Skip to main content

Secular trends in serum lipid levels of a Middle Eastern adult population; 10 years follow up in Tehran lipid and glucose study



To examine trends in the population levels of serum lipids among a Middle-Eastern adult population with high prevalence of dyslipidemia.


A population-based cohort of adult Iranian participants, aged ≥20 years underwent four consecutive examinations between 1999–2001 and 2008–2011. Trends in age and multivariate-adjusted mean lipid levels were calculated using generalized estimating equations.


At each of the 4 assessments, there were significant decreases in levels of total cholesterol (TC) (multivariate-adjusted means, 5.21 vs. 4.88 mmol/L in men; 5.42 vs. 5.07 mmol/L in women), triglycerides (TGs) (2.11 vs. 1.94 mmol/L in men; 1.88 vs. 1.74 mmol/L in women), and an increase in HDL-C level in both genders (0.95 vs. 1.058 mmol/L in men; 1.103 vs. 1.246 mmol/L in women) in multivariate analyses (all Ps <0.001); however, body mass index (BMI) significantly increased simultaneously (25.92 vs. 27.45 kg/m2 in men; 27.76 vs. 30.02 kg/m2 in women) (P < 0.001). There were significant (P < 0.001) increases in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels only among men (5.35 vs. 5.73 mmol/L). Results did not change after excluding participants that had cardiovascular disease or used lipid lowering drugs during follow-up. There were significant decreases in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, low HDL-C, hypertriglyceridemia (all Ps <0.001) during follow-up. Furthermore, the consumption of lipid lowering drugs significantly increased (P <0.001).


During a 10 years follow-up, favorable trends were observed in the population levels of TC, triglycerides, HDL-C, which could not be fully accounted for by the increase observed in the consumption of lipid lowering drugs. These favorable trends were counterbalanced by the progressive increase in general obesity and FPG level.


Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the main causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, leading severe concern that CHD will become pandemic problem [1]. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) account for 38–50% of deaths in Iran [2]. Numerous studies have reported that high serum cholesterol and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are major risk factors for coronary heart disease [3, 4]. There are also evidences to show that high triglycerides and CHD have an association [5, 6]. The prevalence of dyslipidemia between Tehranian adult population has been reported to be high [7]. We have recently observed that all lipid measures were significant predictors of incident CHD among an Iranian population aged ≥50 years in sex and multivariate-adjusted regression models [8].

Trends in a lipid measure vary across different countries; even in the same country different lipid measures might have different trends in both directions and magnitudes of changes. A number of studies have examined the trends in serum lipid levels either in repeated cross-sectional time-series [915] or in longitudinal cohort studies [1618]. It seems that the trends in the levels of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are favorable in most of countries, except India, China and Japan [9, 10, 12]. In a global study of trends in serum total cholesterol in 199 countries, the mean level of total cholesterol changed little between 1980 and 2008, declining by less than 0.1 mmol/L per decade in men and women. Total cholesterol decreased in the high-income region consisting of Australasia, North America, and western Europe, and in central and eastern Europe while it increased in east and southeast Asia and Pacific [19]. In a previous report on time-trends in lipid measures among an Iranian adult population, we observed short-term favorable trends paralleling the increasing trend in obesity measures, whether such favorable trends have extended to a longer time-frame in the light of increases observed in the diabetes and obesity remains to be elucidated [15, 20].

Recently the fourth follow-up assessment of a large community-based longitudinal study of a Middle East population, the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) has been completed, herein, the trends in the population levels of serum lipids and indices as well as trends in prevalence of dyslipidemia among TLGS’ participants followed for more than a decade, enabling us to investigate the trends in lipid measures during the last decade.


Study design and sample

Detailed descriptions of TLGS have been reported elsewhere [21]. In brief, the TLGS is a large scale, long term, community-based prospective study performed on a representative sample of residents of district 13 of Tehran, the capital of Iran. The TLGS has two major components: a cross-sectional prevalence study of non-communicable disease and associated risk factors, implemented between March 1999 and December 2001, and a prospective follow-up study. Data collection is ongoing, designed to continue for at least 20 years, on triennial basis.

