farnesoid X receptor regulates adipocyte differentiation and function by promoting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and interfering with the Wnt/beta-catenin pathways. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:36759–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We sincerely thank Yangge Lv and Xuan Ke for technical assistance, and Yifeng Du for language assistance.


This work was supported by the funds from the Natural Science Foundation of China (81470881 to Zan Fu).

Author information




TH and ZF designed the study; ZF and HH analyzed all data, and were major contributors in writing the manuscript; TH and YL performed the histological examination of liver and gallbladder and Western blot; SW and TH performed biochemical assays. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zan Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All animals used in this study were treated strictly according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines of the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care Review Committee, China Pharmaceutical University, China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, T., Lv, Y., Wang, S. et al. Pioglitazone prevents cholesterol gallstone formation through the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in guinea pigs with a lithogenic diet. Lipids Health Dis 18, 218 (2019).

Download citation


  • Pioglitazone
  • Gallstone
  • Lithogenic diet
  • Cholesterol
  • Bile acid