Study population

Of total of 27340 residents aged ≥ 3 years invited by telephone call, 15005 residents participated in first examination. Of this population those aged ≥ 20 years (n=10366), were categorized into the cohort (n=6437) and intervention group (n=3929), the latter to be educated for implementation of life style modifications. After excluding intervention group, participants without any lipid levels record in baseline (n=196), and participants without follow-up record in any examination (n=1290), the final sample consisted of a total of 4951 individuals (2866 women) with at least 1 follow-up. In the secondary analyses, we analyzed trends of lipid levels in a smaller sample (2394) obtained by excluding individuals with prevalent or incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and current use of lipid lowering drugs (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Outline of selection design of study participants.

The design of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Clinical and anthropometric measurements

Subjects were interviewed by trained interviewers using pretested questionnaires. Information on age, sex, past medical history of CVD, medication use, smoking habits and family history of premature CVD was collected. Anthropometric measured including weight and waist circumference (WC). Using standard protocols, WC was measured by a trained individual at the level of the umbilicus. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in squared meters. Blood pressure (BP) was measured twice in a seated position after 15 min resting using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. Education status was categorized into 3 groups: 1. Illiterate/primary school (less than 6 years); 2. Below diploma /diploma (6-12 years) and 3. Higher than diploma (more than 12 years). Marital status was categorized as single, married and widowed/divorced.

Laboratory measurements

After 12–14 h overnight fasting, blood samples were drawn from veins of the participitants into Vacutainer® tubes between 7.00 and 9.00 A.M. and centrifuged within 30–45 min of collection. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was measured by the enzymatic colorimetric glucose oxidase method; inter-and intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) at baseline and follow-up phases were both less than 2.3%. A Selectra 2 autoanalyzer (Vital Scientific, Spankeren, Netherlands) was used in the TLGS research laboratory, on the day of blood collection, to analyze samples for serum total cholesterol (TC) and TGs. Enzymatic colorimetric tests were used to assay TC with cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase; for TGs, glycerol phosphate oxidase was used. HDL-C was measured after precipitation of the lipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic acid. LDL-C was calculated according to the Friedewald formula if TGs were <4.5 mmol/l [22]. Non-HDL-C was calculated by subtracting HDL-C from TC; TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C were calculated by dividing TC and TG by HDL-C, respectively. Both inter and intra-assay coefficients of variation were less than 1.9, 2.1 and 3% for TC, TGs and HDL-C, respectively in all baseline and follow-up assays of lipid profile.

Cardiovascular disease outcome

Details of the collection of cardiovascular outcome data have been published elsewhere [21]. In the current study, the events targeted were the first CVD events, including definite myocardial infarction (MI), probable MI, unstable angina, angiographic-proven coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke (as defined by a new neurological deficit that lasted more than 24 h).

Definition of terms

Dyslipidemia was defined as follows: Hypercholesterolemia: serum TC ≥ 6.19 mmol/L; Hypertriglyceridemia: serum TGs ≥ 2.26 mmol/L; Low HDL-C: serum HDL < 1.036 mmol/L; High non-HDL-C: serum non-HDL-C ≥ 5.15 mmol/L; High TC/HDL-C ≥ 5.97; High TG /HDL-C ≥ 2.18 [23].

Participants who had systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or were on antihypertensive drugs were referred to as hypertensive. Diabetes mellitus was ascertained among participants who had FPG ≥7 mmol/L or were on glucose lowering medication. Participants who were smoking at the time of examination were considered as current smokers.

Statistical analysis

Continuously-distributed variables were described by reporting their mean (SD). Median and inter-quartile ranges were reported for TGs levels because the distribution was highly positively skewed. All analyses were performed separately for males and females. The statistical significance of the differences in mean levels of normally distributed variables was examined using the t-test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for TGs. Chi-square test was performed to test univariate statistical association between categorical variables at baseline.

All baseline characteristics including age, educational level, marital status, smoking, systolic blood pressure, WC, diabetes, and history of CVD, were included in the logistic model with participation as the outcome. The probability of participation was estimated using logistic model and used as a propensity score. We added this propensity score to the longitudinal models as a covariate and examined if the probability of participation was associated with trend in lipid levels [24]. Furthermore we adjusted propensity score for all baseline characteristics in all four examination cycles and the parameter estimates remained essentially unchanged. Therefore, the selection bias is unlikely to have affected our estimations.

Trends of TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TGs levels were primary lipid measures of interest for the current analyses. We further explored the trend in the population levels of non-HDL-C, TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C ratio as well. Time trends in the population levels of the lipid measures, were examined using generalized estimating equations (GEE). The GEE method facilitates analysis of longitudinal data or repeated measures on dependent variables of many different distributions, mainly binary data [25]. GEE is a statistical technique enabling researchers to restrict modeling to the first moment which require only the correct working correlation matrix which specified the univariate marginal distributions [26]. Analysis with an exchangeable correlation structure with only random intercept was designed for the current data. Such an approach enabled us to account for the correlation among observations following assessment of each examination cycle. Models were developed at two hierarchial levels; age-adjusted (adjusting for age, propensity score and examination cycle) and multivariate-adjusted (adjusting for age, examination cycle, propensity score, BMI, current smoking, diabetes, hypertension and total cholesterol level [in analysis of HDL-C and TG]). Trends in BMI and FPG were also examined in both age and multivariate-adjusted models.

We also compared the trends in prevalence of high cholesterol, high TGs, low HDL-C, high non-HDL-C, high TC/HDL-C and high TG/HDL-C. The significance of trends in the proportions was examined by pooled logistic regression. All the analyses were repeated in the smaller sample (i.e. excluding individuals with prevalent or incident CVD and current use of lipid lowering drugs).

P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (ver. 9.2, SAS Institute, Car, NC, USA).


The comparison between baseline characteristics of participants with and without follow-up disclosed that the followed men had higher mean levels of TC, TGs and BMI, although they had lower rate of smoking. There was no difference in the lipid status between the followed versus non followed women; however, the followed participants had lower rate of smoking (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics comparison of participants with and without follow-up with respect to different genders *

In the baseline examination, male participants were older, more likely to be single, being smokers, and had higher educational levels, as well as higher TGs, TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C levels compared to female participants; however mean BMI, total and HDL-C levels were higher in female participants in comparison with male ones (Table 2).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics participants by gender *

The baseline as well as follow-up characteristics of three assessments are shown in Table 3 in each gender. At baseline examination the mean age of participants were 43.8 (15.011) and 41.61 (13.77) years for men and women, respectively. Mean BMI was 25.73 (4.046) and 27.51(5.2) kg/m2 in men and women, respectively.

Table 3 Characteristics of participants by gender at examination cycle (baseline + 3 follow ups) *

As presented in the Tables 4 and 5, we observed a statistically significant decrease in the age and multivariate-adjusted levels of total and non-HDL cholesterol, TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C, as well as TGs for both genders (p-value for TGs trend was marginally significant for men). In contrast there was a significant increase in HDL-C levels across follow-up examinations in both men and women (all P-values <0.001). Meanwhile, the results demonstrated a significant increase in the population levels of BMI (in both genders) and FPG (only among men) in the same time frame in both genders.

Table 4 Age-adjusted mean levels * of fasting lipids, FPG and BMI by examination cycle in large sample
Table 5 Multivariate-adjusted mean levels * of fasting lipids, FPG and BMI by examination cycle in large sample

Table 6 show the time trends in the age and multivariate-adjusted prevalence rate of different aspects of dyslipidemia in the large sample. During the study, in both gender, there were significant decreases in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C, high non-HDL-C, high TC/HDL-C and high TG/HDL-C. Furthermore consumption of lipid lowering drugs significantly (p < 0.001) increased in both genders.

Table 6 Proportions of participants in Lipid-related categories * by examination cycle in large sample

As ancillary analyses we repeated all analyses among individuals without CVD who were not on lipid lowering drugs and observed that the results remained essentially unchanged in both age and multivariate-adjusted models (Tables 7, 8 and 9).

Table 7 Age-adjusted mean levels * of fasting lipids, FPG and BMI by examination cycle in small sample
Table 8 Multivariate-adjusted mean levels * of fasting lipids, FPG and BMI by examination cycle in small sample
Table 9 proportions of participants in Lipid-related categories * by examination cycle in small sample


Using a large cohort of a Middle Eastern adults population, we demonstrated favorable time trends in the population levels of total cholesterol, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, TG/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C among both genders during 10 years follow up. Such favorable trends in lipids levels and ratios could not be fully accounted for by the significant increase in consumption of lipid lowering drugs. In contrast, however, population levels of general adiposity and FPG have increased in both genders potentially leading to long term risk of cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular disease has long been known to be a multi-factorial disease. In 1948, the Framingham Heart Study embarked on an ambitious project in health research to identify the common factors that contribute to cardiovascular disease [27], over the years, careful monitoring of the Framingham Study population has led to the identification of the major CVD risk factors among which lipid measures have been widely investigated [28, 29]. Several initiatives have been launched in different countries to reduce the burden of CVD by reducing the level of its risk factors [3032]. As such, the important question to be answered would be whether these findings could be translated to better risk factor levels in the population [33]. Perceiving this need, several studies have attempted to explore the time trends in the CVD risk factors in the populations of different ethnic groups. Favorable trends in the lipid measures have been documented by large studies conducted in European as well as North American populations [28, 34, 35]. However, the effects of these favorable trends on the population burden of CVD have paralleled the increasing trends in the obesity and diabetes [36, 37]. As a consequence, the favorable trends in the CVD morbidity and mortality leveled off at beginning of the 21st century [11, 35]. Middle Eastern population has been estimated to harbor a great fraction of the world’s burden of diabetes and obesity [20, 38]. In fact, while America have been estimated to spend more than half of the global health expenditure on diabetes, less than 10% of the global health expenditure will be spent in the low and middle-income countries [39]. Therefore, resorting to controlling other risk factors that are more amenable to treatment and prevention continues to be the best policy to stopping CVD. We demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful favorable trends in the population levels of the lipid measures over the last decade, finding that did not change after multivariate adjustment and elimination of lipid lowering drugs users. The desirable trends for lipid measures in our population is compatible with those of other studies using cross-sectional surveys [911, 14] and prospective studies [13, 1618] as well.

We observed an increase in the population levels of HDL-C simultaneously with decline in triglycerides levels, a finding in agreement with results of the Framingham study [13] and in contrast to those of other studies [9, 10, 12], showing simultaneous increases in TC, TGs and decreasing HDL-C.

In our study the prevalence of high cholesterol decline about 48% and 42% in men and women respectively, while the percentage of US adults with high total cholesterol decline by 27% between 1999 and 2010; furthermore it was reported that about 12% of female participants and 31% of male participants had low HDL-C [14]. However, in our adult population the prevalence of low HDL-C was 52% for men and 26% for women, despite decreasing trend in low HDL-C, dyslipidemia still has a higher prevalence, compared to U.S adults.

Although changes in nutritional habits [40, 41], physical activity and endurance exercise [42, 43] are all known to be among important determinants of serum lipid levels; the decreasing trends in lipid levels in our population could hardly be explained by life style changes (i.e. physical activity), since it was shown that low physical activity is common in Iranian population [44, 45]. It has been shown, however, that over 30% of Iranian families are now consuming less hydrogenated oil than they did in the past [46, 47], that could possibly explain the favorable lipid trend in TLGS population during recent years. In line with our findings, cross-sectional National studies conducted by Ministry of Health and Medical Education among Iranian adult population in whole country, showed significant decrease in level of high total cholesterol (Etemad K., Center for Non-communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran, unpublished observations).

Another factor that affected serum lipids is cigarette smoking. Craig et al. in a meta-analysis about effect of smoking on cardiovascular risk factors demonstrated that compared with non-smokers, cigarettes smokers had significantly higher TC, TG and lower concentrations of HDL-C [48]. The review study in field of smoking between 1991 and 2007 in Iran showed that during these years smoking did not increased, which might justify the favorable trend in HDL-C level of our population [49].

Our study has both strengths and limitations. The strengths of the current study lie in its design as a long term community-based prospective study conducted on a large sample of Middle Eastern men and women, a region where data on secular trends in the lipid levels is lacking, also lipid profile components were measured rather than self-reported. Our findings need to be interpreted in light of its limitations as is inherent to any prospective study [13]. First, survivor bias might have biased favorable trends towards overestimated values, i.e. individuals with possible unfavorable changes in their lipid levels might have died and thus been excluded from repeated measurements. Second, as any cohort study we cannot rule out healthy cohort effect i.e. the possibility of the effect of knowledge about the serum lipids might have affected the lifestyle or lipid drugs consumption in the participants, leading to the favorable trends in lipid levels. Third, we did not have any systematic data on the trends of nutritional behavior, physical activity and knowledge of the primary prevention in our population, consequently it is not possible to test the hypothesis that whether the trends observed could be attributable to changes in physical activity or nutrition status. Forth, the results obtained in the current study might not applicable to certain age groups including younger (less than 20 years) and older (over than 75 years) ones. Finally, our population was selected from middle-aged Middle East Caucasians and therefore we cannot make inferences beyond a similar group.


The main findings in this study include an observed decrease in total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride levels as well as TC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C in an adult Iranian population during the period of 1999–2001 until 2008–2011. Overall the trends of general obesity and FPG level were observed to have increased. The net effect of such trends on the CVD burden warrants further investigations.


  1. Brown JR, O'Connor GT: Coronary heart disease and prevention in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 2150-2153. 10.1056/NEJMp1003880

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hatmi Z, Tahvildari S, Motlag AG, Kashani AS: Prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors in Iran: a population based survey. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007, 7: 32- 10.1186/1471-2261-7-32

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford ES, Capewell S: Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in the U.S. from 1980 through 2002: concealed leveling of mortality rates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50: 2128-2132. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson PW, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Kannel WB: Prevalence of coronary heart disease in the Framingham Offspring Study: role of lipoprotein cholesterols. Am J Cardiology. 1980, 46: 649-654. 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90516-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assmann G, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A, Huang Y: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a predictor of coronary heart disease risk. The PROCAM experience and pathophysiological implications for reverse cholesterol transport. Atherosclerosis. 1996, 124 (Suppl): S11-S20.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Austin MA, Hokanson JE, Edwards KL: Hypertriglyceridemia as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol. 1998, 81: 7B-12B. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00031-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Azizi F, Rahmani M, Ghanbarian A, Emami H, Salehi P, Mirmiran P, Sarbazi N: Serum lipid levels in an Iranian adults population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003, 18: 311-319.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tohidi M, Mohebi R, Cheraghi L, Hajsheikholeslami F, Aref S, Nouri S, Azizi F, Hadaegh F: Lipid profile components and incident cerebrovascular events versus coronary heart disease; the result of 9 years follow-up in Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Clin Biochem. 2013, 46: 716-721. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.012

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta R, Guptha S, Agrawal A, Kaul V, Gaur K, Gupta VP: Secular trends in cholesterol lipoproteins and triglycerides and prevalence of dyslipidemias in an urban Indian population. Lipids Health Dis. 2008, 7: 40- 10.1186/1476-511X-7-40

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arai H, Yamamoto A, Matsuzawa Y, Saito Y, Yamada N, Oikawa S, Mabuchi H, Teramoto T, Sasaki J, Nakaya N: Serum lipid survey and its recent trend in the general Japanese population in 2000. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005, 12: 98-106. 10.5551/jat.12.98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnett DK, Jacobs DR, Luepker RV, Blackburn H, Armstrong C, Claas SA: Twenty-year trends in serum cholesterol, hypercholesterolemia, and cholesterol medication use: the Minnesota Heart Survey, 1980–1982 to 2000–2002. Circulation. 2005, 112: 3884-3891. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.549857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li JZ, Wang S, Dong J, Zhu LH, Li YL, Gao DL, Tian YP, Dong L, Yang L, Li SK: Present status of serum lipid levels in Beijing professional populations and its trend of changes over 15 years--a collaborative study of seven research and clinical laboratories in Beijing. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2005, 352: 199-207. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.09.027

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingelsson E, Massaro JM, Sutherland P, Jacques PF, Levy D, D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Robins SJ: Contemporary trends in dyslipidemia in the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Ind Health. 2009, 169: 279-286.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll MD, Kit BK, Lacher DA: Total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010. NCHS data brief. 2012, 1: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bozorgmanesh MR, Hadaegh F, Padyab M, Mehrabi Y, Azizi F: Temporal changes in anthropometric parameters and lipid profile according to body mass index among an adult Iranian urban population. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008, 53: 13-22. 10.1159/000152869

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szklo M, Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Gotto A, Nieto FJ, Patsch W, Shimakawa T, Sorlie P, Wijnberg L: Trends in plasma cholesterol levels in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Prev Med. 2000, 30: 252-259. 10.1006/pmed.1999.0612

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott RD, Yano K, Hakim AA, Burchfiel CM, Sharp DS, Rodriguez BL, Curb JD: Changes in total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol over 10- and 20-year periods (the Honolulu Heart Program). Am J Cardiol. 1998, 82: 172-178. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00310-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrara A, Barrett-Connor E, Shan J: Total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol decrease with age in older men and women. The Rancho Bernardo Study 1984–1994. Circulation. 1997, 96: 37-43. 10.1161/01.CIR.96.1.37

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farzadfar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, Pelizzari PM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Lin JK, Stevens GA, Riley LM: National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3· 0 million participants. Lancet. 2011, 377: 578-586. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62038-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harati H, Hadaegh F, Saadat N, Azizi F: Population-based incidence of Type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors: results from a six-year cohort study in Iran. BMC public health. 2009, 9: 186- 10.1186/1471-2458-9-186

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Momenan AA, Hadaegh F, Mirmiran P, Hedayati M, Mehrabi Y, Zahedi-Asl S, Tehran L, : Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials. 2009, 10: 5- 10.1186/1745-6215-10-5

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry. 1972, 18: 499-502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. , : Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jr DAR: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 2265-2281. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Edited by: Rees K, Dyakova M, Ward K, Thorogood M, Brunner E. 2013,

  26. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G: Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York. 2005, USA: Springer,

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cupples LA, Yang Q, Demissie S, Copenhafer D, Levy D, : Description of the Framingham Heart Study data for Genetic Analysis Workshop 13. BMC Genet. 2003, 4 (Suppl 1): S2- 10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S2

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sytkowski PA, Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB: Changes in risk factors and the decline in mortality from cardiovascular disease. The Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990, 322: 1635-1641. 10.1056/NEJM199006073222304

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP: Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1983, 67: 968-977. 10.1161/01.CIR.67.5.968

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, Brotons C, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, Ebrahim S, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G: European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J. 2003, 24: 1601-1610. 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00347-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, De Backer G, Ebrahim S, Gjelsvik B: European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. 2007, 14 (Suppl 2): S1-S113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, Albus C, Benlian P, Boysen G, Cifkova R: European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012, 33: 1635-1701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Uemura K, Pisa Z: Trends in cardiovascular disease mortality in industrialized countries since 1950. World health statistics quarterly Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales. 1987, 41: 155-178.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vartiainen E, Laatikainen T, Peltonen M, Juolevi A, Mannisto S, Sundvall J, Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Valsta L, Puska P: Thirty-five-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 2010, 39: 504-518. 10.1093/ije/dyp330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arnett DK, McGovern PG, Jacobs DR, Shahar E, Duval S, Blackburn H, Luepker RV: Fifteen-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1980–1982 through 1995–1997): the Minnesota Heart Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2002, 156: 929-935. 10.1093/aje/kwf133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Cadwell BL, Imperatore G, Williams DE, Flegal KM, Narayan KM, Williamson DF: Secular trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors according to body mass index in US adults. JAMA. 2005, 293: 1868-1874. 10.1001/jama.293.15.1868

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006, 367: 1747-1757. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Motlagh B, O'Donnell M, Yusuf S: Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Middle East: a systematic review. European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. 2009, 16: 268-280. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328322ca1b. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328322ca1b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, Vistisen D, Sicree R, Shaw J, Nichols G: Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010, 87: 293-301. 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nakamura H, Arakawa K, Itakura H, Kitabatake A, Goto Y, Toyota T, Nakaya N, Nishimoto S, Muranaka M, Yamamoto A: Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006, 368: 1155-1163. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69472-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brunner EJ, Rees K, Ward K, Burke M, Thorogood M: Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, Art. No.: CD002128 (Issue 4): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002128.pub3,

    Google Scholar 

  42. Varady KA, Jones PJ: Combination diet and exercise interventions for the treatment of dyslipidemia: an effective preliminary strategy to lower cholesterol levels?. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 1829-1835.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilund KR, Feeney LA, Tomayko EJ, Weiss EP, Hagberg JM: Effects of endurance exercise training on markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis. Physiol Res. 2009, 58: 545-552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Esteghamati A, Khalilzadeh O, Rashidi A, Kamgar M, Meysamie A, Abbasi M: Physical activity in Iran: results of the third national surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases (SuRFNCD-2007). J Phys Act Health. 2011, 8: 27-35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Momenan AA, Delshad M, Mirmiran P, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F: Leisure Time Physical Activity and Its Determinants among Adults in Tehran: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Prev Med. 2011, 2: 243-251.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Torabi P, Zare F, Shekholeslam R, Safavi SM: In 12th Nutritional Congress. Study of vegetable oil consumption in 15 pilot universities of Iran. 2004, Tabriz; Iran,

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mohammadifard N, Toghianifar N, Sajjadi F, Alikhasi H, Kelishadi R, Maghroun M, Esmaeili M, Ehteshami S, Tabaie H, Sarrafzadegan N: Improvement of dietary oil consumption following a community trial in a developing country: the role of translational research in health promotion. ARYA atherosclerosis. 2013, 9: 29-37.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Craig WY, Palomaki GE, Haddow JE: Cigarette smoking and serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations: an analysis of published data. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1989, 298: 784-788. 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.784

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Meysamie A, Ghaletaki R, Zhand N, Abbasi M: Cigarette Smoking in Iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2012, 41: 1-14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by grant No. 121 from the National Research Council of Iran. We express appreciation to Mrs. Niloofar Shiva for their editorial contribution and constructive feedback. The funding source had no role in design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Hadaegh.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FH, MK. Analyzed the data: SA. Wrote the paper: MK, FH, ML, MB, involved in acquisition of analysis data files from cohort database: SA, Contributed to interpretation of results: FH, MK, NS, MT, FA, ML, MB. Critically reviewed drafts of the manuscript and made comments to improve clarity: MK, FH, ML, and MT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kheirandish, M., Asgari, S., Lotfaliany, M. et al. Secular trends in serum lipid levels of a Middle Eastern adult population; 10 years follow up in Tehran lipid and glucose study. Lipids Health Dis 13, 20 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Secular trends
  • Serum lipids measures
  • Middle Eastern adult population
  • Cohort
  • Dislipidemia